(06-17-2025 08:25 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(06-17-2025 06:43 PM)BartlettTigerFan Wrote:  It’s hilarious, and shows what a narcissist tanq is, that he really thinks he’s upsetting us. Like I give a tinker’s damn about anything said here.

And the group still exhibits Rent Free. neat stuff. Quite the warrior way. Pappy must be proud there. Lolz.

As I've mentioned more than a couple of times, Pappy is dead, so pride is an unlikely sin for him.

This may be my favorite thread of the year so far. Tanq defending a gangbanging, wife beating human smuggler...

Chasing ambulances is hard work.

(06-17-2025 09:40 PM)TripleA Wrote:  This may be my favorite thread of the year so far. Tanq defending a gangbanging, wife beating human smuggler...

Still too brain dead to get the issue correct. Much better in 3a ville to make it up. Why am I not surprised.

(06-17-2025 09:58 PM)BartlettTigerFan Wrote:  Chasing ambulances is hard work.

Might be. Don’t know. But please exhibit that pinheaded trait of making stuff up. It’s like you idiots can’t do anything but that. And that’s a slam on idiots.

(06-18-2025 12:00 AM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(06-17-2025 09:40 PM)TripleA Wrote:  This may be my favorite thread of the year so far. Tanq defending a gangbanging, wife beating human smuggler...

Still too brain dead to get the issue correct. Much better in 3a ville to make it up. Why am I not surprised.

I knew that would crank you up. Yes, nobody but a veggie brain like Biden wouldn't know you defended due process to the death with Abrego Garcia, and yes, you said IF he was guilty, then after due process he should get whatever was decided, BUT...you also defended Garcia as the Maryland dad, while completely ignoring that he was stopped for speeding, and the officers quickly deduced that he was engaged in human smuggling, but the Biden admin ordered him to be released.

You also dismissed the two deportation orders he already had, and the fact that the rival gangbanger who supposedly was a danger to Garcia was in a gang that no longer existed.

Plus, you ignored that Garcia was identified by one of his fellow gangbangers as having assisted in murdering said rival gang member's mother.

You also had no issue with Sen. Van Hollen or the numbnut Congressmen flying down there to defend Garcia's "rights as a Maryland man."

If all that's not defending Garcia the man, I don't know what would be.

Ok, come on back with your usual baloney. You always do...

(06-18-2025 12:33 AM)TripleA Wrote:  

(06-18-2025 12:00 AM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(06-17-2025 09:40 PM)TripleA Wrote:  This may be my favorite thread of the year so far. Tanq defending a gangbanging, wife beating human smuggler...

Still too brain dead to get the issue correct. Much better in 3a ville to make it up. Why am I not surprised.

I knew that would crank you up. Yes, nobody but a veggie brain like Biden wouldn't know you defended due process to the death with Abrego Garcia,

Good, you got at least one thing correct -- and at the outset. The issue is due process. Not Abrego.

But I think there is whole world of either incorrect or made up stuff coming down the pike here....

Quote:and yes, you said IF he was guilty, then after due process he should get whatever was decided,

And score two correct points for you. Good job.

Quote:BUT...you also defended Garcia as the Maryland dad,

I seem to remember noting that was used to 'soften' his image by one side, while the other side tossed out a veritable truckload of allegations.

Bit of a falter in the 'getting things accurate' column. But I wont make too much hay on that.

Quote:while completely ignoring that he was stopped for speeding, and the officers quickly deduced that he was engaged in human smuggling, but the Biden admin ordered him to be released.

Last I saw he was stopped, questioned by the cop, and released by the cop. Kind of a bit off from "quickly deduced" thingy you put above.

And that 'letting him go three years ago after the stop' is now pretty much the sole cited evidence against him when Trump TACOed and brought him back.

We shall see how that now-revived issue goes. Being released at the scene isnt an auspicious start. And to repeat, in the great hope it might mean something to you, IF he is found guilty after due process -- he should get whatever is decided. No skin off my back on that.

Quote:You also dismissed the two deportation orders he already had,

Nope. Focused on the no due process **** up by the Trump administration. Which was the main point.

Quote:and the fact that the rival gangbanger who supposedly was a danger to Garcia was in a gang that no longer existed.

Yep, since it is immaterial schlock to the due process issue.

That is important to his wrongful deportation with no process..... how? Besides getting you excited and jumping up and dwon and flapping your arms here and now, that is.

