(10-04-2024 07:45 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(10-04-2024 06:57 AM)bearcat65 Wrote:  It evidently was news that Bruce Springsteen endorsed Harris as it was reported this morning on the radio. That should have surprised no one yet it was considered newsworthy.

News <> Newsworthy

And I don't think anyone posted a thread about it here.

But but but 50 former intelligence community operatives condemned Trump and you splooged all over that thread, hell you may have even created it. I'll give you this one thing, you are consistent. You consistently fall on the wrong side of any issue.

(10-04-2024 07:47 AM)TripleA Wrote:  Pretty funny, the anti-Trumpers getting all hot and bothered about a thread almost identical to one on Harris earlier.

LOL, isn't it though. It's that whole lack of self awareness thing.

(10-04-2024 07:48 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(10-04-2024 07:40 AM)TripleA Wrote:  Leave it to Tanq to come in and crap on a thread that has zero to do with anything he's saying other than his acute case of TDS.

Funny, did you do the same to the thread where security officials endorsed Harris?

I think his point is that Republicans endorsing a Republican isn't exactly groundbreaking.

And for the Gold Star families, just to put it in context, only 11 family members of 13 entire families that were killed signed the letter. Granted there are likely more than 11 in those entire families that will vote for trump, 11 isn't exactly a high number when you consider that 13 entire families is likely several dozen.

Awww look at little tommie using conjecture and speculation as evidence of nothing. As usual, they always create their own "facts".

You have as much idea as I do about the political leanings of the signatories, which is to say none at all.

(10-04-2024 06:14 AM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(10-03-2024 10:40 PM)TripleA Wrote:  

Quote:Hundreds of national security officials, ex-Cabinet members, Gold Star families endorse Trump
Trump endorsed by 400 foreign policy, national security officials from previous GOP admins
By Chris Pandolfo Fox News
Published October 3, 2024 6:58pm EDT | Updated October 3, 2024 7:01pm EDT

More than 400 national security and foreign policy officials, ex-Cabinet members, retired military officers and Gold Star families endorsed former President Trump on Thursday.

In an open letter organized by former National Security Adviser Robert O'Brien and former NSC Chief of Staff Alex Gray, the signatories condemn the "repeated failures" of the Biden-Harris administration's foreign policy and urged Americans to re-elect Trump.

"From a world at peace under President Trump, we are closer to a third world war than ever before under the Biden-Harris Administration," the letter states. "With multiple escalating wars around the world, an open border that allows terrorists to flood into the American homeland, and malign actors like China operating unabated, U.S. national security has been profoundly damaged by the failed policies of Kamala Harris and Joe Biden."

The endorsement was signed by several prominent officials from the Trump administration, including former Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, former Attorney General Bill Barr, former U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations and former 2024 Republican presidential candidate Nikki Haley, and many more.

Eleven family members of the 13 American troops killed at Abbey Gate at Kabul's airport during the 2021 U.S. withdrawal from Afghanistan also signed the letter, which praised Trump's foreign policy record in contrast to Biden's controversial actions...

...Additionally, 40 retired U.S. ambassadors, 75 retired senior military officers and several hundred officials from previous Republican administrations signed the letter, praising Trump's diplomatic efforts on cease-fire agreements between Turkey and Kurdish fighters in Syria and the Abraham Accords. The letter refers to Trump as a "peacemaker."

Read more here:

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/hundred...orse-trump

I guess it is quite the unusual news item when ex- Trump cabinet members endorse Trump.

Wait, the presidents cabinet has been expanded to 400 something persons?? When did that happen?

(10-04-2024 07:40 AM)TripleA Wrote:  Leave it to Tanq to come in and crap on a thread that has zero to do with anything he's saying other than his acute case of TDS.

Funny, did you do the same to the thread where security officials endorsed Harris?

I find it funny that a candidate or their supporters have to note members of a candidates cabinet are supporting them as being newsworthy.

And even more interesting when it is actually newsworthy since almost a majority of those previous cabinet members have actually endorsed the other candidate.

I guess you don't see te same irony there.

(10-04-2024 07:33 AM)tanqtonic Wrote:  I have zero problem charging some shitbird who tries to short circuit the electoral slates of 7 states and 25 million voters.

Maybe that’s just me.

