(09-19-2024 09:58 AM)oruvoice Wrote:  So many words...to say absolutely nothing.

To some it very well may seem as nothing, I am sure.

(09-19-2024 10:06 AM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(09-19-2024 09:58 AM)oruvoice Wrote:  So many words...to say absolutely nothing.

To some it very well may seem as nothing, I am sure.

To people that speak plainly and truthfully, yes.

NEW: Josh Hawley Drops Disturbing Whistleblower Info on Second Assassination Attempt

(09-19-2024 01:26 AM)TripleA Wrote:  

(09-18-2024 10:56 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(09-18-2024 10:53 PM)TripleA Wrote:  "Biden willingly ceded that right to someone else."

I spit water on my keyboard. That's twice today!

Care to enlighten us with your plethora of first hand insights? Or just dissemble with the best of them.....

Sure. You said that, of course. Word for word.

Talk about dissembling.

Kindly explain the process that allowed Biden to "willingly cede the right to" run for president to Kamala Harris. Willingly? Not the least bit of coercion by anybody else? Not the least bit of sadness, regret or anger on Biden's part, or on the part of his family?

You don't really believe that.

He didn't answer my simple question about that, so I doubt you get one either.

He is going to stick to "technically" the dems can do anything they want because it's in the bylaws... even though the way this went down is unprecedented and about as far from "democratic" (yes the irony) as it gets .... He will continue to act like this was business as usual and all good in the democratic hood. Even though everyone in the entire world with even half a brain knows what really happened.

Lawyer Schick

Sent from my SM-S928U using Tapatalk

(09-19-2024 05:19 PM)maximus Wrote:  

(09-19-2024 01:26 AM)TripleA Wrote:  

(09-18-2024 10:56 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(09-18-2024 10:53 PM)TripleA Wrote:  "Biden willingly ceded that right to someone else."

I spit water on my keyboard. That's twice today!

Care to enlighten us with your plethora of first hand insights? Or just dissemble with the best of them.....

Sure. You said that, of course. Word for word.

Talk about dissembling.

Kindly explain the process that allowed Biden to "willingly cede the right to" run for president to Kamala Harris. Willingly? Not the least bit of coercion by anybody else? Not the least bit of sadness, regret or anger on Biden's part, or on the part of his family?

You don't really believe that.

He didn't answer my simple question about that, so I doubt you get one either.

He is going to stick to "technically" the dems can do anything they want because it's in the bylaws... even though the way this went down is unprecedented and about as far from "democratic" (yes the irony) as it gets .... He will continue to act like this was business as usual and all good in the democratic hood. Even though everyone in the entire world with even half a brain knows what really happened.

Lawyer Schick

Sent from my SM-S928U using Tapatalk

I already answered. Pretty much in full.
https://csnbbs.com/thread-993512-post-19...id19757274

Notwithstanding your off topic personal lamentations above.

(09-19-2024 05:24 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(09-19-2024 05:19 PM)maximus Wrote:  

(09-19-2024 01:26 AM)TripleA Wrote:  

(09-18-2024 10:56 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(09-18-2024 10:53 PM)TripleA Wrote:  "Biden willingly ceded that right to someone else."

I spit water on my keyboard. That's twice today!

Care to enlighten us with your plethora of first hand insights? Or just dissemble with the best of them.....

Sure. You said that, of course. Word for word.

Talk about dissembling.

Kindly explain the process that allowed Biden to "willingly cede the right to" run for president to Kamala Harris. Willingly? Not the least bit of coercion by anybody else? Not the least bit of sadness, regret or anger on Biden's part, or on the part of his family?

You don't really believe that.

He didn't answer my simple question about that, so I doubt you get one either.

He is going to stick to "technically" the dems can do anything they want because it's in the bylaws... even though the way this went down is unprecedented and about as far from "democratic" (yes the irony) as it gets .... He will continue to act like this was business as usual and all good in the democratic hood. Even though everyone in the entire world with even half a brain knows what really happened.

