(03-13-2024 08:23 AM)Was SoMs Eagle Wrote:  

(03-13-2024 07:24 AM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(03-13-2024 06:50 AM)AdoptedMonarch Wrote:  

(03-13-2024 06:13 AM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(03-12-2024 11:30 PM)Was SoMs Eagle Wrote:  Buckwheat says 9-0.

Yep, and Tanq a few months ago on this board said that he had zero idea how the ballot removal case would be decided. No skin off my back, Buckwheat. If you are trying to ascribe that to me -- well, leave it to a moron to try and make something up to attach as some sort of insult in that issue. You be you.

I'd make a comment on the nuance in per curiam decision that is followed by 5 judges, and the concurrence from 3 that says some majorly different things about that unsigned opinion, but I will assume that would be miles above your head, so I wont bother.

Good grief, it seems some of the more terminally stupid around here took a whole host extra helping of stupid pills in the last few months.

When the Anthony Weiner crotch-photos scandal broke, I recall being surprised most by the comments from Jon Stewart and others on the left chuckling about how large he was. That was a very comforting moment for me. Like most men, I've had my "size matters" moments of self doubt. But if those Anthony Weiner photos qualifies as large, then I've got nothing whatsoever to worry about.

You, tanq., are serving a similar purpose. If your face-saving reservations regarding the ultimate outcome of the Supreme Court's ballot decision count in your mind as smart, then you've elevated most everyone else on this board to genius level. Even the Trumplets outpace you.

You sure have your panties in a wad this morning. Maybe take them off at night.

How dare I be honest and say 'I don know how this will turn out', when there is zero caselaw on the subject. The horror.

I will say honesty sure takes a backseat to sheer stupidity around here.

Quote:What you did on this forum, before running and hiding,

Yes how dare I actually attend to my job and leave idiots like you in the lurch. The temerity.

Quote:was castigate anyone who expressed an opinion on the political weaponization of the FBI, the DoJ and much of the judiciary.

Opine all you want on the supposed political weaponization, sparkles.

Quote:How DARE anyone refer to the "Garland Stasi" or the "Wray Gestapo".

Hey you are free to say that all day long and then some. No law against stupid ass empty rhetoric. How dare that someone think that that is stupid ass empty rhetoric is your point of view I guess.

Quote: Procedures govern issuance of search warrants, so the quasi-judge in Florida cannot be questioned about his signing off on the midnight raid of Trump's residence.

Yep procedures govern the issuance of warrants. And the *judge* in Florida (yes magistrates hold Article 3 powers, I hate to tell your simple mind) should absolutely have the issue scrutinized, as should any decision. The simple fact is that the decision kind of fell in middle of allowable and with the proper procedure. Bummer for you. Notwithstanding of your constant caterwaul of the magical words of 'Stasi' and 'KGB'. Imagine that.

Kind of just like your constant caterwauling about me. Again, imagine that.

Oh, and here is an interesting little factoid about the MAL warrant. For all your animal screeching about it, Trump's team did not make any beef about the insufficiency of the warrant. Considering the deadline for those types of dispositive motions was (I think) two weeks ago, please cry some moar (intentional misspelling to help the mental midgets here) about it. Apparently the Trump legal team thought so much of that issue you whine about that they -- didnt do anything.

Quote:Yet now that the Hur testimony is coming to light, there is no other conclusion to be had. Our federal system of justice is corrupt. Those on the right get prosecuted. Those on the left get ignored, or absurd excuses made for them when they no longer can be ignored.

I guess 'the Hur testimony' is now the battle cry for the empty rhetoric crowd now. Goody.

Quote:You nevertheless still have the gall to pretend that those of us expressing doubts got it wrong and you were right all along. What a pathetic display. At least RWT gets paid for his intellectual dishonesty.

Huh? Last I saw saying 'I dont know how the case will turn out' is neither right, nor wrong. Oh, I forgot, why let that get in the way of your pathetic rhetorical chorus. Yay.

Buckwheat knew how it would turn out. 9-0.

Glad you did. Glad you got a counterpoint to the regurgitated crap you usually provide. Bravo.