What’s your o/u cutoff line? You’re ok w/ short circuiting 14 mil Dem voters, so I’m assuming is between 14-25m votes as where you draw the line of being ok.

(10-04-2024 08:23 AM)TigerBlue4Ever Wrote:  

(10-04-2024 07:33 AM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(10-04-2024 07:17 AM)stinkfist Wrote:  

(10-04-2024 07:14 AM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(10-04-2024 06:28 AM)stinkfist Wrote:  it's also quite unusual for anyone with a brain to defend lawfare w/o an agenda...

Prosecuting criminal activity. How terrible. The sheer horror.

My agenda resides in the first sentence stink. I guess that is quite unusual for some…..

yet, nothing has proved to be criminal unless subjectivity is the mantra...

I have a broad brush, too, sir...

I have zero problem charging some shitbird who tries to short circuit the electoral slates of 7 states and 25 million voters.

Maybe that’s just me.

You know as much about what's happening with regard to the persecution of DJT as any of the rest of us, which is to say none of us KNOW jackshite.

I'm actually quite confident I know more about that than pretty much anyone here.

Quote:We only "know" what we hear on the news, you included unless you have such high power contacts as to be intimately familiar with certain information as may exist which mere mortals like the rest of us aren't privy to.

I guess you forgot the court filings are public documents. And the things I read about or listen to on some legal news sources I try and verify.

As opposed to gaining the insight on conservativetreehousewatchthemslurpitalldown.com

(10-04-2024 09:40 AM)MemTigers1998 Wrote:  

(10-04-2024 07:33 AM)tanqtonic Wrote:  I have zero problem charging some shitbird who tries to short circuit the electoral slates of 7 states and 25 million voters.

Maybe that’s just me.

What’s your o/u cutoff line? You’re ok w/ short circuiting 14 mil Dem voters, so I’m assuming is between 14-25m votes as where you draw the line of being ok.

Please tell me where I am okay with short circuiting 14 million Dem voters? Or even 14 million Rep voters which is what you probably meant to say. Or even 14 million voters? Or even 50 voters?

Please be specific.

I am. Trump sought to cancel and replace the electoral slates of 7 states. All certified by the governors and legislatures of those states. And submitted prior to the safe harbor date Without a single act of those legislatures. And without a single court case to back that action.

Yeah, trying to short circuit those votes should be tried. Trying to replace them with slates having the same legal backing as pulling them out of a box of Capn Crunch absolutely should bethe of a criminal prosecution.

Cant wait to see you state where I support the short circuiting of the votes you clamor about above..

(10-04-2024 08:39 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(10-04-2024 08:02 AM)bearcat65 Wrote:  

(10-04-2024 07:45 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(10-04-2024 06:57 AM)bearcat65 Wrote:  It evidently was news that Bruce Springsteen endorsed Harris as it was reported this morning on the radio. That should have surprised no one yet it was considered newsworthy.

News <> Newsworthy

And I don't think anyone posted a thread about it here.

Read post 2.

Already did, what's your point?

Over your head apparently.

If Democrat leadership ever gets enough of their people in office, they want to eliminate the electoral votes of all 50 states - permanently. They also want to create additional blue states to greatly enhance their ability to always have the majority in the Senate.

I can only say, that if Trump hater Bill Barr endorsed him things must be pretty dire in our country.

Where is the video of the anti trump impeachment witness on MSNBC endorsing..... Trump?

I'm can't stop laughing



Sent from my SM-S928U using Tapatalk

Neal and Bob are very active in this thread….interesting

(10-04-2024 09:55 AM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(10-04-2024 09:40 AM)MemTigers1998 Wrote:  

(10-04-2024 07:33 AM)tanqtonic Wrote:  I have zero problem charging some shitbird who tries to short circuit the electoral slates of 7 states and 25 million voters.

Maybe that’s just me.

What’s your o/u cutoff line? You’re ok w/ short circuiting 14 mil Dem voters, so I’m assuming is between 14-25m votes as where you draw the line of being ok.

Please tell me where I am okay with short circuiting 14 million Dem voters? Or even 14 million Rep voters which is what you probably meant to say. Or even 14 million voters? Or even 50 voters?

Please be specific.

