(03-25-2023 10:11 AM)U_of_Elvis Wrote:  

(03-25-2023 10:07 AM)shere khan Wrote:  The Ashley Biden diary is the most recent example of a blanket media blackout, a July 2019 excerpt going viral two weeks ago. Read this and defend it as non-newsworthy:
“Was I molested,” the author writes. “I think so — I can’t remember specifics but I do remember trauma. Hyper-sexualized @ a young age . . . I remember being somewhat sexualized with Caroline; I remember having sex with friends @ a young age; showers w/my dad (probably not appropriate).”

https://nypost.com/2022/07/08/portrait-o...the-press/


Prog filth voted for this. No wonder they are pissed about a bible in a library

Now I know this may be hard for you, but does that say the same words as the picture you posted?

No, because the quote in the picture is made up.

We get it. You think its ok and believe the media. Good luck. You believed the jab, believed hunters laptop was russian dis information, believe supporting ukraine is supporting drmocracy.

You are lost. I dontt care. It is acceptable.

We get it. The lines are drawn.

These are your people

https://twitter.com/JeffYoungerTX/status...81634?s=20

Your president filth






But but but

The bible in a library

Reeeeeeeerr

(03-25-2023 10:11 AM)U_of_Elvis Wrote:  

(03-25-2023 10:07 AM)shere khan Wrote:  The Ashley Biden diary is the most recent example of a blanket media blackout, a July 2019 excerpt going viral two weeks ago. Read this and defend it as non-newsworthy:
“Was I molested,” the author writes. “I think so — I can’t remember specifics but I do remember trauma. Hyper-sexualized @ a young age . . . I remember being somewhat sexualized with Caroline; I remember having sex with friends @ a young age; showers w/my dad (probably not appropriate).”

https://nypost.com/2022/07/08/portrait-o...the-press/


Prog filth voted for this. No wonder they are pissed about a bible in a library

Now I know this may be hard for you, but does that say the same words as the picture you posted?

No, because the quote in the picture is made up.

So your only beef with the whole thing is one sentence?

(03-25-2023 10:18 AM)shere khan Wrote:  These are your people

https://twitter.com/JeffYoungerTX/status...81634?s=20

Evil, twisted, sick, demented... There aren't enough words to describe the child abuse I just watched.

(03-25-2023 10:37 AM)TigerBlue4Ever Wrote:  

(03-25-2023 10:18 AM)shere khan Wrote:  These are your people

https://twitter.com/JeffYoungerTX/status...81634?s=20

Evil, twisted, sick, demented... There aren't enough words to describe the child abuse I just watched.

Democrats

(03-25-2023 10:14 AM)shere khan Wrote:  

(03-25-2023 10:11 AM)U_of_Elvis Wrote:  

(03-25-2023 10:07 AM)shere khan Wrote:  The Ashley Biden diary is the most recent example of a blanket media blackout, a July 2019 excerpt going viral two weeks ago. Read this and defend it as non-newsworthy:
“Was I molested,” the author writes. “I think so — I can’t remember specifics but I do remember trauma. Hyper-sexualized @ a young age . . . I remember being somewhat sexualized with Caroline; I remember having sex with friends @ a young age; showers w/my dad (probably not appropriate).”

https://nypost.com/2022/07/08/portrait-o...the-press/


Prog filth voted for this. No wonder they are pissed about a bible in a library

Now I know this may be hard for you, but does that say the same words as the picture you posted?

No, because the quote in the picture is made up.

We get it. You think its ok and believe the media. Good luck. You believed the jab, believed hunters laptop was russian dis information, believe supporting ukraine is supporting drmocracy.

You are lost. I dontt care. It is acceptable.

We get it. The lines are drawn.

I get it, you care about what you want to believe and not the truth.

The truth is the quote you posted isn’t in the leaked diary.

(03-25-2023 10:03 AM)shere khan Wrote:  George Orwell — 'The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.'

^^^^^

Hey! They do that for Covid too! Imagine that.

(03-25-2023 11:59 AM)U_of_Elvis Wrote:  

(03-25-2023 10:14 AM)shere khan Wrote:  

(03-25-2023 10:11 AM)U_of_Elvis Wrote:  

(03-25-2023 10:07 AM)shere khan Wrote:  The Ashley Biden diary is the most recent example of a blanket media blackout, a July 2019 excerpt going viral two weeks ago. Read this and defend it as non-newsworthy:
“Was I molested,” the author writes. “I think so — I can’t remember specifics but I do remember trauma. Hyper-sexualized @ a young age . . . I remember being somewhat sexualized with Caroline; I remember having sex with friends @ a young age; showers w/my dad (probably not appropriate).”

https://nypost.com/2022/07/08/portrait-o...the-press/


Prog filth voted for this. No wonder they are pissed about a bible in a library

Now I know this may be hard for you, but does that say the same words as the picture you posted?

