(08-12-2022 12:05 PM)Hambone10 Wrote:  

(08-12-2022 10:24 AM)GoodOwl Wrote:  As well as Ivermectin.

Would you then agree that the blanket recommendations for mass-COVID19 vaccination of children and young adults was and is a mistake (excepting those few who might have a severe co-morbidity)?

Yes, Ivermectin as well.

I don't remotely see how the 'pressure' put on people to get vaccinated was remotely justified....

As to it being a mistake, the mistake was the elimination of options... the elimination of choice. I don't see that strong encouragement as we do for flu, or even much more than that would have been unreasonable considering the circumstances... but we did a massive multiple of that... and I think the repeats and boosters and all were really more about trying to 'live up to the initial hype' of near 100% efficacy... and now that this has been shot to hell, we're just supposed to forget it.

I think the initial vaccine and encouragement was warranted. I think the follow ups and hard pressures were not.

Focusing on the issue at hand here...

So, the 'next' time we have a 'situation' what have we been conditioned from this experience with the 'experts' at CLDC and other govt agencies?

Thinking about the monkeypox and the fact that not only has a specific "vax" been already developed before the approaching 'pandemic' but the fact that 98% of those who get it here have something in common the MSM and govt leaders don't want to mention out loud because that would show most normal people aren't at risk, as well as make them look even worse than they already do...plus the fact that the gubmint has already spent millions to purchase the "vaxes" for it, perhaps for about come November, right? A low-level soap scriptwriter or pulp-fiction novelist couldn't make this up any better...but we're supposed to have confidence in what these duplicitous idiots at these government alphabet agencies say? Fool me once...

(08-12-2022 12:30 PM)GoodOwl Wrote:  

(08-12-2022 12:05 PM)Hambone10 Wrote:  

(08-12-2022 10:24 AM)GoodOwl Wrote:  As well as Ivermectin.

Would you then agree that the blanket recommendations for mass-COVID19 vaccination of children and young adults was and is a mistake (excepting those few who might have a severe co-morbidity)?

Yes, Ivermectin as well.

I don't remotely see how the 'pressure' put on people to get vaccinated was remotely justified....

As to it being a mistake, the mistake was the elimination of options... the elimination of choice. I don't see that strong encouragement as we do for flu, or even much more than that would have been unreasonable considering the circumstances... but we did a massive multiple of that... and I think the repeats and boosters and all were really more about trying to 'live up to the initial hype' of near 100% efficacy... and now that this has been shot to hell, we're just supposed to forget it.

I think the initial vaccine and encouragement was warranted. I think the follow ups and hard pressures were not.

Focusing on the issue at hand here...

So, the 'next' time we have a 'situation' what have we been conditioned from this experience with the 'experts' at CLDC and other govt agencies?

Thinking about the monkeypox and the fact that not only has a specific "vax" been already developed before the approaching 'pandemic' but the fact that 98% of those who get it here have something in common the MSM and govt leaders don't want to mention out loud because that would show most normal people aren't at risk, as well as make them look even worse than they already do...plus the fact that the gubmint has already spent millions to purchase the "vaxes" for it, perhaps for about come November, right? A low-level soap scriptwriter or pulp-fiction novelist couldn't make this up any better...but we're supposed to have confidence in what these duplicitous idiots at these government alphabet agencies say? Fool me once...

Ham - this is exactly what I was talking about...

To GoodOwl - Why do you find an existence of a monkey pox vaccine suspicious? It was first identified in 1958.

What conditions do the 98% of infected people share? I know that monkey pox is more prevalent in the gay community, by a wide margin. But since you're saying that the MSM and government leaders don't want to mention it out loud, it sounds like there must be some other population that is even more at risk. I mean, there even some counties that are only offering vaccines to gay or bisexual men, so what is this group that no one wants to talk about?

You keep putting vaccine in quotes. Why is that? Do you think it doesn't work?

(08-12-2022 01:05 PM)RiceLad15 Wrote:  To GoodOwl - Why do you find an existence of a monkey pox vaccine suspicious? It was first identified in 1958.

What conditions do the 98% of infected people share? I know that monkey pox is more prevalent in the gay community, by a wide margin. But since you're saying that the MSM and government leaders don't want to mention it out loud, it sounds like there must be some other population that is even more at risk. I mean, there even some counties that are only offering vaccines to gay or bisexual men, so what is this group that no one wants to talk about?

