(06-24-2022 05:10 PM)fsquid Wrote: Just provide universal prenatal and maternal care and be done with it.
Sent from my Pixel 6 using Tapatalk
Would be nice but the right does not care about that
Yeah, the side fighting to murder babies are the ones who truly care about the children.
Neither side cares about babies mate. They just care about fundraising on the issue and trust me, donations were a coming the last 2 days on either side.
Sent from my Pixel 6 using Tapatalk
lol. You do realize the moment you "win" on an issue---that issue ceases to be a fund raising tool.
Here's pResident FUBAR before he had dementia, trying to sound smart. You can tell he is pretty pleased that he thinks he sounds smart by his body language.
Big man thinks siding with the feminists will get him laid... for the first time.
Too bad for us that his mom didn't agree with his position.........
Back to the basement for him then...
I have to say---a lot of these nutty women on the front lines of the abortion rights protests dont look like they need to worry too much about a man getting them pregnant.
(06-24-2022 05:13 PM)Mr_XcentricK Wrote: Would be nice but the right does not care about that
Yeah, the side fighting to murder babies are the ones who truly care about the children.
Neither side cares about babies mate. They just care about fundraising on the issue and trust me, donations were a coming the last 2 days on either side.
Sent from my Pixel 6 using Tapatalk
Politicians are politicians, but most pro life people are NOT pro life for the sake of money.
We see abortion as murder because it is.
70 million aborted babies is perhaps the single most horrific genocide in human history.
I agree you are, you've been consistent the whole time Ive known your existence on this board. If republicans cared, there would be universal maternity care. We could argue on the details but the premise would be there. If democrats cared they would agree that there has to be some limits to abortion. Probably at the 15 weeks we have in Florida.
Sent from my Pixel 6 using Tapatalk
Mandatory free IUD placement for all women. No less.
If getting pregnant is health crisis, the left should advocate for this.
Max, you misunderstand dem priorities. IUD's for all does not really meet the prime directive. POWER. If they did that, some of their crazier factions would revolt.
Big man thinks siding with the feminists will get him laid... for the first time.
Too bad for us that his mom didn't agree with his position.........
Back to the basement for him then...
I have to say---a lot of these nutty women on the front lines of the abortion rights protests dont look like they need to worry too much about a man getting them pregnant.
Quote:Big Apple abortion protesters were in support of a sex strike Saturday — as “abstinence” started trending on Twitter in the wake of the Supreme Court’s decision to overturn Roe v. Wade.
“If you’re a man who won’t get a vasectomy, even though it’s reversible, and you’re not out in the streets fighting for my rights, you do not deserve to have sex with me,” Brianna Campbell, a 24-year-old EMT, told The Post.
Caroline Healey, a 22-year-old event coordinator, also questioned why sex was more important than women’s rights.
“I think it’s absolutely valid for us to be withholding the Holy Grail that men seem to think is important,” she told The Post at an abortion protest in Manhattan’s Union Square.
“Why shouldn’t we withhold it if we’re always worried that they’re not going put a condom on, that they’re going take one off after we ask them to,” she added.
“If we can’t safely go out and have sex and know that we will have a choice after that, then why should we be expected to?”
Meanwhile, Maya Demri, a survivor of rape, insisted that women need to “do everything in their legal power to get our rights back” after the high court struck down the landmark abortion ruling.
“I cannot sit here and imagine what my sisters in red states are going to do if they’re getting pregnant by rape and need to not just carry the tragedy of the worst thing that has happened to them, but also carry them in the body for nine months,” she told The Post.
“If this world thinks that they can oppress women forever, then we close our legs.”
Calls for a nationwide sex strike were also gathering momentum on social media and, at one point, “abstinence” was trending on Twitter with more than 26,900 tweets as of Saturday afternoon.
“Women of America: Take the pledge. Because SCOTUS overturned Roe v. Wade, we cannot take the risk of an unintended pregnancy, therefore, we will not have sex with any man — including our husbands — unless we are trying to become pregnant,” one Twitter user wrote.
“I live in New York and I am DOUBLE FURIOUS with the Supreme Court. I want to find people who are coordinating a mass sex strike. That is our power,” one woman raged. “Women have the power here. No more sex until abortion rights are federal law.”
Another said: “Perhaps a #sexstrike (also known as #abstinence) would help the men folk to be all in on this #womensrights issue.”
A number of others were sharing an image online that read: “#SexStrike. If our choices are denied, so are yours.”
The calls for abstinence came as other pro-choice activists took to the streets across the country for a second day in protest over Friday’s abortion ruling.
Others also planned to demonstrate outside the homes of the six conservative justices.
Quote:Former Democratic presidential candidate Andrew Yang tweeted Friday that Democrats only have themselves to blame after the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade.
Yang argued Democrats wasted decades by not codifying Roe v. Wade into law, leading to the Supreme Court overturning it in a landmark decision Friday.
“It feels like Democrats owe their people an apology for being bad at their jobs — they had a long time to codify Roe v. Wade, defend a balanced court, get RBG to step down, etc. Instead they got played and trounced. ‘Help undo our failures!’ is not a compelling rallying cry,” Yang tweeted.
“The people who are going to get hurt by this the worst will be poor women in red states, while the folks who played politics with this will glide along and email people for money,” he continued.