I am. Trump sought to cancel and replace the electoral slates of 7 states. All certified by the governors and legislatures of those states. And submitted prior to the safe harbor date Without a single act of those legislatures. And without a single court case to back that action.

Yeah, trying to short circuit those votes should be tried. Trying to replace them with slates having the same legal backing as pulling them out of a box of Capn Crunch absolutely should bethe of a criminal prosecution.

Cant wait to see you state where I support the short circuiting of the votes you clamor about above..

You are voting for a dumb whore who was installed after 14 million democrats voted in the primary for Biden.

81 million

Its a patriot's duty to challenge that utter bullshite

Only fascists and retards think it should be illegal to question the results of an election

Its the duty of those in power to question and to challenge a stolen election

The filth are lost.

(10-04-2024 05:26 PM)MemTigers1998 Wrote:  

(10-04-2024 09:55 AM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(10-04-2024 09:40 AM)MemTigers1998 Wrote:  

(10-04-2024 07:33 AM)tanqtonic Wrote:  I have zero problem charging some shitbird who tries to short circuit the electoral slates of 7 states and 25 million voters.

Maybe that’s just me.

What’s your o/u cutoff line? You’re ok w/ short circuiting 14 mil Dem voters, so I’m assuming is between 14-25m votes as where you draw the line of being ok.

Please tell me where I am okay with short circuiting 14 million Dem voters? Or even 14 million Rep voters which is what you probably meant to say. Or even 14 million voters? Or even 50 voters?

Please be specific.

I am. Trump sought to cancel and replace the electoral slates of 7 states. All certified by the governors and legislatures of those states. And submitted prior to the safe harbor date Without a single act of those legislatures. And without a single court case to back that action.

Yeah, trying to short circuit those votes should be tried. Trying to replace them with slates having the same legal backing as pulling them out of a box of Capn Crunch absolutely should bethe of a criminal prosecution.

Cant wait to see you state where I support the short circuiting of the votes you clamor about above..

You are voting for a dumb whore who was installed after 14 million democrats voted in the primary for Biden.

Maybe ponder what happened. The main contender dropped out. I guess that series of events doesn't register. Additionally, every delegate who was voted to the Dem convention exercised their vote. Imagine that.

As opposed to your religious idol who simply tried to remove duly elected electors. Based in nothing more than his thin ego.

Lolz.

Third thing --- I'm at this point voting Libertarian. As opposed to your idiotic supposition above.

Double lolz. Maybe next time try facts. Instead of gross generalizations and suppositions.

(10-04-2024 05:45 PM)shere khan Wrote:  81 million

Its a patriot's duty to challenge that utter bullshite

Only fascists and retards think it should be illegal to question the results of an election

Its the duty of those in power to question and to challenge a stolen election

The filth are lost.

Big difference between 'question' and 'throw out electors'.

A retard knows that difference. Apparently you do not.

(10-04-2024 05:53 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(10-04-2024 05:26 PM)MemTigers1998 Wrote:  

(10-04-2024 09:55 AM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(10-04-2024 09:40 AM)MemTigers1998 Wrote:  

(10-04-2024 07:33 AM)tanqtonic Wrote:  I have zero problem charging some shitbird who tries to short circuit the electoral slates of 7 states and 25 million voters.

Maybe that’s just me.

What’s your o/u cutoff line? You’re ok w/ short circuiting 14 mil Dem voters, so I’m assuming is between 14-25m votes as where you draw the line of being ok.

Please tell me where I am okay with short circuiting 14 million Dem voters? Or even 14 million Rep voters which is what you probably meant to say. Or even 14 million voters? Or even 50 voters?

Please be specific.

I am. Trump sought to cancel and replace the electoral slates of 7 states. All certified by the governors and legislatures of those states. And submitted prior to the safe harbor date Without a single act of those legislatures. And without a single court case to back that action.

Yeah, trying to short circuit those votes should be tried. Trying to replace them with slates having the same legal backing as pulling them out of a box of Capn Crunch absolutely should bethe of a criminal prosecution.

Cant wait to see you state where I support the short circuiting of the votes you clamor about above..

You are voting for a dumb whore who was installed after 14 million democrats voted in the primary for Biden.

Maybe ponder what happened. The main contender dropped out. I guess that series of events doesn't register. Additionally, every delegate who was voted to the Dem convention exercised their vote. Imagine that.

