(12-11-2022 01:55 PM)Mr_XcentricK Wrote:  

(12-11-2022 01:53 PM)BartlettTigerFan Wrote:  He's not actually this stupid, he's just a troll. Even he doesn't really believe the BS he types.

No you are just pissed they have naot arrested anyone for the “crime”

Hahaha. I'm not pissed about anything troll. You and your ilk are insignificant. You can do or say whatever you want so long as you don't come on my property to do it.

(12-11-2022 02:03 PM)BartlettTigerFan Wrote:  

(12-11-2022 01:55 PM)Mr_XcentricK Wrote:  

(12-11-2022 01:53 PM)BartlettTigerFan Wrote:  He's not actually this stupid, he's just a troll. Even he doesn't really believe the BS he types.

No you are just pissed they have naot arrested anyone for the “crime”

Hahaha. I'm not pissed about anything troll. You and your ilk are insignificant. You can do or say whatever you want so long as you don't come on my property to do it.

So insignificant that the left sits in the WH and controls the Senate.

Why in da ____ would I come onto your property? Sounds like someone is itching to feel like a man with his pew pew in hand.

why is the the left ends up having a heavy flow day anytime IUD Vindman gets junk-kicked in the vag?

Looking forward to the fraud Fauci being exposed, LOL.

Too damn SWEET.

(12-11-2022 01:51 PM)Mr_XcentricK Wrote:  

(12-11-2022 11:55 AM)bullet Wrote:  

(12-11-2022 11:40 AM)Mr_XcentricK Wrote:  And remember when everyone rejoiced that companies were ruled to be “citizens”? So wouldn’t what Twitter did be protected under free speech?

Conspiring with the government to limit people's speech is a violation of the Constitution.

Lying about what you are doing is false advertising and a violation of their contract with users.

Terms of Service. You know the thing where almost no one reads the fine print.

Did they ever say they were not moderating the content?

Absolutely. Doerey lied under oath to Congress over and over. Go watch the video.

(12-11-2022 04:15 PM)boss man Wrote:  Looking forward to the fraud Fauci being exposed, LOL.

Too damn SWEET.

It would be justice if he and the alphabet folks would have to answer for what they’ve done and continue to do………….but I won’t hold my breath.

We have a justice system for “regular Americans” and a different one for these disgusting piles of crap, unfortunately.

(12-11-2022 04:25 PM)Crebman Wrote:  

(12-11-2022 04:15 PM)boss man Wrote:  Looking forward to the fraud Fauci being exposed, LOL.

Too damn SWEET.

It would be justice if he and the alphabet folks would have to answer for what they’ve done and continue to do………….but I won’t hold my breath.

We have a justice system for “regular Americans” and a different one for these disgusting piles of crap, unfortunately.

nothing burger

(12-11-2022 04:25 PM)TripleA Wrote:  

(12-11-2022 01:51 PM)Mr_XcentricK Wrote:  

(12-11-2022 11:55 AM)bullet Wrote:  

(12-11-2022 11:40 AM)Mr_XcentricK Wrote:  And remember when everyone rejoiced that companies were ruled to be “citizens”? So wouldn’t what Twitter did be protected under free speech?

Conspiring with the government to limit people's speech is a violation of the Constitution.

Lying about what you are doing is false advertising and a violation of their contract with users.

Terms of Service. You know the thing where almost no one reads the fine print.

Did they ever say they were not moderating the content?

Absolutely. Doerey lied under oath to Congress over and over. Go watch the video.

Perjury is one thing. What crime was committed in banning people? Keep in mind the SCOTUS upheld a business' right last week to not serve gay couples

(12-11-2022 06:53 PM)Mr_XcentricK Wrote:  

(12-11-2022 04:25 PM)Crebman Wrote:  

(12-11-2022 04:15 PM)boss man Wrote:  Looking forward to the fraud Fauci being exposed, LOL.

Too damn SWEET.

It would be justice if he and the alphabet folks would have to answer for what they’ve done and continue to do………….but I won’t hold my breath.

We have a justice system for “regular Americans” and a different one for these disgusting piles of crap, unfortunately.

nothing burger

I see you have all the liberal talking points. Your indoctrination was very good.

When chiner takes over you will be one of the first to drop to your knees and take your prize into your mouth.

(12-11-2022 06:58 PM)Hernando Hills Tiger Wrote:  

(12-11-2022 06:53 PM)Mr_XcentricK Wrote:  

(12-11-2022 04:25 PM)Crebman Wrote:  

(12-11-2022 04:15 PM)boss man Wrote:  Looking forward to the fraud Fauci being exposed, LOL.

Too damn SWEET.

It would be justice if he and the alphabet folks would have to answer for what they’ve done and continue to do………….but I won’t hold my breath.

We have a justice system for “regular Americans” and a different one for these disgusting piles of crap, unfortunately.

nothing burger

I see you have all the liberal talking points. Your indoctrination was very good.

When chiner takes over you will be one of the first to drop to your knees and take your prize into your mouth.

How long have you had the talking point of arresting Fauci? And how many times has he been arrested?

Do you mean China? I am a Cold War child so not paying the China boogeyman line

(12-11-2022 01:45 PM)Mr_XcentricK Wrote:  

(12-11-2022 12:01 PM)TigerBlue4Ever Wrote:  

(12-11-2022 11:40 AM)Mr_XcentricK Wrote:  And remember when everyone rejoiced that companies were ruled to be “citizens”? So wouldn’t what Twitter did be protected under free speech?

