Is this what you really want Dems?

Sent from my SM-G988U using Tapatalk

Translation: We know we're losing in November.

What an idiot. Raskin's argument is that the 14th Amendment disqualifies from office any person who aided and abetted an insurrection, and Raskin claims Jan. 6th qualifies.

Good luck getting the Supreme Court to rule on that.

Of course, the Dems will then use that as a weapon in the war on SCOTUS.

(08-05-2024 09:12 PM)TripleA Wrote:  What an idiot. Raskin's argument is the the 14th Amendment disqualifies from office any person who aided and abetted an insurrection, and Raskin claims Jan. 6th qualifies.

By his premise Opposing Political parties or government agents including foreign could stir up a crowd to react a certain way to get enough in Congress to deem a candidate as disqualified from running

(08-05-2024 09:12 PM)TripleA Wrote:  What an idiot. Raskin's argument is the the 14th Amendment disqualifies from office any person who aided and abetted an insurrection, and Raskin claims Jan. 6th qualifies.

Good luck getting the Supreme Court to rule on that.

Of course, the Dems will then use that as a weapon in the war on SCOTUS.

He is aiding and abetting insurrection. He is pushing for armed conflict and a take over of the government. He is basically claiming that they will not relinquish power under any circumstances.

Sent from my SM-G988U using Tapatalk

Bring it

At what point do the Democrats in Congress (some) along with other elected and selected officials working in Washington get called out as being threats to our democracy and interfering with the election process? Rhetorical question.

(08-05-2024 09:18 PM)hburg Wrote:  

(08-05-2024 09:12 PM)TripleA Wrote:  What an idiot. Raskin's argument is the the 14th Amendment disqualifies from office any person who aided and abetted an insurrection, and Raskin claims Jan. 6th qualifies.

Good luck getting the Supreme Court to rule on that.

Of course, the Dems will then use that as a weapon in the war on SCOTUS.

He is aiding and abetting insurrection. He is pushing for armed conflict and a take over of the government. He is basically claiming that they will not relinquish power under any circumstances.

Sent from my SM-G988U using Tapatalk

is AKA, the tanq-0fer-rang! ...

Can we go ahead and file charges on Raskin and his merry band of insurrectionists?

(08-06-2024 01:19 AM)stinkfist Wrote:  

(08-05-2024 09:18 PM)hburg Wrote:  

(08-05-2024 09:12 PM)TripleA Wrote:  What an idiot. Raskin's argument is the the 14th Amendment disqualifies from office any person who aided and abetted an insurrection, and Raskin claims Jan. 6th qualifies.

Good luck getting the Supreme Court to rule on that.

Of course, the Dems will then use that as a weapon in the war on SCOTUS.

He is aiding and abetting insurrection. He is pushing for armed conflict and a take over of the government. He is basically claiming that they will not relinquish power under any circumstances.

Sent from my SM-G988U using Tapatalk

is AKA, the tanq-0fer-rang! ...

Speaking of Tanq, where is that dude?

That is not a great strategy in the long run, but sure, knock yourself out Jamie.

(08-06-2024 09:12 AM)TripleA Wrote:  

(08-06-2024 01:19 AM)stinkfist Wrote:  

(08-05-2024 09:18 PM)hburg Wrote:  

(08-05-2024 09:12 PM)TripleA Wrote:  What an idiot. Raskin's argument is the the 14th Amendment disqualifies from office any person who aided and abetted an insurrection, and Raskin claims Jan. 6th qualifies.

Good luck getting the Supreme Court to rule on that.

Of course, the Dems will then use that as a weapon in the war on SCOTUS.

He is aiding and abetting insurrection. He is pushing for armed conflict and a take over of the government. He is basically claiming that they will not relinquish power under any circumstances.

Sent from my SM-G988U using Tapatalk

is AKA, the tanq-0fer-rang! ...

Speaking of Tanq, where is that dude?

Divorce mediation meetings are very high in his area....

What is the real point of Raskin saying this?

Is he threatening people not to vote for Trump? That sounds a bit undemocratic, doesn't it?

(08-06-2024 09:17 AM)rath v2.0 Wrote:  What is the real point of Raskin saying this?

Is he threatening people not to vote for Trump? That sounds a bit undemocratic, doesn't it?

You just don't understand democracy

(08-06-2024 09:17 AM)Eldonabe Wrote:  

(08-06-2024 09:12 AM)TripleA Wrote:  

(08-06-2024 01:19 AM)stinkfist Wrote:  

(08-05-2024 09:18 PM)hburg Wrote:  

(08-05-2024 09:12 PM)TripleA Wrote:  What an idiot. Raskin's argument is the the 14th Amendment disqualifies from office any person who aided and abetted an insurrection, and Raskin claims Jan. 6th qualifies.

Good luck getting the Supreme Court to rule on that.

Of course, the Dems will then use that as a weapon in the war on SCOTUS.

He is aiding and abetting insurrection. He is pushing for armed conflict and a take over of the government. He is basically claiming that they will not relinquish power under any circumstances.

Sent from my SM-G988U using Tapatalk

is AKA, the tanq-0fer-rang! ...

Speaking of Tanq, where is that dude?

Divorce mediation meetings are very high in his area....

He's saying he doesn't care about the will of the people, he cares only about the will of the party.. IN other words... Party over country..

Rat-faced goblin.

The party of democracy!

Picked up Glenn Beck

[video=YouTube]https://youtu.be/OMlGkyZr298?si=-mhjh2OXZKZIMWv3[/video]

Sent from my SM-G988U using Tapatalk

These people act and speak with impunity it seems.

If the votes are cast and they are legitimate, it is their obligation to fulfil the wishes of the people they are supposed to represent - all the people, not just some of them. I don't know if Biden really won or not in 20, but once it was ratified the rhetoric should have stopped.

Compromise is all but dead at this point. It is also a symptom (the worst symptom) of not having term limits for these f-ing people. A guy like Raskin can say and do almost anything he likes and he will cruise in his re-election - and he knows it. Once in a while people overplay their hand (like Jamaal Brown and Cori Bush) but they are the exception.

(08-08-2024 07:53 AM)Eldonabe Wrote:  These people act and speak with impunity it seems.

If the votes are cast and they are legitimate, it is their obligation to fulfil the wishes of the people they are supposed to represent - all the people, not just some of them. I don't know if Biden really won or not in 20, but once it was ratified the rhetoric should have stopped.

Compromise is all but dead at this point. It is also a symptom (the worst symptom) of not having term limits for these f-ing people. A guy like Raskin can say and do almost anything he likes and he will cruise in his re-election - and he knows it. Once in a while people overplay their hand (like Jamaal Brown and Cori Bush) but they are the exception.

all that supposed shite is meaningless, when ................................... @>270EVsBlueBakedInn(619) and/or moo-moo-chelle (aka big mike) if all else fails by Aug. 22, 2024 ... (AM) … #7*states30counties


at least the majority of you guys are FINALLY understanding the real baTTTle...