(11-02-2022 01:40 PM)Eagleaidaholic Wrote:  He had a list of other people he was going after. We haven't seen the list. Wonder why?

Hadn't heard that part yet... he had a list of names?

I just vote him as a fruit-loop nut case...

Does "Elder Abuse" mean when you hurt someone over a certain age in California? I thought it meant when someone is hurt by someone caring for, or related to the victim. I think they are just making up stuff because they rarely charge people with anything.

If I had a dollar for every MAGA supporting, illegal alien, nudist, living in a camper in Berkeley, with a BLM sign on the house and a gay flag on a tree in the yard, I’d be broke.

(11-02-2022 05:16 PM)Hernando Hills Tiger Wrote:  If I had a dollar for every MAGA supporting, illegal alien, nudist, living in a camper in Berkeley, with a BLM sign on the house and a gay flag on a tree in the yard, I’d be broke.

*imagine me saying this in Bidenspeak, you know in a whisper*

"They don't care".

The MSM spins this for the stupid Demoncrapped voter because they know that that these people won't try to find out the truth and rely on what the lying, in the Demoncraptic hands MSM tells them. Do you really think these idiots will try to find out the truth? What's doubly sad is that they themselves will ape the same story to others. If it wasn't so serious and sad it would be laughable.

(11-02-2022 08:44 AM)stinkfist Wrote:  

(11-02-2022 08:38 AM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  

(11-02-2022 08:36 AM)UofMstateU Wrote:  bwahahahahahahahahahaha
At this point, its more believable that there was an orgy going on at the house and members of capitol police were in their underwear too before the hammers started flying.

There are almost an infinite number of things that are more believable than the "official" version.

I put the official version in the ‘least likely’ category…

What?

You’ve never heard of Hammer Time before Get it On time?

You haven’t lived, bro.



#Fransicko

(11-02-2022 11:24 AM)oruvoice Wrote:  A homeless, nudist, in Berkeley, living out of an old school bus, with gay pride flag on the front, and BLM flag on the back and they tell Tom that he's a MAGA republican, and he buys it.

I mean, the level of willful stupidity is off the charts.

Yea,
Remember the witness from the last time Paulie got hammered?

What ever happened to “Him/Her”? Xe just walk away and nothing else for the accident record?

Sure. Seems completely legit to me.

Lol

(11-02-2022 11:24 AM)Claw Wrote:  

(11-02-2022 11:13 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(11-02-2022 10:59 AM)JRsec Wrote:  

(11-02-2022 10:48 AM)Eldonabe Wrote:  

(11-02-2022 10:36 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

Which contradicts a lot of other reports from credible news sources?

Who to believe....

WHO

TO

BELIEVE?

Number 3 clearly defies the crime scene pictures and the law of physics, but don't believe those photos and immutable laws of physics, your eyes were lying as usual especially if you have common sense which means you weren't educated in one of our schools and do not adhere to social media guidelines.

A message from the Department of Homeland Security

The above was a paid political advertisement by the PAC to install corporate enforced socialism.

So the laws of physics prove that someone putting a hammer through a window NEVER results in any of the glass falling on the same side from which they broke it from?

Dude, just stop. You're apparently stuck in a Hollywood movie!

Pretty sure I see debris both inside and outside, You?



Further, the guy told the FBI he broke the window with a hammer because breaking IN was difficult.

So again, I guess the FBI, the guy, and Pelosi are all lying.

While I don't believe the "official" narrative, the glass is not relevant. You crash the window in with the hammer, then you pull it back to hit it again. That action of bringing back the hammer will pull some more glass back with it. You might even clear the glass using the hammer to pull back toward you.

The glass thing is inconclusive other than being consistent with intentionally breaking glass with a tool. That looks like someone broke it with a tool going back and forth as opposed to throwing something through the glass.

