(04-19-2021 01:00 PM)Rice93 Wrote: I haven't spent much time on this forum of late, but I check from time to time. I haven't responded to this previously because I don't really see the point in OO's question.
Quick reply here only to say... has there been ANYBODY here that has suggested that there are common-sense gun control laws which would prevent EVERY mass shooting were they to be enacted? Certainly there are outliers/exceptions for every piece of legislation.
I'm certain that OO isn't suggesting that any new law is pointless if it doesn't prevent every future mass shooting. It seems worthwhile to achieve even a 10% reduction if possible.
I don't know the particulars of this shooting. Whether or not currently proposed laws would have prevented this specific shooting doesn't make those proposed laws worthless, IMO.
Agree with your last statement, but at the same time, if they don't prevent at least some shootings, what is their value? The impetus for new laws is supposedly to prevent future occurrences.
To broaden the question, it is not clear that any proposed laws would stop any of the shootings.
In case after case, the current gun laws, enacted to prevent mass shootings, did not stop mass shootings.
It certainly is not clear that any of the proposed laws would result in a 10% reduction. How do you measure shootings that don't happen, anyway?
Now, I am sure some people want to pursue the myth that I and other right wingers don't want any laws at all. No true. But before I go all in on generic gun control, I want specifics. Sadly lacking, it seems.
Ironically, I am no longer a gun owner, having gifted them all to my nephew, a Biden-voting Houston resident, who needs them more than I do. He has been carjacked, burgled, and attacked on the street - in the Rice U. neighborhood. No, I did not do a background check on him.