(10-02-2024 11:35 AM)rath v2.0 Wrote:  

(10-02-2024 11:13 AM)Kruciff Wrote:  

(10-02-2024 11:10 AM)GeminiCoog Wrote:  

(10-02-2024 11:05 AM)WKUApollo Wrote:  

(10-02-2024 11:00 AM)Kruciff Wrote:  Idk man, sounds pretty weak to me. I'm a fan of anyone get called out for lying at any time. If someone says you're lying you shut them down with proof, not childish whimpering

So, what you're saying is..you didn't watch it?

He admitted as much.

Kruciff: Luckily, Vance actually had proof and did shut them down. *shrugs*

You heard: "Moderators aren't allowed to fact check"
I heard: "You're not allowed to call out my lies"

Simple as that

The moderators welched on an agreement. Your spirit animals.

And the difference between my views and yours is that you care more about the moderators lying than your representative

(10-02-2024 11:13 AM)Kruciff Wrote:  

(10-02-2024 11:10 AM)GeminiCoog Wrote:  

(10-02-2024 11:05 AM)WKUApollo Wrote:  

(10-02-2024 11:00 AM)Kruciff Wrote:  

(10-02-2024 10:54 AM)GeminiCoog Wrote:  It is when they said they weren't going to do that during the course of explaining the rules. Also, it's not whining. It's calling them out on their own hypocrisy. What they did was against the rules all sides (both candidates and the moderators) agreed upon. He's within his right as a debate participant to call them out.

Idk man, sounds pretty weak to me. I'm a fan of anyone get called out for lying at any time. If someone says you're lying you shut them down with proof, not childish whimpering

So, what you're saying is..you didn't watch it?

He admitted as much.

Kruciff: Luckily, Vance actually had proof and did shut them down. *shrugs*

You heard: "Moderators aren't allowed to fact check"
I heard: "You're not allowed to call out my lies"

Simple as that

They even released the rules a few days before the actual debate, as seen in this thread. In case you don't click on it, it says that the moderators weren't going to fact check the candidates. In fact, as per the rules, the candidates were going to fact check themselves. So again, the moderators broke the rules and Vance called them out on it, fact checking them.

Someone else can bring up the exact application Vance was referring to in the exchange. I've got stuff to do.

I’m not going to apologize but the two female moderators were annoying

(10-02-2024 09:50 AM)oruvoice Wrote:  

(10-02-2024 09:47 AM)BartlettTigerFan Wrote:  

(10-02-2024 09:45 AM)oruvoice Wrote:  Even the climate change "question" was qualified with "we all know climate change is real "

Who is "we"?

The CBS "moderator". She set-up the question in a leading/deceitful manner.

Multiple times

They were leading Walz to answer in certain ways when he had to provide a rebuttal

It was painfully obvious

Sent from my SM-S928U using Tapatalk

(10-02-2024 10:32 AM)Kruciff Wrote:  

(10-02-2024 10:22 AM)MemTigers1998 Wrote:  

(10-02-2024 09:57 AM)Kruciff Wrote:  Whoops I forgot this was on last night haha

Apparently Walz did too

What leads you to say that? Everything i'm seeing, Walz had plenty to say, was great on policy, and was quite respectful too

Bwhehehehehehehehehehehehehehejahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha

Sent from my SM-S928U using Tapatalk

(10-02-2024 11:39 AM)BigTigerMike Wrote:  I’m not going to apologize but the two female moderators were annoying

(10-02-2024 11:05 AM)WKUApollo Wrote:  

(10-02-2024 11:00 AM)Kruciff Wrote:  

(10-02-2024 10:54 AM)GeminiCoog Wrote:  

(10-02-2024 10:50 AM)Kruciff Wrote:  

(10-02-2024 10:46 AM)AdoptedMonarch Wrote:  Yeah, true. I suspect he had a nasty mess to wipe off his boots afterward from the absolute ass-kicking he dealt out - - not just to Uncle Tampon, but to the moderators also.

Whining to the moderators that they're not allowed to fact check isn't the flex you think it is.

It is when they said they weren't going to do that during the course of explaining the rules. Also, it's not whining. It's calling them out on their own hypocrisy. What they did was against the rules all sides (both candidates and the moderators) agreed upon. He's within his right as a debate participant to call them out.

Idk man, sounds pretty weak to me. I'm a fan of anyone get called out for lying at any time. If someone says you're lying you shut them down with proof, not childish whimpering

So, what you're saying is..you didn't watch it?

Lefts talking points are obviously out

Not many watched, Waltz did poorly because of Vance

Sent from my SM-S928U using Tapatalk

(10-02-2024 11:37 AM)Kruciff Wrote:  

(10-02-2024 11:35 AM)rath v2.0 Wrote:  

(10-02-2024 11:13 AM)Kruciff Wrote:  

(10-02-2024 11:10 AM)GeminiCoog Wrote:  

(10-02-2024 11:05 AM)WKUApollo Wrote:  So, what you're saying is..you didn't watch it?

He admitted as much.

Kruciff: Luckily, Vance actually had proof and did shut them down. *shrugs*

You heard: "Moderators aren't allowed to fact check"
I heard: "You're not allowed to call out my lies"

Simple as that

The moderators welched on an agreement. Your spirit animals.