Fine. Why didn’t the alarms go off in the SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE’ house? Where was the Secret Service? Night off? Lol

C’mon people…

(11-02-2022 11:24 AM)Claw Wrote:  

(11-02-2022 11:13 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(11-02-2022 10:59 AM)JRsec Wrote:  

(11-02-2022 10:48 AM)Eldonabe Wrote:  

(11-02-2022 10:36 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

Which contradicts a lot of other reports from credible news sources?

Who to believe....

WHO

TO

BELIEVE?

Number 3 clearly defies the crime scene pictures and the law of physics, but don't believe those photos and immutable laws of physics, your eyes were lying as usual especially if you have common sense which means you weren't educated in one of our schools and do not adhere to social media guidelines.

A message from the Department of Homeland Security

The above was a paid political advertisement by the PAC to install corporate enforced socialism.

So the laws of physics prove that someone putting a hammer through a window NEVER results in any of the glass falling on the same side from which they broke it from?

Dude, just stop. You're apparently stuck in a Hollywood movie!

Pretty sure I see debris both inside and outside, You?



Further, the guy told the FBI he broke the window with a hammer because breaking IN was difficult.

So again, I guess the FBI, the guy, and Pelosi are all lying.

While I don't believe the "official" narrative, the glass is not relevant. You crash the window in with the hammer, then you pull it back to hit it again. That action of bringing back the hammer will pull some more glass back with it. You might even clear the glass using the hammer to pull back toward you.

The glass thing is inconclusive other than being consistent with intentionally breaking glass with a tool. That looks like someone broke it with a tool going back and forth as opposed to throwing something through the glass.

Then, at 82 YO you fight over the hammer with a violent intruder until the cops show up? You don’t run? Grab a knife? Flee upstairs? Why didn’t the cops shoot the guy on sight?

C’mon. Another false flag or even worse. Paulie P getting his last gig on perhaps

Remember the DePape guy went to the hospital too. Why?

(11-03-2022 04:20 AM)JMUDunk Wrote:  

(11-02-2022 11:24 AM)Claw Wrote:  

(11-02-2022 11:13 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(11-02-2022 10:59 AM)JRsec Wrote:  

(11-02-2022 10:48 AM)Eldonabe Wrote:  Which contradicts a lot of other reports from credible news sources?

Who to believe....

WHO

TO

BELIEVE?

Number 3 clearly defies the crime scene pictures and the law of physics, but don't believe those photos and immutable laws of physics, your eyes were lying as usual especially if you have common sense which means you weren't educated in one of our schools and do not adhere to social media guidelines.

A message from the Department of Homeland Security

The above was a paid political advertisement by the PAC to install corporate enforced socialism.

So the laws of physics prove that someone putting a hammer through a window NEVER results in any of the glass falling on the same side from which they broke it from?

Dude, just stop. You're apparently stuck in a Hollywood movie!

Pretty sure I see debris both inside and outside, You?



Further, the guy told the FBI he broke the window with a hammer because breaking IN was difficult.

So again, I guess the FBI, the guy, and Pelosi are all lying.

While I don't believe the "official" narrative, the glass is not relevant. You crash the window in with the hammer, then you pull it back to hit it again. That action of bringing back the hammer will pull some more glass back with it. You might even clear the glass using the hammer to pull back toward you.

The glass thing is inconclusive other than being consistent with intentionally breaking glass with a tool. That looks like someone broke it with a tool going back and forth as opposed to throwing something through the glass.

Fine. Why didn’t the alarms go off in the SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE’ house? Where was the Secret Service? Night off? Lol

C’mon people…

I’m going to guess that her security detail was probably with her, not sitting at home with her husband.

If the secret service had been there and stopped this you would be complaining about how she shouldn’t even have secret service, and they shouldn’t be wasting taxpayer money spending their time protecting her husband when she is out of town.

(11-03-2022 07:38 AM)U_of_Elvis Wrote:  

(11-03-2022 04:20 AM)JMUDunk Wrote:  

(11-02-2022 11:24 AM)Claw Wrote:  

(11-02-2022 11:13 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(11-02-2022 10:59 AM)JRsec Wrote:  Number 3 clearly defies the crime scene pictures and the law of physics, but don't believe those photos and immutable laws of physics, your eyes were lying as usual especially if you have common sense which means you weren't educated in one of our schools and do not adhere to social media guidelines.

