(04-13-2022 01:36 PM)GoodOwl Wrote:  Pfizer BioNTech Covid Vaccine and Ventricular tachycardia - a phase IV clinical study of CDC and FDA data

Quote:Summary:

Ventricular tachycardia is found among people who get Pfizer BioNTech Covid Vaccine, especially for people who are male, 60+ old, and in the first week of getting the vaccine.

The phase IV clinical study analyzes which people get Pfizer BioNTech Covid Vaccine and have Ventricular tachycardia. It is created by eHealthMe based on reports of 286,220 people who have side effects when getting Pfizer BioNTech Covid Vaccine from the CDC and the FDA, and is updated regularly. You can use the study as a second opinion to make health care decisions.

Reportedly, Comedian Gilbert Gottfried died of Ventricular Tachycardia. He was in his 60's and male (according to a biologist).

Hmmm... had he received the Vaccine within one week prior to his death?

Plenty of other things may cause Ventricular Tachycardia as well.

(04-13-2022 01:36 PM)GoodOwl Wrote:  Pfizer BioNTech Covid Vaccine and Ventricular tachycardia - a phase IV clinical study of CDC and FDA data

Quote:Summary:

Ventricular tachycardia is found among people who get Pfizer BioNTech Covid Vaccine, especially for people who are male, 60+ old, and in the first week of getting the vaccine.

The phase IV clinical study analyzes which people get Pfizer BioNTech Covid Vaccine and have Ventricular tachycardia. It is created by eHealthMe based on reports of 286,220 people who have side effects when getting Pfizer BioNTech Covid Vaccine from the CDC and the FDA, and is updated regularly. You can use the study as a second opinion to make health care decisions.

Reportedly, Comedian Gilbert Gottfried died of Ventricular Tachycardia. He was in his 60's and male (according to a biologist).

Also... WTF is this website? From their words:

"With medical big data and AI algorithms, eHealthMe enables everyone to run phase IV clinical trial [sic] to detect adverse drug outcomes and monitor effectiveness.".

Honestly your post is laughably weak in terms of supporting a correlation between the vaccine and Gottfried's death (which I presume was the point of your posting it).

Fauci and the gang definitely do NOT want you reading this DAMNING thread of one man’s horrific experience with the Moderna vaccine

Cover Up: Philadelphia Ends Mask Mandate DAYS After Announcing Its Return

Quote: I mean, mask data isn’t that hard to understand if you actually look at it. Tell me how much masks have mattered over the last three years, bud. (Graph from @ianmSC). https://t.co/Tq1KaUVSMd pic.twitter.com/Nzg2qglm4m
— Clay Travis (@ClayTravis) April 21, 2022

Fauci

(04-22-2022 10:23 AM)OptimisticOwl Wrote:  Fauci

Tsk, you're not supposed to use swear words on here, OO. For shame.

(04-22-2022 12:17 PM)GoodOwl Wrote:  

(04-22-2022 10:23 AM)OptimisticOwl Wrote:  Fauci

Tsk, you're not supposed to use swear words on here, OO. For shame.

It's an F-word, but not THE F-word.

I think I understand Fauci’s point, but that was not a politically astute way of phrasing it.

(04-22-2022 01:04 PM)OptimisticOwl Wrote:  

(04-22-2022 12:17 PM)GoodOwl Wrote:  

(04-22-2022 10:23 AM)OptimisticOwl Wrote:  Fauci

Tsk, you're not supposed to use swear words on here, OO. For shame.

It's an F-word, but not THE F-word.

isn't it, though?

(04-22-2022 04:52 PM)GoodOwl Wrote:  

(04-22-2022 01:04 PM)OptimisticOwl Wrote:  

(04-22-2022 12:17 PM)GoodOwl Wrote:  

(04-22-2022 10:23 AM)OptimisticOwl Wrote:  Fauci

Tsk, you're not supposed to use swear words on here, OO. For shame.

It's an F-word, but not THE F-word.

isn't it, though?

Nobody ever told me to go fauci myself, although I think there are some here who would like to.