You keep putting vaccine in quotes. Why is that? Do you think it doesn't work?

and 'fair' or not... (to Good Owl) unfortunately the younger populations, particularly in 'developed' countries are significantly more sexually fluid than older generations... so there are numerous bisexual persons who can then easily infect hetero persons... who then infect other hetero persons. A faithful hetero couple is at little risk I suspect, but that isn't everyone, nor perhaps even more than a plurality anymore.

(08-12-2022 02:12 PM)Hambone10 Wrote:  

(08-12-2022 01:05 PM)RiceLad15 Wrote:  To GoodOwl - Why do you find an existence of a monkey pox vaccine suspicious? It was first identified in 1958.

What conditions do the 98% of infected people share? I know that monkey pox is more prevalent in the gay community, by a wide margin. But since you're saying that the MSM and government leaders don't want to mention it out loud, it sounds like there must be some other population that is even more at risk. I mean, there even some counties that are only offering vaccines to gay or bisexual men, so what is this group that no one wants to talk about?

You keep putting vaccine in quotes. Why is that? Do you think it doesn't work?

and 'fair' or not... (to Good Owl) unfortunately the younger populations, particularly in 'developed' countries are significantly more sexually fluid than older generations... so there are numerous bisexual persons who can then easily infect hetero persons... who then infect other hetero persons. A faithful hetero couple is at little risk I suspect, but that isn't everyone, nor perhaps even more than a plurality anymore.

Wow. Just wow.

(08-14-2022 10:12 PM)GoodOwl Wrote:  

(08-12-2022 02:12 PM)Hambone10 Wrote:  

(08-12-2022 01:05 PM)RiceLad15 Wrote:  To GoodOwl - Why do you find an existence of a monkey pox vaccine suspicious? It was first identified in 1958.

What conditions do the 98% of infected people share? I know that monkey pox is more prevalent in the gay community, by a wide margin. But since you're saying that the MSM and government leaders don't want to mention it out loud, it sounds like there must be some other population that is even more at risk. I mean, there even some counties that are only offering vaccines to gay or bisexual men, so what is this group that no one wants to talk about?

You keep putting vaccine in quotes. Why is that? Do you think it doesn't work?

and 'fair' or not... (to Good Owl) unfortunately the younger populations, particularly in 'developed' countries are significantly more sexually fluid than older generations... so there are numerous bisexual persons who can then easily infect hetero persons... who then infect other hetero persons. A faithful hetero couple is at little risk I suspect, but that isn't everyone, nor perhaps even more than a plurality anymore.

Wow. Just wow.

??

Do you really find this surprising? I'm not endorsing it (nor condemning it), merely noting it. A free society certainly includes the right to be intimate with whomever they choose... and many make choices that some of us would not.

well, now it seems NBC (an "approved list" member) has gone raciss...but theyn say it, so it must be true, correct?

Quote:Sex between Men, Not skin contact, is fueling monkeypox, new research suggests

The claim that skin-to-skin contact during sex between men, not intercourse itself, drives most monkeypox transmission is likely backward, a growing group of experts say.

Since the outset of the global monkeypox outbreak in May, public health and infectious disease experts have told the public that the virus is largely transmitting through skin-to-skin contact, in particular during sex between men.

Now, however, an expanding cadre of experts has come to believe that sex between men itself — both anal as well as oral intercourse — is likely the main driver of global monkeypox transmission. The skin contact that comes with sex, these experts say, is probably much less of a risk factor.

In recent weeks, a growing body of scientific evidence — including a trio of studies published in peer-reviewed journals, as well as [url=https://worldhealthorg.shinyapps.io/mpx_global/reports from national, regional and global health authorities[/url] — has suggested that experts may have framed monkeypox’s typical transmission route precisely backward.

So, to review:

Previous authoritative reports and advice from so-called "experts" and "health officials" is wrong;

The peer-reviewed health experts now admit they were wrong and gave bad advice;

Government "experts", "health experts", the MSM, and the leadership willfully spread false misinformation to the public, and no consequences to them have or will ensue to stop them from continuing their government and "health" misinformation campaigns which threaten the people they are supposed to help protect instead of lying to them;

Certain disordered behaviors are the primary factor that put anyone at risk...avoid these behaviors and there seems to be less evidence of any risk;

Mass vaccinations (of the kind governments have already spent millions of taxpayer dollars on to line pockets of sus companies) are Not warranted (once again) even though they have been promoted by both government officials and the media with "events" happening already to get people vaccinated for 'the next pandemic' even though the first turned out to be mostly a dud;

The MSM ignored warnings from many of what was really causing the monkeypox outbreak in favor of attempting to promote another 'big story' and get ratings, despite the harm the MSM caused to the general public, most of whom were never and are never at risk;

The MSM was being dishonest with the public about the truth about this problem, and reluctant if not totally closed off about how to nip it in the bud (because, political correctness is once again more important than truth and facts);

The Media (and government "health" officials and "experts" once again demonstrated they are Not to be trusted by the general public...

