(08-01-2024 11:04 AM)TripleA Wrote:  

(08-01-2024 10:50 AM)WalkThePlank Wrote:  

(08-01-2024 10:45 AM)BigTigerMike Wrote:  Libs are just mad that Kamala’s crafted honeymoon narrative is being challenged and now they have to defend it

It's also about creating narratives out of thin air to distract from the main issues - cost of living, housing affordability, border, foreign wars, etc.

Unfortunately a strong subset of the population that eat up nonsense like this. Make everything personality driven, ad hominem, race, gender and vote like it's 1964.

Anyone who is basing their vote off of this type of stuff is a hard core Democrat voter anyway. He's not "losing voters."

Really? You don't think undecided voters watching on TV would react poorly to how he handled that situation? I think some would. The base loves it, but undecided voters are a different sell. They need to be convinced he's not just a bully, and that he can handle tough situations diplomatically.

I need to stop now. I'm beginning to sound like AM.

Do you think "Independent voters" would prefer someone that does a complete 180 on what she believes from what she ran on 4 years ago instead of someone that defends himself? That is the TRUE question.

(08-01-2024 11:12 AM)WalkThePlank Wrote:  You can believe that someone does poor in an event, interview, etc. Do you base your vote entirely on that alone?

Joe Biden lost everything in 90 minutes in June. One event.

(08-01-2024 11:18 AM)The Sicatoka Wrote:  

(08-01-2024 11:12 AM)WalkThePlank Wrote:  You can believe that someone does poor in an event, interview, etc. Do you base your vote entirely on that alone?

Joe Biden lost everything in 90 minutes in June. One event.

None of Trump’s events have gone that badly, or even close to it.

(08-01-2024 10:31 AM)WalkThePlank Wrote:  

(08-01-2024 09:58 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(08-01-2024 08:42 AM)WalkThePlank Wrote:  How do you "stop talking about it" when a journalist directly asks you about it? She asked a loaded question with multiple accusations and he answered it. As he should have.

Actually answer the question she asked...which was when you make the comments you have in the past like she cited...how do you expect black people to support you.

And, I don't know, maybe be a tad contrite and pivot a bit? But he can't as he's afraid that would offend his base.

And then he doubles down with more **** like this. He's just not capable.

He gave an answer and tried to pivot to his economic record with minorities, which is a valid response that resonates more with people who are actually thinking about voting for him.

And he's not incorrect about her heritage. You can pretend to be offended by it, but what he said was 100% accurate. Anyone basing their vote off that is moronic to begin with. Same thing with the Vance/Cat lady saga.

Black is a color, not a race or "heritage." Take a look at her father's photo and tell me if he looks black to you.

But I agree, the whole thing is dumb. I think Vance is a moron regardless of his comments about cats or whether he ****** a couch.

(08-01-2024 10:45 AM)BigTigerMike Wrote:  Libs are just mad that Kamala’s crafted honeymoon narrative is being challenged and now they have to defend it

Not mad at all...happy trump is showing his racist/birther traits once again.

Tom, if anyone needs couch time it may be you.

The Vance tale is fabricated.
From a source you'll trust:
https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/po...235068142/

Other sources:
https://www.google.com/search?q=vance+co...e&ie=UTF-8

Sounded like a mostly Pro-Trump crowd to me.

(08-01-2024 11:26 AM)The Sicatoka Wrote:  Tom, if anyone needs couch time it may be you.

The Vance tale is fabricated.
From a source you'll trust:
https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/po...235068142/

Other sources:
https://www.google.com/search?q=vance+co...e&ie=UTF-8

Sorry, but there's NO way we can prove that he didn't have sex with a couch. It could have happened.

(08-01-2024 11:27 AM)Eagleaidaholic Wrote:  Sounded like a mostly Pro-Trump crowd to me.

Perhaps it's time for hearing aides?

(08-01-2024 11:04 AM)TripleA Wrote:  

(08-01-2024 10:50 AM)WalkThePlank Wrote:  

(08-01-2024 10:45 AM)BigTigerMike Wrote:  Libs are just mad that Kamala’s crafted honeymoon narrative is being challenged and now they have to defend it

It's also about creating narratives out of thin air to distract from the main issues - cost of living, housing affordability, border, foreign wars, etc.

Unfortunately a strong subset of the population that eat up nonsense like this. Make everything personality driven, ad hominem, race, gender and vote like it's 1964.

Anyone who is basing their vote off of this type of stuff is a hard core Democrat voter anyway. He's not "losing voters."

Really? You don't think undecided voters watching on TV would react poorly to how he handled that situation? I think some would. The base loves it, but undecided voters are a different sell. They need to be convinced he's not just a bully, and that he can handle tough situations diplomatically.

I need to stop now. I'm beginning to sound like AM.

Any type of undecided voters especially in the midwestern swing states are not buying Kamala’s gender/let’s make history campaign; they’re concern about jobs which is exactly what Trump was talking up yesterday at his campaign stop. Just because Trump throwing alongside that she’s faking the whole identify politics isn’t going to sway them to say ‘I’m with her……Hillary tried that already

So we have 2 fake Indian Dems -

Kumswala and Fauxcahontas

Such a pile of trash political party

(08-01-2024 11:31 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(08-01-2024 11:27 AM)Eagleaidaholic Wrote:  Sounded like a mostly Pro-Trump crowd to me.

Perhaps it's time for hearing aides?

Sounded like a Jerry Springer "reactions" crowd.

Oh snap; he di' int say that; oh yes he did.

(08-01-2024 07:51 AM)ericsrevenge76 Wrote:  Pushing back on those harpies was the best move he could make to attract more black males.

Bingo. It's not the black women he's after here. Most of them don't want to deal with their bull**** either.

