(09-10-2025 06:03 PM)Redbanksdog Wrote:  

(09-10-2025 05:16 PM)maximus Wrote:  My 17 year old daughter walked in from school a little earlier, and she was crying... it was about this.

She followed him and she spoke about how he influenced her in good ways.

I didnt even know that she followed him. That was the reach he had.



Sent from my SM-S928U using Tapatalk

Same thing here, one of the boys called us about the news. He also followed Charlie Kirk. We already had heard the news but didn't know that he also followed him. It really is a sad day for his family and this country.

One of my sons told me too.

(09-10-2025 06:05 PM)BartlettTigerFan Wrote:  I can't believe the scum popping up in this thread. Your time will come. Rest assured.

I'm just going to start reporting their celebratory posts. The mods can decide whether or not to ban them.

(09-10-2025 05:54 PM)BartlettTigerFan Wrote:  

(09-10-2025 05:40 PM)--- Wrote:  He was ok with kids dying for 2nd amendment rights, i'm ok with him dying for 2nd amendment rights.

Well, you always were a sick piece of $hit.

Yeah, fk him. Trump won Kruciff you POS fuktard. You can GFY

(09-10-2025 05:39 PM)ABAB_Up_down Wrote:  

(09-10-2025 05:35 PM)Frank Grimes Wrote:  

(09-10-2025 05:30 PM)ABAB_Up_down Wrote:  This is a man that argued that the people being killed from gun violence is a necessary cost.

This is the only developed country that has such a sad amount of shootings because whenever these shootings happen people like Kirk always rush to say thoughts and prayers but also that the deaths are worth not changing our gun laws. If it wasn't for people like Kirk he might still be alive today and his kids might still have a dad.

Utah passed a law to allow open carry on college campuses less than a month ago. Would it have been so easy for this shooter to kill Kirk if he couldn't be openly carrying a gun on UV's campus today? Will Utah reconsider its new law that already helped one murderer or will Utah's lawmakers just say thoughts and prayers and move on?

This is also a man that was not sympathetic at all about the shootings of Melissa Hortman and John Hoffman in July. When that shooting happened he rushed to blame Tim Walz.

I expect this post to be met with people reporting me, trying to ban me and maybe even hoping to censor the words I typed along with claims of me being hateful, evil, and whatever else, but think back to when Paul Pelosi was attacked in his own home. Kirk decided to push the right wing conspiracy that Pelosi and the random assailant man were gay lovers and that someone should pay the bail of the criminal. So as long as someone is not accusing Kirk of actually being gay lovers with his murderer then they are are higher moral grounds than the grounds of which Kirk lived his life.

Are you actually justifying him being killed?

Again, I disagreed with Kirk on most things, but I’m not gonna justify his death. You make change by convincing people why you think they’re wrong, not violence.

Justifying? No.

Pointing out that he spent his life working to make sure murders like this kept happening? Yes.



And I don't care for any moral outrage because again remember that as long as someone is not accusing Kirk of actually being gay lovers with his murderer then they are are higher moral grounds than the grounds of which he lived his life.

What happened to Kirk is horrific. Just like what happened in Minnesota a couple months ago was horrific. Trump nearly getting assassinated is horrific. Or Pelosi’s husband getting assaulted. Political violence just shows how intellectually weak someone is.

You aren’t bringing anyone to your side of the argument when you say, “he did this to himself”. You’re just causing more division and hatred. If you can just ignore a father/husband/son dying with no sympathy, seek help.

(09-10-2025 06:08 PM)MemTigers1998 Wrote:  

(09-10-2025 05:54 PM)BartlettTigerFan Wrote:  

(09-10-2025 05:40 PM)--- Wrote:  He was ok with kids dying for 2nd amendment rights, i'm ok with him dying for 2nd amendment rights.

Well, you always were a sick piece of $hit.

Yeah, fk him. Trump won Kruciff you POS fuktard. You can GFY

Just report ---'s post. (Sorry. Make that Kruciff even though he pretty much nuked his account.)

My youngest grandson, 21, replied back when I said the left is trying to start a war with "Literally. It's super sad because I've grown up watching some of his stuff, so have so many other people my age/generation. He had a huge influence on the younger population."

