The former senior CIA officer who helped oversee the 2017 intelligence assessment on Russia’s interference in the 2016 election says Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard and the White House are “lying” when they claim that it was an attempt to sabotage President Donald Trump.

Susan Miller, a retired CIA officer who helped lead the team that produced the report about Russia’s actions during the 2016 campaign, told NBC News it was based on credible information that showed Moscow sought to help Trump win the election, but that there was no sign of a conspiracy between the Kremlin and the Trump campaign.

“The director of national intelligence and the White House are lying, again,” Miller said. “We definitely had the intel to show with high probability that the specific goal of the Russians was to get Trump elected.”

She added: “At the same time, we found no two-way collusion between Trump or his team with the Russians at that time.”

Miller spoke to NBC News after Gabbard alleged Wednesday that the 2017 intelligence assessment was based on “manufactured” information as part of a “treasonous conspiracy” by the Obama administration to undermine Trump and tarnish his electoral victory. Gabbard cited a 2020 report from Republicans on the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, which she declassified and released this week, that asserted there was insufficient information to conclude Russia had been trying to tip the scales in favor of Trump.

Miller said “it is clear that Trump and his followers have a script they want to follow, despite the facts.”

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/nationa...rcna220870

Still desperate I see.

(07-26-2025 10:57 AM)BartlettTigerFan Wrote:  Still desperate I see.

Still non-substantive I see.

NBC News...LOL, why not CBS, PBS, ABC, anyone of those has the credibility of, um, youse guys.

(07-26-2025 10:58 AM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(07-26-2025 10:57 AM)BartlettTigerFan Wrote:  Still desperate I see.

Still non-substantive I see.

I don’t debate clueless idiots.

lulz the crotch stank coming out of the dc deep state is wicked right about now. They are big time nervous.

By the way, Tulsi cant be lying. She's simply releasing actual email and statements made by the Obama f*cknuts.

The left is the best magicians on the face of the planet. Their misdirection skills still fool the Memsa’s of the world.

Can literally unveil it in black and white the communications, the reports, etc and they still won’t believe the the drop of the actual documents. Facts have never mattered to them.

These retards are broken.

Hi, my name is Menses and I am a clown.

(07-26-2025 11:02 AM)BartlettTigerFan Wrote:  

(07-26-2025 10:58 AM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(07-26-2025 10:57 AM)BartlettTigerFan Wrote:  Still desperate I see.

Still non-substantive I see.

I don’t debate clueless idiots.

Cool cool GI Joe boi.

So known liar says they're lying... gotcha.

(07-26-2025 10:53 AM)Marc Mensa Wrote:  The former senior CIA officer who helped oversee the 2017 intelligence assessment on Russia’s interference in the 2016 election says Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard and the White House are “lying” when they claim that it was an attempt to sabotage President Donald Trump.

Susan Miller, a retired CIA officer who helped lead the team that produced the report about Russia’s actions during the 2016 campaign, told NBC News it was based on credible information that showed Moscow sought to help Trump win the election, but that there was no sign of a conspiracy between the Kremlin and the Trump campaign.

“The director of national intelligence and the White House are lying, again,” Miller said. “We definitely had the intel to show with high probability that the specific goal of the Russians was to get Trump elected.”

She added: “At the same time, we found no two-way collusion between Trump or his team with the Russians at that time.”

Miller spoke to NBC News after Gabbard alleged Wednesday that the 2017 intelligence assessment was based on “manufactured” information as part of a “treasonous conspiracy” by the Obama administration to undermine Trump and tarnish his electoral victory. Gabbard cited a 2020 report from Republicans on the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, which she declassified and released this week, that asserted there was insufficient information to conclude Russia had been trying to tip the scales in favor of Trump.

Miller said “it is clear that Trump and his followers have a script they want to follow, despite the facts.”

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/nationa...rcna220870

This just in the progressive leftist bias is in DC bigly

Therefore your witness and this article has no credibility

Btw, your narrative already played out in congress and was deemed inconclusive

So, no the only known liars are the ones you are carrying water for

Well if gabbard and WH is lying, what will you do?

