(11-26-2020 01:48 PM)U_of_Elvis Wrote:  

(11-26-2020 01:02 AM)banker Wrote:  There are a bunch of short clips, 1-3’minutes, currently still up on YouTube.

One interesting thing I hadn’t heard -‘according to the state they received requests for, and mailed out, 1.8 million absentee ballots. However, there were over 2.5 million absentee ballots counted in the state. No one has been able to explain that 700,000 vote difference.

This is another error on the trump legal teams part that is just as bad as the Michigan vs. Minnesota one.

Rudy said : "In the commonwealth of Pennsylvania, 1,823,148 mail-in ballots were sent out. You received back approximately 1.4 million. But in the count for President, you counted 2.5 million."

That's a very specific number. It also happens to be the number of mail in ballots requested for the PRIMARY election. You can see that at the link below, the data set was updated in Sept. and the total requested ballots is 1,823,148. You can see the total at the bottom of the table preview area.

https://data.pa.gov/Government-Efficienc.../853w-ecfz

Rudy is comparing the number of ballots requested from the primary, with the 2.5M counted in the general election.

The PA SoS reported to the AP that 3M mail in ballots had been requested at the end of October.

https://apnews.com/article/election-2020...e4ce7e4161

Wrong.

Below is from Mastriano. Those numbers came straight from the PA dashboard. (PA has since removed this data from their dashboard.) Maybe if twitter hadnt suspended Mastriano, you could have saved yourself form the embarrassment of posting your conjecture versus the actual data.

Also, noone from the state denied in the hearing that the numbers that Rudy was referencing was wrong. And they still havent. You would think the SOS would wantt to get out in front of that considering the data came from their own dashboard.

(11-27-2020 08:56 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

(11-26-2020 01:48 PM)U_of_Elvis Wrote:  

(11-26-2020 01:02 AM)banker Wrote:  There are a bunch of short clips, 1-3’minutes, currently still up on YouTube.

One interesting thing I hadn’t heard -‘according to the state they received requests for, and mailed out, 1.8 million absentee ballots. However, there were over 2.5 million absentee ballots counted in the state. No one has been able to explain that 700,000 vote difference.

This is another error on the trump legal teams part that is just as bad as the Michigan vs. Minnesota one.

Rudy said : "In the commonwealth of Pennsylvania, 1,823,148 mail-in ballots were sent out. You received back approximately 1.4 million. But in the count for President, you counted 2.5 million."

That's a very specific number. It also happens to be the number of mail in ballots requested for the PRIMARY election. You can see that at the link below, the data set was updated in Sept. and the total requested ballots is 1,823,148. You can see the total at the bottom of the table preview area.

https://data.pa.gov/Government-Efficienc.../853w-ecfz

Rudy is comparing the number of ballots requested from the primary, with the 2.5M counted in the general election.

The PA SoS reported to the AP that 3M mail in ballots had been requested at the end of October.

https://apnews.com/article/election-2020...e4ce7e4161

Wrong.

Below is from Mastriano. Those numbers came straight from the PA dashboard. (PA has since removed this data from their dashboard.) Maybe if twitter hadnt suspended Mastriano, you could have saved yourself form the embarrassment of posting your conjecture versus the actual data.

Also, noone from the state denied in the hearing that the numbers that Rudy was referencing was wrong. And they still havent. You would think the SOS would wantt to get out in front of that considering the data came from their own dashboard.

Do you think the screenshot with the number of ballots cast was posted on the PA SOS site, or the text typed below? Without the added text that screenshot tells us nothing about how many ballots PA SOS mailed.

As to why officials from the PA SOS didn’t answer in the room, they weren’t there. That “hearing” wasn’t a hearing in front of the PA senate.

It was an event organized by the GOP at a hotel. It had as much official standing as one of Rudy’s press conferences or a Rotary club meeting.

So your stance here is that the state sent out the exact same very specific number of ballots in both the primary and the general election?

And before the election, and before the supposed algorithm know how many votes to add, they reported over three million ballots to the AP just in case.

What’s more likely, Rudy reading the exact number of ballots from the wrong data set or all of that?

