Now we know why she is hiding in Hawaii.

If you see the Democrats leading the polls, don't panic, it's only meant to demoralize you.

But honestly I don't think the polls as a whole were as bad as they've been in the past. There's elections where they never have the R ahead & the R wins by double digits. Trump led them pretty consistent this year. The problem is there's about 4 or 5 really bad polling companies

(11-26-2024 07:10 PM)Bronco14 Wrote:  If you see the Democrats leading the polls, don't panic, it's only meant to demoralize you.

But honestly I don't think the polls as a whole were as bad as they've been in the past. There's elections where they never have the R ahead & the R wins by double digits. Trump led them pretty consistent this year. The problem is there's about 4 or 5 really bad polling companies

IMO, the untrue positive polls are much more to generate big money donations than anything else.

Our entire government is nothing but a money laundering operation.

I give you Ukraine.

(11-26-2024 07:10 PM)Bronco14 Wrote:  If you see the Democrats leading the polls, don't panic, it's only meant to demoralize you.

But honestly I don't think the polls as a whole were as bad as they've been in the past. There's elections where they never have the R ahead & the R wins by double digits. Trump led them pretty consistent this year. The problem is there's about 4 or 5 really bad polling companies

All the liberal polls were off. Probably deliberately.

You heard enough inside chatter to know that the public polls were wrong. The Dems were worried.

(11-26-2024 07:18 PM)bullet Wrote:  

(11-26-2024 07:10 PM)Bronco14 Wrote:  If you see the Democrats leading the polls, don't panic, it's only meant to demoralize you.

But honestly I don't think the polls as a whole were as bad as they've been in the past. There's elections where they never have the R ahead & the R wins by double digits. Trump led them pretty consistent this year. The problem is there's about 4 or 5 really bad polling companies

All the liberal polls were off. Probably deliberately.

You heard enough inside chatter to know that the public polls were wrong. The Dems were worried.

Trump's camp knew all that, too.

this out get the 'popular' vote...

somebody smarter than thine answer this...

if election interference is supposedly illegal, please explain how muh muh muh poles are legal (w/o any oversight) when the msm is owned by a major majority of leftists/foreign interests/debt...

at what point does the constitution vs. pure propaganda come into play?! ... fire in a theater type 'stuffins'

fk ... those motherfk'rs didn't have the telegraph at the 'drafting' ...

it's a shame tanq-0fer-rang can't chime in on this guy ...

muh fk'n poles ........... just fk'n yikes!~!!

(11-26-2024 07:19 PM)TripleA Wrote:  

(11-26-2024 07:18 PM)bullet Wrote:  

(11-26-2024 07:10 PM)Bronco14 Wrote:  If you see the Democrats leading the polls, don't panic, it's only meant to demoralize you.

But honestly I don't think the polls as a whole were as bad as they've been in the past. There's elections where they never have the R ahead & the R wins by double digits. Trump led them pretty consistent this year. The problem is there's about 4 or 5 really bad polling companies

All the liberal polls were off. Probably deliberately.

You heard enough inside chatter to know that the public polls were wrong. The Dems were worried.

Trump's camp knew all that, too.

They were saying they were putting almost all their money into PA, MI and WI. They felt like NC, GA, AZ and NV were locked up. The closest states:
Wisconsin 0.9 Trump
MI 1.4 Trump
PA 1.7 Trump

GA 2.2 Trump
NH 2.7 Harris
NV 3.1 Trump
NC 3.2 Trump
MN 4.2 Harris
AZ 5.5 Trump
VA 5.8 Harris
NJ 5.9 Harris
NM 6.0 Harris
ME 6.4 Harris

Every other state was over 10%.

Kamala may be dumb but she’s not stupid. She’s a Democrat politician from California. She knows a good grift when she sees one. She spent 3 1/2 years watching the old white guy pocket millions from China, and half the old Soviet bloc, through his drug addled son.

Kamala wasn’t going to miss the opportunity to get hers. She knew if they admitted she was trailing the flow of money from nut job leftist donors would dry up.

What’s even more remarkable is she actually got people to vote for her while never doing a real interview or actually articulating a position on multiple issues.

