Jury officially back into deliberations on count 2 despite the defense again requesting a mistrial due to the jury instructions being blatantly violated

Judge denied the mistrial motion and jury is deliberating

(12-09-2024 10:22 AM)solohawks Wrote:  Jury officially back into deliberations on count 2 despite the defense again requesting a mistrial due to the jury instructions being blatantly violated

Judge denied the mistrial motion and jury is deliberating

Turned over on appeal.

He wont do a day.

(12-09-2024 10:23 AM)shere khan Wrote:  

(12-09-2024 10:22 AM)solohawks Wrote:  Jury officially back into deliberations on count 2 despite the defense again requesting a mistrial due to the jury instructions being blatantly violated

Judge denied the mistrial motion and jury is deliberating

Turned over on appeal.

He wont do a day.

Im not as optimistic as you...i could see this judge remanding Penny into custody this week if a guilty verdict comes back pending sentencing.

Appeals take time and usually defendants suffer during the appeals process

Also want to point out that if he is going to have any chance at all at using the Good Samaritan laws to shield from the upcoming civil suit, he needs to not be found guilty.

Logically acquittal is out of the question at this point unless the hold out(s) had a spiritual conversion yesterday

He's going to be convicted on the lesser charge. Kangaroo court almost ensured that on Friday.

(12-09-2024 10:36 AM)rath v2.0 Wrote:  He's going to be convicted on the lesser charge. Kangaroo court almost ensured that on Friday.

Same here. Judge should be disbarred. Him and Juan Merchan, as well.

These aren't just activist judges. They are lawbreakers.

Judge empathizing with the unfair treatment the prosecutors have received...can't make this $tuff up

(12-09-2024 10:36 AM)rath v2.0 Wrote:  He's going to be convicted on the lesser charge. Kangaroo court almost ensured that on Friday.

We know there was at least one pro-Defendant juror holding out last week on the Manslaughter count. (And really, there might be many others for all we know). That same juror could just as easily hold out on the Negligence count.

If the Judge commits Civil Rights violations by not providing Penny's Constitutional Rights, that is a Federal beef and the Trump DOJ can address it. This judge presents himself as someone that has no idea of how a trial is to be run.

(12-09-2024 10:40 AM)Native Georgian Wrote:  

(12-09-2024 10:36 AM)rath v2.0 Wrote:  He's going to be convicted on the lesser charge. Kangaroo court almost ensured that on Friday.

We know there was at least one pro-Defendant juror holding out last week on the Manslaughter count. (And really, there might be many others for all we know). That same juror could just as easily hold out on the Negligence count.

I would. I don't need to be there. Enough in the media from eyewitnesses to make it a no-brainer decision.

The system is designed to make it expedient for a hold out to find a safe landing zone. The judge provided that safe landing zone on Friday.

If there's only one or two holding out, I expect they will give in if for no other reason than to get back to their lives.

(12-09-2024 10:57 AM)rath v2.0 Wrote:  The system is designed to make it expedient for a hold out to find a safe landing zone. The judge provided that safe landing zone on Friday.

If there's only one or two holding out, I expect they will give in if for no other reason than to get back to their lives.

I was a juror on a criminal trial last December. I know I wouldn't do that, b/c we had 4 counts to try, and we were all over the place at first. I never changed from what I had initially concluded at the end of the trial, and I know there was no way I would have changed my vote just to go home earlier.

Of course, that's me, not necessarily everybody.

All of us eventually came to the same conclusions I did, even though I wasn't really the one leading the charge. He was convicted on two charges, and acquitted on the other two.

I wish I could have discovered what his sentence was. That was done by the judge sometime later, well after we were dismissed.

If you had a job you needed to pay bills or owned a small business or had young kids and you were required to show up for jury duty 7 weeks ago your opinion just might change.

These people are ready to be done.

(12-09-2024 10:40 AM)Native Georgian Wrote:  

(12-09-2024 10:36 AM)rath v2.0 Wrote:  He's going to be convicted on the lesser charge. Kangaroo court almost ensured that on Friday.

We know there was at least one pro-Defendant juror holding out last week on the Manslaughter count. (And really, there might be many others for all we know). That same juror could just as easily hold out on the Negligence count.

that being the case, they have a stinkfist in the lot ... nuts would tell 'em right out of the gate, "y'all wake me up when ewes are finished pissin' around ... my vote of not guilty will still be the same, ewe dipshites!"

disclaimer: in this case, there's no question I would've lied to get on that jury!

NOT GUILTY!!! Let the riots begin.

(12-09-2024 11:37 AM)WKUApollo Wrote:  NOT GUILTY!!! Let the riots begin.

Now he has to deal with a Civil Case that should be dismissed immediately.

Wow, threats issued after the jury completes their chore. Unreal and not very nice. The jurors did their civic duty.

Justice prevails.

WOW! wasn't expecting that...the guilty juror must have been the holdout and was ready to be done

(12-09-2024 11:37 AM)WKUApollo Wrote:  NOT GUILTY!!! Let the riots begin.

#sanityLivesMatter > #sanitizedHiveMinds

Good. Not guilty. Now he needs to move to a red state