Lawyer Schick

Sent from my SM-S928U using Tapatalk

I already answered. Pretty much in full.
https://csnbbs.com/thread-993512-post-19...id19757274

Notwithstanding your off topic personal lamentations above.

You didn't answer my question and you provided yet another lawyer shtick kamala like word salad answer to his.

And like Triple A said.... you can't believe a word you're posting.

It's OK, just say you are OK with a silent coup and stop wasting your time trying to explain away this unprecedented square peg into the "democracy" round hole.



Sent from my SM-S928U using Tapatalk

Oh.... and who the hell is currently the executive running the country?

Sent from my SM-S928U using Tapatalk

(09-19-2024 07:14 PM)maximus Wrote:  

(09-19-2024 05:24 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(09-19-2024 05:19 PM)maximus Wrote:  

(09-19-2024 01:26 AM)TripleA Wrote:  

(09-18-2024 10:56 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  Care to enlighten us with your plethora of first hand insights? Or just dissemble with the best of them.....

Sure. You said that, of course. Word for word.

Talk about dissembling.

Kindly explain the process that allowed Biden to "willingly cede the right to" run for president to Kamala Harris. Willingly? Not the least bit of coercion by anybody else? Not the least bit of sadness, regret or anger on Biden's part, or on the part of his family?

You don't really believe that.

He didn't answer my simple question about that, so I doubt you get one either.

He is going to stick to "technically" the dems can do anything they want because it's in the bylaws... even though the way this went down is unprecedented and about as far from "democratic" (yes the irony) as it gets .... He will continue to act like this was business as usual and all good in the democratic hood. Even though everyone in the entire world with even half a brain knows what really happened.

Lawyer Schick

Sent from my SM-S928U using Tapatalk

I already answered. Pretty much in full.
https://csnbbs.com/thread-993512-post-19...id19757274

Notwithstanding your off topic personal lamentations above.

You didn't answer my question and you provided yet another lawyer shtick kamala like word salad answer to his.

And like Triple A said.... you can't believe a word you're posting.

It's OK, just say you are OK with a silent coup and stop wasting your time trying to explain away this unprecedented square peg into the "democracy" round hole.

Funny, as I said -- I am absolutely fine with any private group doing that that group feels they need to do (within the law).

The Ds found themselves in a situation that was disadvantageous. They improvised, they overcame. As a group. And I havent heard any complaints from that group.

The only people complaining are the Trumpies. If you hadnt noticed. Funny that.

The people most affected by the bow out, and the re-selection --- seem to be the Rs. They are the ones complaining up a storm. Just. Like. You. Above.

Silent coup? Pretty much rhetorically thin and stupid, Id say. Considering no one from within that group that would be the main victim in your frothing seems to be complaining.

Bummer for you they did this, did it seamlessly, and have done it without internal complaining or bitching. Interesting you are the champion for them -- even though no one on the D side seems to be put out. Most normal people would denote that as really odd.

Cant wait to hear more of your complaining for them. Especially since they dont seem to be complaining at all.

(09-19-2024 07:27 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(09-19-2024 07:14 PM)maximus Wrote:  

(09-19-2024 05:24 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(09-19-2024 05:19 PM)maximus Wrote:  

(09-19-2024 01:26 AM)TripleA Wrote:  Sure. You said that, of course. Word for word.

Talk about dissembling.

Kindly explain the process that allowed Biden to "willingly cede the right to" run for president to Kamala Harris. Willingly? Not the least bit of coercion by anybody else? Not the least bit of sadness, regret or anger on Biden's part, or on the part of his family?

You don't really believe that.

He didn't answer my simple question about that, so I doubt you get one either.

He is going to stick to "technically" the dems can do anything they want because it's in the bylaws... even though the way this went down is unprecedented and about as far from "democratic" (yes the irony) as it gets .... He will continue to act like this was business as usual and all good in the democratic hood. Even though everyone in the entire world with even half a brain knows what really happened.

Lawyer Schick

Sent from my SM-S928U using Tapatalk

I already answered. Pretty much in full.
https://csnbbs.com/thread-993512-post-19...id19757274

Notwithstanding your off topic personal lamentations above.

