That dummy falls for every hoax

Willingly stupid.

(08-28-2024 10:16 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(08-28-2024 10:15 AM)bearcat65 Wrote:  

(08-28-2024 10:13 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(08-28-2024 10:11 AM)bearcat65 Wrote:  

(08-28-2024 10:08 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  Maybe. But you should also know that perhaps some family members want to keep politics and the media out of their tragedy.

Even as they would like some recognition of their children which they are getting from Trump. Not so much from your side.

That might mean something if trump didn't have his history. See McCain, Kelly, etc,

And his history is still better than recent dem presidents.

******* laughable.

Absolute fact. Not even debatable to be honest.

(08-28-2024 10:12 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(08-28-2024 10:00 AM)UofMstateU Wrote:  Its sad that these family members lost their loved one due to Kamala's incompetence. (Someone remind Joe they died on his watch.)

Its even sadder that gold star families cant have a solemn ceremony for the fallen family members, in which Biden*, Harris, and stolen valor Tim "scout" Walz refused to attend, without some menstruating tds suffering karen throwing a hissy fit about stuff they no nothing about.

It's sadder that you are using their deaths to score cheap political points.

And I love that you keep doubling down on your scout idiocy. What a clown you are.

1. These arent cheap political points. They are golden because Kamala is incompetent and you know how bad it looks. But, I guess it was a nice touch that someone who worked for Kamala decided to write a letter once they found out Trump was actually there.

2. Noone would know about this had your guys even bothered to show up

3. Sorry for chapping your ass today, #sofaBois

(08-28-2024 10:12 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(08-28-2024 10:00 AM)UofMstateU Wrote:  Its sad that these family members lost their loved one due to Kamala's incompetence. (Someone remind Joe they died on his watch.)

Its even sadder that gold star families cant have a solemn ceremony for the fallen family members, in which Biden*, Harris, and stolen valor Tim "scout" Walz refused to attend, without some menstruating tds suffering karen throwing a hissy fit about stuff they no nothing about.

It's sadder that you are using their deaths to score cheap political points.

And I love that you keep doubling down on your scout idiocy. What a clown you are.

WTH do you think you were doing with this thread OP?

Another day. The sun rises. Tom makes a fool of himself. The sun sets.

It's like the movie Groundhog Day for morons.

(08-28-2024 10:08 AM)TripleA Wrote:  The two Ts in here are battling to see which one is the more obtuse today. It's a close call.

Funny, you dont seem aware that I am actually supporting a portion of your side of the issues. Lolz.

And all I said on the other portion was -- if there is tape, lets see it. That seems to be a real 'ouchie' for you for some reason. Double lolz.

(08-28-2024 10:15 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(08-28-2024 10:08 AM)TripleA Wrote:  The two Ts in here are battling to see which one is the more obtuse today. It's a close call.

You, who claim not to like trump, battling to see how much you can take before gagging.

Damn, you really are dense.

Disliking someone is a reasonable reaction, given Trump's personality, wouldn't you say?

But your girl is so outrageously incompetent and socialistic, with ideas that would absolutely continue to destroy this country, I will gladly vote for the a-hole, whose policies actually brought this country prosperity for 4 years.

I realize that's a compound thought process, which is why you don't get it.

(08-28-2024 10:33 AM)TripleA Wrote:  

(08-28-2024 10:12 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(08-28-2024 10:00 AM)UofMstateU Wrote:  Its sad that these family members lost their loved one due to Kamala's incompetence. (Someone remind Joe they died on his watch.)

Its even sadder that gold star families cant have a solemn ceremony for the fallen family members, in which Biden*, Harris, and stolen valor Tim "scout" Walz refused to attend, without some menstruating tds suffering karen throwing a hissy fit about stuff they no nothing about.

It's sadder that you are using their deaths to score cheap political points.

And I love that you keep doubling down on your scout idiocy. What a clown you are.

WTH do you think you were doing with this thread OP?

Ouch!

in before some libturd karen numbnut says they heard Trump say "suckers and losers" in section 60.

