(07-08-2025 04:26 PM)TripleA Wrote:  I'm not talking about today, Tanq. I'm talking about your entire experience here. And yes, all I'm ever going to do with you on here is dive bomb, b/c I gave up on having an actual adult debate with you, long ago.

The fact that you blame everybody but yourself for all your negative interactions here is actually mind boggling.

Cool cool. So now you will always be your usual whiny *****. Neato.

You do that pardner. Sounds like fun from your end.

The problem is that half the time you think your ****** empty rhetoric is the bees knees. And when it encounters real hard issues, and real hard facts, and in this case really stupid assumptions on 'funding' that you had no fing idea were in play, or were ambushed about this is a 'viewpoint discrimination' issue instead of the dumb*** one liner saying 'hey its a law, that is the end point' that you seemingly swallowed hook, line and sinker -- you do your old stuff and do your old whiny ***** schtick.

And when I respond to crappy whiny name calling in the way I do, it sets you off double time.

Neat stuff there.

Just like when you post your twitter crap, and refuse to even attempt to background it. And when you get your geritol ass scalded on it, ***** and moan that you have zero obligation to vet or background any little crappy thing you say. Sound about right?

Ha, if you think anything you have ever said here sets me off, then you're dumber than I thought. It's a message board, not real life, yet you act like we're in a courtroom.

I just think you're a freak show who deserves to be ridiculed. You actually make me laugh.

Here's the deal, genius. How many people do I have a problem communicating with here?

How many people do you have a problem with?

P.S. I post dozens of tweets daily, sometimes more. If you think I'm going to "background" every one, you are out of your mind.

Every person on here knows exactly what a tweet is. It is someone else's comment online that you pass along for discussion purposes. If it's wrong, it's wrong. Big deal. Easily discovered.

Meanwhile, I would like to point out that "background" is a noun, not a verb.

(07-08-2025 05:20 PM)TripleA Wrote:  P.S. I post dozens of tweets daily, sometimes more. If you think I'm going to "background" every one, you are out of your mind.

Every person on here knows exactly what a tweet is. It is someone else's comment online that you pass along for discussion purposes. If it's wrong, it's wrong. Big deal. Easily discovered.

Cool cool Mr whiny.

Quote:Meanwhile, I would like to point out that "background" is a noun, not a verb.

cool cool mr dictionary.

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/background

(07-08-2025 05:16 PM)TripleA Wrote:  Ha, if you think anything you have ever said here sets me off, then you're dumber than I thought. It's a message board, not real life, yet you act like we're in a courtroom.

I just think you're a freak show who deserves to be ridiculed. You actually make me laugh.

Here's the deal, genius. How many people do I have a problem communicating with here?

How many people do you have a problem with?

Cool cool Mr 'I care so less Im not mad but yet I feel the need to incessantly whine like a ***** to just about every comment to me'.

Rent free, Geritol. rent free.

OK, you got me. Only lawyers use "background" as a verb.

Oh, and you conveniently ignored the question about how many people I don't get along with here, versus you.

Of course, we all know the answer, don't we?

(07-08-2025 02:45 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(07-08-2025 02:07 PM)ThreeifbyLightning Wrote:  

(07-08-2025 01:21 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  I see the retard howlers are alit here. Cool cool.

Take the bet then if I'm such a retard.

I take it you think yourself a retard howler? Your stuff has an iota of substance, and sometimes not a whole hea[ing load of nothing but insults.

For the record, neither retard, nor howler at the current.

I told you, instead of the bet, try answering the simple question that you waltzed away from so daintily.

If you want to do your bull**** schlock jumior gman testosterone epeen bet stuff and pound your cute little frumpy chicken fried grease stained uniform shirt in that manner -- go right ahead, my friend.

You ran away from a very simple yes/ no question, mind you. Lolz.

The simple fact is you:
-- dont have a fing clue about the impact of 1st amendment on this,
-- dont have a fing clue about the issue of viewpoint discrimination on the issue,
-- dont have a clue as to the main issue in the lawsuit,
-- dont have a clue that the issue isnt to direct funding,
-- dont have a clue how to distinguish paid for services from such direct funding,
-- dont have a clue that how people expend their earned money is simply their business in terms of political activity
-- pound your junior gman authoritarian handle of 'President kann doo anyting hee wantz wit da money' garbage,
-- followed interestingly by the self-contradictory position to above of 'Congress has unfettered power of the purse',
-- followed by an amazing void of the contents of the 1st amendment and how that might impact the issue.