I’m comfortably not embarrassed. You want to try again?

(11-27-2020 09:10 PM)U_of_Elvis Wrote:  

(11-27-2020 08:56 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

(11-26-2020 01:48 PM)U_of_Elvis Wrote:  

(11-26-2020 01:02 AM)banker Wrote:  There are a bunch of short clips, 1-3’minutes, currently still up on YouTube.

One interesting thing I hadn’t heard -‘according to the state they received requests for, and mailed out, 1.8 million absentee ballots. However, there were over 2.5 million absentee ballots counted in the state. No one has been able to explain that 700,000 vote difference.

This is another error on the trump legal teams part that is just as bad as the Michigan vs. Minnesota one.

Rudy said : "In the commonwealth of Pennsylvania, 1,823,148 mail-in ballots were sent out. You received back approximately 1.4 million. But in the count for President, you counted 2.5 million."

That's a very specific number. It also happens to be the number of mail in ballots requested for the PRIMARY election. You can see that at the link below, the data set was updated in Sept. and the total requested ballots is 1,823,148. You can see the total at the bottom of the table preview area.

https://data.pa.gov/Government-Efficienc.../853w-ecfz

Rudy is comparing the number of ballots requested from the primary, with the 2.5M counted in the general election.

The PA SoS reported to the AP that 3M mail in ballots had been requested at the end of October.

https://apnews.com/article/election-2020...e4ce7e4161

Wrong.

Below is from Mastriano. Those numbers came straight from the PA dashboard. (PA has since removed this data from their dashboard.) Maybe if twitter hadnt suspended Mastriano, you could have saved yourself form the embarrassment of posting your conjecture versus the actual data.

Also, noone from the state denied in the hearing that the numbers that Rudy was referencing was wrong. And they still havent. You would think the SOS would wantt to get out in front of that considering the data came from their own dashboard.

Do you think the screenshot with the number of ballots cast was posted on the PA SOS site, or the text typed below? Without the added text that screenshot tells us nothing about how many ballots PA SOS mailed.

As to why officials from the PA SOS didn’t answer in the room, they weren’t there. That “hearing” wasn’t a hearing in front of the PA senate.

It was an event organized by the GOP at a hotel. It had as much official standing as one of Rudy’s press conferences or a Rotary club meeting.

So your stance here is that the state sent out the exact same very specific number of ballots in both the primary and the general election?

And before the election, and before the supposed algorithm know how many votes to add, they reported over three million ballots to the AP just in case.

What’s more likely, Rudy reading the exact number of ballots from the wrong data set or all of that?

I’m comfortably not embarrassed. You want to try again?

1. It was a legislative hearing held at the senate. You can scream all you want to, but it was a hearing.

2. Point to any official from PA who has denied those numbers.

3. You should be embarrassed. I cant tell if your face is red or not because its up Toms ass.

(11-27-2020 09:16 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

(11-27-2020 09:10 PM)U_of_Elvis Wrote:  

(11-27-2020 08:56 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

(11-26-2020 01:48 PM)U_of_Elvis Wrote:  

(11-26-2020 01:02 AM)banker Wrote:  There are a bunch of short clips, 1-3’minutes, currently still up on YouTube.

One interesting thing I hadn’t heard -‘according to the state they received requests for, and mailed out, 1.8 million absentee ballots. However, there were over 2.5 million absentee ballots counted in the state. No one has been able to explain that 700,000 vote difference.

This is another error on the trump legal teams part that is just as bad as the Michigan vs. Minnesota one.

Rudy said : "In the commonwealth of Pennsylvania, 1,823,148 mail-in ballots were sent out. You received back approximately 1.4 million. But in the count for President, you counted 2.5 million."

That's a very specific number. It also happens to be the number of mail in ballots requested for the PRIMARY election. You can see that at the link below, the data set was updated in Sept. and the total requested ballots is 1,823,148. You can see the total at the bottom of the table preview area.

https://data.pa.gov/Government-Efficienc.../853w-ecfz

Rudy is comparing the number of ballots requested from the primary, with the 2.5M counted in the general election.