BE Aware: The MIDETERM Covid variant is nigh upon us...don't fall for it, it is a LIE.

because Morton said 'when it rains it pours'...

Quote:The natural immunity provided by COVID-19 infection in unvaccinated adults is on par with protection conferred from vaccines against reinfection with or hospitalization from the virus, a new study reveals. Immunity from COVID-19 was also shown to persist longer than any vaccine-induced immunity.

“We found that, before the emergence of the Omicron variant, natural immunity provided a similar degree of protection against COVID-19 infection as mRNA vaccination,” summarized study author Dr. Ari Robicsek.

Dr. Robicsek is the chief medical analytics officer for the Providence health system, one of the largest health systems in the United States, which published the study in collaboration with researchers from the University of Chicago.

The study – “Rates of COVID-19 Among Unvaccinated Adults With Prior COVID-19” – found that unvaccinated adults with prior COVID-19 infection had an 85 percent lower risk of acquiring COVID-19 than unvaccinated individuals without previous infection.

“The findings that patients with prior COVID-19 had 88% protection against hospitalization for COVID-19 and 83% protection against COVID-19 not requiring hospitalization suggest that natural immunity was associated with similar protection against mild and severe disease,” explained the study.

“mRNA vaccines are associated with similar prolonged protection from severe COVID-19 as found in our study, although vaccine-associated protection from mild COVID-19 has been shown to wane at 6 months,” it continued.

Natural immunity in unvaccinated individuals was shown to persist for up to nine months following the initial infection, which was as far out as researchers were able to study. “Protection remained stable over the study period with no attenuation up to 9 months from initial infection,” it explained.

“Prior studies investigating protection against SARS-CoV-2 reinfection found similar results, with protection associated with natural immunity ranging from 80.5 percent to 100 percent,” added the paper. “This level of protection is similar to that reported for mRNA vaccines.”

The figures were based on an analysis of over 100,000 patients tested for COVID-19 at 1,300 sites of care across Providence’s massive health care system between October 1st, 2020 and November 1st, 2021. The study was published online on April 20th in JAMA Network Open.

“This data is key to helping us understand the strength and longevity of natural immunity, and allows us to compare the effectiveness of a prior infection with mRNA vaccines,” according to Dr. Amy Compton-Phillips, Providence’s chief clinical officer.

“The results provide new insight into the length of protection following an initial infection among the unvaccinated population and could have important implications for vaccination guidelines and public health policy,” she added.

The study follows an unearthed interview featuring Anthony Fauci asserting that the “best vaccination is to get infected yourself,” in reference to influenza in 2004.

Link


so, um, "we" were right again...oh my, Mr. Sulu!

Correlation Between Mask Compliance and COVID-19 Outcomes in Europe

While people across the globe have been coerced to wear germ-ridden fabrics across their faces to enter indoor venues or travel throughout the pandemic in the name of “safety,” new research confirms wearing face coverings increases the likelihood of getting sick or contracting a deadly infection.

After examining the correlation between morbidity and mask usage using data collected from 35 European countries over a six-month span throughout the 2020-2021 winter, Associate Professor Beny Spira at the University of São Paulo found wearing masks not only useless in preventing the transmission of COVID or airborne viruses but a “moderate positive correlation between mask usage and deaths.”

According to Spira’s peer reviewed study published in Cureus Journal of Medical Science on April 19 , face masks do nothing to prevent transmission of disease and, in fact, increase te risk of dying from COVID-19 and respiratory illnesses.

“The findings presented in this short communication suggest that countries with high levels of mask compliance did not perform better than those with low mask usage in the six-month period that encompassed the second European wave of COVID-19,” Spira notes in the study titled Correlation Between Mask Compliance and COVID-19 Outcomes in Europe.

“The lack of negative correlations between mask usage and COVID-19 cases and deaths suggest that the widespread use of masks at a time when an effective intervention was most needed, i.e., during the strong 2020-2021 autumn-winter peak, was not able to reduce COVID-19 transmission,” he continues.