You didn't answer my question and you provided yet another lawyer shtick kamala like word salad answer to his.

And like Triple A said.... you can't believe a word you're posting.

It's OK, just say you are OK with a silent coup and stop wasting your time trying to explain away this unprecedented square peg into the "democracy" round hole.

Funny, as I said -- I am absolutely fine with any private group doing that that group feels they need to do (within the law).

The Ds found themselves in a situation that was disadvantageous. They improvised, they overcame. As a group. And I havent heard any complaints from that group.

The only people complaining are the Trumpies. If you hadnt noticed. Funny that.

The people most affected by the bow out, and the re-selection --- seem to be the Rs. They are the ones complaining up a storm. Just. Like. You. Above.

Silent coup? Pretty much rhetorically thin and stupid, Id say. Considering no one from within that group that would be the main victim in your frothing seems to be complaining.

Bummer for you they did this, did it seamlessly, and have done it without internal complaining or bitching. Interesting you are the champion for them -- even though no one on the D side seems to be put out. Most normal people would denote that as really odd.

Cant wait to hear more of your complaining for them. Especially since they dont seem to be complaining at all.

Who do expect to report on those disenfranchised voters who didn't vote for Cumswala and surely wouldn't vote for her in a primary of her and 10 dead people. Which outlet is going to do their j.o.b. and find those people and actually report on it?

Why is she hiding in the basement if she is so damn good and so damn popular?

And why did Biden exit the race again? You know, in unprecedented fashion.

Sent from my SM-S928U using Tapatalk

Forgot, I did read this last night.... it was on Yahoo news and written by Fox so it's probably fake, I guess. Maybe ABC or NBC will do a follow up interview of this dim.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/democratic-op...29404.html

Sent from my SM-S928U using Tapatalk

It’s not complaining, it’s simply pointing the hypocrisy of the “saving democracy” Dems. They dumped an old vegetable and installed someone who may be an even bigger imbecile. That’s a toss up.

(09-19-2024 07:39 PM)maximus Wrote:  

(09-19-2024 07:27 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(09-19-2024 07:14 PM)maximus Wrote:  

(09-19-2024 05:24 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(09-19-2024 05:19 PM)maximus Wrote:  He didn't answer my simple question about that, so I doubt you get one either.

He is going to stick to "technically" the dems can do anything they want because it's in the bylaws... even though the way this went down is unprecedented and about as far from "democratic" (yes the irony) as it gets .... He will continue to act like this was business as usual and all good in the democratic hood. Even though everyone in the entire world with even half a brain knows what really happened.

Lawyer Schick

Sent from my SM-S928U using Tapatalk

I already answered. Pretty much in full.
https://csnbbs.com/thread-993512-post-19...id19757274

Notwithstanding your off topic personal lamentations above.

You didn't answer my question and you provided yet another lawyer shtick kamala like word salad answer to his.

And like Triple A said.... you can't believe a word you're posting.

It's OK, just say you are OK with a silent coup and stop wasting your time trying to explain away this unprecedented square peg into the "democracy" round hole.

Funny, as I said -- I am absolutely fine with any private group doing that that group feels they need to do (within the law).

The Ds found themselves in a situation that was disadvantageous. They improvised, they overcame. As a group. And I havent heard any complaints from that group.

The only people complaining are the Trumpies. If you hadnt noticed. Funny that.

The people most affected by the bow out, and the re-selection --- seem to be the Rs. They are the ones complaining up a storm. Just. Like. You. Above.

Silent coup? Pretty much rhetorically thin and stupid, Id say. Considering no one from within that group that would be the main victim in your frothing seems to be complaining.

Bummer for you they did this, did it seamlessly, and have done it without internal complaining or bitching. Interesting you are the champion for them -- even though no one on the D side seems to be put out. Most normal people would denote that as really odd.

Cant wait to hear more of your complaining for them. Especially since they dont seem to be complaining at all.

Who do expect to report on those disenfranchised voters who didn't vote for Cumswala and surely wouldn't vote for her in a primary of her and 10 dead people. Which outlet is going to do their j.o.b. and find those people and actually report on it?