If you have the spine and chops you claim, answer my first question. Easy peasy.

Quote:If I'm a retard then what does that make the person (i.e. you) who has lost multiple times to this retard? You can add another after this one is settled.

Im not the person who runs away from answering a single simple question, good sir.


My answer to your epeen bet **** is -- I typically dont do epeen driven bet ****. Which seems to have captivated transfixed your gander gaze pretty tightly.

If you have spine and chops you exhibit with your epeen bet **** above, maybe apply that spine and chops to answering my very easy yes/ no question.

Here is the full thing: A government, has zero business making a decision on the eligibility of a group providing Medicare services, and being paid for those services, based on *any* political viewpoint test.

We shall see if the courts note that. You seem flabbergasted by the mere mention of that. Cool cool.

Let me explain one last thing to you. When you resort to adolescent - like 7 year old - insults and name calling you’re dead to me. Seriously grow the **** up. I don’t have the desire or time in my life to waste it on you. Lastly, I’m also not repeating myself over and over again. I already explained why your question is false and frankly ignorant. You can live with the reality or not. I really don’t give a damn.

(07-08-2025 05:37 PM)ThreeifbyLightning Wrote:  

(07-08-2025 02:45 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  We shall see if the courts note that. You seem flabbergasted by the mere mention of that. Cool cool.

Let me explain one last thing to you. When you resort to adolescent - like 7 year old - insults and name calling you’re dead to me. Seriously grow the **** up. I don’t have the desire or time in my life to waste it on you. Lastly, I’m also not repeating myself over and over again. I already explained why your question is false and frankly ignorant. You can live with the reality or not. I really don’t give a damn.

Bravo! Exactly how most of us feel!

I can't believe he's been doing this all day. I worked 5 hours. I've been to Memphis and back. Washed 3 loads of clothes. He's still spouting nonsense.

(07-08-2025 06:05 PM)BartlettTigerFan Wrote:  I can't believe he's been doing this all day. I worked 5 hours. I've been to Memphis and back. Washed 3 loads of clothes. He's still spouting nonsense.

Aren't Tuesdays normally work days for attorneys?

(07-08-2025 05:37 PM)ThreeifbyLightning Wrote:  

(07-08-2025 02:45 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(07-08-2025 02:07 PM)ThreeifbyLightning Wrote:  

(07-08-2025 01:21 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  I see the retard howlers are alit here. Cool cool.

Take the bet then if I'm such a retard.

I take it you think yourself a retard howler? Your stuff has an iota of substance, and sometimes not a whole hea[ing load of nothing but insults.

For the record, neither retard, nor howler at the current.

I told you, instead of the bet, try answering the simple question that you waltzed away from so daintily.

If you want to do your bull**** schlock jumior gman testosterone epeen bet stuff and pound your cute little frumpy chicken fried grease stained uniform shirt in that manner -- go right ahead, my friend.

You ran away from a very simple yes/ no question, mind you. Lolz.

The simple fact is you:
-- dont have a fing clue about the impact of 1st amendment on this,
-- dont have a fing clue about the issue of viewpoint discrimination on the issue,
-- dont have a clue as to the main issue in the lawsuit,
-- dont have a clue that the issue isnt to direct funding,
-- dont have a clue how to distinguish paid for services from such direct funding,
-- dont have a clue that how people expend their earned money is simply their business in terms of political activity
-- pound your junior gman authoritarian handle of 'President kann doo anyting hee wantz wit da money' garbage,
-- followed interestingly by the self-contradictory position to above of 'Congress has unfettered power of the purse',
-- followed by an amazing void of the contents of the 1st amendment and how that might impact the issue.

If you have the spine and chops you claim, answer my first question. Easy peasy.

Quote:If I'm a retard then what does that make the person (i.e. you) who has lost multiple times to this retard? You can add another after this one is settled.

Im not the person who runs away from answering a single simple question, good sir.


My answer to your epeen bet **** is -- I typically dont do epeen driven bet ****. Which seems to have captivated transfixed your gander gaze pretty tightly.

If you have spine and chops you exhibit with your epeen bet **** above, maybe apply that spine and chops to answering my very easy yes/ no question.