(09-10-2025 04:12 PM)maximus Wrote:  I really hope this resonates with the younger generation in a positive way. Charlie was really good at connecting and debating in a way to help folks see an alternate point of view.

Im hoping those kids who followed him and maybe disagreed or on the fence with him will see the light and turn to morality and absolutes and freedome vs. the rotten alternative.

See above...




Sent from my SM-S928U using Tapatalk

(09-10-2025 06:11 PM)ABAB_Up_down Wrote:  

(09-10-2025 06:01 PM)bullet Wrote:  

(09-10-2025 05:39 PM)ABAB_Up_down Wrote:  

(09-10-2025 05:35 PM)Frank Grimes Wrote:  

(09-10-2025 05:30 PM)ABAB_Up_down Wrote:  This is a man that argued that the people being killed from gun violence is a necessary cost.

This is the only developed country that has such a sad amount of shootings because whenever these shootings happen people like Kirk always rush to say thoughts and prayers but also that the deaths are worth not changing our gun laws. If it wasn't for people like Kirk he might still be alive today and his kids might still have a dad.

Utah passed a law to allow open carry on college campuses less than a month ago. Would it have been so easy for this shooter to kill Kirk if he couldn't be openly carrying a gun on UV's campus today? Will Utah reconsider its new law that already helped one murderer or will Utah's lawmakers just say thoughts and prayers and move on?

This is also a man that was not sympathetic at all about the shootings of Melissa Hortman and John Hoffman in July. When that shooting happened he rushed to blame Tim Walz.

I expect this post to be met with people reporting me, trying to ban me and maybe even hoping to censor the words I typed along with claims of me being hateful, evil, and whatever else, but think back to when Paul Pelosi was attacked in his own home. Kirk decided to push the right wing conspiracy that Pelosi and the random assailant man were gay lovers and that someone should pay the bail of the criminal. So as long as someone is not accusing Kirk of actually being gay lovers with his murderer then they are are higher moral grounds than the grounds of which Kirk lived his life.

Are you actually justifying him being killed?

Again, I disagreed with Kirk on most things, but I’m not gonna justify his death. You make change by convincing people why you think they’re wrong, not violence.

Justifying? No.

Pointing out that he spent his life working to make sure murders like this kept happening? Yes.



And I don't care for any moral outrage because again remember that as long as someone is not accusing Kirk of actually being gay lovers with his murderer then they are are higher moral grounds than the grounds of which he lived his life.

I think this 2nd post warrants a ban.

The first was totally inappropriate at this time. Doubling down should get him banned.

Censorship and cancel culture can be very effective at removing people whose words you do not like so you can create safe spaces free of dissenting comments.

I don't really understand why you want to silence these words though. It is a fact that this is a man that was not sympathetic at all about the shootings of Melissa Hortman and John Hoffman in July. When that shooting happened he rushed to blame Tim Walz. That happen just 2 months ago.

This is also a guy who accused Paul Pelosi of being gay lovers with the man that attacked him in his own home. I don't see how anyone could object to me saying that as long as someone is not accusing Kirk of actually being gay lovers with his murderer then they are on higher moral grounds than the grounds of which Kirk lived his life.

Oh, sit down and be quiet. You're celebrating the assassination of someone you disagree with, which is against the AUP, and you have been reported by me as doing just that. Sorry, not sorry. (Don't like it? Don't do it.)

(09-10-2025 06:11 PM)ABAB_Up_down Wrote:  This is also a guy who accused Paul Pelosi of being gay lovers with the man that attacked him in his own home.

Well except this part is true.

(09-10-2025 06:11 PM)TigerBlue4Ever Wrote:  My youngest grandson, 21, replied back when I said the left is trying to start a war with "Literally. It's super sad because I've grown up watching some of his stuff, so have so many other people my age/generation. He had a huge influence on the younger population."

100%

Sent from my SM-S928U using Tapatalk

(09-10-2025 05:45 PM)TigerBlue4Ever Wrote:  Get back to us the next time some crazed right wing radical shoots and kills a prominent young democrat. GTFO with that crap. Typical fence sitting CYA "moderate".