Ohhhh.... the poor scared democrats whom you are defending are *also* being *silenced*. Lolz.

Quote:Why is she hiding in the basement if she is so damn good and so damn popular?

Rather irrelevant. Being popular does not equal 'complaining about how she was selected'. Interesting side turn there.

Quote:And why did Biden exit the race again? You know, in unprecedented fashion.

And again -- relevance? Or just another reflex complaint there?

Probably because they had a series of tough talks with him, and finally got him to see the light he probably would not win.

From his letter:

Quote:And while it has been my intention to seek reelection, I believe it is in the best interest of my party and the country for me to stand down and to focus solely on fulfilling my duties as President for the remainder of my term.

Im also intrigued that in this you are the bright, shining star championing the horrible misuse of the people in the Democratic party in this (even though they arent complaining at all about it), you dont seem to exhibit that bright shining star to champion the folks who have been referred to (on live TV and in front of 70 million people), as a group, "eating the dogs.... eating the cats.... eating the pets" -- falsely in the aggregate.

And dont seem to exhibit that same umbrage of rights for the same group of people (Haitians in Springfield) who, even though are in the US legally (under the TPS program), were referred to in the passage as 'illegal immigrants' who are 'swarming across our nation.'

Not a peep of defending the Springfield Haitians from that, but jumping up and down and around in defending the poor downtrodden Democrats from an action. An action that they arent complaining about at all.

Quite the resume there of being the defender of rights -- very evenly applied. <slow clap>

(09-19-2024 07:41 PM)maximus Wrote:  Forgot, I did read this last night.... it was on Yahoo news and written by Fox so it's probably fake, I guess. Maybe ABC or NBC will do a follow up interview of this dim.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/democratic-op...29404.html

Stop the presses. Maximus has *found* disaffected Democrats. Albeit not disaffected in the manner in the current subject.

But huzzah!!!! Maximus posts about a couple of disaffected Dems.

Truly earth shattering stuff.

ANd for the record, it probably is real. Immaterial though. But probably real.

(09-19-2024 07:43 PM)MemTigers1998 Wrote:  It’s not complaining, it’s simply pointing the hypocrisy of the “saving democracy” Dems. They dumped an old vegetable and installed someone who may be an even bigger imbecile. That’s a toss up.

Can you name a Constitutional procedure that the Democrats **** on in their decision to change candidates? Important point -- note the phrase "their decision" along with the basic fact of "their group".

And yes, when a sitting President *decides* to try and **** on the mechanisms embedded in the Constitution, and in the law, regarding the transfer of power -- I do rate that as *just* a *little* more important that trying to scold a group in how *they as a group* decided on a candidate.

And again, nice job championing how terrible the issue in the Democrats. Last I saw they arent complaining about *their* own *internal decision* on how to appraoch that change in candidates.

Glad you are a super duper red white and blue protector of rights, Mom, and apple pie on this. Lolz. Kind of stupid to do that when the group you are bitching about their own *internal* methods hasnt complained a peep.

Prrrrrettyyyyyyyy cooooollll.

(09-19-2024 07:27 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(09-19-2024 07:14 PM)maximus Wrote:  

(09-19-2024 05:24 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(09-19-2024 05:19 PM)maximus Wrote:  

(09-19-2024 01:26 AM)TripleA Wrote:  Sure. You said that, of course. Word for word.

Talk about dissembling.

Kindly explain the process that allowed Biden to "willingly cede the right to" run for president to Kamala Harris. Willingly? Not the least bit of coercion by anybody else? Not the least bit of sadness, regret or anger on Biden's part, or on the part of his family?

You don't really believe that.

He didn't answer my simple question about that, so I doubt you get one either.

He is going to stick to "technically" the dems can do anything they want because it's in the bylaws... even though the way this went down is unprecedented and about as far from "democratic" (yes the irony) as it gets .... He will continue to act like this was business as usual and all good in the democratic hood. Even though everyone in the entire world with even half a brain knows what really happened.

