(09-19-2024 10:17 AM)miko33 Wrote:  This is all a waste of time. Regardless of the affidavit being true or false - everyone who watched the debate could see that the moderators were biased in how they treated each candidate.

One candidate was not like the other. One claimed people were eating dogs, cats and pets. FFS!

(09-19-2024 10:14 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  Fine, Brzaile gave her all the questions. Again, NONE of that would make this made-up story any more credible.

Neither of us know the veracity of this story. You choose to say it's made up and I choose to say that it wouldn't be surprising based on history.

The fact that is clear to ALL is that ABC put their thumb on the scale to some degree, whether "fact checking" one and not the other or blatantly giving the questions beforehand.

The fact that you lack intellectual honesty and integrity says it all. The media not being honest & fair is a really big deal (whether you fully understand it or not) if you truly believe what you say about "democracy".

Since we're dealing in hypotheticals. I can say with complete confidence that if Harris said that JD Vance ****** couches that the moderators would have told her that was not true.

And there is NO history for this. Brazile, was not the entire news organization at CNN like this "affidavit" claims about ABC.

(09-19-2024 10:32 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  Since we're dealing in hypotheticals. I can say with complete confidence that if Harris said that JD Vance ****** couches that the moderators would have told her that was not true.

We will never know, as the moderators didn't question a single thing Kamala said.

Congrats?

(09-19-2024 10:18 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(09-19-2024 10:17 AM)miko33 Wrote:  This is all a waste of time. Regardless of the affidavit being true or false - everyone who watched the debate could see that the moderators were biased in how they treated each candidate.

One candidate was not like the other. One claimed people were eating dogs, cats and pets. FFS!

The other claimed there were no active duty troops in a combat zone. Check the other thread for troops reaction.

(09-19-2024 11:00 AM)bearcat65 Wrote:  

(09-19-2024 10:18 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(09-19-2024 10:17 AM)miko33 Wrote:  This is all a waste of time. Regardless of the affidavit being true or false - everyone who watched the debate could see that the moderators were biased in how they treated each candidate.

One candidate was not like the other. One claimed people were eating dogs, cats and pets. FFS!

The other claimed there were no active duty troops in a combat zone. Check the other thread for troops reaction.

Actually, Trump said, "They are saying they're eating people's cats and dogs". Which is an accurate statement. Reports are STILL coming out from earlier this year of people complaining online and to authorities that their pets are coming up missing, and ducks and geese getting taken from city parks by Haitians.

(09-19-2024 11:05 AM)Eagleaidaholic Wrote:  

(09-19-2024 11:00 AM)bearcat65 Wrote:  

(09-19-2024 10:18 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(09-19-2024 10:17 AM)miko33 Wrote:  This is all a waste of time. Regardless of the affidavit being true or false - everyone who watched the debate could see that the moderators were biased in how they treated each candidate.

One candidate was not like the other. One claimed people were eating dogs, cats and pets. FFS!

The other claimed there were no active duty troops in a combat zone. Check the other thread for troops reaction.

Actually, Trump said, "They are saying they're eating people's cats and dogs". Which is an accurate statement. Reports are STILL coming out from earlier this year of people complaining online and to authorities that their pets are coming up missing, and ducks and geese getting taken from city parks by Haitians.

Quote:And look at what's happening to the towns all over the United States. And a lot of towns don't want to talk -- not going to be Aurora or Springfield. A lot of towns don't want to talk about it because they're so embarrassed by it. In Springfield, they're eating the dogs. The people that came in. They're eating the cats. They're eating -- they're eating the pets of the people that live there. And this is what's happening in our country. And it's a shame.

Debate Transcript

(09-19-2024 11:00 AM)bearcat65 Wrote:  

(09-19-2024 10:18 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(09-19-2024 10:17 AM)miko33 Wrote:  This is all a waste of time. Regardless of the affidavit being true or false - everyone who watched the debate could see that the moderators were biased in how they treated each candidate.

One candidate was not like the other. One claimed people were eating dogs, cats and pets. FFS!

The other claimed there were no active duty troops in a combat zone. Check the other thread for troops reaction.

Her exact quote:

Quote:And as of today, there is not one member of the United States military who is in active duty in a combat zone in any war zone around the world, the first time this century.

https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/harris-t...=113560542

But this isn't something like her saying JD Vance is ******* a couch...which is the equivalent of the cats and dogs nonsense. It's not too hard to imagine that the moderators wouldn't bet able to fact check this in real time as there's a caveat.

Quote:A Defense Department spokesperson told PolitiFact that the U.S. is not currently engaged in a war, nor does the U.S. military have service members fighting in any active war zones.