Get ******. Someone lost their life today, 2 kids lost a dad, and a wife lost the love of her life. Both parties are guilty of this rhetoric. One is more successful. You can bury your head. I've enjoyed Charlie Kirk's views and I follow him on X, even when I don't agree with him.

(09-10-2025 06:09 PM)Frank Grimes Wrote:  

(09-10-2025 05:39 PM)ABAB_Up_down Wrote:  

(09-10-2025 05:35 PM)Frank Grimes Wrote:  

(09-10-2025 05:30 PM)ABAB_Up_down Wrote:  This is a man that argued that the people being killed from gun violence is a necessary cost.

This is the only developed country that has such a sad amount of shootings because whenever these shootings happen people like Kirk always rush to say thoughts and prayers but also that the deaths are worth not changing our gun laws. If it wasn't for people like Kirk he might still be alive today and his kids might still have a dad.

Utah passed a law to allow open carry on college campuses less than a month ago. Would it have been so easy for this shooter to kill Kirk if he couldn't be openly carrying a gun on UV's campus today? Will Utah reconsider its new law that already helped one murderer or will Utah's lawmakers just say thoughts and prayers and move on?

This is also a man that was not sympathetic at all about the shootings of Melissa Hortman and John Hoffman in July. When that shooting happened he rushed to blame Tim Walz.

I expect this post to be met with people reporting me, trying to ban me and maybe even hoping to censor the words I typed along with claims of me being hateful, evil, and whatever else, but think back to when Paul Pelosi was attacked in his own home. Kirk decided to push the right wing conspiracy that Pelosi and the random assailant man were gay lovers and that someone should pay the bail of the criminal. So as long as someone is not accusing Kirk of actually being gay lovers with his murderer then they are are higher moral grounds than the grounds of which Kirk lived his life.

Are you actually justifying him being killed?

Again, I disagreed with Kirk on most things, but I’m not gonna justify his death. You make change by convincing people why you think they’re wrong, not violence.

Justifying? No.

Pointing out that he spent his life working to make sure murders like this kept happening? Yes.



And I don't care for any moral outrage because again remember that as long as someone is not accusing Kirk of actually being gay lovers with his murderer then they are are higher moral grounds than the grounds of which he lived his life.

What happened to Kirk is horrific. Just like what happened in Minnesota a couple months ago was horrific. Trump nearly getting assassinated is horrific. Or Pelosi’s husband getting assaulted. Political violence just shows how intellectually weak someone is.

You aren’t bringing anyone to your side of the argument when you say, “he did this to himself”. You’re just causing more division and hatred. If you can just ignore a father/husband/son dying with no sympathy, seek help.

Pelosi's husband had nothing to do with politics. That was just a general crazy person. The others did.

(09-10-2025 06:09 PM)Frank Grimes Wrote:  

(09-10-2025 05:39 PM)ABAB_Up_down Wrote:  

(09-10-2025 05:35 PM)Frank Grimes Wrote:  

(09-10-2025 05:30 PM)ABAB_Up_down Wrote:  This is a man that argued that the people being killed from gun violence is a necessary cost.

This is the only developed country that has such a sad amount of shootings because whenever these shootings happen people like Kirk always rush to say thoughts and prayers but also that the deaths are worth not changing our gun laws. If it wasn't for people like Kirk he might still be alive today and his kids might still have a dad.

Utah passed a law to allow open carry on college campuses less than a month ago. Would it have been so easy for this shooter to kill Kirk if he couldn't be openly carrying a gun on UV's campus today? Will Utah reconsider its new law that already helped one murderer or will Utah's lawmakers just say thoughts and prayers and move on?

This is also a man that was not sympathetic at all about the shootings of Melissa Hortman and John Hoffman in July. When that shooting happened he rushed to blame Tim Walz.