(03-13-2024 08:36 AM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(03-13-2024 08:23 AM)Was SoMs Eagle Wrote:  

(03-13-2024 07:24 AM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(03-13-2024 06:50 AM)AdoptedMonarch Wrote:  

(03-13-2024 06:13 AM)tanqtonic Wrote:  Yep, and Tanq a few months ago on this board said that he had zero idea how the ballot removal case would be decided. No skin off my back, Buckwheat. If you are trying to ascribe that to me -- well, leave it to a moron to try and make something up to attach as some sort of insult in that issue. You be you.

I'd make a comment on the nuance in per curiam decision that is followed by 5 judges, and the concurrence from 3 that says some majorly different things about that unsigned opinion, but I will assume that would be miles above your head, so I wont bother.

Good grief, it seems some of the more terminally stupid around here took a whole host extra helping of stupid pills in the last few months.

When the Anthony Weiner crotch-photos scandal broke, I recall being surprised most by the comments from Jon Stewart and others on the left chuckling about how large he was. That was a very comforting moment for me. Like most men, I've had my "size matters" moments of self doubt. But if those Anthony Weiner photos qualifies as large, then I've got nothing whatsoever to worry about.

You, tanq., are serving a similar purpose. If your face-saving reservations regarding the ultimate outcome of the Supreme Court's ballot decision count in your mind as smart, then you've elevated most everyone else on this board to genius level. Even the Trumplets outpace you.

You sure have your panties in a wad this morning. Maybe take them off at night.

How dare I be honest and say 'I don know how this will turn out', when there is zero caselaw on the subject. The horror.

I will say honesty sure takes a backseat to sheer stupidity around here.

Quote:What you did on this forum, before running and hiding,

Yes how dare I actually attend to my job and leave idiots like you in the lurch. The temerity.

Quote:was castigate anyone who expressed an opinion on the political weaponization of the FBI, the DoJ and much of the judiciary.

Opine all you want on the supposed political weaponization, sparkles.

Quote:How DARE anyone refer to the "Garland Stasi" or the "Wray Gestapo".

Hey you are free to say that all day long and then some. No law against stupid ass empty rhetoric. How dare that someone think that that is stupid ass empty rhetoric is your point of view I guess.

Quote: Procedures govern issuance of search warrants, so the quasi-judge in Florida cannot be questioned about his signing off on the midnight raid of Trump's residence.

Yep procedures govern the issuance of warrants. And the *judge* in Florida (yes magistrates hold Article 3 powers, I hate to tell your simple mind) should absolutely have the issue scrutinized, as should any decision. The simple fact is that the decision kind of fell in middle of allowable and with the proper procedure. Bummer for you. Notwithstanding of your constant caterwaul of the magical words of 'Stasi' and 'KGB'. Imagine that.

Kind of just like your constant caterwauling about me. Again, imagine that.

Oh, and here is an interesting little factoid about the MAL warrant. For all your animal screeching about it, Trump's team did not make any beef about the insufficiency of the warrant. Considering the deadline for those types of dispositive motions was (I think) two weeks ago, please cry some moar (intentional misspelling to help the mental midgets here) about it. Apparently the Trump legal team thought so much of that issue you whine about that they -- didnt do anything.

Quote:Yet now that the Hur testimony is coming to light, there is no other conclusion to be had. Our federal system of justice is corrupt. Those on the right get prosecuted. Those on the left get ignored, or absurd excuses made for them when they no longer can be ignored.

I guess 'the Hur testimony' is now the battle cry for the empty rhetoric crowd now. Goody.

Quote:You nevertheless still have the gall to pretend that those of us expressing doubts got it wrong and you were right all along. What a pathetic display. At least RWT gets paid for his intellectual dishonesty.

Huh? Last I saw saying 'I dont know how the case will turn out' is neither right, nor wrong. Oh, I forgot, why let that get in the way of your pathetic rhetorical chorus. Yay.

Buckwheat knew how it would turn out. 9-0.

Glad you did. Glad you got a counterpoint to the regurgitated crap you usually provide. Bravo.

9-0. 9-0. 9-0. You are forever branded here. 9-0.

And by Buckwheat no less. Way to go Clarence.

(03-13-2024 08:36 AM)MonarchManiac Wrote:  

(03-13-2024 07:29 AM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(03-13-2024 07:16 AM)TigerBlue4Ever Wrote:  

(03-13-2024 07:04 AM)Was SoMs Eagle Wrote:  

(03-13-2024 06:13 AM)tanqtonic Wrote:  Yep, and Tanq a few months ago on this board said that he had zero idea how the ballot removal case would be decided. No skin off my back, Buckwheat. If you are trying to ascribe that to me -- well, leave it to a moron to try and make something up to attach as some sort of insult in that issue. You be you.

