(08-29-2024 03:41 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(08-29-2024 03:16 PM)oruvoice Wrote:  

(08-29-2024 03:11 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(08-29-2024 02:48 PM)oruvoice Wrote:  

(08-29-2024 02:40 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  Here is the comment from an organization that would spooge in their pants to find such a false statement:

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/arlingt...arges-army

it is wild that an idiot like you will gladly quaff down **** from theconservativetreehouse as nothing but truth, but when it comes to anything that rolls against your theology -- you go into the 'fk it, ah aynt gonner beeleev anytang ohnles aye hole it en my ohn lil idyat hands.'

Quite the look there.

And the funny thing is -- the letter from the 51 never said that it was Russian disinformation. Too fing ignorant on that comment to state the actual facts there as well I see.

The 51 never said it was russian disinformation?

Have you even read the letter, sparkles?

I mean, such an astute person who demands hard copy of a statement from the Army *must* have read the letter, right? Lolz. Its pretty fing obvious that you havent from your comments.

Tell you what, sparkles, read the letter. Come back to us and say where they say that. Should be easy.

Oh. I forgot. You're doing the lawyer thing. This is where you say that they "had reason to believe it was russian disinfo", but they never said it was 100%. Just really likely. When they KNEW it was a lie.

When we say that you are a complete phony, this is what we're talking about. You are not to be taken seriously, as much as you may crave to be, more than anything else.

Have you read the letter? You keep avoiding that question.

Yes. Now, I do I get to read your post filled with legal gymnastics explaining it away?!? I hope so. I need another good laugh at you!

(08-29-2024 03:44 PM)oruvoice Wrote:  

(08-29-2024 03:41 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(08-29-2024 03:16 PM)oruvoice Wrote:  

(08-29-2024 03:11 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(08-29-2024 02:48 PM)oruvoice Wrote:  The 51 never said it was russian disinformation?

Have you even read the letter, sparkles?

I mean, such an astute person who demands hard copy of a statement from the Army *must* have read the letter, right? Lolz. Its pretty fing obvious that you havent from your comments.

Tell you what, sparkles, read the letter. Come back to us and say where they say that. Should be easy.

Oh. I forgot. You're doing the lawyer thing. This is where you say that they "had reason to believe it was russian disinfo", but they never said it was 100%. Just really likely. When they KNEW it was a lie.

When we say that you are a complete phony, this is what we're talking about. You are not to be taken seriously, as much as you may crave to be, more than anything else.

Have you read the letter? You keep avoiding that question.

Yes. Now, I do I get to read your post filled with legal gymnastics explaining it away?!? I hope so. I need another good laugh at you!

Affirmative tanq always trying to prove he is smart enough

(08-29-2024 03:44 PM)oruvoice Wrote:  

(08-29-2024 03:41 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(08-29-2024 03:16 PM)oruvoice Wrote:  

(08-29-2024 03:11 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(08-29-2024 02:48 PM)oruvoice Wrote:  The 51 never said it was russian disinformation?

Have you even read the letter, sparkles?

I mean, such an astute person who demands hard copy of a statement from the Army *must* have read the letter, right? Lolz. Its pretty fing obvious that you havent from your comments.

Tell you what, sparkles, read the letter. Come back to us and say where they say that. Should be easy.

Oh. I forgot. You're doing the lawyer thing. This is where you say that they "had reason to believe it was russian disinfo", but they never said it was 100%. Just really likely. When they KNEW it was a lie.

When we say that you are a complete phony, this is what we're talking about. You are not to be taken seriously, as much as you may crave to be, more than anything else.

Have you read the letter? You keep avoiding that question.

Yes. Now, I do I get to read your post filled with legal gymnastics explaining it away?!? I hope so. I need another good laugh at you!

Glad you read it.

I guess you did not understand the parts, like -- "We want to emphasize that we do not know if the emails, provided to the New York Post by
President Trump’s personal attorney Rudy Giuliani, are genuine or not and that we do not have evidence of Russian involvement". Apparently not.

The worst they say is that they are "suspicious" of the issue.

But apparently in your mind that is them saying the laptop is disinformatiot.

Not a legal question at all. Merely one of reading basic English and the comprehension that comes from that reading.

