(06-24-2022 11:05 AM)BobcatEngineer Wrote:  

(06-24-2022 10:59 AM)miko33 Wrote:  

(06-24-2022 10:53 AM)BobcatEngineer Wrote:  

(06-24-2022 10:46 AM)Gamenole Wrote:  And lest there be any doubt as to the next goals zealots have for this iteration of the Supreme Court, Justice Thomas makes it crystal clear -

Thomas wrote, “In future cases, we should reconsider all of this Court’s substantive due process precedents, including Griswold, Lawrence, and Obergefell.”

Griswold = birth control
Lawrence = homosexual sex
Obergefell = same-sex marriage

https://thehill.com/regulation/court-bat...tq-rights/

Bet you there are some posters here who would like to see interracial marriage go back to the states.

Uncalled for and not needed for the TOPIC of this thread.

Why not?

The argument at the crux of the matter is that SCOTUS exceeded their authority and "legislated from the court" when it came to Roe v. Wade, right?

Doesn't that make other liberties SCOTUS has provided vulnerable? I.e. gay marriage, access to birth control, etc???

P.S. What's uncalled for is calling the nearly 1 in 4 women who have at some point in their life had abortion, "murders".

Murderers or murderesses

Im not much of a Mitch McConnel fan---but this doesnt happen without McConnel blocking Merrit Garland's nomination and speeding things up so Coney-Barret got confirmed before the end of Trumps term. Like him or not (and I dont care for him much)---McConnel owns part of this big win.

(06-24-2022 11:18 AM)BobcatEngineer Wrote:  

(06-24-2022 11:15 AM)Eagleaidaholic Wrote:  The large majority of abortions are already performed before 6 weeks now.

Unless you're taking pregnancy tests often, you don't know you're pregnant until you miss your period.

By the time you miss your period, you are 4 weeks pregnant.

I don’t know about 6 weeks, but according to this CDC report nearly 93% of abortions are 12 weeks or less.

https://www.cdc.gov/reproductivehealth/d...ortion.htm

(06-24-2022 10:53 AM)BobcatEngineer Wrote:  

(06-24-2022 10:46 AM)Gamenole Wrote:  And lest there be any doubt as to the next goals zealots have for this iteration of the Supreme Court, Justice Thomas makes it crystal clear -

Thomas wrote, “In future cases, we should reconsider all of this Court’s substantive due process precedents, including Griswold, Lawrence, and Obergefell.”

Griswold = birth control
Lawrence = homosexual sex
Obergefell = same-sex marriage

https://thehill.com/regulation/court-bat...tq-rights/

Bet you there are some posters here who would like to see interracial marriage go back to the states.

Bet you there's at least one poster here who likes to engage in ridiculous hyperbole.

(06-24-2022 11:24 AM)BigTigerMike Wrote:  

Of course CNN runs to get that idiot's blabbering.

Condom stock is taking off

Dont believe me

Check it

Bwahahahaha

(06-24-2022 11:05 AM)BobcatEngineer Wrote:  

(06-24-2022 10:59 AM)miko33 Wrote:  

(06-24-2022 10:53 AM)BobcatEngineer Wrote:  

(06-24-2022 10:46 AM)Gamenole Wrote:  And lest there be any doubt as to the next goals zealots have for this iteration of the Supreme Court, Justice Thomas makes it crystal clear -

Thomas wrote, “In future cases, we should reconsider all of this Court’s substantive due process precedents, including Griswold, Lawrence, and Obergefell.”

Griswold = birth control
Lawrence = homosexual sex
Obergefell = same-sex marriage

https://thehill.com/regulation/court-bat...tq-rights/

Bet you there are some posters here who would like to see interracial marriage go back to the states.

Uncalled for and not needed for the TOPIC of this thread.

Why not?

The argument at the crux of the matter is that SCOTUS exceeded their authority and "legislated from the court" when it came to Roe v. Wade, right?

Doesn't that make other liberties SCOTUS has provided vulnerable? I.e. gay marriage, access to birth control, etc???

P.S. What's uncalled for is calling the nearly 1 in 4 women who have at some point in their life had abortion, "murders".

riggghht

Because people refuse to PRETEND along with you that this is in the constitution, we must be racists.

What a sad place you have to be in to post this.

(06-24-2022 09:44 AM)BigTigerMike Wrote:  So it’ll be mostly white peoples rioting over this decision?

