Uh oh...it's over now. don the con is on the case!

(12-08-2020 08:10 AM)appst89 Wrote:  Having other states get involved may be the only chance we have to ever have a fair election again. If the rampant fraud from this past election goes unpunished, there will be no need to hold elections in the future because they will all be meaningless.

If only the Dems hadn't waited until 2020 to start stealing elections, we could have avoided DJT's attempted dictatorship.

It's mighty suspicious that so many R's were "elected" to Congress when polls indicated otherwise. By conservative thinking, many of these races clearly must have also been stolen.

(12-09-2020 09:56 AM)Ohio Poly Wrote:  

(12-08-2020 08:10 AM)appst89 Wrote:  Having other states get involved may be the only chance we have to ever have a fair election again. If the rampant fraud from this past election goes unpunished, there will be no need to hold elections in the future because they will all be meaningless.

If only the Dems hadn't waited until 2020 to start stealing elections, we could have avoided DJT's attempted dictatorship.

It's mighty suspicious that so many R's were "elected" to Congress when polls indicated otherwise. By conservative thinking, many of these races clearly must have also been stolen.

why dont any smart democrats post here. i mean, statistically, there have to be a few out there.

(12-09-2020 09:40 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  Uh oh...it's over now. don the con is on the case!

Announce your intention to take a dump on the constitution on Twitter.

Want to know how to get kicked in the face by the SCOTUS? Act like you can tell them what to do.

(12-09-2020 09:36 AM)200yrs2late Wrote:  

(12-09-2020 07:56 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  The stupidity is staggering.

Yes, one has to be incredibly stupid to completely disregard the numerous statistical improbabilities that Biden managed score in his path to "victory".

Yes, one has to be incredibly stupid to be okay with the numerous instances of what is at best is the appearance of impropriety and at worst blatant election fraud.

Yes, one has to be incredibly stupid to be okay with on the fly changes to election laws through the courts and executive orders instead of state legislatures per the Constitution just because one's guy "won".

But hey, at least the stupid aren't screaming "Russia, Russia, Russia" for a change.

The statistical analysis the republicans are putting forward to show the improbability of Biden’s victory are fundamentally flawed. You can’t assume that every batch of votes reported comes from a randomized sample of all votes in the state.

(12-09-2020 09:56 AM)Ohio Poly Wrote:  

(12-08-2020 08:10 AM)appst89 Wrote:  Having other states get involved may be the only chance we have to ever have a fair election again. If the rampant fraud from this past election goes unpunished, there will be no need to hold elections in the future because they will all be meaningless.

If only the Dems hadn't waited until 2020 to start stealing elections, we could have avoided DJT's attempted dictatorship.

It's mighty suspicious that so many R's were "elected" to Congress when polls indicated otherwise. By conservative thinking, many of these races clearly must have also been stolen.

LOL. Are you kidding me? THE POLLS!!! Seriously?

(12-09-2020 10:10 AM)U_of_Elvis Wrote:  

(12-09-2020 09:36 AM)200yrs2late Wrote:  

(12-09-2020 07:56 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  The stupidity is staggering.

Yes, one has to be incredibly stupid to completely disregard the numerous statistical improbabilities that Biden managed score in his path to "victory".

Yes, one has to be incredibly stupid to be okay with the numerous instances of what is at best is the appearance of impropriety and at worst blatant election fraud.

Yes, one has to be incredibly stupid to be okay with on the fly changes to election laws through the courts and executive orders instead of state legislatures per the Constitution just because one's guy "won".

But hey, at least the stupid aren't screaming "Russia, Russia, Russia" for a change.

The statistical analysis the republicans are putting forward to show the improbability of Biden’s victory are fundamentally flawed. You can’t assume that every batch of votes reported comes from a randomized sample of all votes in the state.

One of the Georgia dismissals lays this out nicely. They go through each claim made by a so called expert and debunk them one by one. All of them show this broad analysis of what may have happened, yet none of them actually show that what happened was in anyway outside the realm of possibility or that it was perpetuated by someone in a fraudulent manner. They also show that many of these experts just don't know what they are talking about...additionally, they also lay out that they haven't performed a complete analysis of the matter either.

You know...they asked them to actually prove it.

(12-09-2020 10:10 AM)U_of_Elvis Wrote:  

(12-09-2020 09:36 AM)200yrs2late Wrote:  

(12-09-2020 07:56 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  The stupidity is staggering.

Yes, one has to be incredibly stupid to completely disregard the numerous statistical improbabilities that Biden managed score in his path to "victory".