(08-28-2024 08:22 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  And the final disgrace in this cheap photo-op. Smiling with a thumb up at the graves of heroes, one having nothing to do with the Afghanistan departure he's using. But yeah, Biden glanced at his watch a couple times, so we're "even."

Where are your heroes?

(08-28-2024 10:18 AM)bearcat65 Wrote:  

(08-28-2024 10:16 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(08-28-2024 10:15 AM)bearcat65 Wrote:  

(08-28-2024 10:13 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(08-28-2024 10:11 AM)bearcat65 Wrote:  Even as they would like some recognition of their children which they are getting from Trump. Not so much from your side.

That might mean something if trump didn't have his history. See McCain, Kelly, etc,

And his history is still better than recent dem presidents.

******* laughable.

Absolute fact. Not even debatable to be honest.

Ridiculous. There's no factual metric for which side is more patriotic or troop supporting.

(08-28-2024 11:06 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(08-28-2024 10:18 AM)bearcat65 Wrote:  

(08-28-2024 10:16 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(08-28-2024 10:15 AM)bearcat65 Wrote:  

(08-28-2024 10:13 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  That might mean something if trump didn't have his history. See McCain, Kelly, etc,

And his history is still better than recent dem presidents.

******* laughable.

Absolute fact. Not even debatable to be honest.

Ridiculous. There's no factual metric for which side is more patriotic or troop supporting.

As a retired US Navy officer, I can attest that Trump's policies were far more favorable toward the military than Biden's or Obama's.

(08-28-2024 08:30 AM)VA49er Wrote:  

You can set your watch by it. Problem is the media doesn't do a proper follow up. The damage is done.

(08-28-2024 08:37 AM)UofMstateU Wrote:  Since the pinhead at Arlington seems to be wanting to double down on stupid like Tom, I'll go ahead and lay out a brief history of this:

1. The arlington cumquat was big mad because Trump was there. He got more mad because he had a photographer, which they implied Trump didnt have permission for.

2. Trump had permission for the photographer to be there

3. The Arlington liberal cumquat then said they werent allowed to take pictures in Section 60 of the cemetery.

4. Thats also not true.

5. Then the arlington cumquat quoted federal law and said this:


“Federal law prohibits political campaign or election-related activities within Army National Military Cemeteries, to include photographers, content creators or any other persons attending for purposes, or in direct support of a partisan political candidate’s campaign,” said the cemetery.

“Arlington National Cemetery reinforced and widely shared this law and its prohibitions with all participants.”

But again, the Arlington cumquat was wrong. Trump wasnt there for a campaign event. He was there because he was invited by the families.

So cry harder b*tches. Biden*, the drunk whore, nor stolen valor Walz showed up.

So, the same crying b!tch that used to be the disgruntled librarian at the Archives took some Docent job over at Arlington Nat'l giving tours or something. Likely a promotion for being the crying little b!tch that he is.

(08-28-2024 11:36 AM)b2b Wrote:  

(08-28-2024 08:30 AM)VA49er Wrote:  

You can set your watch by it. Problem is the media doesn't do a proper follow up. The damage is done.

The media isn't concerned with the follow up. It's all about getting the initial story out there and letting people's confirmation bias do the leg work. This thread is a prime example of how that works.

(08-28-2024 11:06 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(08-28-2024 10:18 AM)bearcat65 Wrote:  

(08-28-2024 10:16 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(08-28-2024 10:15 AM)bearcat65 Wrote:  

(08-28-2024 10:13 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  That might mean something if trump didn't have his history. See McCain, Kelly, etc,

And his history is still better than recent dem presidents.

******* laughable.

Absolute fact. Not even debatable to be honest.

Ridiculous. There's no factual metric for which side is more patriotic or troop supporting.

Keep telling yourself that Tom and ignore how the military historically votes. Having served I can tell you it's not typically for democrats.

(08-28-2024 10:37 AM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(08-28-2024 10:08 AM)TripleA Wrote:  The two Ts in here are battling to see which one is the more obtuse today. It's a close call.

Funny, you dont seem aware that I am actually supporting a portion of your side of the issues. Lolz.

