(03-19-2025 01:36 PM)U_of_Elvis Wrote:  

(03-19-2025 12:51 PM)maximus Wrote:  Again, this is all the left has...

Delay via activist leftist judges

Domestic terrorism funded by billionaire leftists

It won't work in the end

Sent from my SM-S928U using Tapatalk

All the people standing against Trump have is, checks notes, the constitution. I’d rather be on the side of the constitution.

Unamerican bunch here rooting against the constitution.

This could be the most pathetic attempt at gaslighting in the history of this board.

Bwhahahaha



Sent from my SM-S928U using Tapatalk

Muh standing with the constiminution!

(03-19-2025 01:37 PM)TripleA Wrote:  

(03-19-2025 01:34 PM)U_of_Elvis Wrote:  

(03-19-2025 08:53 AM)Was SoMs Eagle Wrote:  

(03-19-2025 07:40 AM)U_of_Elvis Wrote:  Federal judge orders DOGE to stop all activity with USAID, says their actions were most likely unconstitutional.

“Chuang granted in part their request for a preliminary injunction and said in a 68-page decision that DOGE and Musk likely violated the Constitution's Appointments Clause and separation of powers.

He ordered Musk and task force employees to reinstate access to email, payment and other electronic systems to all current USAID employees and personal services contractors. The judge also prevented DOGE and Musk from taking any action relating to the shutdown of USAID, including placing employees on administrative leave, firing USAID workers, closing its buildings, bureaus or offices, and deleting the contents of its websites or collections.

DOGE and Musk are prohibited under the judge's order from taking any other actions relating to USAID without the "express authorization" of an agency official with legal authority to take the action”

https://www.cbsnews.com/amp/news/judge-f...itutional/

So now this judge declares an “agency official” is superior to the President of the United States? The single authority over that agency is by constitutional power the POTUS. So who here is standing against the constitution?
Why is common sense in such short supply with progressives?

US aid is chartered by Congress.

“Unless abolished pursuant to the reorganization plan submitted under section 6601 of this title, and except as provided in section 6562 of this title, there is within the Executive branch of Government the United States Agency for International Development as an entity described in section 104 of title 5.”

Firing everyone without a reorganization plan is going to be illegal. There are checks and balances on executors power. Congress has the power of the purse, the judicial branch steps in if you violate the law, and civil servants have legal protection.

There is nothing that prevents the Trump admin from drastically reducing the size of the USAID agency.

Nothing other than the law and Constitution. The line-item veto is not Constitutional. The executive branch just can't decide that congressionally approved spending, is not authorized spending. If they don't like it, take it out of the budget before it passes congress.

(03-19-2025 02:09 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(03-19-2025 01:37 PM)TripleA Wrote:  

(03-19-2025 01:34 PM)U_of_Elvis Wrote:  

(03-19-2025 08:53 AM)Was SoMs Eagle Wrote:  

(03-19-2025 07:40 AM)U_of_Elvis Wrote:  Federal judge orders DOGE to stop all activity with USAID, says their actions were most likely unconstitutional.

“Chuang granted in part their request for a preliminary injunction and said in a 68-page decision that DOGE and Musk likely violated the Constitution's Appointments Clause and separation of powers.

He ordered Musk and task force employees to reinstate access to email, payment and other electronic systems to all current USAID employees and personal services contractors. The judge also prevented DOGE and Musk from taking any action relating to the shutdown of USAID, including placing employees on administrative leave, firing USAID workers, closing its buildings, bureaus or offices, and deleting the contents of its websites or collections.

DOGE and Musk are prohibited under the judge's order from taking any other actions relating to USAID without the "express authorization" of an agency official with legal authority to take the action”

https://www.cbsnews.com/amp/news/judge-f...itutional/

So now this judge declares an “agency official” is superior to the President of the United States? The single authority over that agency is by constitutional power the POTUS. So who here is standing against the constitution?
Why is common sense in such short supply with progressives?

US aid is chartered by Congress.

“Unless abolished pursuant to the reorganization plan submitted under section 6601 of this title, and except as provided in section 6562 of this title, there is within the Executive branch of Government the United States Agency for International Development as an entity described in section 104 of title 5.”

Firing everyone without a reorganization plan is going to be illegal. There are checks and balances on executors power. Congress has the power of the purse, the judicial branch steps in if you violate the law, and civil servants have legal protection.

There is nothing that prevents the Trump admin from drastically reducing the size of the USAID agency.

Nothing other than the law and Constitution. The line-item veto is not Constitutional. The executive branch just can't decide that congressionally approved spending, is not authorized spending. If they don't like it, take it out of the budget before it passes congress.

They just don't have to spend it. Happens every day.

(03-19-2025 01:36 PM)U_of_Elvis Wrote:  

(03-19-2025 12:51 PM)maximus Wrote:  Again, this is all the left has...