However, some U.S. military service members are stationed in areas the U.S. government recognizes as combat zones.

https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/20...ry-in-com/

(09-19-2024 12:10 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(09-19-2024 11:00 AM)bearcat65 Wrote:  

(09-19-2024 10:18 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(09-19-2024 10:17 AM)miko33 Wrote:  This is all a waste of time. Regardless of the affidavit being true or false - everyone who watched the debate could see that the moderators were biased in how they treated each candidate.

One candidate was not like the other. One claimed people were eating dogs, cats and pets. FFS!

The other claimed there were no active duty troops in a combat zone. Check the other thread for troops reaction.

Her exact quote:

Quote:And as of today, there is not one member of the United States military who is in active duty in a combat zone in any war zone around the world, the first time this century.

https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/harris-t...=113560542

But this isn't something like her saying JD Vance is ******* a couch...which is the equivalent of the cats and dogs nonsense. It's not too hard to imagine that the moderators wouldn't bet able to fact check this in real time as there's come caveats.

Quote:A Defense Department spokesperson told PolitiFact that the U.S. is not currently engaged in a war, nor does the U.S. military have service members fighting in any active war zones.

However, some U.S. military service members are stationed in areas the U.S. government recognizes as combat zones.

https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/20...ry-in-com/

She lied.

(09-19-2024 10:18 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(09-19-2024 10:17 AM)miko33 Wrote:  This is all a waste of time. Regardless of the affidavit being true or false - everyone who watched the debate could see that the moderators were biased in how they treated each candidate.

One candidate was not like the other. One claimed people were eating dogs, cats and pets. FFS!

One claimed there's not US forces in war zones.
One claimed that the opponent is pandering Project 2025
One claimed at least three other false hoaxes against the other candidate (i.e. Charlottesville, bloodbath, etc)
One blamed China for COVID yet previously claimed the other candidate was racist for calling out China for the origins of COVID
One claimed that the other candidate would create and sign a national abortion ban
One claimed she's pro-gun after consistently calling for mandatory buy backs.

One pretty much lied with virtually every single statement that was made.

Numerous lies. None of them fact checked. As others said, a paper document isn't needed. Anyone who couldn't see the truth that this was a complete ambush and that the fix was in lacks simple basic human comprehension skills.

(09-19-2024 12:11 PM)bearcat65 Wrote:  

(09-19-2024 12:10 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(09-19-2024 11:00 AM)bearcat65 Wrote:  

(09-19-2024 10:18 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(09-19-2024 10:17 AM)miko33 Wrote:  This is all a waste of time. Regardless of the affidavit being true or false - everyone who watched the debate could see that the moderators were biased in how they treated each candidate.

One candidate was not like the other. One claimed people were eating dogs, cats and pets. FFS!

The other claimed there were no active duty troops in a combat zone. Check the other thread for troops reaction.

Her exact quote:

Quote:And as of today, there is not one member of the United States military who is in active duty in a combat zone in any war zone around the world, the first time this century.

https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/harris-t...=113560542

But this isn't something like her saying JD Vance is ******* a couch...which is the equivalent of the cats and dogs nonsense. It's not too hard to imagine that the moderators wouldn't bet able to fact check this in real time as there's come caveats.

Quote:A Defense Department spokesperson told PolitiFact that the U.S. is not currently engaged in a war, nor does the U.S. military have service members fighting in any active war zones.

However, some U.S. military service members are stationed in areas the U.S. government recognizes as combat zones.

https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/20...ry-in-com/

She lied.

No way...a politician didn't tell the truth. Shocker.

(09-19-2024 12:12 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(09-19-2024 12:11 PM)bearcat65 Wrote:  

(09-19-2024 12:10 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(09-19-2024 11:00 AM)bearcat65 Wrote:  

(09-19-2024 10:18 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  One candidate was not like the other. One claimed people were eating dogs, cats and pets. FFS!

The other claimed there were no active duty troops in a combat zone. Check the other thread for troops reaction.

Her exact quote:

Quote:And as of today, there is not one member of the United States military who is in active duty in a combat zone in any war zone around the world, the first time this century.

https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/harris-t...=113560542

But this isn't something like her saying JD Vance is ******* a couch...which is the equivalent of the cats and dogs nonsense. It's not too hard to imagine that the moderators wouldn't bet able to fact check this in real time as there's come caveats.

Quote:A Defense Department spokesperson told PolitiFact that the U.S. is not currently engaged in a war, nor does the U.S. military have service members fighting in any active war zones.

However, some U.S. military service members are stationed in areas the U.S. government recognizes as combat zones.

https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/20...ry-in-com/

She lied.

No way...a politician didn't tell the truth. Shocker.

So it's bad when Trump does it but okay when Kamala does since she's a politician/democrat. Got it.

To not acknowledge the media bias, blatant media bias, is a credibility killer in and of itself.