Not 'legal gymnastics' at all. Just some nincompoop not necessarily understanding the message in the letter, and blanket repeating what it expressly does not say.

(08-29-2024 03:52 PM)shere khan Wrote:  

(08-29-2024 03:44 PM)oruvoice Wrote:  

(08-29-2024 03:41 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(08-29-2024 03:16 PM)oruvoice Wrote:  

(08-29-2024 03:11 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  Have you even read the letter, sparkles?

I mean, such an astute person who demands hard copy of a statement from the Army *must* have read the letter, right? Lolz. Its pretty fing obvious that you havent from your comments.

Tell you what, sparkles, read the letter. Come back to us and say where they say that. Should be easy.

Oh. I forgot. You're doing the lawyer thing. This is where you say that they "had reason to believe it was russian disinfo", but they never said it was 100%. Just really likely. When they KNEW it was a lie.

When we say that you are a complete phony, this is what we're talking about. You are not to be taken seriously, as much as you may crave to be, more than anything else.

Have you read the letter? You keep avoiding that question.

Yes. Now, I do I get to read your post filled with legal gymnastics explaining it away?!? I hope so. I need another good laugh at you!

Affirmative tanq always trying to prove he is smart enough

Nope, just pointing out the value of understanding items that are written down.

Go git-em, Tig-boy!!!

(08-29-2024 03:56 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(08-29-2024 03:44 PM)oruvoice Wrote:  

(08-29-2024 03:41 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(08-29-2024 03:16 PM)oruvoice Wrote:  

(08-29-2024 03:11 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  Have you even read the letter, sparkles?

I mean, such an astute person who demands hard copy of a statement from the Army *must* have read the letter, right? Lolz. Its pretty fing obvious that you havent from your comments.

Tell you what, sparkles, read the letter. Come back to us and say where they say that. Should be easy.

Oh. I forgot. You're doing the lawyer thing. This is where you say that they "had reason to believe it was russian disinfo", but they never said it was 100%. Just really likely. When they KNEW it was a lie.

When we say that you are a complete phony, this is what we're talking about. You are not to be taken seriously, as much as you may crave to be, more than anything else.

Have you read the letter? You keep avoiding that question.

Yes. Now, I do I get to read your post filled with legal gymnastics explaining it away?!? I hope so. I need another good laugh at you!

Glad you read it.

I guess you did not understand the parts, like -- "We want to emphasize that we do not know if the emails, provided to the New York Post by
President Trump’s personal attorney Rudy Giuliani, are genuine or not and that we do not have evidence of Russian involvement". Apparently not.

The worst they say is that they are "suspicious" of the issue.

But apparently in your mind that is them saying the laptop is disinformatiot.

Not a legal question at all. Merely one of reading basic English and the comprehension that comes from that reading.

Not 'legal gymnastics' at all. Just some nincompoop not necessarily understanding the message in the letter, and blanket repeating what it expressly does not say.

So, I was right. They covered their butts just enough, while going on every media outlet possible saying it was "very likely" russian disinfo, when they knew 100% that it wasn't. Same goes for every Dem politician on the matter. But, keep on tooting their horns and sky-screaming "Trump Bad"!

You never fail to bring a laugh.

(08-29-2024 03:58 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(08-29-2024 03:52 PM)shere khan Wrote:  

(08-29-2024 03:44 PM)oruvoice Wrote:  

(08-29-2024 03:41 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(08-29-2024 03:16 PM)oruvoice Wrote:  Oh. I forgot. You're doing the lawyer thing. This is where you say that they "had reason to believe it was russian disinfo", but they never said it was 100%. Just really likely. When they KNEW it was a lie.

When we say that you are a complete phony, this is what we're talking about. You are not to be taken seriously, as much as you may crave to be, more than anything else.

Have you read the letter? You keep avoiding that question.

Yes. Now, I do I get to read your post filled with legal gymnastics explaining it away?!? I hope so. I need another good laugh at you!

Affirmative tanq always trying to prove he is smart enough

Nope, just pointing out the value of understanding items that are written down.

Go git-em, Tig-boy!!!