Delay via activist leftist judges

Domestic terrorism funded by billionaire leftists

It won't work in the end

Sent from my SM-S928U using Tapatalk

All the people standing against Trump have is, checks notes, the constitution. I’d rather be on the side of the constitution.

Unamerican bunch here rooting against the constitution.

If you support democrats then you aren't in favor of the constitution. Democrats consistently attack free speech, the right to bear arms, and use the judicial to go after political opponents. Democrats only care about the constitution when it suits their needs. It continues to amaze me to see people cheering on the abject waste of taxpayer funds just because they don't like the guy trying to reign it in.

(03-19-2025 02:19 PM)TripleA Wrote:  

(03-19-2025 02:09 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(03-19-2025 01:37 PM)TripleA Wrote:  

(03-19-2025 01:34 PM)U_of_Elvis Wrote:  

(03-19-2025 08:53 AM)Was SoMs Eagle Wrote:  So now this judge declares an “agency official” is superior to the President of the United States? The single authority over that agency is by constitutional power the POTUS. So who here is standing against the constitution?
Why is common sense in such short supply with progressives?

US aid is chartered by Congress.

“Unless abolished pursuant to the reorganization plan submitted under section 6601 of this title, and except as provided in section 6562 of this title, there is within the Executive branch of Government the United States Agency for International Development as an entity described in section 104 of title 5.”

Firing everyone without a reorganization plan is going to be illegal. There are checks and balances on executors power. Congress has the power of the purse, the judicial branch steps in if you violate the law, and civil servants have legal protection.

There is nothing that prevents the Trump admin from drastically reducing the size of the USAID agency.

Nothing other than the law and Constitution. The line-item veto is not Constitutional. The executive branch just can't decide that congressionally approved spending, is not authorized spending. If they don't like it, take it out of the budget before it passes congress.

They just don't have to spend it. Happens every day.

Me no thinky commie tom understands how this works

Sent from my SM-S928U using Tapatalk

The values of the Democratic party are an antithesis to Christian values and anyone claiming they are Christian are lying OR do not know what Christian values are. I won't get into details but if you really claim you know God and still vote/push the agenda for the Demonic Party you are only fooling yourselves. But, you do you and everyone kicks the bucket and Jesus won't be impressed with your lives.

Like a certain cartoon used to say, yoooouuu'lll be sorrrrryyyy.

“ A federal judge on Thursday temporarily blocked Elon Musk ’s Department of Government Efficiency from Social Security Administration systems that hold personal data on millions of Americans.

The decision from U.S. District Judge Ellen Hollander in Maryland also requires the team to delete any personally identifiable data they may have. It comes after labor unions and retirees asked for an emergency order limiting DOGE access to the agency and its vast troves of personal data.

They said DOGE’s “nearly unlimited” access violates privacy laws and presents massive information security risks. A recently departed Social Security official who saw the DOGE team sweep into the agency said she is deeply worried about sensitive information being exposed.”

https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/fe...ta-for-now

(03-20-2025 05:12 PM)U_of_Elvis Wrote:  “ A federal judge on Thursday temporarily blocked Elon Musk ’s Department of Government Efficiency from Social Security Administration systems that hold personal data on millions of Americans.

The decision from U.S. District Judge Ellen Hollander in Maryland also requires the team to delete any personally identifiable data they may have. It comes after labor unions and retirees asked for an emergency order limiting DOGE access to the agency and its vast troves of personal data.

They said DOGE’s “nearly unlimited” access violates privacy laws and presents massive information security risks. A recently departed Social Security official who saw the DOGE team sweep into the agency said she is deeply worried about sensitive information being exposed.”

https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/fe...ta-for-now

Again moron

1. Activist judges using moronic court rulings to delay the inevitable

2. Domestic terrorism by your ilk

All you have pal, and it won't work... and you know it.


Sent from my SM-S928U using Tapatalk

Oh... here you go

Sent from my SM-S928U using Tapatalk

The Dem's continued defense of waste, fraud, abuse, inefficiency, and ineffectiveness solely due to blind hatred of Trump and his voters truly puzzles.

For example, DODE is examining the IRS and found:

""This is a huge program that's currently 30 years behind schedule, and it's already $15 billion over budget," he (Corcos) said. "The IRS has some pretty legacy infrastructure...and the challenge has been how do we migrate that to a modern system?"

'.... many major banks who ran on similar systems have already modernized. He added the IRS is over three decades behind schedule and billions over budget compared to the typical expectations for the industry."

"Bessent, who was recently confirmed as President Donald Trump's treasury secretary, added "one of the biggest surprises for me is just seeing how these entrenched interests, they just keep constricting themselves around the power, around the money, around the systems, and nobody cares."

https://www.foxnews.com/media/doge-deput...y-big-hole

How can any rational person or group oppose fixing systems allowing more efficiency and effectiveness? The situation at the IRS, unfortunately, is just one of a multitude of mismanagement at the federal government.

"Progressives" fancy themselves as "servants of the people", but in reality taxpayers serve them.