But tell us again why anyone with a brain should trust any of these people when it comes to their health, advice and the jo0urnalistic facts (which has become an anachronistic phrase and concept to the MSM and govt "officials" and "experts"...

Quote:“Good Evening. People are dropping like flies from a mysterious killer called ‘unknown case of death.’ So tonight we’re bringing you a special report on this unknown case of death killer so we can steer your thinking in the right direction. I like it when a good plan comes together.

Unknown case of death has even become the leading cause of death in Alberta, Canada. Which is ruled over by Justin Trudeau. So just use your imagination on that correlation. In Alberta, unknown cause of death is causing even more death than heart disease, strokes and diabetes. Combined.”

link to video: UNKNOWN Cause of Death? Our Latest Propaganda!
Awaken With JP
Published August 20, 2022

Report from the NIH National Library of Medicine....Titanium dioxide particles frequently present in face masks intended for general use require regulatory control

Quote: Although titanium dioxide (TiO2) is a suspected human carcinogen when inhaled, fiber-grade TiO2 (nano)particles were demonstrated in synthetic textile fibers of face masks intended for the general public.

STEM-EDX analysis on sections of a variety of single use and reusable face masks visualized agglomerated near-spherical TiO2 particles in non-woven fabrics, polyester, polyamide and bi-component fibers. Median sizes of constituent particles ranged from 89 to 184 nm, implying an important fraction of nano-sized particles (< 100 nm). The total TiO2 mass determined by ICP-OES ranged from 791 to 152,345 µg per mask. The estimated TiO2 mass at the fiber surface ranged from 17 to 4394 µg, and systematically exceeded the acceptable exposure level to TiO2 by inhalation (3.6 µg), determined based on a scenario where face masks are worn intensively. No assumptions were made about the likelihood of the release of TiO2 particles itself, since direct measurement of release and inhalation uptake when face masks are worn could not be assessed. The importance of wearing face masks against COVID-19 is unquestionable. Even so, these results urge for in depth research of (nano)technology applications in textiles to avoid possible future consequences caused by a poorly regulated use and to implement regulatory standards phasing out or limiting the amount of TiO2 particles, following the safe-by-design principle.

so...when you still see multiple idiots out there with masks on..you'll know they are truly idiots who don't follow science...

(08-30-2022 09:32 PM)GoodOwl Wrote:  Report from the NIH National Library of Medicine....Titanium dioxide particles frequently present in face masks intended for general use require regulatory control

Quote: Although titanium dioxide (TiO2) is a suspected human carcinogen when inhaled, fiber-grade TiO2 (nano)particles were demonstrated in synthetic textile fibers of face masks intended for the general public.

STEM-EDX analysis on sections of a variety of single use and reusable face masks visualized agglomerated near-spherical TiO2 particles in non-woven fabrics, polyester, polyamide and bi-component fibers. Median sizes of constituent particles ranged from 89 to 184 nm, implying an important fraction of nano-sized particles (< 100 nm). The total TiO2 mass determined by ICP-OES ranged from 791 to 152,345 µg per mask. The estimated TiO2 mass at the fiber surface ranged from 17 to 4394 µg, and systematically exceeded the acceptable exposure level to TiO2 by inhalation (3.6 µg), determined based on a scenario where face masks are worn intensively. No assumptions were made about the likelihood of the release of TiO2 particles itself, since direct measurement of release and inhalation uptake when face masks are worn could not be assessed. The importance of wearing face masks against COVID-19 is unquestionable. Even so, these results urge for in depth research of (nano)technology applications in textiles to avoid possible future consequences caused by a poorly regulated use and to implement regulatory standards phasing out or limiting the amount of TiO2 particles, following the safe-by-design principle.

so...when you still see multiple idiots out there with masks on..you'll know they are truly idiots who don't follow science...

Finally, the age-old question of why operating room personnel have such an amazingly high rate of cancer has been answered.

