(01-12-2023 03:00 PM)Was SoMs Eagle Wrote:  

(01-12-2023 02:57 PM)Mr_XcentricK Wrote:  

(01-12-2023 02:54 PM)bearcat65 Wrote:  

(01-12-2023 02:43 PM)Mr_XcentricK Wrote:  

(01-12-2023 02:19 PM)bearcat65 Wrote:  https://cis.org/Bensman/Border-Patrol-Ag...ction-Halt

"You hear TV, and they would say, 'well the experts say the wall isn't effective,' and I never understood who these experts were," said the agent. "Because all of our data says, you know, 90 percent effective rate ... dropping of crossings ... increased apprehensions and all of that. And it's like, well who are these experts to say it wasn't effective and what are they basing that on? You know, they never really specify.""


But of course you know better.

Try googling “scaling the border wall”

Also there are critics of the Center for Immigration Studies…

Quote:CIS reports have been widely criticized and debunked by groups such as the Immigration Policy Center and the CATO Institute. Alex Nowrasteh, an immigration policy analyst at CATO, said in early 2017: “Oh, I’m convinced that [CIS executive director Mark Krikorian is] wrong about all the facts and issues. They’re wrong about the impact of immigrants on the U.S. economy and on U.S. society.”

Again, they talked to border agents on site. I have to believe they have a better idea of what's going on and what works than the ones you refer to.

Do you honestly think they are the only Think Tank to talk to the agents? Or that Think Tanks don’t have a bias like media outlets?

OK guys who wants to debate with Horseman that the border is secure and that it’s Biden who did it?

even commie tommie wouldn't circle jerk that two-legged chode...

(01-12-2023 02:57 PM)Mr_XcentricK Wrote:  

(01-12-2023 02:54 PM)bearcat65 Wrote:  

(01-12-2023 02:43 PM)Mr_XcentricK Wrote:  

(01-12-2023 02:19 PM)bearcat65 Wrote:  

(01-12-2023 02:13 PM)Mr_XcentricK Wrote:  I said “border crises” and it has been handed off from President to President. But looking at Trump specifically how much money was spent on a wall that any rational person rightfully predicted was going to be an absolute failure?

https://cis.org/Bensman/Border-Patrol-Ag...ction-Halt

"You hear TV, and they would say, 'well the experts say the wall isn't effective,' and I never understood who these experts were," said the agent. "Because all of our data says, you know, 90 percent effective rate ... dropping of crossings ... increased apprehensions and all of that. And it's like, well who are these experts to say it wasn't effective and what are they basing that on? You know, they never really specify.""


But of course you know better.

Try googling “scaling the border wall”

Also there are critics of the Center for Immigration Studies…

Quote:CIS reports have been widely criticized and debunked by groups such as the Immigration Policy Center and the CATO Institute. Alex Nowrasteh, an immigration policy analyst at CATO, said in early 2017: “Oh, I’m convinced that [CIS executive director Mark Krikorian is] wrong about all the facts and issues. They’re wrong about the impact of immigrants on the U.S. economy and on U.S. society.”

Again, they talked to border agents on site. I have to believe they have a better idea of what's going on and what works than the ones you refer to.

Do you honestly think they are the only Think Tank to talk to the agents? Or that Think Tanks don’t have a bias like media outlets?

So your sources are biased when saying a wall doesn't work. That leaves us with looking at the number of illegal crossings under Biden versus Trump. Of course most know that when a wall was being discussed it wasn't just a physical wall but a wall in places with other measures to deter illegal crossings a fact the left conveniently ignores just as they ignore people on the border with the most knowledge of the actual situation.

zerO’s own head of DHS has said the border situation is an unprecedented disaster.
Anything around a thousand a day is a crisis, said Jeh Johnson.

2022 had 2,000,000 illegal aliens stroll on in and that’s just the ones who gave themselves up. The get always (often the drug mules) are estimated at a quarter of that number in addition.

Now go look up the entire population of say. Atlanta. Finish the wall.

(01-12-2023 02:06 PM)WalkThePlank Wrote:  

(01-12-2023 01:57 PM)Gamenole Wrote:  YES. That's it in a nutshell, I don't think it could be summed up any better in one sentence. Intense fear of the change they rail helplessly against in a desperate and doomed effort to forestall it as long as possible. Fear of the change that means old, white, straight and nominally Christian men no longer hold all of the cards in our country and the world.

Is this why you voted for an old, white, straight, nominally Christian in 2020? Why feed into the system that you supposedly resent by continuing to vote for it?