Yes, one has to be incredibly stupid to be okay with the numerous instances of what is at best is the appearance of impropriety and at worst blatant election fraud.

Yes, one has to be incredibly stupid to be okay with on the fly changes to election laws through the courts and executive orders instead of state legislatures per the Constitution just because one's guy "won".

But hey, at least the stupid aren't screaming "Russia, Russia, Russia" for a change.

The statistical analysis the republicans are putting forward to show the improbability of Biden’s victory are fundamentally flawed. You can’t assume that every batch of votes reported comes from a randomized sample of all votes in the state.

I'm not talking about the vote counts.

President "I didn't lose, I'm not a loser" and his dumb supporters are winning the 2020 sore loser award hands down. SAD.

(12-09-2020 10:22 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  One of the Georgia dismissals lays this out nicely. They go through each claim made by a so called expert and debunk them one by one. All of them show this broad analysis of what may have happened, yet none of them actually show that what happened was in anyway outside the realm of possibility or that it was perpetuated by someone in a fraudulent manner. They also show that many of these experts just don't know what they are talking about...additionally, they also lay out that they haven't performed a complete analysis of the matter either.
You know...they asked them to actually prove it.

And that's problem. After the fact there is no way to prove it. The problem needs to be addressed before the fact, with adequate prevention and detection controls. One party opposes those things.

(12-09-2020 10:31 AM)200yrs2late Wrote:  

(12-09-2020 10:10 AM)U_of_Elvis Wrote:  

(12-09-2020 09:36 AM)200yrs2late Wrote:  

(12-09-2020 07:56 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  The stupidity is staggering.

Yes, one has to be incredibly stupid to completely disregard the numerous statistical improbabilities that Biden managed score in his path to "victory".

Yes, one has to be incredibly stupid to be okay with the numerous instances of what is at best is the appearance of impropriety and at worst blatant election fraud.

Yes, one has to be incredibly stupid to be okay with on the fly changes to election laws through the courts and executive orders instead of state legislatures per the Constitution just because one's guy "won".

But hey, at least the stupid aren't screaming "Russia, Russia, Russia" for a change.

The statistical analysis the republicans are putting forward to show the improbability of Biden’s victory are fundamentally flawed. You can’t assume that every batch of votes reported comes from a randomized sample of all votes in the state.

I'm not talking about the vote counts.

Post your statistical analysis.

Surprised Nevada is not part of the lawsuit.

(12-09-2020 10:59 AM)U_of_Elvis Wrote:  

(12-09-2020 10:31 AM)200yrs2late Wrote:  

(12-09-2020 10:10 AM)U_of_Elvis Wrote:  

(12-09-2020 09:36 AM)200yrs2late Wrote:  

(12-09-2020 07:56 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  The stupidity is staggering.

Yes, one has to be incredibly stupid to completely disregard the numerous statistical improbabilities that Biden managed score in his path to "victory".

Yes, one has to be incredibly stupid to be okay with the numerous instances of what is at best is the appearance of impropriety and at worst blatant election fraud.

Yes, one has to be incredibly stupid to be okay with on the fly changes to election laws through the courts and executive orders instead of state legislatures per the Constitution just because one's guy "won".

But hey, at least the stupid aren't screaming "Russia, Russia, Russia" for a change.

The statistical analysis the republicans are putting forward to show the improbability of Biden’s victory are fundamentally flawed. You can’t assume that every batch of votes reported comes from a randomized sample of all votes in the state.

I'm not talking about the vote counts.

Post your statistical analysis.

why explain what has already been defined in too many other threads...

pissin' on tits is excramentally insolvent....

(12-09-2020 11:42 AM)stinkfist Wrote:  

(12-09-2020 10:59 AM)U_of_Elvis Wrote:  

(12-09-2020 10:31 AM)200yrs2late Wrote:  

(12-09-2020 10:10 AM)U_of_Elvis Wrote:  

(12-09-2020 09:36 AM)200yrs2late Wrote:  Yes, one has to be incredibly stupid to completely disregard the numerous statistical improbabilities that Biden managed score in his path to "victory".

Yes, one has to be incredibly stupid to be okay with the numerous instances of what is at best is the appearance of impropriety and at worst blatant election fraud.

Yes, one has to be incredibly stupid to be okay with on the fly changes to election laws through the courts and executive orders instead of state legislatures per the Constitution just because one's guy "won".

But hey, at least the stupid aren't screaming "Russia, Russia, Russia" for a change.

The statistical analysis the republicans are putting forward to show the improbability of Biden’s victory are fundamentally flawed. You can’t assume that every batch of votes reported comes from a randomized sample of all votes in the state.

I'm not talking about the vote counts.

Post your statistical analysis.

why explain what has already been defined in too many other threads...

pissin' on tits is excramentally insolvent....

I haven't seen a valid statistical analysis posted in the other threads, they have all been fundamentally flawed.

(12-09-2020 11:46 AM)U_of_Elvis Wrote:  

(12-09-2020 11:42 AM)stinkfist Wrote:  

(12-09-2020 10:59 AM)U_of_Elvis Wrote:  

(12-09-2020 10:31 AM)200yrs2late Wrote:  

(12-09-2020 10:10 AM)U_of_Elvis Wrote:  The statistical analysis the republicans are putting forward to show the improbability of Biden’s victory are fundamentally flawed. You can’t assume that every batch of votes reported comes from a randomized sample of all votes in the state.

I'm not talking about the vote counts.

Post your statistical analysis.

why explain what has already been defined in too many other threads...

pissin' on tits is excramentally insolvent....

I haven't seen a valid statistical analysis posted in the other threads, they have all been fundamentally flawed.

therefore, ewe offer zero proof = 0...

yet, ewe offer nothing to invalidate...

the numbers/timeline/forensics relative to historical #s/%s vs. 2020 IN THE POTUS ELECTION IS BY ITSELF A STATISTICAL IMPOSSIBILITY IN A HANDFUL OF COUNTIES....WTF ELSE IS RELEVANT, DIPSHITE...

EWE'RE A TROLL + STATISTICALLY BRAINDEAD

if ya choose to take down the fairness clause, I can fix that down the road at my choosing....

#suckThatTeat

(12-09-2020 10:10 AM)U_of_Elvis Wrote:  The statistical analysis the republicans are putting forward to show the improbability of Biden’s victory are fundamentally flawed. You can’t assume that every batch of votes reported comes from a randomized sample of all votes in the state.

This is actually false. The attempt is to show 'fraud'... and thus an extra 50,000 votes randomly showing up in a liberal stronghold that skews 90/10 for Biden with no other similar outcomes in the other direction is highly suspicious/statistically improbable.... so while your statement above may not be incorrect, it isn't the entire basis of their position. It is merely the baseline for it.

(12-09-2020 10:53 AM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  

(12-09-2020 10:22 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  One of the Georgia dismissals lays this out nicely. They go through each claim made by a so called expert and debunk them one by one. All of them show this broad analysis of what may have happened, yet none of them actually show that what happened was in anyway outside the realm of possibility or that it was perpetuated by someone in a fraudulent manner. They also show that many of these experts just don't know what they are talking about...additionally, they also lay out that they haven't performed a complete analysis of the matter either.
You know...they asked them to actually prove it.

And that's problem. After the fact there is no way to prove it. The problem needs to be addressed before the fact, with adequate prevention and detection controls. One party opposes those things.

This. Hence although I care nothing about changing this election, I am not against these suits moving forward in order to make sure that confidence in our process and elections is restored. Democrats had no faith in 2016 and Republicans no faith in 2020. Democrats acting like this is 'unique' are laughable. The specifics may be unique, but the concept that an election did not reflect the will of the people and the options that result is not at all.

(12-09-2020 01:28 PM)Hambone10 Wrote:  

(12-09-2020 10:10 AM)U_of_Elvis Wrote:  The statistical analysis the republicans are putting forward to show the improbability of Biden’s victory are fundamentally flawed. You can’t assume that every batch of votes reported comes from a randomized sample of all votes in the state.

This is actually false. The attempt is to show 'fraud'... and thus an extra 50,000 votes randomly showing up in a liberal stronghold that skews 90/10 for Biden with no other similar outcomes in the other direction is highly suspicious/statistically improbable.... so while your statement above may not be incorrect, it isn't the entire basis of their position. It is merely the baseline for it.

(12-09-2020 10:53 AM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  

(12-09-2020 10:22 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  One of the Georgia dismissals lays this out nicely. They go through each claim made by a so called expert and debunk them one by one. All of them show this broad analysis of what may have happened, yet none of them actually show that what happened was in anyway outside the realm of possibility or that it was perpetuated by someone in a fraudulent manner. They also show that many of these experts just don't know what they are talking about...additionally, they also lay out that they haven't performed a complete analysis of the matter either.
You know...they asked them to actually prove it.

And that's problem. After the fact there is no way to prove it. The problem needs to be addressed before the fact, with adequate prevention and detection controls. One party opposes those things.

This. Hence although I care nothing about changing this election, I am not against these suits moving forward in order to make sure that confidence in our process and elections is restored. Democrats had no faith in 2016 and Republicans no faith in 2020. Democrats acting like this is 'unique' are laughable. The specifics may be unique, but the concept that an election did not reflect the will of the people and the options that result is not at all.

like masks, that's bs...cameras, affidavits, statistic anomalies, etc...

yeah man, "hands up, knees down....we found another cuck."

(12-09-2020 01:28 PM)Hambone10 Wrote:  

(12-09-2020 10:10 AM)U_of_Elvis Wrote:  The statistical analysis the republicans are putting forward to show the improbability of Biden’s victory are fundamentally flawed. You can’t assume that every batch of votes reported comes from a randomized sample of all votes in the state.

This is actually false. The attempt is to show 'fraud'... and thus an extra 50,000 votes randomly showing up in a liberal stronghold that skews 90/10 for Biden with no other similar outcomes in the other direction is highly suspicious/statistically improbable.... so while your statement above may not be incorrect, it isn't the entire basis of their position. It is merely the baseline for it.

(12-09-2020 10:53 AM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  

(12-09-2020 10:22 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  One of the Georgia dismissals lays this out nicely. They go through each claim made by a so called expert and debunk them one by one. All of them show this broad analysis of what may have happened, yet none of them actually show that what happened was in anyway outside the realm of possibility or that it was perpetuated by someone in a fraudulent manner. They also show that many of these experts just don't know what they are talking about...additionally, they also lay out that they haven't performed a complete analysis of the matter either.
You know...they asked them to actually prove it.

And that's problem. After the fact there is no way to prove it. The problem needs to be addressed before the fact, with adequate prevention and detection controls. One party opposes those things.

This. Hence although I care nothing about changing this election, I am not against these suits moving forward in order to make sure that confidence in our process and elections is restored. Democrats had no faith in 2016 and Republicans no faith in 2020. Democrats acting like this is 'unique' are laughable. The specifics may be unique, but the concept that an election did not reflect the will of the people and the options that result is not at all.

So if a few morons claimed the 2016 election was stolen, that makes it okay for millions of morons to claim the 2020 election was stolen?

For Gods sake man, Hillary conceded in no time and that election was much much much closer. There is NO comparison to what trump and his minions are doing here to 2016. And throw in that he's likely only doing this to raise money, makes it even worse.

(12-09-2020 01:28 PM)Hambone10 Wrote:  

(12-09-2020 10:10 AM)U_of_Elvis Wrote:  The statistical analysis the republicans are putting forward to show the improbability of Biden’s victory are fundamentally flawed. You can’t assume that every batch of votes reported comes from a randomized sample of all votes in the state.

This is actually false. The attempt is to show 'fraud'... and thus an extra 50,000 votes randomly showing up in a liberal stronghold that skews 90/10 for Biden with no other similar outcomes in the other direction is highly suspicious/statistically improbable.... so while your statement above may not be incorrect, it isn't the entire basis of their position. It is merely the baseline for it.

(12-09-2020 10:53 AM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  

(12-09-2020 10:22 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  One of the Georgia dismissals lays this out nicely. They go through each claim made by a so called expert and debunk them one by one. All of them show this broad analysis of what may have happened, yet none of them actually show that what happened was in anyway outside the realm of possibility or that it was perpetuated by someone in a fraudulent manner. They also show that many of these experts just don't know what they are talking about...additionally, they also lay out that they haven't performed a complete analysis of the matter either.
You know...they asked them to actually prove it.

And that's problem. After the fact there is no way to prove it. The problem needs to be addressed before the fact, with adequate prevention and detection controls. One party opposes those things.

This. Hence although I care nothing about changing this election, I am not against these suits moving forward in order to make sure that confidence in our process and elections is restored. Democrats had no faith in 2016 and Republicans no faith in 2020. Democrats acting like this is 'unique' are laughable. The specifics may be unique, but the concept that an election did not reflect the will of the people and the options that result is not at all.

Obama got 97.51% of the vote in Detroit in 2012, Hillary got 94.95% in 2016. it isn't a statistical improbability that Biden got 90% of the vote.

One of for large "ballot dumps" as they called them can directly be traced back to mail in voting for Detroit.

The fundamental problem with the analysis that look at the probability of the distribution of a single batch of ballots is that they assume they are from a random sample of the state and don't take into account the precinct reporting.

No one is surprised that mail in voting in Detroit heavily favors Biden.