We can spot these loons a mile away as soon as they start speaking and usually avoid them. If you are a conservative man and married or are in a relationship with somebody like this, run. Any woman who would do what these looney tunes are proposing are not marriage material. They are trash and deserve to live life as a spinster. Using sex as a weapon has a way of backfiring on you. But they are not rational beings.
(06-26-2022 01:22 PM)MileHighBronco Wrote: Well, most conservative men can relax.
We can spot these loons a mile away as soon as they start speaking and usually avoid them. If you are a conservative man and married or are in a relationship with somebody like this, run. Any woman who would do what these looney tunes are proposing are not marriage material. They are trash and deserve to live life as a spinster. Using sex as a weapon has a way of backfiring on you. But they are not rational beings.
Conservative men mostly marry conservative women. It's the liberal male these harpies will torment! Sweet!
That's only a question for one side. You know that the GOP will not push any legislation for that if they win in the midterms and in 2024. Only one party wants to federalize damn near everything, including elections.
(06-24-2022 05:20 PM)ericsrevenge76 Wrote: Yeah, the side fighting to murder babies are the ones who truly care about the children.
Neither side cares about babies mate. They just care about fundraising on the issue and trust me, donations were a coming the last 2 days on either side.
Sent from my Pixel 6 using Tapatalk
Politicians are politicians, but most pro life people are NOT pro life for the sake of money.
We see abortion as murder because it is.
70 million aborted babies is perhaps the single most horrific genocide in human history.
I agree you are, you've been consistent the whole time Ive known your existence on this board. If republicans cared, there would be universal maternity care. We could argue on the details but the premise would be there. If democrats cared they would agree that there has to be some limits to abortion. Probably at the 15 weeks we have in Florida.
Sent from my Pixel 6 using Tapatalk
Why is killing an unborn child at 15 weeks any better than at any point? And why are so many abortion advocates so adamantly opposed to the death penalty? It defies reason and logic! We don't know the potential of the unborn. We know the depravity of criminals. If we want a better world let's let life prove its own worth. Spare the unborn and eliminate the murderers and rapists and those who prey upon children and the weak.
Exceptions? If the mother's life is at stake, yes. Her decision with no judgment upon her. Rape? Her decision since she didn't have one at conception. Other than that let them live. Execute those who ruin life for others!
AMEN!
The libs are too cowardly to seriously respond to these points.
You support the coddling of criminals and murderers then turn around and VEHEMENTLY support the genocide of innocent CHILDREN.
And you have the GALL to feign the moral high ground on anything under the sun?
(This post was last modified: 06-26-2022 02:25 PM by ericsrevenge76.)
(06-26-2022 01:49 PM)MileHighBronco Wrote: That's only a question for one side. You know that the GOP will not push any legislation for that if they win in the midterms and in 2024. Only one party wants to federalize damn near everything, including elections.
We will see.
GOP politicians are now going to have to run on what they want the abortion standard to be.
My personal preference would be a Constitutional amendment declaring this to be a state issue. I know that is pie in the sky but until we realize this is an issue we are never going to agree it will continue to be an election dividing issue
(06-26-2022 01:14 PM)MileHighBronco Wrote: Max, you misunderstand dem priorities. IUD's for all does not really meet the prime directive. POWER. If they did that, some of their crazier factions would revolt.
Oh I know, im recommending the COVID response solution leftists rallied behind.
Hell advertise the IUD and COVID vaccine together. Health crises averted.
(06-26-2022 01:03 PM)JRsec Wrote: Why is killing an unborn child at 15 weeks any better than at any point? And why are so many abortion advocates so adamantly opposed to the death penalty? It defies reason and logic! We don't know the potential of the unborn. We know the depravity of criminals. If we want a better world let's let life prove its own worth. Spare the unborn and eliminate the murderers and rapists and those who prey upon children and the weak.
Exceptions? If the mother's life is at stake, yes. Her decision with no judgment upon her. Rape? Her decision since she didn't have one at conception. Other than that let them live. Execute those who ruin life for others!
While I agree with most of that, there needs to be an exception for genetic defects that have been detected. I'm not talking about Downs Syndrome, for example but serious defects that could cause suffering to the child and death. There are many that are known.
(06-26-2022 01:03 PM)JRsec Wrote: Why is killing an unborn child at 15 weeks any better than at any point? And why are so many abortion advocates so adamantly opposed to the death penalty? It defies reason and logic! We don't know the potential of the unborn. We know the depravity of criminals. If we want a better world let's let life prove its own worth. Spare the unborn and eliminate the murderers and rapists and those who prey upon children and the weak.
Exceptions? If the mother's life is at stake, yes. Her decision with no judgment upon her. Rape? Her decision since she didn't have one at conception. Other than that let them live. Execute those who ruin life for others!
While I agree with most of that, there needs to be an exception for genetic defects that have been detected. I'm not talking about Downs Syndrome, for example but serious defects that could cause suffering to the child and death. There are many that are known.
Was the post designed to convey a specific contrast, or was it designed to list all possible exceptions?
![[Image: sex-strike-twitter-01.jpg?quality=75&strip=all]](https://nypost.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2022/06/sex-strike-twitter-01.jpg?quality=75&strip=all)