Sent from my Pixel 7 using Tapatalk

(08-01-2024 08:42 AM)WalkThePlank Wrote:  How do you "stop talking about it" when a journalist directly asks you about it? She asked a loaded question with multiple accusations and he answered it. As he should have.

Republicucks still don't understand how to deal with these people.

Sent from my Pixel 7 using Tapatalk

I love how harris changes her dialect to pander to whatever group she’s in front of.

(07-31-2024 02:06 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

Self admitted cuck just like you.

(08-01-2024 10:25 AM)bearcat65 Wrote:  

(08-01-2024 10:18 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(08-01-2024 10:02 AM)hburg Wrote:  The way she said it was contentious and making the claim he is racist. Anyone would get upset with that.

If trump loses his cool over a weak woman reporter's question, how is he supposed to handle world leaders?

Hopefully just like he did in his first term.

BOOM. No wars.

Sent from my Pixel 7 using Tapatalk

(08-01-2024 11:12 AM)WalkThePlank Wrote:  

(08-01-2024 11:04 AM)TripleA Wrote:  

(08-01-2024 10:50 AM)WalkThePlank Wrote:  

(08-01-2024 10:45 AM)BigTigerMike Wrote:  Libs are just mad that Kamala’s crafted honeymoon narrative is being challenged and now they have to defend it

It's also about creating narratives out of thin air to distract from the main issues - cost of living, housing affordability, border, foreign wars, etc.

Unfortunately a strong subset of the population that eat up nonsense like this. Make everything personality driven, ad hominem, race, gender and vote like it's 1964.

Anyone who is basing their vote off of this type of stuff is a hard core Democrat voter anyway. He's not "losing voters."

Really? You don't think undecided voters watching on TV would react poorly to how he handled that situation? I think some would. The base loves it, but undecided voters are a different sell. They need to be convinced he's not just a bully, and that he can handle tough situations diplomatically.

I need to stop now. I'm beginning to sound like AM.

You can believe that someone does poor in an event, interview, etc. Do you base your vote entirely on that alone? I don’t think many people who are truly undecided are going to make their decision on that.

There will be so many more things that happen from now until October that will be on the minds of voters. It’s being blown way out of proportion because the media is propping up a candidate.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Good grief. That's not what I said at all. I said Trump missed an opportunity to influence some undecided voters in his direction. Lots of things influence voters, but you should take advantage of every opportunity.

Most of his public appearances are Trump rallies. He can go full bombastic at those. But in a setting like this, he needs to figure out a less confrontational way to get across his points, especially when they come at you hard.

He had a real chance to contrast his style with that, and instead, he fired his whole arsenal in retaliation. That's fine for us Trumplets, as AM calls us. Not the best tact with undecided voters.

I'm not sure why that is so hard to understand.

(08-01-2024 01:26 PM)TripleA Wrote:  

(08-01-2024 11:12 AM)WalkThePlank Wrote:  

(08-01-2024 11:04 AM)TripleA Wrote:  

(08-01-2024 10:50 AM)WalkThePlank Wrote:  

(08-01-2024 10:45 AM)BigTigerMike Wrote:  Libs are just mad that Kamala’s crafted honeymoon narrative is being challenged and now they have to defend it

It's also about creating narratives out of thin air to distract from the main issues - cost of living, housing affordability, border, foreign wars, etc.

Unfortunately a strong subset of the population that eat up nonsense like this. Make everything personality driven, ad hominem, race, gender and vote like it's 1964.

Anyone who is basing their vote off of this type of stuff is a hard core Democrat voter anyway. He's not "losing voters."

Really? You don't think undecided voters watching on TV would react poorly to how he handled that situation? I think some would. The base loves it, but undecided voters are a different sell. They need to be convinced he's not just a bully, and that he can handle tough situations diplomatically.

I need to stop now. I'm beginning to sound like AM.

You can believe that someone does poor in an event, interview, etc. Do you base your vote entirely on that alone? I don’t think many people who are truly undecided are going to make their decision on that.

There will be so many more things that happen from now until October that will be on the minds of voters. It’s being blown way out of proportion because the media is propping up a candidate.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Good grief. That's not what I said at all. I said Trump missed an opportunity to influence some undecided voters in his direction. Lots of things influence voters, but you should take advantage of every opportunity.

Most of his public appearances are Trump rallies. He can go full bombastic at those. But in a setting like this, he needs to figure out a less confrontational way to get across his points, especially when they come at you hard.

He had a real chance to contrast his style with that, and instead, he fired his whole arsenal in retaliation. That's fine for us Trumplets, as AM calls us. Not the best tact with undecided voters.

I'm not sure why that is so hard to understand.

You clearly haven't been around black men when they deal with black women. I promise you the black men thatwatched that were cheering him on, even if under their breath.

(08-01-2024 01:26 PM)TripleA Wrote:  Good grief. That's not what I said at all. I said Trump missed an opportunity to influence some undecided voters in his direction. Lots of things influence voters, but you should take advantage of every opportunity.

Most of his public appearances are Trump rallies. He can go full bombastic at those. But in a setting like this, he needs to figure out a less confrontational way to get across his points, especially when they come at you hard.

He had a real chance to contrast his style with that, and instead, he fired his whole arsenal in retaliation. That's fine for us Trumplets, as AM calls us. Not the best tact with undecided voters.

I'm not sure why that is so hard to understand.

I'm understanding fine. You're just assuming that he obviously did horrible, with no data or evidence to back that up yet. I'm not sure how it can even be measured with so much that has happened in the last month, so polling is very volatile at the moment after Butler,PA rally, Kamala replacing Biden, RNC done, and DNC coming up.

He will have plenty of opportunities moving forward and both candidates will have more gaffes and "moments of lost opportunity."