Sure affirmative boy. Ketanji Tanq

(08-29-2024 04:14 PM)shere khan Wrote:  

(08-29-2024 03:58 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(08-29-2024 03:52 PM)shere khan Wrote:  

(08-29-2024 03:44 PM)oruvoice Wrote:  

(08-29-2024 03:41 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  Have you read the letter? You keep avoiding that question.

Yes. Now, I do I get to read your post filled with legal gymnastics explaining it away?!? I hope so. I need another good laugh at you!

Affirmative tanq always trying to prove he is smart enough

Nope, just pointing out the value of understanding items that are written down.

Go git-em, Tig-boy!!!

Sure affirmative boy. Ketanji Tanq

I either missed or forgot, but did he tout Ketanji?

(08-29-2024 04:24 PM)oruvoice Wrote:  

(08-29-2024 04:14 PM)shere khan Wrote:  

(08-29-2024 03:58 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(08-29-2024 03:52 PM)shere khan Wrote:  

(08-29-2024 03:44 PM)oruvoice Wrote:  Yes. Now, I do I get to read your post filled with legal gymnastics explaining it away?!? I hope so. I need another good laugh at you!

Affirmative tanq always trying to prove he is smart enough

Nope, just pointing out the value of understanding items that are written down.

Go git-em, Tig-boy!!!

Sure affirmative boy. Ketanji Tanq

I either missed or forgot, but did he tout Ketanji?

He is an affirmative like her one other thing too. Im not gonna out him though.

He has been assessed and processed.
.

(08-29-2024 04:14 PM)shere khan Wrote:  

(08-29-2024 03:58 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(08-29-2024 03:52 PM)shere khan Wrote:  

(08-29-2024 03:44 PM)oruvoice Wrote:  

(08-29-2024 03:41 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  Have you read the letter? You keep avoiding that question.

Yes. Now, I do I get to read your post filled with legal gymnastics explaining it away?!? I hope so. I need another good laugh at you!

Affirmative tanq always trying to prove he is smart enough

Nope, just pointing out the value of understanding items that are written down.

Go git-em, Tig-boy!!!

Sure affirmative boy. Ketanji Tanq

(08-29-2024 04:24 PM)oruvoice Wrote:  

(08-29-2024 04:14 PM)shere khan Wrote:  

(08-29-2024 03:58 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(08-29-2024 03:52 PM)shere khan Wrote:  

(08-29-2024 03:44 PM)oruvoice Wrote:  Yes. Now, I do I get to read your post filled with legal gymnastics explaining it away?!? I hope so. I need another good laugh at you!

Affirmative tanq always trying to prove he is smart enough

Nope, just pointing out the value of understanding items that are written down.

Go git-em, Tig-boy!!!

Sure affirmative boy. Ketanji Tanq

I either missed or forgot, but did he tout Ketanji?

Nope. Just more of the MAGA idiot style of 'just make stuff up' and spout away. As I say time and time again -- great look.

From FOX News: The matter is now closed per the Army. No charges to be filed. Trump and his people have said they may release video from Monday that showed nothing happened.

(08-29-2024 05:07 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(08-29-2024 04:24 PM)oruvoice Wrote:  

(08-29-2024 04:14 PM)shere khan Wrote:  

(08-29-2024 03:58 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(08-29-2024 03:52 PM)shere khan Wrote:  Affirmative tanq always trying to prove he is smart enough

Nope, just pointing out the value of understanding items that are written down.

Go git-em, Tig-boy!!!

Sure affirmative boy. Ketanji Tanq

I either missed or forgot, but did he tout Ketanji?

Nope. Just more of the MAGA idiot style of 'just make stuff up' and spout away. As I say time and time again -- great look.

I didnt out you affimatanq

Quit crying

(08-29-2024 05:13 PM)TripleA Wrote:  Hey Tanq, now that you've split hairs about the exact wording of the letter,

Split hairs on the language -- Im just noting exactly *what* the language was, and what the letter said. How dare someone note exactly what was actually in the letter, and how it differed from some schlobs claim of what it said?

Hate to tell you, the actual contents matter. I would hope that people would understand that. Wild that pointing out the actual contents vs oru's claim of what it said differed. Yes, how dare that those 'hairs be split'.

Maybe the facts are important. Perhaps to some they are superfluous. The latter seems to occur around here quite a bit, mind you.