I'd make a comment on the nuance in per curiam decision that is followed by 5 judges, and the concurrence from 3 that says some majorly different things about that unsigned opinion, but I will assume that would be miles above your head, so I wont bother.

Good grief, it seems some of the more terminally stupid around here took a whole host extra helping of stupid pills in the last few months.

9-0.

He likes words, that's NINE to zero...

And as I said before -- no skin off my back. I guess you failed that part of your English curriculum.

No skin off your back except you are still here trying in vain to make it seem like you don't care with 400 word posts. Just take the L dude. We all know what you thought in terms of the state ballot cases. You were wrong. Own it.

Maybe point it out here. Or just make up crap. Your choice.

My exact response here was "I dont know how they will turn out".

Leave it to a fkwit like you to transform those words into 'You were wrong'. God, that is so stupid as to be literally laughable.

That is as clear a literal a divorce oneself from reality moment as I have seen in a long time. Good grief.

(03-13-2024 08:45 AM)Was SoMs Eagle Wrote:  

(03-13-2024 08:36 AM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(03-13-2024 08:23 AM)Was SoMs Eagle Wrote:  

(03-13-2024 07:24 AM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(03-13-2024 06:50 AM)AdoptedMonarch Wrote:  When the Anthony Weiner crotch-photos scandal broke, I recall being surprised most by the comments from Jon Stewart and others on the left chuckling about how large he was. That was a very comforting moment for me. Like most men, I've had my "size matters" moments of self doubt. But if those Anthony Weiner photos qualifies as large, then I've got nothing whatsoever to worry about.

You, tanq., are serving a similar purpose. If your face-saving reservations regarding the ultimate outcome of the Supreme Court's ballot decision count in your mind as smart, then you've elevated most everyone else on this board to genius level. Even the Trumplets outpace you.

You sure have your panties in a wad this morning. Maybe take them off at night.

How dare I be honest and say 'I don know how this will turn out', when there is zero caselaw on the subject. The horror.

I will say honesty sure takes a backseat to sheer stupidity around here.

Quote:What you did on this forum, before running and hiding,

Yes how dare I actually attend to my job and leave idiots like you in the lurch. The temerity.

Quote:was castigate anyone who expressed an opinion on the political weaponization of the FBI, the DoJ and much of the judiciary.

Opine all you want on the supposed political weaponization, sparkles.

Quote:How DARE anyone refer to the "Garland Stasi" or the "Wray Gestapo".

Hey you are free to say that all day long and then some. No law against stupid ass empty rhetoric. How dare that someone think that that is stupid ass empty rhetoric is your point of view I guess.

Quote: Procedures govern issuance of search warrants, so the quasi-judge in Florida cannot be questioned about his signing off on the midnight raid of Trump's residence.

Yep procedures govern the issuance of warrants. And the *judge* in Florida (yes magistrates hold Article 3 powers, I hate to tell your simple mind) should absolutely have the issue scrutinized, as should any decision. The simple fact is that the decision kind of fell in middle of allowable and with the proper procedure. Bummer for you. Notwithstanding of your constant caterwaul of the magical words of 'Stasi' and 'KGB'. Imagine that.

Kind of just like your constant caterwauling about me. Again, imagine that.

Oh, and here is an interesting little factoid about the MAL warrant. For all your animal screeching about it, Trump's team did not make any beef about the insufficiency of the warrant. Considering the deadline for those types of dispositive motions was (I think) two weeks ago, please cry some moar (intentional misspelling to help the mental midgets here) about it. Apparently the Trump legal team thought so much of that issue you whine about that they -- didnt do anything.

Quote:Yet now that the Hur testimony is coming to light, there is no other conclusion to be had. Our federal system of justice is corrupt. Those on the right get prosecuted. Those on the left get ignored, or absurd excuses made for them when they no longer can be ignored.

I guess 'the Hur testimony' is now the battle cry for the empty rhetoric crowd now. Goody.

Quote:You nevertheless still have the gall to pretend that those of us expressing doubts got it wrong and you were right all along. What a pathetic display. At least RWT gets paid for his intellectual dishonesty.

Huh? Last I saw saying 'I dont know how the case will turn out' is neither right, nor wrong. Oh, I forgot, why let that get in the way of your pathetic rhetorical chorus. Yay.