Spiral, who primarily investigates the molecular genetics of microorganisms, found a “moderate positive correlation” between mask usage and COVID-19 related deaths.

“The positive correlation between mask usage and cases was not statistically significant (rho = 0.136, p = 0.436), while the correlation between mask usage and deaths was positive and significant (rho = 0.351, p = 0.039),” the study reveals. “The Spearman’s correlation between masks and deaths was considerably higher in the West than in East European countries: 0.627 (p = 0.007) and 0.164 (p = 0.514), respectively.”

This is not the first study to find these results on masking.

Countries with higher rate of mask usage saw a greater number of COVID-19 infections, according to the study.

“It could also be claimed that the rise in infection levels prompted mask usage resulting in higher levels of masking in countries with already higher transmission rates. While this assertion is certainly true for some countries, several others with high infection rates, such as France, Germany, Italy, Portugal, and Spain had strict mask mandates in place since the first semester of 2020,” Spira explains.


So, um, "we" were right about this also, once again = the Left was dead wrong yet again.

(05-20-2022 01:53 PM)GoodOwl Wrote:  Correlation Between Mask Compliance and COVID-19 Outcomes in Europe

While people across the globe have been coerced to wear germ-ridden fabrics across their faces to enter indoor venues or travel throughout the pandemic in the name of “safety,” new research confirms wearing face coverings increases the likelihood of getting sick or contracting a deadly infection.

After examining the correlation between morbidity and mask usage using data collected from 35 European countries over a six-month span throughout the 2020-2021 winter, Associate Professor Beny Spira at the University of São Paulo found wearing masks not only useless in preventing the transmission of COVID or airborne viruses but a “moderate positive correlation between mask usage and deaths.”

According to Spira’s peer reviewed study published in Cureus Journal of Medical Science on April 19 , face masks do nothing to prevent transmission of disease and, in fact, increase te risk of dying from COVID-19 and respiratory illnesses.

“The findings presented in this short communication suggest that countries with high levels of mask compliance did not perform better than those with low mask usage in the six-month period that encompassed the second European wave of COVID-19,” Spira notes in the study titled Correlation Between Mask Compliance and COVID-19 Outcomes in Europe.

“The lack of negative correlations between mask usage and COVID-19 cases and deaths suggest that the widespread use of masks at a time when an effective intervention was most needed, i.e., during the strong 2020-2021 autumn-winter peak, was not able to reduce COVID-19 transmission,” he continues.

Spiral, who primarily investigates the molecular genetics of microorganisms, found a “moderate positive correlation” between mask usage and COVID-19 related deaths.

“The positive correlation between mask usage and cases was not statistically significant (rho = 0.136, p = 0.436), while the correlation between mask usage and deaths was positive and significant (rho = 0.351, p = 0.039),” the study reveals. “The Spearman’s correlation between masks and deaths was considerably higher in the West than in East European countries: 0.627 (p = 0.007) and 0.164 (p = 0.514), respectively.”

This is not the first study to find these results on masking.

Countries with higher rate of mask usage saw a greater number of COVID-19 infections, according to the study.

“It could also be claimed that the rise in infection levels prompted mask usage resulting in higher levels of masking in countries with already higher transmission rates. While this assertion is certainly true for some countries, several others with high infection rates, such as France, Germany, Italy, Portugal, and Spain had strict mask mandates in place since the first semester of 2020,” Spira explains.


So, um, "we" were right about this also, once again = the Left was dead wrong yet again.

You might want to cancel your victory parade until this study gets some verification. Don't have time to figure out which journal published it but I did check out the twitter feed of the author.

"As Pinocchio Fauci would say before entering full-mode lying "It might, however, provide some slight benefit in keep out gross droplets""

"Many people warned that the bill will eventually come. But the governments wanted to taste the power of dictatorship.
And the useful idiots parroted the mantra that is more important to save lives than the economy.
We ended up with a death toll and a disgraceful economy."

etc. etc.

