(09-30-2024 09:05 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(09-30-2024 09:00 AM)MemTigers1998 Wrote:  What exactly is incorrect?

Did Walz put tampons in men’s bathrooms? Yes

No, he didn't. I didn't bother with the rest.

Of course you didn’t

Like I said, all facts.

(09-30-2024 09:16 AM)MemTigers1998 Wrote:  

(09-30-2024 09:05 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(09-30-2024 09:00 AM)MemTigers1998 Wrote:  What exactly is incorrect?

Did Walz put tampons in men’s bathrooms? Yes

No, he didn't. I didn't bother with the rest.

Of course you didn’t

Like I said, all facts.

Dude, read the ******* law he signed. It doesn't say a thing about tampon's being put in men's bathrooms.

Further, find one school that did please.

(09-28-2024 01:31 PM)fsquid Wrote:  Has anyone actually watched a VP debate?

Sent from my Pixel 6 using Tapatalk

I watched John Edwards v Dick Cheney thinking Edwards would fillet Cheney… I was wrong. I can’t remember one since.

These debates are pointless, VP debate even more so. I’ll probably be watching MLB playoffs

Bumping for Kruciff.

From what I've read, the CBS apparently lied. Shocker!

(09-30-2024 07:59 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(09-28-2024 01:31 PM)fsquid Wrote:  Has anyone actually watched a VP debate?

I will give this one a bit more attention just because I expect Vance to get exposed yet again...which should be entertaining.

This aged well...

(10-02-2024 12:33 PM)oruvoice Wrote:  

(09-30-2024 07:59 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(09-28-2024 01:31 PM)fsquid Wrote:  Has anyone actually watched a VP debate?

I will give this one a bit more attention just because I expect Vance to get exposed yet again...which should be entertaining.

This aged well...

like any low commie T, walz never had a chance …

(09-30-2024 09:07 AM)Marc Mensa Wrote:  I can see why candidates who depend upon lies would applaud this decision. I’d rather there simply be a realtime fact checker in place to flag the lies & force candidates to debate facts & leave their lies to their paid for advertisements.

Too bad the entire Democratic Party wasn’t fact checked for the last 8 years

(10-02-2024 01:21 PM)450bench Wrote:  

(09-30-2024 09:07 AM)Marc Mensa Wrote:  I can see why candidates who depend upon lies would applaud this decision. I’d rather there simply be a realtime fact checker in place to flag the lies & force candidates to debate facts & leave their lies to their paid for advertisements.

Too bad the entire Democratic Party wasn’t fact checked for the last 8 years

Yep, some on here fail to realize that the "fact checking" has only gone one way for a long time now.

(10-02-2024 01:42 PM)VA49er Wrote:  

(10-02-2024 01:21 PM)450bench Wrote:  

(09-30-2024 09:07 AM)Marc Mensa Wrote:  I can see why candidates who depend upon lies would applaud this decision. I’d rather there simply be a realtime fact checker in place to flag the lies & force candidates to debate facts & leave their lies to their paid for advertisements.

Too bad the entire Democratic Party wasn’t fact checked for the last 8 years

Yep, some on here fail to realize that the "fact checking" has only gone one way for a long time now.

Democrats lie. Nobody fact checks.
Republicans tell an inconvenient truth. Media "fact checks" by telling a lie.

(09-30-2024 11:32 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(09-30-2024 09:16 AM)MemTigers1998 Wrote:  

(09-30-2024 09:05 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(09-30-2024 09:00 AM)MemTigers1998 Wrote:  What exactly is incorrect?

Did Walz put tampons in men’s bathrooms? Yes

No, he didn't. I didn't bother with the rest.

Of course you didn’t

Like I said, all facts.

Dude, read the ******* law he signed. It doesn't say a thing about tampon's being put in men's bathrooms.

Further, find one school that did please.

Here is the law, if you're interested:

"121A.212 ACCESS TO MENSTRUAL PRODUCTS.
A school district or charter school must provide students with access to menstrual products at no charge. The products must be available to all menstruating students in restrooms regularly used by students in grades 4 to 12 according to a plan developed by the school district. For purposes of this section, "menstrual products" means pads, tampons, or other similar products used in connection with the menstrual cycle."

https://www.revisor.mn.gov/statutes/cite/121A.212

Because "menstruating students" in Minnesota are allowed to identify as either male or female and use boys' bathrooms, this is a mandate to put tampons in boys restrooms (although a school might be able to get out of this if they do not have any knowledge of any girls who identify as male at the school).

(10-02-2024 02:17 PM)Captain Bearcat Wrote:  

(09-30-2024 11:32 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(09-30-2024 09:16 AM)MemTigers1998 Wrote:  

(09-30-2024 09:05 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(09-30-2024 09:00 AM)MemTigers1998 Wrote:  What exactly is incorrect?

Did Walz put tampons in men’s bathrooms? Yes

No, he didn't. I didn't bother with the rest.

Of course you didn’t

Like I said, all facts.

Dude, read the ******* law he signed. It doesn't say a thing about tampon's being put in men's bathrooms.

Further, find one school that did please.

Here is the law, if you're interested:

"121A.212 ACCESS TO MENSTRUAL PRODUCTS.
A school district or charter school must provide students with access to menstrual products at no charge. The products must be available to all menstruating students in restrooms regularly used by students in grades 4 to 12 according to a plan developed by the school district. For purposes of this section, "menstrual products" means pads, tampons, or other similar products used in connection with the menstrual cycle."

https://www.revisor.mn.gov/statutes/cite/121A.212

Because "menstruating students" in Minnesota are allowed to identify as either male or female and use boys' bathrooms, this is a mandate to put tampons in boys restrooms (although a school might be able to get out of this if they do not have any knowledge of any girls who identify as male at the school).