Buckwheat knew how it would turn out. 9-0.

Glad you did. Glad you got a counterpoint to the regurgitated crap you usually provide. Bravo.

9-0. 9-0. 9-0. You are forever branded here. 9-0.

And by Buckwheat no less. Way to go Clarence.

And one wonders why Trumpies are thought of as mindless fkwits. Imagine that.

(03-13-2024 08:48 AM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(03-13-2024 08:36 AM)MonarchManiac Wrote:  

(03-13-2024 07:29 AM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(03-13-2024 07:16 AM)TigerBlue4Ever Wrote:  

(03-13-2024 07:04 AM)Was SoMs Eagle Wrote:  9-0.

He likes words, that's NINE to zero...

And as I said before -- no skin off my back. I guess you failed that part of your English curriculum.

No skin off your back except you are still here trying in vain to make it seem like you don't care with 400 word posts. Just take the L dude. We all know what you thought in terms of the state ballot cases. You were wrong. Own it.

Maybe point it out here. Or just make up crap. Your choice.

My exact response here was "I dont know how they will turn out".

Leave it to a fkwit like you to transform those words into 'You were wrong'. God, that is so stupid as to be literally laughable.

That is as clear a literal a divorce oneself from reality moment as I have seen in a long time. Good grief.

Dis you.

People who make up things to reply to shouldn't really be lecturing about divorcing oneself from reality.

Welcome back tanq, pace yourself, it's hard work getting through to them

Sent from my SM-F946U using Tapatalk

(03-13-2024 08:54 AM)appst89 Wrote:  People who make up things to reply to shouldn't really be lecturing about divorcing oneself from reality.

Care to share anything that your pinhead thinks was 'made up'? Please be specific.

(03-13-2024 06:50 AM)AdoptedMonarch Wrote:  ...At least RWT gets paid for his intellectual dishonesty.

Liar.

Yeah, still never been paid one penny for anything I post on here.

And trust me, I'd probably pay others for the opportunity to continually make you guys look like complete morons...thinking that someone would pay someone to post on a board with a footprint the equivalent of a nit.

(03-13-2024 09:04 AM)Kruciff Wrote:  

Welcome back tanq, pace yourself, it's hard work getting through to them

Sent from my SM-F946U using Tapatalk

I have little doubt about never getting through with a vast number here. Especially when the norm seems to be dome weird combination of name calling and making up facts on the fly.

(03-13-2024 09:07 AM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(03-13-2024 08:54 AM)appst89 Wrote:  People who make up things to reply to shouldn't really be lecturing about divorcing oneself from reality.

Care to share anything that your pinhead thinks was 'made up'? Please be specific.

I've already documented them for you more than once. But because you seem to lack the ability to remember, I'll summarize. Three different times you responded to something I didn't say just so you could regale us all with one of your 50,000 word diatribes. I pointed out your error and instead of owning up to it, you said it was my fault that you misunderstood what I said. The other two times I pointed it out, you just failed to respond at all. Told me all I need to know about you. I don't like dishonest people, and I will go out of my way to point them out.

Is that specific enough for your pinhead to comprehend?

(03-13-2024 09:21 AM)tanqtonic Wrote:  Especially when the norm seems to be dome weird combination of name calling and making up facts on the fly.

Something with which you are completely familiar.

(03-13-2024 09:10 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(03-13-2024 06:50 AM)AdoptedMonarch Wrote:  ...At least RWT gets paid for his intellectual dishonesty.

Liar.

Yeah, still never been paid one penny for anything I post on here.

And trust me, I'd probably pay others for the opportunity to continually make you guys look like complete morons...thinking that someone would pay someone to post on a board with a footprint the equivalent of a nit.

Not a lie. Just alternate facts. Kind of the go to gor some.

(03-13-2024 08:49 AM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(03-13-2024 08:45 AM)Was SoMs Eagle Wrote:  

(03-13-2024 08:36 AM)tanqtonic Wrote:  

(03-13-2024 08:23 AM)Was SoMs Eagle Wrote:  

(03-13-2024 07:24 AM)tanqtonic Wrote:  You sure have your panties in a wad this morning. Maybe take them off at night.

How dare I be honest and say 'I don know how this will turn out', when there is zero caselaw on the subject. The horror.

I will say honesty sure takes a backseat to sheer stupidity around here.


