Hello There, Guest! Registered users see far less ads! Register today and join our virtual tailgate. (Login — Register)

Post Reply 
Judge Acquits J6 Protester in First Defeat for DOJ
Author Message
MemTigers1998 Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 20,495
Joined: May 2017
Reputation: 2731
I Root For: Memphis
Location:
Post: #21
RE: Judge Acquits J6 Protester in First Defeat for DOJ
(04-07-2022 05:57 AM)shere khan Wrote:  Ashli Babbit was murdered

Say her name!
04-07-2022 07:33 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Gamenole Offline
All American
*

Posts: 4,264
Joined: Oct 2016
Reputation: 980
I Root For: S Carolina & Fla State
Location:
Post: #22
RE: Judge Acquits J6 Protester in First Defeat for DOJ
(04-07-2022 06:19 AM)TigerBlue4Ever Wrote:  
(04-07-2022 05:34 AM)HappyAppy Wrote:  
(04-06-2022 07:46 PM)olliebaba Wrote:  How will they get back all that time that they were illegally incarcerated? They should sue the DOJ, but that means it will come from the money I "willfully" gave the government. I'm kidding, I did it because, well, I had to. LOL

(04-06-2022 08:57 PM)Eagleaidaholic Wrote:  
(04-06-2022 08:52 PM)Gamenole Wrote:  
(04-06-2022 08:36 PM)WKUYG Wrote:  You seem to take this or try to make it personal....

This was not my victory or anyone posting on this boards victory. This was a victory for our rights and the rule of law being upheld over POLITICS. Of course you would disagree with that, because most of your kind can't separate the two

No, it certainly isn't a personal victory or loss for any of us. But I've gleefully posted as rioters are convicted and a line I frequently use was invoked, so I was attempting to cheerfully acknowledge this one went the other way and that some people (probably most of the people on this board) are happy about that. I completely disagree with you that this case was a victory for our rights or the rule of law, but we don't need to be disagreeable just because we disagree.

He was invited into the Capitol by a guard and went in and he has been in jail for who knows how many months. He didn't break any law, so he was acquired, but his life has been ruined. You're right, justice is not served. Government employees within the DOJ need to be civilly harmed for what they done.

(04-06-2022 10:36 PM)ODUsmitty Wrote:  
(04-06-2022 10:28 PM)TigerBlue4Ever Wrote:  
(04-06-2022 07:56 PM)Gamenole Wrote:  Lol well done, it does go both ways doesn't it! I think the judge made a bad decision here, but of course my opinion is irrelevant. The man was acquitted and can't be tried again for these offenses, so enjoy your victory!

Go fuq yourself. This isn't some video game you play in your moms basement. This is a witch hunt, people and their families have suffered egregiously over this and you treat it like it's some contest. What a prick.
Agreed completely. The time period of confinement prior to jurisdiction is wrong. I hope this gentleman sues the ever loving **** out of the government, as his life has been ruined. Compare and contrast to the Antifa and BLM scum that destroyed inner city business that were detained far less and adjudicated much quicker. Double standards suck, and those that support them swallow.

Lol at all the over the top hysterics in this thread.

Do you guys honestly believe this dude has been sitting in jail for the last year plus on these misdemeanor charges? He hasn’t. He was arrested and released until his trial, just like the majority of the people charged on January 6th.

There is a reason the MTG/Gossar psycho wing of the party are the only ones pushing this political prisoner crap narrative.

Do you guys actually believe this was an insurrection is the more pertinent question. The answer is yes by the way, you do.

You forgot an important word there - failed insurrection.
04-07-2022 07:43 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
appst89 Offline
Herding Cats
*

Posts: 2,783
Joined: Jan 2003
Reputation: 485
I Root For: Appalachian St.
Location:
Post: #23
RE: Judge Acquits J6 Protester in First Defeat for DOJ
(04-07-2022 07:43 AM)Gamenole Wrote:  
(04-07-2022 06:19 AM)TigerBlue4Ever Wrote:  
(04-07-2022 05:34 AM)HappyAppy Wrote:  
(04-06-2022 07:46 PM)olliebaba Wrote:  How will they get back all that time that they were illegally incarcerated? They should sue the DOJ, but that means it will come from the money I "willfully" gave the government. I'm kidding, I did it because, well, I had to. LOL

(04-06-2022 08:57 PM)Eagleaidaholic Wrote:  
(04-06-2022 08:52 PM)Gamenole Wrote:  No, it certainly isn't a personal victory or loss for any of us. But I've gleefully posted as rioters are convicted and a line I frequently use was invoked, so I was attempting to cheerfully acknowledge this one went the other way and that some people (probably most of the people on this board) are happy about that. I completely disagree with you that this case was a victory for our rights or the rule of law, but we don't need to be disagreeable just because we disagree.

He was invited into the Capitol by a guard and went in and he has been in jail for who knows how many months. He didn't break any law, so he was acquired, but his life has been ruined. You're right, justice is not served. Government employees within the DOJ need to be civilly harmed for what they done.