A message from the Department of Homeland Security

The above was a paid political advertisement by the PAC to install corporate enforced socialism.

So the laws of physics prove that someone putting a hammer through a window NEVER results in any of the glass falling on the same side from which they broke it from?

Dude, just stop. You're apparently stuck in a Hollywood movie!

Pretty sure I see debris both inside and outside, You?



Further, the guy told the FBI he broke the window with a hammer because breaking IN was difficult.

So again, I guess the FBI, the guy, and Pelosi are all lying.

While I don't believe the "official" narrative, the glass is not relevant. You crash the window in with the hammer, then you pull it back to hit it again. That action of bringing back the hammer will pull some more glass back with it. You might even clear the glass using the hammer to pull back toward you.

The glass thing is inconclusive other than being consistent with intentionally breaking glass with a tool. That looks like someone broke it with a tool going back and forth as opposed to throwing something through the glass.

Fine. Why didn’t the alarms go off in the SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE’ house? Where was the Secret Service? Night off? Lol

C’mon people…

I’m going to guess that her security detail was probably with her, not sitting at home with her husband.

If the secret service had been there and stopped this you would be complaining about how she shouldn’t even have secret service, and they shouldn’t be wasting taxpayer money spending their time protecting her husband when she is out of town.

Correct. The detail stays with her. The house was supposed to have been watched, and apparently it wasn't.

(11-02-2022 04:48 PM)Eagleaidaholic Wrote:  Does "Elder Abuse" mean when you hurt someone over a certain age in California? I thought it meant when someone is hurt by someone caring for, or related to the victim. I think they are just making up stuff because they rarely charge people with anything.

Correct, I covered this earlier. If you should reasonably know an unknown victim is over 65, then they can charge you for it in California.

Quote:California Penal Code 368 PC defines elder abuse as the physical or emotional abuse, neglect, or financial exploitation of a victim 65 years of age or older. The offense can be prosecuted as a misdemeanor or a felony, and is punishable by up to 4 years of jail or prison.

1.2. Felony elder abuse
A prosecutor must prove the following to convict a person of felony elder abuse:

the defendant willfully or with criminal negligence subjected an elderly person to unjustifiable physical pain or mental suffering,
the conduct was likely to produce great bodily injury or death, and
the accused knew or should have known the victim was 65 years old or older.
“Unjustifiable physical pain or mental suffering” means the same as with misdemeanor abuse.

https://www.shouselaw.com/ca/defense/penal-code/368/

But it also applies in abuse cases for known persons as well.

(11-03-2022 07:31 AM)Eagleaidaholic Wrote:  Remember the DePape guy went to the hospital too. Why?

Duh, it was clearly to visit his gay lover, Paul.

So not only is this guy a radicalized, right wing Qanon nut, he's an illegal immigrant from Canada?

https://www.cnn.com/2022/11/03/politics/...index.html

(11-03-2022 10:34 AM)Kruciff Wrote:  So not only is this guy a radicalized, right wing Qanon nut, he's an illegal immigrant from Canada?

https://www.cnn.com/2022/11/03/politics/...index.html

Germans bombed Pearl Harbor.

Capitol Police Cameras Recorded Video Feed of Pelosi Residence Break-In

Quote:The United States Capitol Police reportedly captured the entirety of the break-in at Nancy Pelosi’s house on its own camera feed, which would confirm the existence of video footage of the assault that took place against her husband last week.

According to NPR, an anonymous source who is allegedly “familiar with the investigation” first told the Washington Post that the Capitol Police had cameras installed in the house as a safety measure for the security of the Speaker of the House. However, since Pelosi herself was not home at the time of the incident, the feeds were not being monitored as closely as they would be if she had been home. Nevertheless, Capitol Police officers were able to use the video footage to coordinate with the San Francisco Police Department in the aftermath.