(09-19-2024 12:20 PM)450bench Wrote:  To not acknowledge the media bias, blatant media bias, is a credibility killer in and of itself.

Not to mention a sign of a really low IQ.

(09-19-2024 12:17 PM)bearcat65 Wrote:  

(09-19-2024 12:12 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(09-19-2024 12:11 PM)bearcat65 Wrote:  

(09-19-2024 12:10 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(09-19-2024 11:00 AM)bearcat65 Wrote:  The other claimed there were no active duty troops in a combat zone. Check the other thread for troops reaction.

Her exact quote:

Quote:And as of today, there is not one member of the United States military who is in active duty in a combat zone in any war zone around the world, the first time this century.

https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/harris-t...=113560542

But this isn't something like her saying JD Vance is ******* a couch...which is the equivalent of the cats and dogs nonsense. It's not too hard to imagine that the moderators wouldn't bet able to fact check this in real time as there's come caveats.

Quote:A Defense Department spokesperson told PolitiFact that the U.S. is not currently engaged in a war, nor does the U.S. military have service members fighting in any active war zones.

However, some U.S. military service members are stationed in areas the U.S. government recognizes as combat zones.

https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/20...ry-in-com/

She lied.

No way...a politician didn't tell the truth. Shocker.

So it's bad when Trump does it but okay when Kamala does since she's a politician/democrat. Got it.

It's bad when they all do it. I don't expect ANY moderator to be able to fact check every utterance out of each of their mouths as nothing would get covered.

Again, she said nothing even close to something so ridiculous as people eating cats and dogs and pets.

Do you see me bitching about all the other things trump just made up in the debate? No, because it's what they do in these things.

(09-19-2024 10:18 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(09-19-2024 10:17 AM)miko33 Wrote:  This is all a waste of time. Regardless of the affidavit being true or false - everyone who watched the debate could see that the moderators were biased in how they treated each candidate.

One candidate was not like the other. One claimed people were eating dogs, cats and pets. FFS!

But you know they aren’t. Just because you know. Right?

Clairvoyant are ya?

(09-19-2024 12:30 PM)Was SoMs Eagle Wrote:  

(09-19-2024 10:18 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(09-19-2024 10:17 AM)miko33 Wrote:  This is all a waste of time. Regardless of the affidavit being true or false - everyone who watched the debate could see that the moderators were biased in how they treated each candidate.

One candidate was not like the other. One claimed people were eating dogs, cats and pets. FFS!

But you know they aren’t. Just because you know. Right?

Clairvoyant are ya?

No, dude. You don't prove something isn't happening. You prove it is. There has been ZERO proof of it happening.

(09-19-2024 12:30 PM)Was SoMs Eagle Wrote:  

(09-19-2024 10:18 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(09-19-2024 10:17 AM)miko33 Wrote:  This is all a waste of time. Regardless of the affidavit being true or false - everyone who watched the debate could see that the moderators were biased in how they treated each candidate.

One candidate was not like the other. One claimed people were eating dogs, cats and pets. FFS!

But you know they aren’t. Just because you know. Right?

Clairvoyant are ya?

Because the media told him it wasn’t happening.

(09-19-2024 12:23 PM)BartlettTigerFan Wrote:  

(09-19-2024 12:20 PM)450bench Wrote:  To not acknowledge the media bias, blatant media bias, is a credibility killer in and of itself.

Not to mention a sign of a really low IQ.

They believe their lies

Its fsscinating. Like cultists.

Indictrination is complete.





Filth

(09-19-2024 12:24 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(09-19-2024 12:17 PM)bearcat65 Wrote:  

(09-19-2024 12:12 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(09-19-2024 12:11 PM)bearcat65 Wrote:  

(09-19-2024 12:10 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  Her exact quote:
https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/harris-t...=113560542

But this isn't something like her saying JD Vance is ******* a couch...which is the equivalent of the cats and dogs nonsense. It's not too hard to imagine that the moderators wouldn't bet able to fact check this in real time as there's come caveats.

https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/20...ry-in-com/

She lied.

No way...a politician didn't tell the truth. Shocker.

So it's bad when Trump does it but okay when Kamala does since she's a politician/democrat. Got it.

It's bad when they all do it. I don't expect ANY moderator to be able to fact check every utterance out of each of their mouths as nothing would get covered.

Again, she said nothing even close to something so ridiculous as people eating cats and dogs and pets.

Do you see me bitching about all the other things trump just made up in the debate? No, because it's what they do in these things.

Except Haitians do eat cats:

https://redirect.viglink.com/?format=go&...-cats.html

And people have been reporting it:
https://redirect.viglink.com/?format=go&...97256.html

Media coverage and the debate moderators were biased and it's not even debatable.