Pentagon spokesperson just said live that Rep. Van Drew's information is incorrect. She said there is no Iranian ship off the coast.

Damn, we need some adults in charge!

Man, there is an all out brawl going on with TV interviews all over the place with different viewpoints. It's a threat. It's not a threat. It's Iranian drones. It's not Iran.

Other politicians are coming out and saying Van Drew has no incentive to lie, but the Pentagon might.

Jan 20 can't get here fast enough. This is ridiculous.

The absolute BS thing is these drones have been flying over our air space for almost a month now.

I posted a video in our video thread here, weeks ago, showing several unidentified lights in the sky in that area.

I've been saying for a while now, WWIII has started and we have yet to engage. This country is run by imbeciles and it looks like damn near half the population are imbeciles also.

Thank goodness Harris didn't win the election.

(12-11-2024 02:11 PM)TripleA Wrote:  Pentagon spokesperson just said live that Rep. Van Drew's information is incorrect. She said there is no Iranian ship off the coast.

Damn, we need some adults in charge!

Its not passing the common sense test. Why would spy drones have port and starboard lights.

This feels like some military ish

(12-11-2024 02:28 PM)shere khan Wrote:  

(12-11-2024 02:11 PM)TripleA Wrote:  Pentagon spokesperson just said live that Rep. Van Drew's information is incorrect. She said there is no Iranian ship off the coast.

Damn, we need some adults in charge!

Its not passing the common sense test. Why would spy drones have port and starboard lights.

This feels like some military ish

Exactly. It is a US vehicle.

(12-11-2024 02:28 PM)shere khan Wrote:  

(12-11-2024 02:11 PM)TripleA Wrote:  Pentagon spokesperson just said live that Rep. Van Drew's information is incorrect. She said there is no Iranian ship off the coast.

Damn, we need some adults in charge!

Its not passing the common sense test. Why would spy drones have port and starboard lights.

This feels like some military ish

The lights reportedly disappear when they are noticed. Don't ask me how.

I don't believe it's our military b/c:

1. It would be simple to say it's a military test and there is nothing to worry about.

2. Several peeps have already said we don't have the technology to produce drones like that. For now, only China does.

3. If #2 is incorrect, then go back to #1, lol.

Too bad Trump isn't in yet. This thread would be unnecessary after a few hours, lol.

(12-11-2024 02:33 PM)TripleA Wrote:  

(12-11-2024 02:28 PM)shere khan Wrote:  

(12-11-2024 02:11 PM)TripleA Wrote:  Pentagon spokesperson just said live that Rep. Van Drew's information is incorrect. She said there is no Iranian ship off the coast.

Damn, we need some adults in charge!

Its not passing the common sense test. Why would spy drones have port and starboard lights.

This feels like some military ish

The lights reportedly disappear when they are noticed. Don't ask me how.

I don't believe it's our military b/c:

1. It would be simple to say it's a military test and there is nothing to worry about.

2. Several peeps have already said we don't have the technology to produce drones like that. For now, only China does.

3. If #2 is incorrect, then go back to #1, lol.

Like they told us when they were testing the Stealth Bomber? Our government lies to us. This has been proven. A foreign spy vehicle will not have US navigational lights. Also, you can turn the lights off by pressing a button. Our government is feeding us a line a bull. Don't take it. If it was from "Iran" they would have blown something up already.

More from the Pentagon spokesperson:

1. The drones are not from a foreign entity.

2. They are not our drones.

3. They pose no threat.

4. If any entity in the area feels the drones are a threat, they have the option to shoot them down.

They obviously know more than they are saying. OR, they don't know jack and refuse to do anything. Like the spy balloons. Or the screw-up with the Afghanistan withdrawal.

(12-11-2024 02:47 PM)Eagleaidaholic Wrote:  

(12-11-2024 02:33 PM)TripleA Wrote:  

(12-11-2024 02:28 PM)shere khan Wrote:  

(12-11-2024 02:11 PM)TripleA Wrote:  Pentagon spokesperson just said live that Rep. Van Drew's information is incorrect. She said there is no Iranian ship off the coast.

Damn, we need some adults in charge!

Its not passing the common sense test. Why would spy drones have port and starboard lights.

This feels like some military ish

The lights reportedly disappear when they are noticed. Don't ask me how.

I don't believe it's our military b/c:

1. It would be simple to say it's a military test and there is nothing to worry about.

2. Several peeps have already said we don't have the technology to produce drones like that. For now, only China does.

3. If #2 is incorrect, then go back to #1, lol.

Like they told us when they were testing the Stealth Bomber? Our government lies to us. This has been proven. A foreign spy vehicle will not have US navigational lights. Also, you can turn the lights off by pressing a button. Our government is feeding us a line a bull. Don't take it. If it was from "Iran" they would have blown something up already.