On Friday, Pelosi’s husband Paul was alone in the home when he was attacked by 42-year-old David DePape, a known far-left activist who advocated for such causes as marijuana distribution and public nudity. DePape, a registered member of the Green Party who had been critical of Democrats for years for not being as far-left as he would like, allegedly attacked the 82-year-old Paul Pelosi with a hammer at about 2:30 in the morning, supposedly shouting “where’s Nancy?”

https://amgreatness.com/2022/11/03/capit...-break-in/

(11-03-2022 10:57 AM)MileHighBronco Wrote:  Capitol Police Cameras Recorded Video Feed of Pelosi Residence Break-In

Quote:The United States Capitol Police reportedly captured the entirety of the break-in at Nancy Pelosi’s house on its own camera feed, which would confirm the existence of video footage of the assault that took place against her husband last week.

According to NPR, an anonymous source who is allegedly “familiar with the investigation” first told the Washington Post that the Capitol Police had cameras installed in the house as a safety measure for the security of the Speaker of the House. However, since Pelosi herself was not home at the time of the incident, the feeds were not being monitored as closely as they would be if she had been home. Nevertheless, Capitol Police officers were able to use the video footage to coordinate with the San Francisco Police Department in the aftermath.

On Friday, Pelosi’s husband Paul was alone in the home when he was attacked by 42-year-old David DePape, a known far-left activist who advocated for such causes as marijuana distribution and public nudity. DePape, a registered member of the Green Party who had been critical of Democrats for years for not being as far-left as he would like, allegedly attacked the 82-year-old Paul Pelosi with a hammer at about 2:30 in the morning, supposedly shouting “where’s Nancy?”

https://amgreatness.com/2022/11/03/capit...-break-in/

The betting sites should be posting odds that the fbi/doj take the video and resample it to 15 fps and blur it to make things unrecognizable. (Just like they did Jan 6 pipe bomber videos.)

We're spending millions on video surveillance for tail pipe Bobby's house, and the capitol police only recognize things are going on when they SFPD shows up on scene.

(11-03-2022 11:39 AM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

(11-03-2022 10:57 AM)MileHighBronco Wrote:  Capitol Police Cameras Recorded Video Feed of Pelosi Residence Break-In

Quote:The United States Capitol Police reportedly captured the entirety of the break-in at Nancy Pelosi’s house on its own camera feed, which would confirm the existence of video footage of the assault that took place against her husband last week.

According to NPR, an anonymous source who is allegedly “familiar with the investigation” first told the Washington Post that the Capitol Police had cameras installed in the house as a safety measure for the security of the Speaker of the House. However, since Pelosi herself was not home at the time of the incident, the feeds were not being monitored as closely as they would be if she had been home. Nevertheless, Capitol Police officers were able to use the video footage to coordinate with the San Francisco Police Department in the aftermath.

On Friday, Pelosi’s husband Paul was alone in the home when he was attacked by 42-year-old David DePape, a known far-left activist who advocated for such causes as marijuana distribution and public nudity. DePape, a registered member of the Green Party who had been critical of Democrats for years for not being as far-left as he would like, allegedly attacked the 82-year-old Paul Pelosi with a hammer at about 2:30 in the morning, supposedly shouting “where’s Nancy?”

https://amgreatness.com/2022/11/03/capit...-break-in/

The betting sites should be posting odds that the fbi/doj take the video and resample it to 15 fps and blur it to make things unrecognizable. (Just like they did Jan 6 pipe bomber videos.)

We're spending millions on video surveillance for tail pipe Bobby's house, and the capitol police only recognize things are going on when they SFPD shows up on scene.

take a wild guess what the pixel count is from the eyes in the sky orbiting the planet … it’ll blow your mind … (hint: +1b)

therefore, Ja!, muh sieg heil gubbmint has yaz by the cods when it comes to manipulation…

#protectMuhPatriarch

The libs fell for the old "banana in the tailpipe", as they always do.

What are the Pelosi’s hiding by not calling for the security footage released?