Here is the full thing: A government, has zero business making a decision on the eligibility of a group providing Medicare services, and being paid for those services, based on *any* political viewpoint test.

We shall see if the courts note that. You seem flabbergasted by the mere mention of that. Cool cool.

Let me explain one last thing to you. When you resort to adolescent - like 7 year old - insults and name calling you’re dead to me. Seriously grow the **** up. I don’t have the desire or time in my life to waste it on you. Lastly, I’m also not repeating myself over and over again. I already explained why your question is false and frankly ignorant. You can live with the reality or not. I really don’t give a damn.

Maybe google 'viewpoint discrimination', hoss.

Then come back and tell us your ace bang up legal analysis.

Or just continue with your flapping of your arms up and down, along with your oh-so-cool epeen bravado bet.

As for name-calling -- I called someone else a comment, and you jumped right into the pool, sparky. So simply stfu about your light it up retorts that you shot right back as a kneejerk.

When you try to dance in the 'epeen bet' pool, yeah, its is a bull**** schlock junior gman testosterone epeen bet schtick. Bummer about that labeling there, but thats exactly what it is. Id prefer you answer my one little simple yes / no question.

And yeah, the comments about what you really dont have a clue about still stand.

That list should be clue who is 'ignorant' on the issue, hoss. Guess not to Mr DHS who seemingly doesnt have a clue on on the impact of the 1st amendment on the issue, and instead decides to call that wild ass 'analysis' and ever convoluting story the real truth and everuything elese 'ignorant'. Good job, hoss.

Get nack to your intelligence at DHS schtick. You hopefully are a crapload better at that then opining on 1st amendment and this issue.

And for all your epeen bravado on an online bet -- I still see you dont have the spine nor the chops to address the one easy question. Lolz.

(07-08-2025 06:25 PM)TripleA Wrote:  

(07-08-2025 06:05 PM)BartlettTigerFan Wrote:  I can't believe he's been doing this all day. I worked 5 hours. I've been to Memphis and back. Washed 3 loads of clothes. He's still spouting nonsense.

Aren't Tuesdays normally work days for attorneys?

Been doing a ton of clean up after hosting rescue workers, chuckles. Be please go for some more of that whiny bitchy pissant **** that you seemingly excel at.

Hosting rescue workers in between the thousands of lines of posts you've made?

Right.

(07-08-2025 07:26 PM)BartlettTigerFan Wrote:  Hosting rescue workers in between the thousands of lines of posts you've made?

Right.

Thousands? And maybe look up the word 'after'. Cool cool. I certain that you cannot, nor will not. Anything to be a pissant. Again, cool cool.

Pappy would be mighty proud of that warrior spirit, hoss. Lolz.

(07-08-2025 07:32 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(07-08-2025 07:26 PM)BartlettTigerFan Wrote:  Hosting rescue workers in between the thousands of lines of posts you've made?

Right.

Thousands? And maybe look up the word 'after'. Cool cool. I certain that you cannot, nor will not. Anything to be a pissant. Again, cool cool.

Pappy would be mighty proud of that warrior spirit, hoss. Lolz.

I'm sure your pappy would be proud of how you treat people on message boards, too.

(07-08-2025 08:11 PM)TripleA Wrote:  

(07-08-2025 07:32 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(07-08-2025 07:26 PM)BartlettTigerFan Wrote:  Hosting rescue workers in between the thousands of lines of posts you've made?

Right.

Thousands? And maybe look up the word 'after'. Cool cool. I certain that you cannot, nor will not. Anything to be a pissant. Again, cool cool.

Pappy would be mighty proud of that warrior spirit, hoss. Lolz.

I'm sure your pappy would be proud of how you treat people on message boards, too.

Probably not. But if he saw the raw weight of whiny pissant pitches, while not being proud, he just might understand.

But please continue your whiny bitchy schtick. It's always such a great look there, My Friend.

What a doofus.

"You meanies say bad things to me, and I have no choice but to act like a *******. Waaahhhh..."

Gee, I really wonder which one came first.

(07-08-2025 08:21 PM)TripleA Wrote:   What a doofus.

"You meanies say bad things to me, and I have no choice but to act like a *******. Waaahhhh..."

Gee, I really wonder which one came first.

Yep. Just more whiny bitchy **** sputters forth from you.

Same old same old. Cool cool.

Awwww. Don't cry my friend.