Lawyer Schick

Sent from my SM-S928U using Tapatalk

I already answered. Pretty much in full.
https://csnbbs.com/thread-993512-post-19...id19757274

Notwithstanding your off topic personal lamentations above.

You didn't answer my question and you provided yet another lawyer shtick kamala like word salad answer to his.

And like Triple A said.... you can't believe a word you're posting.

It's OK, just say you are OK with a silent coup and stop wasting your time trying to explain away this unprecedented square peg into the "democracy" round hole.

Funny, as I said -- I am absolutely fine with any private group doing that that group feels they need to do (within the law).

The Ds found themselves in a situation that was disadvantageous. They improvised, they overcame. As a group. And I havent heard any complaints from that group.

The only people complaining are the Trumpies. If you hadnt noticed. Funny that.

The people most affected by the bow out, and the re-selection --- seem to be the Rs. They are the ones complaining up a storm. Just. Like. You. Above.

Silent coup? Pretty much rhetorically thin and stupid, Id say. Considering no one from within that group that would be the main victim in your frothing seems to be complaining.

Bummer for you they did this, did it seamlessly, and have done it without internal complaining or bitching. Interesting you are the champion for them -- even though no one on the D side seems to be put out. Most normal people would denote that as really odd.

Cant wait to hear more of your complaining for them. Especially since they dont seem to be complaining at all.

" I am absolutely fine with any private group doing that that group feels they need to do"

Now that's a laugh on a National Level.

(09-19-2024 11:39 PM)Redbanksdog Wrote:  

(09-19-2024 07:27 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(09-19-2024 07:14 PM)maximus Wrote:  

(09-19-2024 05:24 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(09-19-2024 05:19 PM)maximus Wrote:  He didn't answer my simple question about that, so I doubt you get one either.

He is going to stick to "technically" the dems can do anything they want because it's in the bylaws... even though the way this went down is unprecedented and about as far from "democratic" (yes the irony) as it gets .... He will continue to act like this was business as usual and all good in the democratic hood. Even though everyone in the entire world with even half a brain knows what really happened.

Lawyer Schick

Sent from my SM-S928U using Tapatalk

I already answered. Pretty much in full.
https://csnbbs.com/thread-993512-post-19...id19757274

Notwithstanding your off topic personal lamentations above.

You didn't answer my question and you provided yet another lawyer shtick kamala like word salad answer to his.

And like Triple A said.... you can't believe a word you're posting.

It's OK, just say you are OK with a silent coup and stop wasting your time trying to explain away this unprecedented square peg into the "democracy" round hole.

Funny, as I said -- I am absolutely fine with any private group doing that that group feels they need to do (within the law).

The Ds found themselves in a situation that was disadvantageous. They improvised, they overcame. As a group. And I havent heard any complaints from that group.

The only people complaining are the Trumpies. If you hadnt noticed. Funny that.

The people most affected by the bow out, and the re-selection --- seem to be the Rs. They are the ones complaining up a storm. Just. Like. You. Above.

Silent coup? Pretty much rhetorically thin and stupid, Id say. Considering no one from within that group that would be the main victim in your frothing seems to be complaining.

Bummer for you they did this, did it seamlessly, and have done it without internal complaining or bitching. Interesting you are the champion for them -- even though no one on the D side seems to be put out. Most normal people would denote that as really odd.

Cant wait to hear more of your complaining for them. Especially since they dont seem to be complaining at all.

" I am absolutely fine with any private group doing that that group feels they need to do"

Now that's a laugh on a National Level.

I take it you dont think the Ds have any right to decide on *how* they wish to select a candidate?

This could be fun to read.......

And yes, I am perfectly fine with any political group choosing their own candidate with whatever means *they* choose to employ as a group.

When a candidate drops out with 10 days to go to the actual nomination -- even more so when choosing a replacement. Imagine that.