Thanks, but I've already read the law. Now, please, find the word 'MENS' in the following....

Quote:"121A.212 ACCESS TO MENSTRUAL PRODUCTS.
A school district or charter school must provide students with access to menstrual products at no charge. The products must be available to all menstruating students in restrooms regularly used by students in grades 4 to 12 according to a plan developed by the school district. For purposes of this section, "menstrual products" means pads, tampons, or other similar products used in connection with the menstrual cycle."

And no, menstrual does not count. And as highlighted, the school district makes the plan.

(09-30-2024 12:03 PM)Marc Mensa Wrote:  

(09-28-2024 01:31 PM)fsquid Wrote:  Has anyone actually watched a VP debate?

Sent from my Pixel 6 using Tapatalk

I watched John Edwards v Dick Cheney thinking Edwards would fillet Cheney… I was wrong. I can’t remember one since.

I think most scholars think the Benson-Quayle one was the biggest mismatch of these and HW still won by 400 electoral votes!

(10-02-2024 01:46 PM)bullet Wrote:  

(10-02-2024 01:42 PM)VA49er Wrote:  

(10-02-2024 01:21 PM)450bench Wrote:  

(09-30-2024 09:07 AM)Marc Mensa Wrote:  I can see why candidates who depend upon lies would applaud this decision. I’d rather there simply be a realtime fact checker in place to flag the lies & force candidates to debate facts & leave their lies to their paid for advertisements.

Too bad the entire Democratic Party wasn’t fact checked for the last 8 years

Yep, some on here fail to realize that the "fact checking" has only gone one way for a long time now.

Democrats lie. Nobody fact checks.
Republicans tell an inconvenient truth. Media "fact checks" by telling a lie.

I find it interesting that folks get angry and put out by fact checking. I would think most would welcome actual facts in the discourse.

(09-30-2024 07:59 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(09-28-2024 01:31 PM)fsquid Wrote:  Has anyone actually watched a VP debate?

I watched a few minutes of the last one...just enough to see that fly land on Pence's head, but not usually.

I will give this one a bit more attention just because I expect Vance to get exposed yet again...which should be entertaining.

How'd that exposing thing go again?

(09-30-2024 07:59 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  I will give this one a bit more attention just because I expect Vance to get exposed yet again...which should be entertaining.

You couldn’t possibly see anything in Walz history, style or experience to make you think he would be able to expose… anyone.

(10-02-2024 04:28 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(10-02-2024 01:46 PM)bullet Wrote:  

(10-02-2024 01:42 PM)VA49er Wrote:  

(10-02-2024 01:21 PM)450bench Wrote:  

(09-30-2024 09:07 AM)Marc Mensa Wrote:  I can see why candidates who depend upon lies would applaud this decision. I’d rather there simply be a realtime fact checker in place to flag the lies & force candidates to debate facts & leave their lies to their paid for advertisements.

Too bad the entire Democratic Party wasn’t fact checked for the last 8 years

Yep, some on here fail to realize that the "fact checking" has only gone one way for a long time now.

Democrats lie. Nobody fact checks.
Republicans tell an inconvenient truth. Media "fact checks" by telling a lie.

I find it interesting that folks get angry and put out by fact checking. I would think most would welcome actual facts in the discourse.

Well, when the "fact checkers" constantly lie, it's pretty clear. But, some aren't smart enough to grasp it.

Btw...have you learned the difference between a man and a woman, yet? I'm rooting for you!

(10-03-2024 09:37 AM)oruvoice Wrote:  

(10-02-2024 04:28 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(10-02-2024 01:46 PM)bullet Wrote:  

(10-02-2024 01:42 PM)VA49er Wrote:  

(10-02-2024 01:21 PM)450bench Wrote:  Too bad the entire Democratic Party wasn’t fact checked for the last 8 years

Yep, some on here fail to realize that the "fact checking" has only gone one way for a long time now.

Democrats lie. Nobody fact checks.
Republicans tell an inconvenient truth. Media "fact checks" by telling a lie.

I find it interesting that folks get angry and put out by fact checking. I would think most would welcome actual facts in the discourse.

Well, when the "fact checkers" constantly lie, it's pretty clear. But, some aren't smart enough to grasp it.

Care to point out the lies in the facts presented in the facts checks in the just recent fact checks? Please, be specific.

Quote:Btw...have you learned the difference between a man and a woman, yet? I'm rooting for you!

Nice dodge aside there, cletus. Kind of part and parcel on your mode of operation. Cool cool.

(10-02-2024 04:28 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(10-02-2024 01:46 PM)bullet Wrote:  

(10-02-2024 01:42 PM)VA49er Wrote:  

(10-02-2024 01:21 PM)450bench Wrote:  

(09-30-2024 09:07 AM)Marc Mensa Wrote:  I can see why candidates who depend upon lies would applaud this decision. I’d rather there simply be a realtime fact checker in place to flag the lies & force candidates to debate facts & leave their lies to their paid for advertisements.

Too bad the entire Democratic Party wasn’t fact checked for the last 8 years

Yep, some on here fail to realize that the "fact checking" has only gone one way for a long time now.

Democrats lie. Nobody fact checks.
Republicans tell an inconvenient truth. Media "fact checks" by telling a lie.

I find it interesting that folks get angry and put out by fact checking. I would think most would welcome actual facts in the discourse.

Yeah, too bad the Democratic Party hasn’t been fact checked for the last 8+ years.