Quote:Plus, you ignored that Garcia was identified by one of his fellow gangbangers as having assisted in murdering said rival gang member's mother.

Then I suggest someone prove that up beyond the above. But boy, those allegations cited as fact sure are good fodder for not so bright and easily distracted, arent they?

Quote:You also had no issue with Sen. Van Hollen or the numbnut Congressmen flying down there to defend Garcia's "rights as a Maryland man."

Correct --- I dont. I dont have any issue with someone promoting due process, or calling attention to the utter lack of due process in Abregos rendition, and the others renditioned with him.

And hate to tell you, pal -- Abrego was literally a "maryland man.' Just as much as my illegal alien neighbors are actually "Texas people", while they are here. And if they are deported, they are deported. Apparently it chaffs your ass to denote that simple fact.

And yep, seems to me that even your demigod came to the conclusion that Abrego had those rights when he TACOed on the matter.

Quote:If all that's not defending Garcia the man, I don't know what would be.

Quite the indictment. Ill make it easy for you.... Abrego, whether pure as the driven snow, or dirtier than an oil pit -- is guaranteed a certain amount of due process. I dont care about non-germane issues to that.

Now that TACO happened, let Abrego face those issues. You dont seem to realize that most are not germane, and the vast majority are simply alleged. I dont tend to mouth and make hay about mere allegations and present them as truth. If and when they are proved up, then I will assign them to Abrego appropriately.

You on the other hand, proffer up a smorgasbord of allegations presented as absolute fact, misstate some of them (unfortunately), and some stick you have up your ass about him being described as a Maryland man, and some other stick up your ass about making shade at some legislators (which somehow equates to a view on Abrego the person.)

Sound like decent summation there, bud?

Quote:Ok, come on back with your usual baloney. You always do...

I dont do half the job on made up or otherwise non-germane comments as some, interestingly.

Allow me to summarize the most recent post. Yes, I tanqtonic support the allegations as Maryland dad because that's a fact, but the truckload of allegations against him are mere allegations even though there's literally a truckload of them. And though that seems like an overwhelming case against him, at the end of the day he's just a Maryland dad that should have had more due process because the due process he received previously where a judge ordered him removable from the United States didn't go quite far enough as far as due process goes.

(06-18-2025 06:45 AM)ThreeifbyLightning Wrote:  Allow me to summarize the most recent post. Yes, I tanqtonic support the allegations as Maryland dad because that's a fact, but the truckload of allegations against him are mere allegations even though there's literally a truckload of them. And though that seems like an overwhelming case against him, at the end of the day he's just a Maryland dad that should have had more due process because the due process he received previously where a judge ordered him removable from the United States didn't go quite far enough as far as due process goes.

Brilliant

(06-18-2025 06:45 AM)ThreeifbyLightning Wrote:  Allow me to summarize the most recent post. Yes, I tanqtonic support the allegations as Maryland dad because that's a fact, but the truckload of allegations against him are mere allegations even though there's literally a truckload of them. And though that seems like an overwhelming case against him, at the end of the day he's just a Maryland dad that should have had more due process because the due process he received previously where a judge ordered him removable from the United States didn't go quite far enough as far as due process goes.

And you completed your summary in a lot less words than Tanq would use.

(06-18-2025 09:16 AM)TripleA Wrote:  

(06-18-2025 06:45 AM)ThreeifbyLightning Wrote:  Allow me to summarize the most recent post. Yes, I tanqtonic support the allegations as Maryland dad because that's a fact, but the truckload of allegations against him are mere allegations even though there's literally a truckload of them. And though that seems like an overwhelming case against him, at the end of the day he's just a Maryland dad that should have had more due process because the due process he received previously where a judge ordered him removable from the United States didn't go quite far enough as far as due process goes.

And you completed your summary in a lot less words than Tanq would use.

And quite a bit more inaccurate. But that seems par for the course around here.

(06-18-2025 09:21 AM)tanqtonic Wrote:  And quite a bit more inaccurate. But that seems par for the course around here.

Classic narcissist.