Quote: I have a couple of questions.

1. Was their intent to convince the public that the laptop was very likely Russian disinfo?

2. Did they already know that the laptop was authentic?

1. Ill follow their words -- that it *may* be disinfo -- and their words were to to not make immediate conclusions. Funny that. Actual verbiage from the letter.

It seems rather counterproductive to admit that they have no evidence whatsoever in the letter itself if their intent is as you say.

As for the specific intent of any and all the 51, all in all, I am not able to tell. When they say in the letter that they themselves dont have any evidence, and they state that one should be careful in the conclusions that are drawn -- I cant see how the intent was to tag the laptop as what you note above.

They do state 'could well be', and then also include warnings about making that leap.

2. Indeterminate -- no one really did at that time.

Quote:Oh wait, I already know!. Yes, it was, and yes, they did.

Im quite unsurprised you already know.

Care to state evidence as to any of your conclusions above, or just your 'pull it out the thin air' opinion?

(08-29-2024 05:49 PM)shere khan Wrote:  

(08-29-2024 05:07 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(08-29-2024 04:24 PM)oruvoice Wrote:  

(08-29-2024 04:14 PM)shere khan Wrote:  

(08-29-2024 03:58 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  Nope, just pointing out the value of understanding items that are written down.

Go git-em, Tig-boy!!!

Sure affirmative boy. Ketanji Tanq

I either missed or forgot, but did he tout Ketanji?

Nope. Just more of the MAGA idiot style of 'just make stuff up' and spout away. As I say time and time again -- great look.

I didnt out you affimatanq

Quit crying

Outing seems to be the 'go to' wank the jank act around here from some. Kind of the MAGA moron go to overall.... lol.

(08-28-2024 08:44 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(08-28-2024 07:51 PM)TigerBlue4Ever Wrote:  

(08-28-2024 06:53 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(08-28-2024 06:35 PM)TigerBlue4Ever Wrote:  

(08-28-2024 06:08 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  Im not a one track pinhead like you. Glad youre surprised.

You don't know jack shite about me. But I know about lawyers. I've known 3 in my whole life who weren't slime. You aint one of them, hoss.

I always like the morons who rail and whine about everyone else, yet when comments are thrown their way the immediate response is "You dont know jack about me".

Fing brilliant there, sparky. Just mind boggling brilliant. Lolz.

Ill stick with my 'one track pinhead' as being on point. Have fun there TB4E.

OK genius, why don't you tell me all about myself?

Absolutely.

You rant and rave about everyone else's past, present, and all sorts of other rhetoric rich, fact thin garbage that you make up out of thin air.

The *millisecond* a comment equally as rude is directed back at you, you jump like youve been hit by an electric eel, and squeal "you dont jack **** about me".

All the while throwing the exact style of **** out in that manner like a dude hopped up on Mexican eight ball and throwing confetti out into the crowd in Times Square at midnite on New Year's.

Given that -- yeah, Im absolutely comfortable with my 'one track pinhead' comment to you.

Fuqn idiot, with me you get what you give, and you just described yourself perfectly. So.Much.Projection.

(08-29-2024 06:24 PM)TigerBlue4Ever Wrote:  

(08-28-2024 08:44 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(08-28-2024 07:51 PM)TigerBlue4Ever Wrote:  

(08-28-2024 06:53 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(08-28-2024 06:35 PM)TigerBlue4Ever Wrote:  You don't know jack shite about me. But I know about lawyers. I've known 3 in my whole life who weren't slime. You aint one of them, hoss.

I always like the morons who rail and whine about everyone else, yet when comments are thrown their way the immediate response is "You dont know jack about me".

Fing brilliant there, sparky. Just mind boggling brilliant. Lolz.

Ill stick with my 'one track pinhead' as being on point. Have fun there TB4E.

OK genius, why don't you tell me all about myself?

Absolutely.

You rant and rave about everyone else's past, present, and all sorts of other rhetoric rich, fact thin garbage that you make up out of thin air.

The *millisecond* a comment equally as rude is directed back at you, you jump like youve been hit by an electric eel, and squeal "you dont jack **** about me".