As opposed to your religious idol who simply tried to remove duly elected electors. Based in nothing more than his thin ego.

Lolz.

Third thing --- I'm at this point voting Libertarian. As opposed to your idiotic supposition above.

Double lolz. Maybe next time try facts. Instead of gross generalizations and suppositions.

" I'm at this point voting Libertarian"

obama supporter

(10-04-2024 05:53 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(10-04-2024 05:26 PM)MemTigers1998 Wrote:  

(10-04-2024 09:55 AM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(10-04-2024 09:40 AM)MemTigers1998 Wrote:  

(10-04-2024 07:33 AM)tanqtonic Wrote:  I have zero problem charging some shitbird who tries to short circuit the electoral slates of 7 states and 25 million voters.

Maybe that’s just me.

What’s your o/u cutoff line? You’re ok w/ short circuiting 14 mil Dem voters, so I’m assuming is between 14-25m votes as where you draw the line of being ok.

Please tell me where I am okay with short circuiting 14 million Dem voters? Or even 14 million Rep voters which is what you probably meant to say. Or even 14 million voters? Or even 50 voters?

Please be specific.

I am. Trump sought to cancel and replace the electoral slates of 7 states. All certified by the governors and legislatures of those states. And submitted prior to the safe harbor date Without a single act of those legislatures. And without a single court case to back that action.

Yeah, trying to short circuit those votes should be tried. Trying to replace them with slates having the same legal backing as pulling them out of a box of Capn Crunch absolutely should bethe of a criminal prosecution.

Cant wait to see you state where I support the short circuiting of the votes you clamor about above..

You are voting for a dumb whore who was installed after 14 million democrats voted in the primary for Biden.

Maybe ponder what happened. The main contender dropped out. I guess that series of events doesn't register. Additionally, every delegate who was voted to the Dem convention exercised their vote. Imagine that.

As opposed to your religious idol who simply tried to remove duly elected electors. Based in nothing more than his thin ego.

Lolz.

Third thing --- I'm at this point voting Libertarian. As opposed to your idiotic supposition above.

Double lolz. Maybe next time try facts. Instead of gross generalizations and suppositions.

Keep parroting that Biden "dropped out" You're a bigger retard than most if you truly keep posting that.

2nd, I've voted libertarian in the last 5 elections ... the moron they put up this year is an A-1 assclown. I'll write my name in before I vote for that moron.

Sent from my SM-S928U using Tapatalk

(10-04-2024 06:22 PM)Redbanksdog Wrote:  

(10-04-2024 05:53 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(10-04-2024 05:26 PM)MemTigers1998 Wrote:  

(10-04-2024 09:55 AM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(10-04-2024 09:40 AM)MemTigers1998 Wrote:  What’s your o/u cutoff line? You’re ok w/ short circuiting 14 mil Dem voters, so I’m assuming is between 14-25m votes as where you draw the line of being ok.

Please tell me where I am okay with short circuiting 14 million Dem voters? Or even 14 million Rep voters which is what you probably meant to say. Or even 14 million voters? Or even 50 voters?

Please be specific.

I am. Trump sought to cancel and replace the electoral slates of 7 states. All certified by the governors and legislatures of those states. And submitted prior to the safe harbor date Without a single act of those legislatures. And without a single court case to back that action.

Yeah, trying to short circuit those votes should be tried. Trying to replace them with slates having the same legal backing as pulling them out of a box of Capn Crunch absolutely should bethe of a criminal prosecution.

Cant wait to see you state where I support the short circuiting of the votes you clamor about above..

You are voting for a dumb whore who was installed after 14 million democrats voted in the primary for Biden.

Maybe ponder what happened. The main contender dropped out. I guess that series of events doesn't register. Additionally, every delegate who was voted to the Dem convention exercised their vote. Imagine that.

As opposed to your religious idol who simply tried to remove duly elected electors. Based in nothing more than his thin ego.

Lolz.

Third thing --- I'm at this point voting Libertarian. As opposed to your idiotic supposition above.

Double lolz. Maybe next time try facts. Instead of gross generalizations and suppositions.

" I'm at this point voting Libertarian"

obama supporter

Wrongo, champ. Next empty supposition, please………