(08-31-2022 05:37 AM)Rice93 Wrote:  

(08-30-2022 09:32 PM)GoodOwl Wrote:  Report from the NIH National Library of Medicine....Titanium dioxide particles frequently present in face masks intended for general use require regulatory control

Quote: Although titanium dioxide (TiO2) is a suspected human carcinogen when inhaled, fiber-grade TiO2 (nano)particles were demonstrated in synthetic textile fibers of face masks intended for the general public.

STEM-EDX analysis on sections of a variety of single use and reusable face masks visualized agglomerated near-spherical TiO2 particles in non-woven fabrics, polyester, polyamide and bi-component fibers. Median sizes of constituent particles ranged from 89 to 184 nm, implying an important fraction of nano-sized particles (< 100 nm). The total TiO2 mass determined by ICP-OES ranged from 791 to 152,345 µg per mask. The estimated TiO2 mass at the fiber surface ranged from 17 to 4394 µg, and systematically exceeded the acceptable exposure level to TiO2 by inhalation (3.6 µg), determined based on a scenario where face masks are worn intensively. No assumptions were made about the likelihood of the release of TiO2 particles itself, since direct measurement of release and inhalation uptake when face masks are worn could not be assessed. The importance of wearing face masks against COVID-19 is unquestionable. Even so, these results urge for in depth research of (nano)technology applications in textiles to avoid possible future consequences caused by a poorly regulated use and to implement regulatory standards phasing out or limiting the amount of TiO2 particles, following the safe-by-design principle.

so...when you still see multiple idiots out there with masks on..you'll know they are truly idiots who don't follow science...

Finally, the age-old question of why operating room personnel have such an amazingly high rate of cancer has been answered.

The article basically addresses that - as in, there is really nothing here yet:

“ No assumptions were made about the likelihood of the release of TiO2 particles itself, since direct measurement of release and inhalation uptake when face masks are worn could not be assessed. The importance of wearing face masks against COVID-19 is unquestionable.”

So big picture, wear a face mask, as the important of wearing one is “unquestionable.”

(08-31-2022 05:59 AM)RiceLad15 Wrote:  

(08-31-2022 05:37 AM)Rice93 Wrote:  

(08-30-2022 09:32 PM)GoodOwl Wrote:  Report from the NIH National Library of Medicine....Titanium dioxide particles frequently present in face masks intended for general use require regulatory control

Quote: Although titanium dioxide (TiO2) is a suspected human carcinogen when inhaled, fiber-grade TiO2 (nano)particles were demonstrated in synthetic textile fibers of face masks intended for the general public.

STEM-EDX analysis on sections of a variety of single use and reusable face masks visualized agglomerated near-spherical TiO2 particles in non-woven fabrics, polyester, polyamide and bi-component fibers. Median sizes of constituent particles ranged from 89 to 184 nm, implying an important fraction of nano-sized particles (< 100 nm). The total TiO2 mass determined by ICP-OES ranged from 791 to 152,345 µg per mask. The estimated TiO2 mass at the fiber surface ranged from 17 to 4394 µg, and systematically exceeded the acceptable exposure level to TiO2 by inhalation (3.6 µg), determined based on a scenario where face masks are worn intensively. No assumptions were made about the likelihood of the release of TiO2 particles itself, since direct measurement of release and inhalation uptake when face masks are worn could not be assessed. The importance of wearing face masks against COVID-19 is unquestionable. Even so, these results urge for in depth research of (nano)technology applications in textiles to avoid possible future consequences caused by a poorly regulated use and to implement regulatory standards phasing out or limiting the amount of TiO2 particles, following the safe-by-design principle.

so...when you still see multiple idiots out there with masks on..you'll know they are truly idiots who don't follow science...

Finally, the age-old question of why operating room personnel have such an amazingly high rate of cancer has been answered.

The article basically addresses that - as in, there is really nothing here yet:

“ No assumptions were made about the likelihood of the release of TiO2 particles itself, since direct measurement of release and inhalation uptake when face masks are worn could not be assessed. The importance of wearing face masks against COVID-19 is unquestionable.”

So big picture, wear a face mask, as the important of wearing one is “unquestionable.”

No, Lad. Don't follow THAT science. Follow the OTHER science.