No, because the quote in the picture is made up.

We get it. You think its ok and believe the media. Good luck. You believed the jab, believed hunters laptop was russian dis information, believe supporting ukraine is supporting drmocracy.

You are lost. I dontt care. It is acceptable.

We get it. The lines are drawn.

I get it, you care about what you want to believe and not the truth.

The truth is the quote you posted isn’t in the leaked diary.

Do you deny that Joe showered with his daughter? How many uncomfortable scenes do you need to watch with Joe and young girls? Would you feel comfortable if Joe was handling your twelve year old girl? And, would you trust him enough to leave them alone together?

If you can't answer these questions honestly you are as perverted as the deflection you are trying to run cover for! Semantics much? Let's just say that isn't verbatim what was written. Cringeworthy at best.

But then again it has what has gotten us to where we are today with the freak show being played as normalcy.

(03-24-2023 08:14 AM)Kruciff Wrote:  

(03-24-2023 08:10 AM)b2b Wrote:  I guess the difference is that the Bible makes it perfectly clear that these are degenerate behaviors and there were consequences for them EVERY TIME.

No the difference is the people banning the books think the Bible is an exception to the laws they pass.

Don't quite get your point?

(03-25-2023 02:44 PM)umbluegray Wrote:  

(03-24-2023 08:14 AM)Kruciff Wrote:  

(03-24-2023 08:10 AM)b2b Wrote:  I guess the difference is that the Bible makes it perfectly clear that these are degenerate behaviors and there were consequences for them EVERY TIME.

No the difference is the people banning the books think the Bible is an exception to the laws they pass.

Don't quite get your point?

Christians pushing Christianity veiled in legislation typically tend to forget that the laws they pass also apply to them too. Take the book bans, for example. If your goal was to "protect children of a certain age from pornographic or sexual material" that's a pretty easy problem to solve, that could be done any number of ways, but the way the Republicans have chosen is "ban anything that I (the republican citizen) assume to be pornographic and sexual in content" not realizing that this definition that they've put down would also impact them negatively, i.e. content in the Bible. I can speculate many reasons why this is, but at the end of the day, this complete lack of rational response from these religiously motivated political groups, who very typically put solution over practice, always have this very same tell. I mentioned previously that the Satanic Temple as a legal organization has utilized this to great success in ensuring the separation of church and state at the regional and national level.

(03-25-2023 05:14 PM)Kruciff Wrote:  

(03-25-2023 02:44 PM)umbluegray Wrote:  

(03-24-2023 08:14 AM)Kruciff Wrote:  

(03-24-2023 08:10 AM)b2b Wrote:  I guess the difference is that the Bible makes it perfectly clear that these are degenerate behaviors and there were consequences for them EVERY TIME.

No the difference is the people banning the books think the Bible is an exception to the laws they pass.

Don't quite get your point?

Christians pushing Christianity veiled in legislation typically tend to forget that the laws they pass also apply to them too. Take the book bans, for example. If your goal was to "protect children of a certain age from pornographic or sexual material" that's a pretty easy problem to solve, that could be done any number of ways, but the way the Republicans have chosen is "ban anything that I (the republican citizen) assume to be pornographic and sexual in content" not realizing that this definition that they've put down would also impact them negatively, i.e. content in the Bible. I can speculate many reasons why this is, but at the end of the day, this complete lack of rational response from these religiously motivated political groups, who very typically put solution over practice, always have this very same tell. I mentioned previously that the Satanic Temple as a legal organization has utilized this to great success in ensuring the separation of church and state at the regional and national level.

ok groomer

As I understood the rule when the court opined originally like 50 years ago, one consideration was whether the book/movie/document had any redeeming social values or simply appealed to prurient interest. I think the Bible wins all day on redeeming social values.

(03-25-2023 05:14 PM)Kruciff Wrote:  Christians pushing Christianity veiled in legislation typically tend to forget that the laws they pass also apply to them too. Take the book bans, for example. If your goal was to "protect children of a certain age from pornographic or sexual material" that's a pretty easy problem to solve, that could be done any number of ways, but the way the Republicans have chosen is "ban anything that I (the republican citizen) assume to be pornographic and sexual in content" not realizing that this definition that they've put down would also impact them negatively, i.e. content in the Bible. I can speculate many reasons why this is, but at the end of the day, this complete lack of rational response from these religiously motivated political groups, who very typically put solution over practice, always have this very same tell. I mentioned previously that the Satanic Temple as a legal organization has utilized this to great success in ensuring the separation of church and state at the regional and national level.

Maybe you should try to read the Bible first before making such a stupid statement. Then again, it doesn't have pictures so you might not understand it.