All the while throwing the exact style of **** out in that manner like a dude hopped up on Mexican eight ball and throwing confetti out into the crowd in Times Square at midnite on New Year's.

Given that -- yeah, Im absolutely comfortable with my 'one track pinhead' comment to you.

Fuqn idiot, with me you get what you give, and you just described yourself perfectly. So.Much.Projection.

Assessed and processed

(08-29-2024 06:05 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(08-29-2024 05:49 PM)shere khan Wrote:  

(08-29-2024 05:07 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(08-29-2024 04:24 PM)oruvoice Wrote:  

(08-29-2024 04:14 PM)shere khan Wrote:  Sure affirmative boy. Ketanji Tanq

I either missed or forgot, but did he tout Ketanji?

Nope. Just more of the MAGA idiot style of 'just make stuff up' and spout away. As I say time and time again -- great look.

I didnt out you affimatanq

Quit crying

Outing seems to be the 'go to' wank the jank act around here from some. Kind of the MAGA moron go to overall.... lol.

He has gone to teh pecker.

Its official. He is broken



Cf. bondsjohns



Broken

(08-29-2024 05:38 PM)CrimsonPhantom Wrote:  From FOX News: The matter is now closed per the Army. No charges to be filed. Trump and his people have said they may release video from Monday that showed nothing happened.

bwahahahahahahaha

the fear of being sued for defamation is very strong with this one.

here's a quick video of the arlington cumquat right after Trump and the gold star families ignored him and entered the area.

(08-29-2024 06:29 PM)shere khan Wrote:  

(08-29-2024 06:05 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(08-29-2024 05:49 PM)shere khan Wrote:  

(08-29-2024 05:07 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(08-29-2024 04:24 PM)oruvoice Wrote:  I either missed or forgot, but did he tout Ketanji?

Nope. Just more of the MAGA idiot style of 'just make stuff up' and spout away. As I say time and time again -- great look.

I didnt out you affimatanq

Quit crying

Outing seems to be the 'go to' wank the jank act around here from some. Kind of the MAGA moron go to overall.... lol.

He has gone to teh pecker.

Its official. He is broken



Cf. bondsjohns



Broken

(08-29-2024 06:24 PM)TigerBlue4Ever Wrote:  

(08-28-2024 08:44 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(08-28-2024 07:51 PM)TigerBlue4Ever Wrote:  

(08-28-2024 06:53 PM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(08-28-2024 06:35 PM)TigerBlue4Ever Wrote:  You don't know jack shite about me. But I know about lawyers. I've known 3 in my whole life who weren't slime. You aint one of them, hoss.

I always like the morons who rail and whine about everyone else, yet when comments are thrown their way the immediate response is "You dont know jack about me".

Fing brilliant there, sparky. Just mind boggling brilliant. Lolz.

Ill stick with my 'one track pinhead' as being on point. Have fun there TB4E.

OK genius, why don't you tell me all about myself?

Absolutely.

You rant and rave about everyone else's past, present, and all sorts of other rhetoric rich, fact thin garbage that you make up out of thin air.

The *millisecond* a comment equally as rude is directed back at you, you jump like youve been hit by an electric eel, and squeal "you dont jack **** about me".

All the while throwing the exact style of **** out in that manner like a dude hopped up on Mexican eight ball and throwing confetti out into the crowd in Times Square at midnite on New Year's.

Given that -- yeah, Im absolutely comfortable with my 'one track pinhead' comment to you.

Fuqn idiot, with me you get what you give, and you just described yourself perfectly. So.Much.Projection.

I guess you dont quite understand the hilarity in your 'make stuff up and sling it' mode when contrasted to your 'YOU DONT KNOW JACK ABOUT ME' shot out like youve been jabbed with an electric eel when something rolls your way.

You be you, My Friend.

And no, with you it sure ISNT 'you get what you give'. I really havent interacted with you -- that is until you jumped into a thread and started slobbering your 'Fuqn idiot' -style lines.

Not able to adduce cause and effect very well? Honestly, I dont give flip what you say outside your ranting garbage 7th grade **** to me. I guess it didnt enter that thickened occipital plate on the timing of stuff. Tends to happen to some.

Have a great day, night, wee My Friend. Or however long it is before you aim another mongloid rant my way.