Not saying the paper doesn't hold up (I have no idea) but I'm saying your boy may be incredibly biased and this may affect the quality of this study.

New Peer-reviewed Study Confirms Brain Disease results from COVID "Vaccine"

These things do not seem to be "vaccines", they seems to be more like POISONS and best avoided:

CJD is a “rare” disease that is caused by abnormal infectious proteins in the brain called “prions,” according to NHS. Although the presence of prions is not necessarily dangerous or deadly, the proteins will cause degenerative brain disease if they become diseased or misfolded. Once this process begins, the malfunctioning prions will continue to corrupt other cells, leading to a prognosis that is always fatal.

As of right now, CJD is uncurable. There are zero treatment options available. The disease is essentially a death sentence, but it is traditionally dormant for several years before manifesting into a deadly complication.

Unfortunately, with the new cases of CJD that have been linked to the alleged "vaccine", that doesn’t seem to be the case. The disease is progressing at an alarming and unprecedented rate. So much so that the researchers who published another pre-print study out of France are concerned that the experimental mRNA vaccines contributed directly to creating a new type of CJD that is more aggressive and behaves differently than in previous cases.

Quote: NEW – Pfizer's primary mRNA injections "temporarily" impair semen concentration and total motile count among donors.

The scope of the study did not include the effects of additional "booster" injections. https://t.co/wRtL6bCxdx

— Disclose.tv (@disclosetv) June 19, 2022

Covid-19 vaccination BNT162b2 temporarily impairs semen concentration and total motile count among semen donors

Quote:CAPSULE: A retrospective longitudinal multicenter comparison reveals temporary sperm concentration reduction 3 months post BNT162b2 vaccination and later recovery. Semen volume and motility remain stable.

This article has been accepted for publication and undergone full peer review.

In the latest study, released this week, the participants were studied for five months after receiving the vaccine according to CDC recommendations. Each participant provided multiple samples, spread out throughout the study’s duration.

The results showed a staggering drop in male fertility, with the average decrease being 22.1% across the study group.

The study concludes, “Systemic immune response after BNT162b2 vaccine is a reasonable cause for transient semen concentration and TMC decline.”

In short, the Pfizer COVID vaccine does in fact reduce male fertility.

(06-19-2022 01:19 PM)GoodOwl Wrote:  In short, the Pfizer COVID vaccine does in fact reduce male fertility.

Where was this when I needed it?

(For the leftists, this is humor)

(06-19-2022 01:19 PM)GoodOwl Wrote:  In the latest study, released this week, the participants were studied for five months after receiving the vaccine according to CDC recommendations. Each participant provided multiple samples, spread out throughout the study’s duration.

The results showed a staggering drop in male fertility, with the average decrease being 22.1% across the study group.

The study concludes, “Systemic immune response after BNT162b2 vaccine is a reasonable cause for transient semen concentration and TMC decline.”

In short, the Pfizer COVID vaccine does in fact reduce male fertility.

Is the drop that occurs permanent? How do other vaccines impact these fertility issues?

(06-20-2022 06:02 PM)RiceLad15 Wrote:  

(06-19-2022 01:19 PM)GoodOwl Wrote:  In the latest study, released this week, the participants were studied for five months after receiving the vaccine according to CDC recommendations. Each participant provided multiple samples, spread out throughout the study’s duration.

The results showed a staggering drop in male fertility, with the average decrease being 22.1% across the study group.

The study concludes, “Systemic immune response after BNT162b2 vaccine is a reasonable cause for transient semen concentration and TMC decline.”

In short, the Pfizer COVID vaccine does in fact reduce male fertility.

Is the drop that occurs permanent? How do other vaccines impact these fertility issues?

From the linked abstract:

Quote:Discussion
This longitudinal study focused on SD demonstrates selective temporary sperm concentration and TMC deterioration three months after vaccination followed by later recovery verified by diverse statistical analyses.

Conclusions
Systemic immune response after BNT162b2 vaccine is a reasonable cause for transient semen concentration and TMC decline. Long-term prognosis remains good.