(03-25-2023 11:59 AM)U_of_Elvis Wrote:  

(03-25-2023 10:14 AM)shere khan Wrote:  

(03-25-2023 10:11 AM)U_of_Elvis Wrote:  

(03-25-2023 10:07 AM)shere khan Wrote:  The Ashley Biden diary is the most recent example of a blanket media blackout, a July 2019 excerpt going viral two weeks ago. Read this and defend it as non-newsworthy:
“Was I molested,” the author writes. “I think so — I can’t remember specifics but I do remember trauma. Hyper-sexualized @ a young age . . . I remember being somewhat sexualized with Caroline; I remember having sex with friends @ a young age; showers w/my dad (probably not appropriate).”

https://nypost.com/2022/07/08/portrait-o...the-press/


Prog filth voted for this. No wonder they are pissed about a bible in a library

Now I know this may be hard for you, but does that say the same words as the picture you posted?

No, because the quote in the picture is made up.

We get it. You think its ok and believe the media. Good luck. You believed the jab, believed hunters laptop was russian dis information, believe supporting ukraine is supporting drmocracy.

You are lost. I dontt care. It is acceptable.

We get it. The lines are drawn.

I get it, you care about what you want to believe and not the truth.

The truth is the quote you posted isn’t in the leaked diary.

We cant hear you over the sound of Joe Biden* showering with his daughter.

(03-25-2023 07:38 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

(03-25-2023 11:59 AM)U_of_Elvis Wrote:  

(03-25-2023 10:14 AM)shere khan Wrote:  

(03-25-2023 10:11 AM)U_of_Elvis Wrote:  

(03-25-2023 10:07 AM)shere khan Wrote:  The Ashley Biden diary is the most recent example of a blanket media blackout, a July 2019 excerpt going viral two weeks ago. Read this and defend it as non-newsworthy:
“Was I molested,” the author writes. “I think so — I can’t remember specifics but I do remember trauma. Hyper-sexualized @ a young age . . . I remember being somewhat sexualized with Caroline; I remember having sex with friends @ a young age; showers w/my dad (probably not appropriate).”

https://nypost.com/2022/07/08/portrait-o...the-press/


Prog filth voted for this. No wonder they are pissed about a bible in a library

Now I know this may be hard for you, but does that say the same words as the picture you posted?

No, because the quote in the picture is made up.

We get it. You think its ok and believe the media. Good luck. You believed the jab, believed hunters laptop was russian dis information, believe supporting ukraine is supporting drmocracy.

You are lost. I dontt care. It is acceptable.

We get it. The lines are drawn.

I get it, you care about what you want to believe and not the truth.

The truth is the quote you posted isn’t in the leaked diary.

We cant hear you over the sound of Joe Biden* showering with his daughter.

I still want him to confirm that his only point of contention with the entire story is based on a one sentence statement she may or may not have made.

(03-25-2023 05:14 PM)Kruciff Wrote:  

(03-25-2023 02:44 PM)umbluegray Wrote:  

(03-24-2023 08:14 AM)Kruciff Wrote:  

(03-24-2023 08:10 AM)b2b Wrote:  I guess the difference is that the Bible makes it perfectly clear that these are degenerate behaviors and there were consequences for them EVERY TIME.

No the difference is the people banning the books think the Bible is an exception to the laws they pass.

Don't quite get your point?

Christians pushing Christianity veiled in legislation typically tend to forget that the laws they pass also apply to them too. Take the book bans, for example. If your goal was to "protect children of a certain age from pornographic or sexual material" that's a pretty easy problem to solve, that could be done any number of ways, but the way the Republicans have chosen is "ban anything that I (the republican citizen) assume to be pornographic and sexual in content" not realizing that this definition that they've put down would also impact them negatively, i.e. content in the Bible. I can speculate many reasons why this is, but at the end of the day, this complete lack of rational response from these religiously motivated political groups, who very typically put solution over practice, always have this very same tell. I mentioned previously that the Satanic Temple as a legal organization has utilized this to great success in ensuring the separation of church and state at the regional and national level.

All that hatred you have for God, the Bible and Christians only ends one way for you.

Being cast into the Lake of fire for all eternity on judgment day.

You're on a one way road and that's where it ends. No matter how much you hate me or people like me, I don't wish that ending on you or anyone.

I pray with all my heart you repent and come to faith in Christ before you cross over into eternity.

(03-25-2023 10:00 PM)ericsrevenge76 Wrote:  

(03-25-2023 05:14 PM)Kruciff Wrote:  

(03-25-2023 02:44 PM)umbluegray Wrote:  

(03-24-2023 08:14 AM)Kruciff Wrote:  

(03-24-2023 08:10 AM)b2b Wrote:  I guess the difference is that the Bible makes it perfectly clear that these are degenerate behaviors and there were consequences for them EVERY TIME.