And the difference between my views and yours is that you care more about the moderators lying than your representative

Yeah. No big deal that the media are liars. I mean, they don't have any power and nobody listens to them.

And thankfully we have Dems like Biden, Harris, Walz, Pelosi, Schiff, that are honest and don't lie.

(10-02-2024 11:37 AM)Kruciff Wrote:  

(10-02-2024 11:35 AM)rath v2.0 Wrote:  

(10-02-2024 11:13 AM)Kruciff Wrote:  

(10-02-2024 11:10 AM)GeminiCoog Wrote:  

(10-02-2024 11:05 AM)WKUApollo Wrote:  So, what you're saying is..you didn't watch it?

He admitted as much.

Kruciff: Luckily, Vance actually had proof and did shut them down. *shrugs*

You heard: "Moderators aren't allowed to fact check"
I heard: "You're not allowed to call out my lies"

Simple as that

The moderators welched on an agreement. Your spirit animals.

And the difference between my views and yours is that you care more about the moderators lying than your representative

And you don’t care about the 8+ years of lies your entire party have espoused on the general public. And that is proven in the hypocrisy of your posts.

Simple as that.

(10-02-2024 11:37 AM)Kruciff Wrote:  

(10-02-2024 11:35 AM)rath v2.0 Wrote:  

(10-02-2024 11:13 AM)Kruciff Wrote:  

(10-02-2024 11:10 AM)GeminiCoog Wrote:  

(10-02-2024 11:05 AM)WKUApollo Wrote:  So, what you're saying is..you didn't watch it?

He admitted as much.

Kruciff: Luckily, Vance actually had proof and did shut them down. *shrugs*

You heard: "Moderators aren't allowed to fact check"
I heard: "You're not allowed to call out my lies"

Simple as that

The moderators welched on an agreement. Your spirit animals.

And the difference between my views and yours is that you care more about the moderators lying than your representative

It would help if the "moderators" were actually correct when "fact checking". Last night showed you how simple minded and uninformed the self appointed and biased "arbitors" of truth actually are. The moderators are TV telepropter readers---talking heads---nothing more. Worse yet---they are lying every time they open their mouth to claim they are some sort of unbiased arbiters of truth.
Last night we learned these network talking heads (both women despite the fact that half the nation is made up of men---as if men have no special interests or concerns in this election cycle--what happened to diversity?) are not experts in political minutia. They not only kicked off the debate by immediately breaking their publicly stated rules on "fact" checking (twice)---but they embarrassingly got their "fact check" wrong----just as ABC did a few weeks before.

Its time for America to stop trusting these network propagandist who are really nothing more than captive press organs for the DNC when it comes to political reporting (fortunately polling suggests most of America has already stopped trusting these deceptive morons).

Lowest IQ ticket in the history of the world.

Harris and Walz couldn't manage a hot dog stand



Sent from my SM-S928U using Tapatalk

betting markets tighten ...
polymarket flips ...
but muh cat ladies ...

REVERSAL OF FORTUNE

(10-02-2024 11:43 AM)maximus Wrote:  

(10-02-2024 10:32 AM)Kruciff Wrote:  

(10-02-2024 10:22 AM)MemTigers1998 Wrote:  

(10-02-2024 09:57 AM)Kruciff Wrote:  Whoops I forgot this was on last night haha

Apparently Walz did too

What leads you to say that? Everything i'm seeing, Walz had plenty to say, was great on policy, and was quite respectful too

Bwhehehehehehehehehehehehehehejahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha

Sent from my SM-S928U using Tapatalk

Yep….respectful??? Zero respect for Trump since he announced he was running in 2015 and you libs wanna talk about respect? Once again, your blatant hypocrisy shows in every post.

K didn't watch, yet he's an expert on what happened in the debate.

Walz took a major ass kicking. So did the mods. Period.

NYT said it. CNN said it. Everybody but MSNBC. Panel of 14 undecided voters voted 12-2 for Vance, with only 5 Red leans in the group.

I didn't watch.

I have been watching some clips.

Walz looked terrified most of the debate.

Like, wtf?

(10-02-2024 06:04 PM)BartlettTigerFan Wrote:  I didn't watch.

I have been watching some clips.

Walz looked terrified most of the debate.

Like, wtf?

I forget who said earlier on in the thread, but somebody posted that Josh Shapiro is probably thinking 'wtf?' after watching the debate last night. lol Man, Kamala couldn't have picked a worse running mate.

Me.

She botched that pick so badly.

Fear of Dearbornistan.

Just imagine campaigning for months about how “weird” some guy is only to have that guy embarrass you on national TV for 90 straight minutes

(10-02-2024 06:07 PM)GeminiCoog Wrote:  

(10-02-2024 06:04 PM)BartlettTigerFan Wrote:  I didn't watch.

I have been watching some clips.

Walz looked terrified most of the debate.

Like, wtf?

I forget who said earlier on in the thread, but somebody posted that Josh Shapiro is probably thinking 'wtf?' after watching the debate last night. lol Man, Kamala couldn't have picked a worse running mate.

Shapiro didn't want it. He is eyeing 2028. You lose and your political career is over.