(04-06-2022 10:36 PM)ODUsmitty Wrote:  
(04-06-2022 10:28 PM)TigerBlue4Ever Wrote:  Go fuq yourself. This isn't some video game you play in your moms basement. This is a witch hunt, people and their families have suffered egregiously over this and you treat it like it's some contest. What a prick.
Agreed completely. The time period of confinement prior to jurisdiction is wrong. I hope this gentleman sues the ever loving **** out of the government, as his life has been ruined. Compare and contrast to the Antifa and BLM scum that destroyed inner city business that were detained far less and adjudicated much quicker. Double standards suck, and those that support them swallow.

Lol at all the over the top hysterics in this thread.

Do you guys honestly believe this dude has been sitting in jail for the last year plus on these misdemeanor charges? He hasn’t. He was arrested and released until his trial, just like the majority of the people charged on January 6th.

There is a reason the MTG/Gossar psycho wing of the party are the only ones pushing this political prisoner crap narrative.

Do you guys actually believe this was an insurrection is the more pertinent question. The answer is yes by the way, you do.

You forgot an important word there - failed insurrection.

You misspelled staged.
04-07-2022 07:46 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
solohawks Offline
Legend
*

Posts: 25,717
Joined: May 2008
Reputation: 1187
I Root For: UNCW
Location: Wilmington, NC
Post: #24
RE: Judge Acquits J6 Protester in First Defeat for DOJ
(04-06-2022 07:56 PM)Gamenole Wrote:  
(04-06-2022 06:15 PM)Native Georgian Wrote:  In the words of a fellow poster: Good News!

Lol well done, it does go both ways doesn't it! I think the judge made a bad decision here, but of course my opinion is irrelevant. The man was acquitted and can't be tried again for these offenses, so enjoy your victory!

He won judge roulette and played his hand very well.

The other guy with the same charges and likely similar circumstances lost judge roulette and landed on an Obama judge He won't be as fortunate.

Its kinda scary how different the law is based in your judge
04-07-2022 07:56 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Native Georgian Offline
Legend
*

Posts: 31,577
Joined: May 2008
Reputation: 1425
I Root For: TULANE+GA.STATE
Location: Decatur GA
Post: #25
RE: Judge Acquits J6 Protester in First Defeat for DOJ
(04-07-2022 07:56 AM)solohawks Wrote:  Its kinda scary how different the law is based in your judge
Quite true, and “kinda scary” is actually an understatement.

Some of y’all may know that the Watergate scandals of the 1970s are a special subject of interest for me. In that case, one federal judge (John Sirica) had sufficient seniority that he was able to assign almost all of the Watergate-related cases to his own court. That enabled him to control the judicial outcomes for all those defendants far more than any one judge could have done under normal circumstances.

One of the major defendants in “Watergate” was a man named Charles Colson, a high-ranking aide to President Nixon. Ironically, his case was *not* assigned to Sirica, for complex reasons outside of Sirica’s control. And as a result, the federal prosecutors knew they would have a much more challenging battle to get Colson convicted. So, they offered Colson a plea bargain that involved pure probation with no prison time (none of the defendants in Sirica’s court were offered that!)

Colson, however, was in the throes of an intense religious conversion. He refused the probation plea-offer and personally insisted on pleading to more serious charges that *did* involve some prison time. I can only imagine the private reaction of the prosecutors, the judge, or Colson’s own attorneys when they realized what he was doing.

The final irony is that Colson’s religious faith was frequently lampooned in the media as a “jailhouse conversion” even though the conversion happened before he was incarcerated and the prosecutors were offering straight probation. Oh, well!
(This post was last modified: 04-07-2022 08:23 AM by Native Georgian.)
04-07-2022 08:20 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
bullet Offline
Legend
*

Posts: 83,638
Joined: Apr 2012
Reputation: 5053
I Root For: Texas, UK, UGA
Location:
Post: #26
RE: Judge Acquits J6 Protester in First Defeat for DOJ
(04-07-2022 05:57 AM)shere khan Wrote:  Ashli Babbit was murdered

ttt
04-07-2022 09:17 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 




User(s) browsing this thread:


Copyright © 2002-2026 Collegiate Sports Nation Bulletin Board System (CSNbbs), All Rights Reserved.
CSNbbs is an independent fan site and is in no way affiliated to the NCAA or any of the schools and conferences it represents.
This site monetizes links. FTC Disclosure.
We allow third-party companies to serve ads and/or collect certain anonymous information when you visit our web site. These companies may use non-personally identifiable information (e.g., click stream information, browser type, time and date, subject of advertisements clicked or scrolled over) during your visits to this and other Web sites in order to provide advertisements about goods and services likely to be of greater interest to you. These companies typically use a cookie or third party web beacon to collect this information. To learn more about this behavioral advertising practice or to opt-out of this type of advertising, you can visit http://www.networkadvertising.org.
Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2026 MyBB Group.