And all I said on the other portion was -- if there is tape, lets see it. That seems to be a real 'ouchie' for you for some reason. Double lolz.

As usual, you're putting words in my mouth and arguing some straw man that was not even a thought anywhere in my sperm count.

That was a generic comment, unrelated to any specific issue, based on you and Tommy getting your asses kicked on a regular basis lately because...wait for it...

You both are so damn obtuse.

ob·tuse
/əbˈto͞os,äbˈto͞os/
adjective
1. annoyingly insensitive or slow to understand.

You rarely ever answer my direct questions, and almost always make some argument either unrelated to what I said, or based on misunderstanding what I said, or why I said it.

I mean, you just did it again.

(08-28-2024 12:00 PM)TripleA Wrote:  

(08-28-2024 10:37 AM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(08-28-2024 10:08 AM)TripleA Wrote:  The two Ts in here are battling to see which one is the more obtuse today. It's a close call.

Funny, you dont seem aware that I am actually supporting a portion of your side of the issues. Lolz.

And all I said on the other portion was -- if there is tape, lets see it. That seems to be a real 'ouchie' for you for some reason. Double lolz.

As usual, you're putting words in my mouth and arguing some straw man that was not even a thought anywhere in my sperm count.

That was a generic comment, unrelated to any specific issue, based on you and Tommy getting your asses kicked on a regular basis lately because...wait for it...

You both are so damn obtuse.

ob·tuse
/əbˈto͞os,äbˈto͞os/
adjective
1. annoyingly insensitive or slow to understand.

You rarely ever answer my direct questions, and almost always make some argument either unrelated to what I said, or based on misunderstanding what I said, or why I said it.

I mean, you just did it again.

And he thinks being that way makes him "smart".

(08-28-2024 12:00 PM)TripleA Wrote:  

(08-28-2024 10:37 AM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(08-28-2024 10:08 AM)TripleA Wrote:  The two Ts in here are battling to see which one is the more obtuse today. It's a close call.

Funny, you dont seem aware that I am actually supporting a portion of your side of the issues. Lolz.

And all I said on the other portion was -- if there is tape, lets see it. That seems to be a real 'ouchie' for you for some reason. Double lolz.

As usual, you're putting words in my mouth and arguing some straw man that was not even a thought anywhere in my sperm count.

That was a generic comment, unrelated to any specific issue, based on you and Tommy getting your asses kicked on a regular basis lately because...wait for it...

You both are so damn obtuse.

ob·tuse
/əbˈto͞os,äbˈto͞os/
adjective
1. annoyingly insensitive or slow to understand, and sometimes having a sexual infatuation with sofas. Sometimes referred to as a #sofaBois.

You rarely ever answer my direct questions, and almost always make some argument either unrelated to what I said, or based on misunderstanding what I said, or why I said it.

I mean, you just did it again.

Updated Obtuse definition incoming.

(08-28-2024 10:01 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(08-28-2024 09:09 AM)TripleA Wrote:  

(08-28-2024 09:02 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(08-28-2024 08:53 AM)TripleA Wrote:  General Kellogg just said in a live interview that he was there, that the families invited Trump and his group there, and that none of them saw anything.

Womp womp.

Have you ever been to Arlington? Do you not understand that one individual can't see everything that takes place in the entirety of the cemetery?

And yes, some of the family members invited him there. But the family members DO NOT have any authority to allow photography in Section 60.

Yes, I have been to Arlington, numbnuts. And to the Wall. Several times. I served during that war, and my best childhood friend's name is on that wall.

I also worked out of DC, and had an office there, for 15 years.

So don't lecture me about Arlington cemetery, or anything else, for that matter. All you're doing is trying to stir up sh!t that isn't there, as usual.

It's all partisan speculation on your part. As usual.

You're an embarrassment to humanity.

Waaaaaaah, then you should know that this incident could have very well taken place out of the eyesight of your one guy or some of the family members. All I was saying.

Right. And you should know this "incident" could very well not have happened at all.

And how do know this isn't "sitting well with many"? How many have you spoken to? Same number as Knee Pads has primary votes?