(yet another example of how GO draws ridiculous conclusions from abstracts of medical literature and yet some here demand that you and I fully evaluate all of his posts objectively to make sure that he's not finally speaking some truth)

(08-31-2022 08:36 AM)Rice93 Wrote:  

(08-31-2022 05:59 AM)RiceLad15 Wrote:  

(08-31-2022 05:37 AM)Rice93 Wrote:  

(08-30-2022 09:32 PM)GoodOwl Wrote:  Report from the NIH National Library of Medicine....Titanium dioxide particles frequently present in face masks intended for general use require regulatory control

Quote: Although titanium dioxide (TiO2) is a suspected human carcinogen when inhaled, fiber-grade TiO2 (nano)particles were demonstrated in synthetic textile fibers of face masks intended for the general public.

STEM-EDX analysis on sections of a variety of single use and reusable face masks visualized agglomerated near-spherical TiO2 particles in non-woven fabrics, polyester, polyamide and bi-component fibers. Median sizes of constituent particles ranged from 89 to 184 nm, implying an important fraction of nano-sized particles (< 100 nm). The total TiO2 mass determined by ICP-OES ranged from 791 to 152,345 µg per mask. The estimated TiO2 mass at the fiber surface ranged from 17 to 4394 µg, and systematically exceeded the acceptable exposure level to TiO2 by inhalation (3.6 µg), determined based on a scenario where face masks are worn intensively. No assumptions were made about the likelihood of the release of TiO2 particles itself, since direct measurement of release and inhalation uptake when face masks are worn could not be assessed. The importance of wearing face masks against COVID-19 is unquestionable. Even so, these results urge for in depth research of (nano)technology applications in textiles to avoid possible future consequences caused by a poorly regulated use and to implement regulatory standards phasing out or limiting the amount of TiO2 particles, following the safe-by-design principle.

so...when you still see multiple idiots out there with masks on..you'll know they are truly idiots who don't follow science...

Finally, the age-old question of why operating room personnel have such an amazingly high rate of cancer has been answered.

The article basically addresses that - as in, there is really nothing here yet:

“ No assumptions were made about the likelihood of the release of TiO2 particles itself, since direct measurement of release and inhalation uptake when face masks are worn could not be assessed. The importance of wearing face masks against COVID-19 is unquestionable.”

So big picture, wear a face mask, as the important of wearing one is “unquestionable.”

No, Lad. Don't follow THAT science. Follow the OTHER science.

(yet another example of how GO draws ridiculous conclusions from abstracts of medical literature and yet some here demand that you and I fully evaluate all of his posts objectively to make sure that he's not finally speaking some truth)

You appear to be evaluating them anyway. Maybe just state your objections/differences?

I am mostly in disagreement with GO on this topic. I am fully vaccinated and twice boosted...and I am recovering from Covid. My doctor said he had seen no difference in severity between his patients who were vaccinated and those who weren't. Just anecdotal, and I still intend to get the next booster when it comes out. My personal choice, somewhat influenced by my age.

But I don't think GO is totally off base, and I respect the American tradition of letting people make their own decisions. I think that trying to force the entire population into one choice is perhaps...semi-fascistic?

(08-31-2022 08:46 AM)OptimisticOwl Wrote:  

(08-31-2022 08:36 AM)Rice93 Wrote:  

(08-31-2022 05:59 AM)RiceLad15 Wrote:  

(08-31-2022 05:37 AM)Rice93 Wrote:  

(08-30-2022 09:32 PM)GoodOwl Wrote:  Report from the NIH National Library of Medicine....Titanium dioxide particles frequently present in face masks intended for general use require regulatory control



so...when you still see multiple idiots out there with masks on..you'll know they are truly idiots who don't follow science...

Finally, the age-old question of why operating room personnel have such an amazingly high rate of cancer has been answered.

The article basically addresses that - as in, there is really nothing here yet:

“ No assumptions were made about the likelihood of the release of TiO2 particles itself, since direct measurement of release and inhalation uptake when face masks are worn could not be assessed. The importance of wearing face masks against COVID-19 is unquestionable.”

So big picture, wear a face mask, as the important of wearing one is “unquestionable.”

No, Lad. Don't follow THAT science. Follow the OTHER science.

(yet another example of how GO draws ridiculous conclusions from abstracts of medical literature and yet some here demand that you and I fully evaluate all of his posts objectively to make sure that he's not finally speaking some truth)

You appear to be evaluating them anyway. Maybe just state your objections/differences?

I look at them when I want. They are nearly 100% garbage takes especially when evaluating medical literature. If I blow some of them off it doesn't make sense to be told "Why are you ignoring him!?!?".