Who are you preaching to? Everybody here, even Tom and Elvis, we all understand the government lies. This is a poly board, not Reddit.

And #3 is the fail safe in case they are lying. Duh.

We're just batting stuff around until the truth emerges. It always does, sooner or later. Also, I don't think Van Drew is lying. He cold have bad info. Biden admin and the military? Absolutely. They lie all the time.

I still say if they know it's theirs, they could just say what that are saying without the statement that it isn't theirs. Just say it's not a problem. Period.

Here's another thought. If those drones are ours, why would the Pentagon spox say it was okay to shoot them down?

(12-11-2024 02:28 PM)shere khan Wrote:  

(12-11-2024 02:11 PM)TripleA Wrote:  Pentagon spokesperson just said live that Rep. Van Drew's information is incorrect. She said there is no Iranian ship off the coast.

Damn, we need some adults in charge!

Its not passing the common sense test. Why would spy drones have port and starboard lights.

This feels like some military ish

Not only your point, but if it were the case it is in one of the busiest shipping lanes in the world. There would be videos of them launching and returning all over the place thanks to the other ships that surely are in the area.

(12-11-2024 02:52 PM)TripleA Wrote:  More from the Pentagon spokesperson:

1. The drones are not from a foreign entity.

2. They are not our drones.

3. They pose no threat.

4. If any entity in the area feels the drones are a threat, they have the option to shoot them down.

They obviously know more than they are saying. OR, they don't know jack and refuse to do anything. Like the spy balloons. Or the screw-up with the Afghanistan withdrawal.

The incompetence level just went up exponentially

WTF

Sent from my SM-S928U using Tapatalk

(12-11-2024 02:52 PM)TripleA Wrote:  More from the Pentagon spokesperson:

1. The drones are not from a foreign entity.

2. They are not our drones.

3. They pose no threat.

4. If any entity in the area feels the drones are a threat, they have the option to shoot them down.

They obviously know more than they are saying. OR, they don't know jack and refuse to do anything. Like the spy balloons. Or the screw-up with the Afghanistan withdrawal.

If 1. and 2. are true how can 3. be true?

(12-11-2024 03:21 PM)Eagleaidaholic Wrote:  

(12-11-2024 02:52 PM)TripleA Wrote:  More from the Pentagon spokesperson:

1. The drones are not from a foreign entity.

2. They are not our drones.

3. They pose no threat.

4. If any entity in the area feels the drones are a threat, they have the option to shoot them down.

They obviously know more than they are saying. OR, they don't know jack and refuse to do anything. Like the spy balloons. Or the screw-up with the Afghanistan withdrawal.

If 1. and 2. are true how can 3. be true?

Good question. Only thing I can figure is they are a commercial entity in the U.S. But then why wouldn't they tell us?

OR, they are actually UAPs. But then we wouldn't know about #3, lol.

(12-11-2024 03:27 PM)TripleA Wrote:  

(12-11-2024 03:21 PM)Eagleaidaholic Wrote:  

(12-11-2024 02:52 PM)TripleA Wrote:  More from the Pentagon spokesperson:

1. The drones are not from a foreign entity.

2. They are not our drones.

3. They pose no threat.

4. If any entity in the area feels the drones are a threat, they have the option to shoot them down.

They obviously know more than they are saying. OR, they don't know jack and refuse to do anything. Like the spy balloons. Or the screw-up with the Afghanistan withdrawal.

If 1. and 2. are true how can 3. be true?

Good question. Only thing I can figure is they are a commercial entity in the U.S.

OR US Secret Service.

(12-11-2024 03:21 PM)Eagleaidaholic Wrote:  

(12-11-2024 02:52 PM)TripleA Wrote:  More from the Pentagon spokesperson:

1. The drones are not from a foreign entity.

2. They are not our drones.

3. They pose no threat.

4. If any entity in the area feels the drones are a threat, they have the option to shoot them down.

They obviously know more than they are saying. OR, they don't know jack and refuse to do anything. Like the spy balloons. Or the screw-up with the Afghanistan withdrawal.

If 1. and 2. are true how can 3. be true?

it cannot unless muh DEI rules the roost...

More Fox reporting. Van Drew said the Iranian ship has been tracked since it left port, we knew it had drones aboard, and it took about a month for the ship to arrive.

The Pentagon denies it.

Somebody lying!!!!