(03-21-2025 08:17 AM)Tiger1983 Wrote:  The Dem's continued defense of waste, fraud, abuse, inefficiency, and ineffectiveness solely due to blind hatred of Trump and his voters truly puzzles.

For example, DODE is examining the IRS and found:

""This is a huge program that's currently 30 years behind schedule, and it's already $15 billion over budget," he (Corcos) said. "The IRS has some pretty legacy infrastructure...and the challenge has been how do we migrate that to a modern system?"

'.... many major banks who ran on similar systems have already modernized. He added the IRS is over three decades behind schedule and billions over budget compared to the typical expectations for the industry."

"Bessent, who was recently confirmed as President Donald Trump's treasury secretary, added "one of the biggest surprises for me is just seeing how these entrenched interests, they just keep constricting themselves around the power, around the money, around the systems, and nobody cares."

https://www.foxnews.com/media/doge-deput...y-big-hole

How can any rational person or group oppose fixing systems allowing more efficiency and effectiveness? The situation at the IRS, unfortunately, is just one of a multitude of mismanagement at the federal government.

"Progressives" fancy themselves as "servants of the people", but in reality taxpayers serve them.

Yeah, not even close.

(03-21-2025 07:50 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

How about going to the thread where this lives and post?

Like I already said there.... people can do all of this online and not physically go anywhere.

Sent from my SM-S928U using Tapatalk

(03-21-2025 09:03 AM)maximus Wrote:  

(03-21-2025 07:50 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

How about going to the thread where this lives and post?

Like I already said there.... people can do all of this online and not physically go anywhere.

I had no ******* clue it "lived" anywhere. And in case you're not aware, people receiving SS tend to be old. They're not normally the most savvy folks online.

(03-21-2025 09:10 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(03-21-2025 09:03 AM)maximus Wrote:  

(03-21-2025 07:50 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

How about going to the thread where this lives and post?

Like I already said there.... people can do all of this online and not physically go anywhere.

I had no ******* clue it "lived" anywhere. And in case you're not aware, people receiving SS tend to be old. They're not normally the most savvy folks online.

I Posted about this the other day. I guess you missed it. That X Post is 95% BS.

Here you go Tom,

This subject is lacking some information and will answer a lot of questions. This infor is from the SSA website.

The Social Security Administration (SSA) is taking proactive steps to enhance the security of its services by implementing stronger identity verification procedures. The updated measures will further safeguard Social Security records and benefits against fraudulent activity. Over the next two weeks, SSA will carefully transition to stronger identity proofing procedures for both benefit claims and direct deposit changes. Individuals seeking these services who cannot use their personal my Social Security account, which requires online identity proofing, will then need to visit a local Social Security office to prove their identity in person. At the same time, the agency will expedite processing all direct deposit change requests – both in person and online – to one business day. Prior to this change, online direct deposit changes were held for 30 days.

“Americans deserve to have their Social Security records protected with the utmost integrity and vigilance,” said Lee Dudek, Acting Commissioner of Social Security. “For far too long, the agency has used antiquated methods for proving identity. Social Security can better protect Americans while expediting service.”

Rest of the story here.
https://blog.ssa.gov/social-security-str...o-one-day/

(03-21-2025 10:23 AM)Redbanksdog Wrote:  

(03-21-2025 09:10 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(03-21-2025 09:03 AM)maximus Wrote:  

(03-21-2025 07:50 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

How about going to the thread where this lives and post?

Like I already said there.... people can do all of this online and not physically go anywhere.

I had no ******* clue it "lived" anywhere. And in case you're not aware, people receiving SS tend to be old. They're not normally the most savvy folks online.

I Posted about this the other day. I guess you missed it.

Yeah, because I don't live here 24x7. And...

Quote:The contents of this message are hidden because Redbanksdog is on your ignore list.

(03-21-2025 10:39 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(03-21-2025 10:23 AM)Redbanksdog Wrote:  

(03-21-2025 09:10 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(03-21-2025 09:03 AM)maximus Wrote:  

(03-21-2025 07:50 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

How about going to the thread where this lives and post?

Like I already said there.... people can do all of this online and not physically go anywhere.

I had no ******* clue it "lived" anywhere. And in case you're not aware, people receiving SS tend to be old. They're not normally the most savvy folks online.

I Posted about this the other day. I guess you missed it.

Yeah, because I don't live here 24x7. And...

Quote:The contents of this message are hidden because Redbanksdog is on your ignore list.

I'm om your ignore list, I know Tom can't see this but wow.

(03-21-2025 09:10 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(03-21-2025 09:03 AM)maximus Wrote:  

(03-21-2025 07:50 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

How about going to the thread where this lives and post?

Like I already said there.... people can do all of this online and not physically go anywhere.

I had no ******* clue it "lived" anywhere. And in case you're not aware, people receiving SS tend to be old. They're not normally the most savvy folks online.

Try using the search feature dummy.



Sent from my SM-S928U using Tapatalk