There's nothing wrong with old, white, straight and nominally Christian men as President or in other positions of power. Nobody wants to exclude them, they're a large part of our population and they've done a good job running this country in many ways. They're just not going to have the monopoly on power that they held for much of nation's history.

I hope the next bus load drops off in front of Horseman’s house.

(01-12-2023 03:10 PM)BobcatEngineer Wrote:  

Now that’s a good one there since comedy works best with truth mixed in.

Only problem is sane people don’t think that possibility is funny at all.

(01-12-2023 03:10 PM)Gamenole Wrote:  

(01-12-2023 02:06 PM)WalkThePlank Wrote:  

(01-12-2023 01:57 PM)Gamenole Wrote:  YES. That's it in a nutshell, I don't think it could be summed up any better in one sentence. Intense fear of the change they rail helplessly against in a desperate and doomed effort to forestall it as long as possible. Fear of the change that means old, white, straight and nominally Christian men no longer hold all of the cards in our country and the world.

Is this why you voted for an old, white, straight, nominally Christian in 2020? Why feed into the system that you supposedly resent by continuing to vote for it?

There's nothing wrong with old, white, straight and nominally Christian men as President or in other positions of power. Nobody wants to exclude them, they're a large part of our population and they've done a good job running this country in many ways. They're just not going to have the monopoly on power that they held for much of nation's history.

If I told you that not one conservative/republican that I know personally has ever said anything about keeping white people in power, would you believe it?

Nobody with serious views wants white people to have a monopoly on power. It's legitimately one of the dumbest things to believe in society. Nobody should be penalized or rewarded for having certain skin pigmentation.

(01-12-2023 03:25 PM)WalkThePlank Wrote:  

(01-12-2023 03:10 PM)Gamenole Wrote:  

(01-12-2023 02:06 PM)WalkThePlank Wrote:  

(01-12-2023 01:57 PM)Gamenole Wrote:  YES. That's it in a nutshell, I don't think it could be summed up any better in one sentence. Intense fear of the change they rail helplessly against in a desperate and doomed effort to forestall it as long as possible. Fear of the change that means old, white, straight and nominally Christian men no longer hold all of the cards in our country and the world.

Is this why you voted for an old, white, straight, nominally Christian in 2020? Why feed into the system that you supposedly resent by continuing to vote for it?

There's nothing wrong with old, white, straight and nominally Christian men as President or in other positions of power. Nobody wants to exclude them, they're a large part of our population and they've done a good job running this country in many ways. They're just not going to have the monopoly on power that they held for much of nation's history.

If I told you that not one conservative/republican that I know personally has ever said anything about keeping white people in power, would you believe it?

Nobody with serious views wants white people to have a monopoly on power. It's legitimately one of the dumbest things to believe in society. Nobody should be penalized or rewarded for having certain skin pigmentation.

dude ... I really mean, dude!

this is how they suck ya in via the AI succubus ... last warning ... enter at your own risk, bubba!

it's better to slap 'em silly or not engage at this point .... that's why 'nole is dangerous ... just like commie tommie was ~7 years ago...

it's either sig line 4 or bend-the-fk-0ver for these pos ... your choice, pal!

The irony of Mr Xcuses posts....very impressive

Sent from my SM-F721U using Tapatalk

(01-12-2023 03:45 PM)stinkfist Wrote:  dude ... I really mean, dude!

this is how they suck ya in via the AI succubus ... last warning ... enter at your own risk, bubba!

it's better to slap 'em silly or not engage at this point .... that's why 'nole is dangerous ... just like commie tommie was ~7 years ago...

it's either sig line 4 or bend-the-fk-0ver for these pos ... your choice, pal!

Nole, Tom, Kruciff, etc are fine in my book. Had many decent discussions with them in the past. All good

(01-12-2023 03:49 PM)WalkThePlank Wrote:  

(01-12-2023 03:45 PM)stinkfist Wrote:  dude ... I really mean, dude!

this is how they suck ya in via the AI succubus ... last warning ... enter at your own risk, bubba!

it's better to slap 'em silly or not engage at this point .... that's why 'nole is dangerous ... just like commie tommie was ~7 years ago...

it's either sig line 4 or bend-the-fk-0ver for these pos ... your choice, pal!

Nole, Tom, Kruciff, etc are fine in my book. Had many decent discussions with them in the past. All good

good luck ... Kruciff is having fair moments of late ... that's a plus!