You're another one here with a very strange worldview. Stifling others speech is now free speech? Libtard logic.

Twitter is a private company. A private company can not trample your free speech rights. The Constitution is about the people’s relationship to the government or are you guys now saying you want to be socialist?

Well---thats the whole controversy. The private company was not acting alone, the DNC and actual Federal government agencies were pressuring and directing the stifling of free speech.

(12-11-2022 06:58 PM)Mr_XcentricK Wrote:  

(12-11-2022 04:25 PM)TripleA Wrote:  

(12-11-2022 01:51 PM)Mr_XcentricK Wrote:  

(12-11-2022 11:55 AM)bullet Wrote:  

(12-11-2022 11:40 AM)Mr_XcentricK Wrote:  And remember when everyone rejoiced that companies were ruled to be “citizens”? So wouldn’t what Twitter did be protected under free speech?

Conspiring with the government to limit people's speech is a violation of the Constitution.

Lying about what you are doing is false advertising and a violation of their contract with users.

Terms of Service. You know the thing where almost no one reads the fine print.

Did they ever say they were not moderating the content?

Absolutely. Doerey lied under oath to Congress over and over. Go watch the video.

Perjury is one thing. What crime was committed in banning people? Keep in mind the SCOTUS upheld a business' right last week to not serve gay couples

It would be akin to those gay customers thinking they were getting a wedding cake, only for their wedding goers to take a bite and realize it was made with fake or bad ingredients while non-gay customers received legit cakes.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

Liberals never deviate.

Anything that is not within their control is deemed "hate speech" and "radical views".

(12-11-2022 07:29 PM)Attackcoog Wrote:  

(12-11-2022 01:45 PM)Mr_XcentricK Wrote:  

(12-11-2022 12:01 PM)TigerBlue4Ever Wrote:  

(12-11-2022 11:40 AM)Mr_XcentricK Wrote:  And remember when everyone rejoiced that companies were ruled to be “citizens”? So wouldn’t what Twitter did be protected under free speech?

You're another one here with a very strange worldview. Stifling others speech is now free speech? Libtard logic.

Twitter is a private company. A private company can not trample your free speech rights. The Constitution is about the people’s relationship to the government or are you guys now saying you want to be socialist?

Well---thats the whole controversy. The private company was not acting alone, the DNC and actual Federal government agencies were pressuring and directing the stifling of free speech.

And why do you and others leav out the part where the RNC was offered the same services?

(12-11-2022 07:57 PM)B_Hawk06 Wrote:  

(12-11-2022 06:58 PM)Mr_XcentricK Wrote:  

(12-11-2022 04:25 PM)TripleA Wrote:  

(12-11-2022 01:51 PM)Mr_XcentricK Wrote:  

(12-11-2022 11:55 AM)bullet Wrote:  Conspiring with the government to limit people's speech is a violation of the Constitution.

Lying about what you are doing is false advertising and a violation of their contract with users.

Terms of Service. You know the thing where almost no one reads the fine print.

Did they ever say they were not moderating the content?

Absolutely. Doerey lied under oath to Congress over and over. Go watch the video.

Perjury is one thing. What crime was committed in banning people? Keep in mind the SCOTUS upheld a business' right last week to not serve gay couples

It would be akin to those gay customers thinking they were getting a wedding cake, only for their wedding goers to take a bite and realize it was made with fake or bad ingredients while non-gay customers received legit cakes.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

It was websites not cakes. Nice try but again the RNC had access too the same services at Twitter.

(12-12-2022 12:29 AM)Mr_XcentricK Wrote:  

(12-11-2022 07:57 PM)B_Hawk06 Wrote:  It would be akin to those gay customers thinking they were getting a wedding cake, only for their wedding goers to take a bite and realize it was made with fake or bad ingredients while non-gay customers received legit cakes.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

It was websites not cakes. Nice try but again the RNC had access too the same services at Twitter.

B_Hawk’s analogy is dead-on apt, Mr. X. In this context, there is no meaningful difference whatsoever between a good and a service.

Your response is little better than the kindergarten kid who covers his ears and says “I can’t hear you”.

(12-12-2022 12:29 AM)Mr_XcentricK Wrote:  

(12-11-2022 07:57 PM)B_Hawk06 Wrote:  

(12-11-2022 06:58 PM)Mr_XcentricK Wrote:  

(12-11-2022 04:25 PM)TripleA Wrote:  

(12-11-2022 01:51 PM)Mr_XcentricK Wrote:  Terms of Service. You know the thing where almost no one reads the fine print.

Did they ever say they were not moderating the content?

Absolutely. Doerey lied under oath to Congress over and over. Go watch the video.

Perjury is one thing. What crime was committed in banning people? Keep in mind the SCOTUS upheld a business' right last week to not serve gay couples

It would be akin to those gay customers thinking they were getting a wedding cake, only for their wedding goers to take a bite and realize it was made with fake or bad ingredients while non-gay customers received legit cakes.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

It was websites not cakes. Nice try but again the RNC had access too the same services at Twitter.

What? You mean Twitter doesn’t sell cakes?! Oh my, who knew?!

Purposely being obtuse because you don’t want to face facts suits you.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro