(03-25-2021 07:43 AM)JMUDunk Wrote: Just tossed out names off the top of my head.
Clearly not the point. But ok.
Go read what ‘18 is saying, it’s been chronic like that since, well forever. I can only personally speak since around ‘87 or so though, but I’ll put some trust in the ‘63 alumna I’ve known for thirty years. They give exclusively to FeceU.
Why?
Success in varsity sports can spur school spirit and giving. No argument about that. Post graduation, alums can also take pride in their school through the success of varsity teams, and football can be a major part of that. Men’s basketball (if successful) can rival, and in some instances surpass FB, in flying the flag high and generating giving (Villanova would be a great example of that.
The usefulness of using/promoting sports as a vehicle for giving, however, is limited. The better path is to promote success among the graduates from its various academic programs, especially professional schools. Graduates who accumulate wealth post graduation are the vehicle for rapid growth of a school’s endowment, and further development of the university’s national and international profile. Sports may serve as a tie to that wealthy alum, but in many instances the tie is weak or non-existent.
The following is a true story, but only one example that has been repeated at other schools receiving large $$$ gifts.
Michael Dell, founder of Dell Computers, is a U. of Texas alum. His success in life and continued interest in UT isn’t wholly based on athletics. His recent gift of $150 million to build a medical school on the Austin campus was based on the desire to meet the need for more doctors, but also on the desire to elevate UT’s academic profile. So, the “what came first, the chicken or the egg” question remains. Did Dell’s success in the business world and willingness to give back hundreds of millions of $$$ to his Alma mater build the medical school? Or was the medical school built because of the success of UT athletics? I would argue the medical school was built because Dell had become fabulously wealthy and still felt a strong feeling of connection to UT, however, Dell first had to become rich.
And that’s JMU’s situation (at present). JMU has yet to see a Michael Dell emerge among our graduates. JMU does boast some very successful alums, and they are beginning to give back, but JMU has yet to see a gift of the size that can significantly elevate or change the direction of the university. In time I’m hopeful such a gift (or gifts) will come to JMU, but I have my doubts a move to FBS and G5 FB will move the needle.