Wonder if tanq will visit the Maryland dad in prison

(06-18-2025 09:21 AM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(06-18-2025 09:16 AM)TripleA Wrote:  

(06-18-2025 06:45 AM)ThreeifbyLightning Wrote:  Allow me to summarize the most recent post. Yes, I tanqtonic support the allegations as Maryland dad because that's a fact, but the truckload of allegations against him are mere allegations even though there's literally a truckload of them. And though that seems like an overwhelming case against him, at the end of the day he's just a Maryland dad that should have had more due process because the due process he received previously where a judge ordered him removable from the United States didn't go quite far enough as far as due process goes.

And you completed your summary in a lot less words than Tanq would use.

And quite a bit more inaccurate. But that seems par for the course around here.

I recall when TIBL started posting on this subject. He did so in a straightforward manner, IMO. Calmly and professionally, and he had the added advantage of having actually worked in immigration in DHS.

Then in short order, you managed to turn him into one more opponent here who in your view doesn't know what he's talking about. Funny how that happens.

(06-18-2025 09:31 AM)MemTigers1998 Wrote:  Wonder if tanq will visit the Maryland dad in prison

Does the state of Maryland allow conjugal visits?

(06-18-2025 06:45 AM)ThreeifbyLightning Wrote:  I tanqtonic recognize support the allegations as recognize the phrase of 'Maryland dad' because that's as a fact, and recognize the bias in the use of the phrase to soften his image.

There are a but the truckload of allegations against him, which may be proven, but have not, and until so actually are mere allegations, even though some folks with another bias and less understanding of the issue will simply try to say there's literally a truckload of them to try and dance their way out of them not being proven. Including some that should understand that concept (such as LE), but apparently simply dont. And though that seems like an overwhelming case against him when one doesnt understand the concept of actual proof, at the end of the day he's just a Maryland dad person that should have received had more due process on his actual removal, but somehow the people antsy for his removal think that somehow because the due process he received previously somehow covered his ultimate illegal and improper removal where a judge ordered him removable from the United States didn't go quite far enough as far as due process goes.

FIFY big guy.

And like just about every LE Ive ever met, bar a very small number, you seemingly think that there is a kneejerk solution to 'prove up an allegation' under to due process by layering on simply more allegations.

And Im glad that you seemingly mix and match 'allegation' with fact in the first sentence. Im unsure what to make of it when a long time professional in LE lays out "support the allegations of 'Maryland dad' because that's a fact", which is pretty much gobbledygook. Perhaps the meanings of 'fact' and 'allegation' might be a start with that.

Cute tricks above, but those aint the rules in the US. Bummer dude.

See Tanq, just the way you worded that response is why so many people here tangle with you.

If a person disagrees with you, it is your nature to make it personal, regardless of the merits of either position.

Odd that most of us only have issues with one or two peeps here, yet somehow you seem to lock horns with a couple of dozen or so. I wonder why?

(06-18-2025 09:54 AM)TripleA Wrote:  Odd that most of us only have issues with one or two peeps here, yet somehow you seem to lock horns with a couple of dozen or so. I wonder why?

Maybe because there are a bunch of folks who slurp up as the golden rule of truth what you follow, and there are a handful that dont.

Kind of obvious there. my friend. You havent clued into that?

And there is no personal edge to his comment, whatsover. Nor any to any of yours that follow. Cool cool.

(06-18-2025 09:58 AM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(06-18-2025 09:54 AM)TripleA Wrote:  Odd that most of us only have issues with one or two peeps here, yet somehow you seem to lock horns with a couple of dozen or so. I wonder why?

Maybe because there are a bunch of folks who slurp up as the golden rule of truth what you follow, and there are a handful that dont.

Kind of obvious there. my friend. You havent clued into that?

Yeah, they are all wrong, and you're the only one who is right. Got it.

(06-18-2025 10:00 AM)TripleA Wrote:  

(06-18-2025 09:58 AM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(06-18-2025 09:54 AM)TripleA Wrote:  Odd that most of us only have issues with one or two peeps here, yet somehow you seem to lock horns with a couple of dozen or so. I wonder why?

Maybe because there are a bunch of folks who slurp up as the golden rule of truth what you follow, and there are a handful that dont.

Kind of obvious there. my friend. You havent clued into that?

Yeah, they are all wrong, and you're the only one who is right. Got it.

I guess you dont notice that ratio issue in issue viewpoint.

Every single person who posts something against the orthodoxy of the howlers gets an automatic personal attack against them, pretty much every single time.

Yet that escapes you when you use your numbers comment above. Cool cool.

Kind of an amazing oversight, 3a.