Here’s something for you to chew on, lawyer boy:

Quote:The essential elements of fraud are:
False and willful representation or assertion
Intentional misrepresentation of a material fact
Knowledge that the representation is false
Reliance on the fact by the recipient of the information
Making a claim that is not true
Knowing that the claim was false or making the claim in a reckless manner

Your inability to see past the (admittedly blinding) shortcomings of Donald Trump has got you running cover for people who are leagues worse. Private action does not excuse taking advantage of others - - for their money and for their political support.

If I thought you were dumb - - along the lines of Mensa or Mr. X. - - I’d feel a bit sorry for you. But I don’t think you are dumb. I think you are underhanded, rude and malignant.

[Having said that, you’ve done right by owl#s on this forum. That at least is appreciated by all.]

(09-20-2024 04:38 AM)AdoptedMonarch Wrote:  Here’s something for you to chew on, lawyer boy:

Quote:The essential elements of fraud are:
False and willful representation or assertion
Intentional misrepresentation of a material fact
Knowledge that the representation is false
Reliance on the fact by the recipient of the information
Making a claim that is not true
Knowing that the claim was false or making the claim in a reckless manner

Your inability to see past the (admittedly blinding) shortcomings of Donald Trump has got you running cover for people who are leagues worse. Private action does not excuse taking advantage of others - - for their money and for their political support.

If I thought you were dumb - - along the lines of Mensa or Mr. X. - - I’d feel a bit sorry for you. But I don’t think you are dumb. I think you are underhanded, rude and malignant.

[Having said that, you’ve done right by owl#s on this forum. That at least is appreciated by all.]

When you remove all of the personal asides -- what is left that actually has anything to do with the subject at hand?

(09-19-2024 11:39 PM)Redbanksdog Wrote:  

(09-19-2024 07:27 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(09-19-2024 07:14 PM)maximus Wrote:  

(09-19-2024 05:24 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(09-19-2024 05:19 PM)maximus Wrote:  He didn't answer my simple question about that, so I doubt you get one either.

He is going to stick to "technically" the dems can do anything they want because it's in the bylaws... even though the way this went down is unprecedented and about as far from "democratic" (yes the irony) as it gets .... He will continue to act like this was business as usual and all good in the democratic hood. Even though everyone in the entire world with even half a brain knows what really happened.

Lawyer Schick

Sent from my SM-S928U using Tapatalk

I already answered. Pretty much in full.
https://csnbbs.com/thread-993512-post-19...id19757274

Notwithstanding your off topic personal lamentations above.

You didn't answer my question and you provided yet another lawyer shtick kamala like word salad answer to his.

And like Triple A said.... you can't believe a word you're posting.

It's OK, just say you are OK with a silent coup and stop wasting your time trying to explain away this unprecedented square peg into the "democracy" round hole.

Funny, as I said -- I am absolutely fine with any private group doing that that group feels they need to do (within the law).

The Ds found themselves in a situation that was disadvantageous. They improvised, they overcame. As a group. And I havent heard any complaints from that group.

The only people complaining are the Trumpies. If you hadnt noticed. Funny that.

The people most affected by the bow out, and the re-selection --- seem to be the Rs. They are the ones complaining up a storm. Just. Like. You. Above.

Silent coup? Pretty much rhetorically thin and stupid, Id say. Considering no one from within that group that would be the main victim in your frothing seems to be complaining.

Bummer for you they did this, did it seamlessly, and have done it without internal complaining or bitching. Interesting you are the champion for them -- even though no one on the D side seems to be put out. Most normal people would denote that as really odd.

Cant wait to hear more of your complaining for them. Especially since they dont seem to be complaining at all.

" I am absolutely fine with any private group doing that that group feels they need to do"

Now that's a laugh on a National Level.

Dems are free to choose a candidate any way they want to. Just don’t gaslight Americans saying you’re “saving democracy” when you don’t even have a democratic process of choosing your candidate. It’s hypocritical. The Dems just need to own their hypocrisy.

(09-19-2024 07:21 PM)maximus Wrote:  Oh.... and who the hell is currently the executive running the country?

Sent from my SM-S928U using Tapatalk

We have never known that since Bribem was sworn in. And we sure as hell don’t know now. And we will not know if Harris is elected. The first love of the democrat elite, the shadow government run for profit.