(11-26-2024 07:30 PM)CardinalJim Wrote:  Kamala may be dumb but she’s not stupid. She’s a Democrat politician from California. She knows a good grift when she sees one. She spent 3 1/2 years watching the old white guy pocket millions from China, and half the old Soviet bloc, through his drug addled son.

Kamala wasn’t going to miss the opportunity to get hers. She knew if they admitted she was trailing the flow of money from nut job leftist donors would dry up.

What’s even more remarkable is she actually got people to vote for her while never doing a real interview or actually articulating a position on multiple issues.

and she 'married' a jew-in-tow ...

and no, there is nothing remarkable how many 'votes' she got ... casper the knight rider would've gotten the same amount...

@formerTTTally

LULZ!






That's great! That's awesome! I remember saying Trump was going to win, but I don't think I said it was going to be a landslide. I'm glad it was, but man, them knowing she was never ahead and admitting it after the fact is the best news yet!

She's a textbook democrat. Look at the scoreboard:

!. Knows how to spend money like it's candy.
2. Knows how to slide some of that campaign money in her pocket.
3. Can lie.
4. Can lay.
5. Takes orders from the man behind the curtain.

So the campaign fund raising was a scam from the beginning. Shocker.

Bet a few donor whales are big pissed right about now.

Golden

Sent from my SM-S928U using Tapatalk

(11-26-2024 08:13 PM)GeminiCoog Wrote:  LULZ!






That's great! That's awesome! I remember saying Trump was going to win, but I don't think I said it was going to be a landslide. I'm glad it was, but man, them knowing she was never ahead and admitting it after the fact is the best news yet!

There are those here who said Trump could never win. That he was the only republican who could lose. That he would blow it like ‘20. That he couldn’t stay on topic and would destroy himself. That we would all see the error of our ways.

Hell, some even called him an idiot. Stupid. A moron.

You know who you are.

We understand. You were just plain wrong. That’s OK. Just stay the course now because the slings and arrows are not going to stop because he won. As a matter of fact they haven’t even started yet. There is literally no guessing what the filth will try this time. It it will be something really big and outrageous. Guaranteed.

This isn’t “news”, of course this has been a years long money laundering scheme.

Sloe sleeps comfortably in his beach chair, crackhead bob travels the world, we pay the bills.

Grifters gon grift.

Been, sadly, time immemorial.

Time for a real change.

(11-26-2024 09:08 PM)Bear Catlett Wrote:  She's a textbook democrat. Look at the scoreboard:

!. Knows how to spend money like it's candy.
2. Knows how to slide some of that campaign money in her pocket.
3. Can lie.
4. Can lay.
5. Takes orders from the man behind the curtain.

the question becomes ... does she replace slick dipshite in the current hangin' 1, or just blend into irrelevance...

either way she's toast ... by '28, nuts will almost be 65 .... if he makes it prior to #costa, there's boots that will be culled/may not be able wade, nor gig, in muh swamp...

(11-26-2024 11:50 PM)JMUDunk Wrote:  This isn’t “news”, of course this has been a years long money laundering scheme.

Sloe sleeps comfortably in his beach chair, crackhead bob travels the world, we pay the bills.

Grifters gon grift.

Been, sadly, time immemorial.

Time for a real change.

if not, we know who's fk'd...

again .... #simpleMath ... @boomersByAttrition #wealthSiphon

they all apply ... however, the 'pod puppets' are picking up on how TTTo FINALLY FIGHT BACK!!!

sometime earlier today, some cat came with the bold text ... however, he rearranged ... they've been crawling this boaRD for sometime, now...

you guys will start hearing more in relative 'argumentum' moving forward...

(11-26-2024 07:15 PM)TripleA Wrote:  

(11-26-2024 07:10 PM)Bronco14 Wrote:  If you see the Democrats leading the polls, don't panic, it's only meant to demoralize you.

But honestly I don't think the polls as a whole were as bad as they've been in the past. There's elections where they never have the R ahead & the R wins by double digits. Trump led them pretty consistent this year. The problem is there's about 4 or 5 really bad polling companies

IMO, the untrue positive polls are much more to generate big money donations than anything else.

It is great for the media too. If one candidate is way ahead. less people will pay attention to them as well.