Sent from my Pixel 9 using CSNbbs mobile app

(07-26-2025 04:19 PM)fsquid Wrote:  Well if gabbard and WH is lying, what will you do?

Sent from my Pixel 9 using CSNbbs mobile app

I have him OD'n on msm and Gannett opioids ... oh, snap ... shitehead's already doin' that ...

lol NBC News. lol Susan Miller.

(07-26-2025 11:47 AM)ThreeifbyLightning Wrote:  The left is the best magicians on the face of the planet. Their misdirection skills still fool the Memsa’s of the world.

Can literally unveil it in black and white the communications, the reports, etc and they still won’t believe the the drop of the actual documents. Facts have never mattered to them.

They are completely ignoring the larger issue at play- did Trump collude with Russia during the 2016 election and did the Obama administration engage in seditious conspiracy to impede Trump from the election through most of his first term and beyond- and want to focus on a few, smaller issues:

1) did Russia “hack” any vote totals? The answer to that seems to be a clear no.

2) did Russia engage in any attempt to influence the election? I’d say that’s a clear yes. Every country attempts to influence our elections. There were Labour Party officials from the UK flown over in ‘24 to help Kamala.

3) did Russia want to help the Trump or Hillary campaign in ‘16? I’d say the summaries I’ve read are mixed. There was certainly an intelligence assessment asserting the former, but other evidence asserting the latter. And if Putin REALLY wanted OMB to win, why would he withhold information about Clinton being a drugged up side of beef?

The three issues are of interest for sure, but the issue at question for the past ten days or whatever doesn’t really rely upon an answer to any.

The allegation is, did the Obama administration engage in seditious conspiracy to impede the operations of the first Trump term? And a few more issues:

1) Who was involved with that conspiracy? How high up?

2) For how long and where did that conspiracy exist? SOL, venue

3) Did Obama engage in conspiratorial activities post 1/20/2017? In which case does Trump v United States apply to those activities?

Susan Miller needs to be subpoenaed. Let’s see if she pleads the fif.

(07-26-2025 07:37 PM)VCE Wrote:  

(07-26-2025 11:47 AM)ThreeifbyLightning Wrote:  The left is the best magicians on the face of the planet. Their misdirection skills still fool the Memsa’s of the world.

Can literally unveil it in black and white the communications, the reports, etc and they still won’t believe the the drop of the actual documents. Facts have never mattered to them.

They are completely ignoring the larger issue at play- did Trump collude with Russia during the 2016 election and did the Obama administration engage in seditious conspiracy to impede Trump from the election through most of his first term and beyond- and want to focus on a few, smaller issues:

1) did Russia “hack” any vote totals? The answer to that seems to be a clear no.

2) did Russia engage in any attempt to influence the election? I’d say that’s a clear yes. Every country attempts to influence our elections. There were Labour Party officials from the UK flown over in ‘24 to help Kamala.

3) did Russia want to help the Trump or Hillary campaign in ‘16? I’d say the summaries I’ve read are mixed. There was certainly an intelligence assessment asserting the former, but other evidence asserting the latter. And if Putin REALLY wanted OMB to win, why would he withhold information about Clinton being a drugged up side of beef?

The three issues are of interest for sure, but the issue at question for the past ten days or whatever doesn’t really rely upon an answer to any.

The allegation is, did the Obama administration engage in seditious conspiracy to impede the operations of the first Trump term? And a few more issues:

1) Who was involved with that conspiracy? How high up?

2) For how long and where did that conspiracy exist? SOL, venue

3) Did Obama engage in conspiratorial activities post 1/20/2017? In which case does Trump v United States apply to those activities?

Yes but the real question is not just seditious conspiracy but such using the power vested in them by their government positions. That is way damn more serious.

(07-26-2025 07:43 PM)CardinalJim Wrote:  Susan Miller needs to be subpoenaed. Let’s see if she pleads the fif.

If ‘pleading the fifth’ is now the sin qua non of guilt, will you apply that same standard to all?

https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/tru...-rcna42355

450 times iirc.

Did the knucklehead even read this before posting? This is the kid who broke the window then claimed he didn’t do it.