No the difference is the people banning the books think the Bible is an exception to the laws they pass.

Don't quite get your point?

Christians pushing Christianity veiled in legislation typically tend to forget that the laws they pass also apply to them too. Take the book bans, for example. If your goal was to "protect children of a certain age from pornographic or sexual material" that's a pretty easy problem to solve, that could be done any number of ways, but the way the Republicans have chosen is "ban anything that I (the republican citizen) assume to be pornographic and sexual in content" not realizing that this definition that they've put down would also impact them negatively, i.e. content in the Bible. I can speculate many reasons why this is, but at the end of the day, this complete lack of rational response from these religiously motivated political groups, who very typically put solution over practice, always have this very same tell. I mentioned previously that the Satanic Temple as a legal organization has utilized this to great success in ensuring the separation of church and state at the regional and national level.

All that hatred you have for God, the Bible and Christians only ends one way for you.

Being cast into the Lake of fire for all eternity on judgment day.

You're on a one way road and that's where it ends. No matter how much you hate me or people like me, I don't wish that ending on you or anyone.

I pray with all my heart you repent and come to faith in Christ before you cross over into eternity.

You clutch those pearls any harder, and you'll compete with De Beers on the open market

(03-25-2023 10:35 PM)Kruciff Wrote:  

(03-25-2023 10:00 PM)ericsrevenge76 Wrote:  

(03-25-2023 05:14 PM)Kruciff Wrote:  

(03-25-2023 02:44 PM)umbluegray Wrote:  

(03-24-2023 08:14 AM)Kruciff Wrote:  No the difference is the people banning the books think the Bible is an exception to the laws they pass.

Don't quite get your point?

Christians pushing Christianity veiled in legislation typically tend to forget that the laws they pass also apply to them too. Take the book bans, for example. If your goal was to "protect children of a certain age from pornographic or sexual material" that's a pretty easy problem to solve, that could be done any number of ways, but the way the Republicans have chosen is "ban anything that I (the republican citizen) assume to be pornographic and sexual in content" not realizing that this definition that they've put down would also impact them negatively, i.e. content in the Bible. I can speculate many reasons why this is, but at the end of the day, this complete lack of rational response from these religiously motivated political groups, who very typically put solution over practice, always have this very same tell. I mentioned previously that the Satanic Temple as a legal organization has utilized this to great success in ensuring the separation of church and state at the regional and national level.

All that hatred you have for God, the Bible and Christians only ends one way for you.

Being cast into the Lake of fire for all eternity on judgment day.

You're on a one way road and that's where it ends. No matter how much you hate me or people like me, I don't wish that ending on you or anyone.

I pray with all my heart you repent and come to faith in Christ before you cross over into eternity.

You clutch those pearls any harder, and you'll compete with De Beers on the open market

I sincerely love you and don't want you to end up in the Lake of Fire for all eternity, Kruciff.

I pray will all my heart you come to salvation in Jesus.

God bless you and your family.

(03-25-2023 10:00 PM)ericsrevenge76 Wrote:  

(03-25-2023 05:14 PM)Kruciff Wrote:  

(03-25-2023 02:44 PM)umbluegray Wrote:  

(03-24-2023 08:14 AM)Kruciff Wrote:  

(03-24-2023 08:10 AM)b2b Wrote:  I guess the difference is that the Bible makes it perfectly clear that these are degenerate behaviors and there were consequences for them EVERY TIME.

No the difference is the people banning the books think the Bible is an exception to the laws they pass.

Don't quite get your point?

Christians pushing Christianity veiled in legislation typically tend to forget that the laws they pass also apply to them too. Take the book bans, for example. If your goal was to "protect children of a certain age from pornographic or sexual material" that's a pretty easy problem to solve, that could be done any number of ways, but the way the Republicans have chosen is "ban anything that I (the republican citizen) assume to be pornographic and sexual in content" not realizing that this definition that they've put down would also impact them negatively, i.e. content in the Bible. I can speculate many reasons why this is, but at the end of the day, this complete lack of rational response from these religiously motivated political groups, who very typically put solution over practice, always have this very same tell. I mentioned previously that the Satanic Temple as a legal organization has utilized this to great success in ensuring the separation of church and state at the regional and national level.

All that hatred you have for God, the Bible and Christians only ends one way for you.

Being cast into the Lake of fire for all eternity on judgment day.

You're on a one way road and that's where it ends. No matter how much you hate me or people like me, I don't wish that ending on you or anyone.

I pray with all my heart you repent and come to faith in Christ before you cross over into eternity.

Unfortunately, sometimes Eric you just have to dust off your shoes and move on.

Just remember if we died with him then we live with him. If we endure this life in him then we will reign with him. But, if we disown him he will surely disown us. We can be faithless but he will remain faithful for he cannot disown himself.