Yes how dare I actually attend to my job and leave idiots like you in the lurch. The temerity.


Opine all you want on the supposed political weaponization, sparkles.


Hey you are free to say that all day long and then some. No law against stupid ass empty rhetoric. How dare that someone think that that is stupid ass empty rhetoric is your point of view I guess.


Yep procedures govern the issuance of warrants. And the *judge* in Florida (yes magistrates hold Article 3 powers, I hate to tell your simple mind) should absolutely have the issue scrutinized, as should any decision. The simple fact is that the decision kind of fell in middle of allowable and with the proper procedure. Bummer for you. Notwithstanding of your constant caterwaul of the magical words of 'Stasi' and 'KGB'. Imagine that.

Kind of just like your constant caterwauling about me. Again, imagine that.

Oh, and here is an interesting little factoid about the MAL warrant. For all your animal screeching about it, Trump's team did not make any beef about the insufficiency of the warrant. Considering the deadline for those types of dispositive motions was (I think) two weeks ago, please cry some moar (intentional misspelling to help the mental midgets here) about it. Apparently the Trump legal team thought so much of that issue you whine about that they -- didnt do anything.


I guess 'the Hur testimony' is now the battle cry for the empty rhetoric crowd now. Goody.


Huh? Last I saw saying 'I dont know how the case will turn out' is neither right, nor wrong. Oh, I forgot, why let that get in the way of your pathetic rhetorical chorus. Yay.

Buckwheat knew how it would turn out. 9-0.

Glad you did. Glad you got a counterpoint to the regurgitated crap you usually provide. Bravo.

9-0. 9-0. 9-0. You are forever branded here. 9-0.

And by Buckwheat no less. Way to go Clarence.

And one wonders why Trumpies are thought of as mindless fkwits. Imagine that.

Buckwheat knew. 9-0. Who’s the mindless “fkwit”?

(03-13-2024 09:04 AM)Kruciff Wrote:  

Welcome back tanq, pace yourself, it's hard work getting through to them

Sent from my SM-F946U using Tapatalk

Hey 9-0, another ally. Khrushchev approves!
Mindless “fkwits”.

(03-13-2024 06:13 AM)tanqtonic Wrote:  I'd make a comment on the nuance in per curiam decision that is followed by 5 judges, and the concurrence from 3 that says some majorly different things about that unsigned opinion, but I will assume that would be miles above your head, so I wont bother.

Sadly, it looks like you're going to have to make this comment after all.

Clearly, the mopes have no clue how these things work.

(03-13-2024 09:33 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(03-13-2024 06:13 AM)tanqtonic Wrote:  I'd make a comment on the nuance in per curiam decision that is followed by 5 judges, and the concurrence from 3 that says some majorly different things about that unsigned opinion, but I will assume that would be miles above your head, so I wont bother.

Sadly, it looks like you're going to have to make this comment after all.

Clearly, the mopes have no clue how these things work.

As for you, Tommie Bois, is Biden cleared of wrongdoing by Hur’s report? Asking here because you ignored that thread.

(03-13-2024 09:33 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(03-13-2024 06:13 AM)tanqtonic Wrote:  I'd make a comment on the nuance in per curiam decision that is followed by 5 judges, and the concurrence from 3 that says some majorly different things about that unsigned opinion, but I will assume that would be miles above your head, so I wont bother.

Sadly, it looks like you're going to have to make this comment after all.

Clearly, the mopes have no clue how these things work.

It's hard to say which of you is the bigger embarrassment:

--> tanq, for insisting on displaying his own epic ignorance?

--> or RWT for insisting on displaying his total lack of integrity?

(03-13-2024 09:37 AM)Was SoMs Eagle Wrote:  

(03-13-2024 09:33 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(03-13-2024 06:13 AM)tanqtonic Wrote:  I'd make a comment on the nuance in per curiam decision that is followed by 5 judges, and the concurrence from 3 that says some majorly different things about that unsigned opinion, but I will assume that would be miles above your head, so I wont bother.

Sadly, it looks like you're going to have to make this comment after all.

Clearly, the mopes have no clue how these things work.

As for you is Biden cleared of wrongdoing by Hur’s report? Asking here because you ignored that thread.

So, let me see if I have this straight.

I get paid to post here, but yet I didn't post on a thread, and that hurts your butt?

Seek help.

Seeing Tanq spin & twirl is pretty darn funny.