'nole is your enemy ... never forget that serpent...

tommie commie was outed years ago ... I know ... I was his poster child for 'ignore' ... he made the mistake of telling me such ... #oopsy

@fairWarning

(01-12-2023 02:06 PM)WalkThePlank Wrote:  

(01-12-2023 01:57 PM)Gamenole Wrote:  YES. That's it in a nutshell, I don't think it could be summed up any better in one sentence. Intense fear of the change they rail helplessly against in a desperate and doomed effort to forestall it as long as possible. Fear of the change that means old, white, straight and nominally Christian men no longer hold all of the cards in our country and the world.

Is this why you voted for an old, white, straight, nominally Christian in 2020? Why feed into the system that you supposedly resent by continuing to vote for it?

Exactly why Leftists are called hypocrites. The very same thing that they say that they abhor and they go and vote for it anyway. You have a 50 year member of government who lied, insulted and was openly corrupt and because he has a D in front of his name they think he's all that, yep, all that is crooked.

They were aghast at Trumps telephone call to the Ukraine and wanted to investigate and yet they got this SOB blatently committing quid pro quo about a loan that the Ukrainians wanted (and he wasn't even president then) and they turn the other way.

Face it, the Leftists are so evil and hypocritical and yet they never see it. "Ya zora nunca se ve la cola ni el zorillo el fundio". Loosely translated, they can't see themselves as they are.

(01-12-2023 04:02 PM)olliebaba Wrote:  

(01-12-2023 02:06 PM)WalkThePlank Wrote:  

(01-12-2023 01:57 PM)Gamenole Wrote:  YES. That's it in a nutshell, I don't think it could be summed up any better in one sentence. Intense fear of the change they rail helplessly against in a desperate and doomed effort to forestall it as long as possible. Fear of the change that means old, white, straight and nominally Christian men no longer hold all of the cards in our country and the world.

Is this why you voted for an old, white, straight, nominally Christian in 2020? Why feed into the system that you supposedly resent by continuing to vote for it?

Exactly why Leftists are called hypocrites. The very same thing that they say that they abhor and they go and vote for it anyway. You have a 50 year member of government who lied, insulted and was openly corrupt and because he has a D in front of his name they think he's all that, yep, all that is crooked.

They were aghast at Trumps telephone call to the Ukraine and wanted to investigate and yet they got this SOB blatently committing quid pro quo about a loan that the Ukrainians wanted (and he wasn't even president then) and they turn the other way.

Face it, the Leftists are so evil and hypocritical and yet they never see it. "Ya zora nunca se ve la cola ni el zorillo el fundio". Loosely translated, they can't see themselves as they are.

how does one combat someone that doesn't care?

hint: it's no longer the threat of religion or the construct of today's version of law ... it dayum sure isn't incentivized capitalism...

Who's a Conspiracy Theorist?

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/democra...atch-found

(01-12-2023 04:22 PM)gdunn Wrote:  Who's a Conspiracy Theorist?

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/democra...atch-found

(01-12-2023 02:08 PM)Mr_XcentricK Wrote:  

(01-12-2023 02:06 PM)WalkThePlank Wrote:  

(01-12-2023 01:57 PM)Gamenole Wrote:  YES. That's it in a nutshell, I don't think it could be summed up any better in one sentence. Intense fear of the change they rail helplessly against in a desperate and doomed effort to forestall it as long as possible. Fear of the change that means old, white, straight and nominally Christian men no longer hold all of the cards in our country and the world.

Is this why you voted for an old, white, straight, nominally Christian in 2020? Why feed into the system that you supposedly resent by continuing to vote for it?

Did Dem voters ever say we don’t have some of the same frustrations with pir current political party system and their processes that Republicans do?

LOL...This is choice backtracking.

You have your own thread goofy. I created it to hold all of the lunatic leftist utopia BS you clowns want to do and are doing....

Someone help guide this poor soul to the goodness, he can go in and enjoy the stench from all of the mess in that thread.

Sent from my SM-F721U using Tapatalk

(01-12-2023 03:49 PM)WalkThePlank Wrote:  

(01-12-2023 03:45 PM)stinkfist Wrote:  dude ... I really mean, dude!

this is how they suck ya in via the AI succubus ... last warning ... enter at your own risk, bubba!

it's better to slap 'em silly or not engage at this point .... that's why 'nole is dangerous ... just like commie tommie was ~7 years ago...

it's either sig line 4 or bend-the-fk-0ver for these pos ... your choice, pal!

Nole, Tom, Kruciff, etc are fine in my book. Had many decent discussions with them in the past. All good

I have no problem with them either. There would be no reason to come here without them other than to read a constant GOP circle jerkfest.