Evidence #3. Look at the large number of grossly ignorant white people reacting to the decision. If I didn’t know better I would think they are in need of an abortion at the moment. I mean seriously where are their husbands and boyfriends? Absolutely sheer insanity temper tantrums of spoiled brats. Go home and stop embarrassing yourselves.

What really strikes me as odd is the number of Gay and Lesbians who are so supportive of extermination of the unborn. It’s not like they are going to procreate.

It amazes me how many of those people with shirts or signs that say "my body my choice" are probably ones that would force you to take the covid shot.

Planned Parenthood was the Plaintiff in this case correct?

One could argue if Planned Parenthood had compromised with the state of MS and accepted the 15 week threshold, we wouldn't be here now.

Refusing to compromise is risky

Thank you President Donald J. Trump... still making liberals cry!

(06-24-2022 10:37 AM)ericsrevenge76 Wrote:  

(06-24-2022 10:34 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(06-24-2022 10:23 AM)ericsrevenge76 Wrote:  

(06-24-2022 10:05 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(06-24-2022 09:56 AM)rath v2.0 Wrote:  Personal responsibility. What a concept.

1. That's incredibly naïve, especially in young adults.
2. You think this ruling is suddenly going to make women and men more responsible?

That is incredibly dishonest, contraceptive is cheap and even free in many cases and its literally avaible everywhere.

That excuse just won't fly in 2022.

Yes, of course. But you should know that when dealing with sexual relations that you're not always taking the time to rationally think these things through. And as stated, this ruling is going to change that.

That's completely honest. If you disagree, that's fine and you're entitled to your opinion.

If you can CHOOSE to have sex, you can CHOOSE to use birth control.

That is completely honest.

And if you disagree you are taking a less than honest position.

Just as many young girls keep condoms in the nightstand drawer as guys do. Nothing new

(06-24-2022 11:05 AM)Attackcoog Wrote:  

(06-24-2022 10:50 AM)Bear Catlett Wrote:  This is even more evidence that Trump may be the greatest president in history.

lol---I was thinking this thread should be remained "Trump Strikes Back".

Isnt it funny how things Trump gave us that Biden* and the democrats twiddled on with the turd nugget touch has turned to crap: gas prices, inflation, war, no baby formula, border crisis, afghanistan, etc

But the things they cant touch, we are still enjoying the winning.

(06-24-2022 11:13 AM)umbluegray Wrote:  If the court exceeded its authority on ANYTHING then it should be up for review.

The Constitution is very clear on what authority is granted to the federal government. Everything else is left to the states.

Courts shouldn't MAKE law. They should only rule on whether or not something is legal within the framework of the state or US constitutions.

Would you like to see Loving v Virginia reversed? Send it back to the States?

(06-24-2022 10:53 AM)BobcatEngineer Wrote:  

(06-24-2022 10:46 AM)Gamenole Wrote:  And lest there be any doubt as to the next goals zealots have for this iteration of the Supreme Court, Justice Thomas makes it crystal clear -

Thomas wrote, “In future cases, we should reconsider all of this Court’s substantive due process precedents, including Griswold, Lawrence, and Obergefell.”

Griswold = birth control
Lawrence = homosexual sex
Obergefell = same-sex marriage

https://thehill.com/regulation/court-bat...tq-rights/

Bet you there are some posters here who would like to see interracial marriage go back to the states.

Or like Biden who fought to keep black kids from going to his kids schools....



Sent from my SM-N975U using Tapatalk

(06-24-2022 10:53 AM)BobcatEngineer Wrote:  

(06-24-2022 10:46 AM)Gamenole Wrote:  And lest there be any doubt as to the next goals zealots have for this iteration of the Supreme Court, Justice Thomas makes it crystal clear -

Thomas wrote, “In future cases, we should reconsider all of this Court’s substantive due process precedents, including Griswold, Lawrence, and Obergefell.”

Griswold = birth control
Lawrence = homosexual sex
Obergefell = same-sex marriage

https://thehill.com/regulation/court-bat...tq-rights/

Bet you there are some posters here who would like to see interracial marriage go back to the states.

If it means I don't have to see them in every TV commercial, sure

Sent from my Pixel 6 using Tapatalk

Of course president F-ing A-hole comes out to divide the country even further with his stupidity.