I expect this post to be met with people reporting me, trying to ban me and maybe even hoping to censor the words I typed along with claims of me being hateful, evil, and whatever else, but think back to when Paul Pelosi was attacked in his own home. Kirk decided to push the right wing conspiracy that Pelosi and the random assailant man were gay lovers and that someone should pay the bail of the criminal. So as long as someone is not accusing Kirk of actually being gay lovers with his murderer then they are are higher moral grounds than the grounds of which Kirk lived his life.

Are you actually justifying him being killed?

Again, I disagreed with Kirk on most things, but I’m not gonna justify his death. You make change by convincing people why you think they’re wrong, not violence.

Justifying? No.

Pointing out that he spent his life working to make sure murders like this kept happening? Yes.



And I don't care for any moral outrage because again remember that as long as someone is not accusing Kirk of actually being gay lovers with his murderer then they are are higher moral grounds than the grounds of which he lived his life.

What happened to Kirk is horrific. Just like what happened in Minnesota a couple months ago was horrific. Trump nearly getting assassinated is horrific. Or Pelosi’s husband getting assaulted. Political violence just shows how intellectually weak someone is.

You aren’t bringing anyone to your side of the argument when you say, “he did this to himself”. You’re just causing more division and hatred. If you can just ignore a father/husband/son dying with no sympathy, seek help.

Half of what I have said is quoting or referencing what Kirk said himself. Yet by quoting him and acting nowhere near as disrespectful as he did in life I'm being divisive? Does that say anything about his rhetoric?

It is very odd to be okay with everything Kirk said when other people were attacked or killed, but upset by what I am saying. I'm just pointing out that he was killed by laws he fought for. Other people have been killed by the same laws and other people will continue to be killed by them. It's easy to view those deaths as "necessary" like this person did when they are faceless statics. Yet when they are personal or parasocial people feel differently.

(09-10-2025 06:08 PM)MemTigers1998 Wrote:  

(09-10-2025 05:54 PM)BartlettTigerFan Wrote:  

(09-10-2025 05:40 PM)--- Wrote:  He was ok with kids dying for 2nd amendment rights, i'm ok with him dying for 2nd amendment rights.

Well, you always were a sick piece of $hit.

Yeah, fk him. Trump won Kruciff you POS fuktard. You can GFY

What do you expect? Kruciff is an effing coward. Runs away from pushback, deletes his user name, then drops back in to throw stink bombs that reveal his true character, at just the wrong moments.

(09-10-2025 06:15 PM)mlb Wrote:  Get ******. Someone lost their life today, 2 kids lost a dad, and a wife lost the love of her life. Both parties are guilty of this rhetoric. One is more successful. You can bury your head. I've enjoyed Charlie Kirk's views and I follow him on X, even when I don't agree with him.

Are you reading what your beloved leftists are posting in this thread?

(09-10-2025 06:15 PM)mlb Wrote:  

(09-10-2025 05:45 PM)TigerBlue4Ever Wrote:  Get back to us the next time some crazed right wing radical shoots and kills a prominent young democrat. GTFO with that crap. Typical fence sitting CYA "moderate".

Get ******. Someone lost their life today, 2 kids lost a dad, and a wife lost the love of her life. Both parties are guilty of this rhetoric. One is more successful. You can bury your head. I've enjoyed Charlie Kirk's views and I follow him on X, even when I don't agree with him.

Bullcrap. We don't (usually) call for someone on the left to be killed because of their ideology. They, on the other hand, do.

Screw it. Andybible's right. They want us all dead.

(09-10-2025 06:17 PM)TripleA Wrote:  

(09-10-2025 06:08 PM)MemTigers1998 Wrote:  

(09-10-2025 05:54 PM)BartlettTigerFan Wrote:  

(09-10-2025 05:40 PM)--- Wrote:  He was ok with kids dying for 2nd amendment rights, i'm ok with him dying for 2nd amendment rights.

Well, you always were a sick piece of $hit.

Yeah, fk him. Trump won Kruciff you POS fuktard. You can GFY

What do you expect? Kruciff is an effing coward. Runs away from pushback, deletes his user name, then drops back in to throw stink bombs that reveal his true character, at just the wrong moments.

He just marked his account as away.

Blocked my first account just now... ever

An obvious paid troll



Sent from my SM-S928U using Tapatalk