Quote:I am mostly in disagreement with GO on this topic. I am fully vaccinated and twice boosted...and I am recovering from Covid. My doctor said he had seen no difference in severity between his patients who were vaccinated and those who weren't. Just anecdotal, and I still intend to get the next booster when it comes out. My personal choice, somewhat influenced by my age.

But I don't think GO is totally off base, and I respect the American tradition of letting people make their own decisions. I think that trying to force the entire population into one choice is perhaps...semi-fascistic?

The bolded is a different issue than his garbage medical takes but yeah... I agree that in general people should have the right to make their own decisions although public health emergencies may create special cases. I certainly don't feel like debating the whole vaccine mandate at this time.

(08-31-2022 08:55 AM)Rice93 Wrote:  

(08-31-2022 08:46 AM)OptimisticOwl Wrote:  

(08-31-2022 08:36 AM)Rice93 Wrote:  

(08-31-2022 05:59 AM)RiceLad15 Wrote:  

(08-31-2022 05:37 AM)Rice93 Wrote:  Finally, the age-old question of why operating room personnel have such an amazingly high rate of cancer has been answered.

The article basically addresses that - as in, there is really nothing here yet:

“ No assumptions were made about the likelihood of the release of TiO2 particles itself, since direct measurement of release and inhalation uptake when face masks are worn could not be assessed. The importance of wearing face masks against COVID-19 is unquestionable.”

So big picture, wear a face mask, as the important of wearing one is “unquestionable.”

No, Lad. Don't follow THAT science. Follow the OTHER science.

(yet another example of how GO draws ridiculous conclusions from abstracts of medical literature and yet some here demand that you and I fully evaluate all of his posts objectively to make sure that he's not finally speaking some truth)

You appear to be evaluating them anyway. Maybe just state your objections/differences?

I look at them when I want. They are nearly 100% garbage takes especially when evaluating medical literature. If I blow some of them off it doesn't make sense to be told "Why are you ignoring him!?!?".

Quote:I am mostly in disagreement with GO on this topic. I am fully vaccinated and twice boosted...and I am recovering from Covid. My doctor said he had seen no difference in severity between his patients who were vaccinated and those who weren't. Just anecdotal, and I still intend to get the next booster when it comes out. My personal choice, somewhat influenced by my age.

But I don't think GO is totally off base, and I respect the American tradition of letting people make their own decisions. I think that trying to force the entire population into one choice is perhaps...semi-fascistic?

The bolded is a different issue than his garbage medical takes but yeah... I agree that in general people should have the right to make their own decisions although public health emergencies may create special cases. I certainly don't feel like debating the whole vaccine mandate at this time.

Nor do I, as my position is purely personal. In the debate, I don't have a side.

Appropriately timed...

hmmmmmmmmm.....

Quote:In 2021, Georgian nurse Megi Brakadze, 27, was one of the first patients to take the AtraZeneca vaccine.

Within 24 hours she was dead.

Doctors tried to restart her heart but were not able to revive her completely.

For some reason, Megi’s story did not make the headlines. It was not allowed.

Here's a link:

Megi Bakradze, one of the first nurse who received the covid vaccine on television is now dead pic.twitter.com/k7yI2z8kVt

— Vaccine victims (@RodolpheTola) September 6, 2022

rumble link: https://rumble.com/v1j7reu-megi-bakradze...ied-2.html

HHMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMmmmmmmm....

UK Bans COVID Vax for Kids – Investigation Finds Vaccine Affects Sexual Development in Little Boys [video]

Sep 7, 2022

Quote:The UK Health Security Agency banned the COVID vaccine from children who had not turned five by the end of last month. The UK will no longer offer the vaccine to children aged 5 to 11.

Wolf also discussed a recent investigation that revealed the devastating affects of the vaccine on little boys. According to Dr. Naomi Wolf, the vaccine is hindering the development of the testes of pre-adolescent boys. This is a catastrophe.

The vaccines hurt the testes and hurt the parts of the testes that develop the masculinity and secondary sex characteristics of little boys, and baby boys, and teenage boys. So they literally harm the chances of your little boy child to grow up normally as a male human adult.

But, why would the Progs want to do that?....oh, wait.....now it makes sense...

The worst doctor you can possibly have is the Federal Government.

link: Ex-FDNY Delivers a Fiery Speech Against COVID Mandates at NYC Council Meeting