The PA SoS reported to the AP that 3M mail in ballots had been requested at the end of October.

https://apnews.com/article/election-2020...e4ce7e4161

Wrong.

Below is from Mastriano. Those numbers came straight from the PA dashboard. (PA has since removed this data from their dashboard.) Maybe if twitter hadnt suspended Mastriano, you could have saved yourself form the embarrassment of posting your conjecture versus the actual data.

Also, noone from the state denied in the hearing that the numbers that Rudy was referencing was wrong. And they still havent. You would think the SOS would wantt to get out in front of that considering the data came from their own dashboard.

Do you think the screenshot with the number of ballots cast was posted on the PA SOS site, or the text typed below? Without the added text that screenshot tells us nothing about how many ballots PA SOS mailed.

As to why officials from the PA SOS didn’t answer in the room, they weren’t there. That “hearing” wasn’t a hearing in front of the PA senate.

It was an event organized by the GOP at a hotel. It had as much official standing as one of Rudy’s press conferences or a Rotary club meeting.

So your stance here is that the state sent out the exact same very specific number of ballots in both the primary and the general election?

And before the election, and before the supposed algorithm know how many votes to add, they reported over three million ballots to the AP just in case.

What’s more likely, Rudy reading the exact number of ballots from the wrong data set or all of that?

I’m comfortably not embarrassed. You want to try again?

1. It was a legislative hearing held at the senate. You can scream all you want to, but it was a hearing.

2. Point to any official from PA who has denied those numbers.

3. You should be embarrassed. I cant tell if your face is red or not because its up Toms ass.

The PA SOS must have been embarrassed since they deleted the data. Why did they delete it?

(11-27-2020 09:16 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

(11-27-2020 09:10 PM)U_of_Elvis Wrote:  

(11-27-2020 08:56 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

(11-26-2020 01:48 PM)U_of_Elvis Wrote:  

(11-26-2020 01:02 AM)banker Wrote:  There are a bunch of short clips, 1-3’minutes, currently still up on YouTube.

One interesting thing I hadn’t heard -‘according to the state they received requests for, and mailed out, 1.8 million absentee ballots. However, there were over 2.5 million absentee ballots counted in the state. No one has been able to explain that 700,000 vote difference.

This is another error on the trump legal teams part that is just as bad as the Michigan vs. Minnesota one.

Rudy said : "In the commonwealth of Pennsylvania, 1,823,148 mail-in ballots were sent out. You received back approximately 1.4 million. But in the count for President, you counted 2.5 million."

That's a very specific number. It also happens to be the number of mail in ballots requested for the PRIMARY election. You can see that at the link below, the data set was updated in Sept. and the total requested ballots is 1,823,148. You can see the total at the bottom of the table preview area.

https://data.pa.gov/Government-Efficienc.../853w-ecfz

Rudy is comparing the number of ballots requested from the primary, with the 2.5M counted in the general election.

The PA SoS reported to the AP that 3M mail in ballots had been requested at the end of October.

https://apnews.com/article/election-2020...e4ce7e4161

Wrong.

Below is from Mastriano. Those numbers came straight from the PA dashboard. (PA has since removed this data from their dashboard.) Maybe if twitter hadnt suspended Mastriano, you could have saved yourself form the embarrassment of posting your conjecture versus the actual data.

Also, noone from the state denied in the hearing that the numbers that Rudy was referencing was wrong. And they still havent. You would think the SOS would wantt to get out in front of that considering the data came from their own dashboard.

Do you think the screenshot with the number of ballots cast was posted on the PA SOS site, or the text typed below? Without the added text that screenshot tells us nothing about how many ballots PA SOS mailed.

As to why officials from the PA SOS didn’t answer in the room, they weren’t there. That “hearing” wasn’t a hearing in front of the PA senate.

It was an event organized by the GOP at a hotel. It had as much official standing as one of Rudy’s press conferences or a Rotary club meeting.

So your stance here is that the state sent out the exact same very specific number of ballots in both the primary and the general election?

And before the election, and before the supposed algorithm know how many votes to add, they reported over three million ballots to the AP just in case.

What’s more likely, Rudy reading the exact number of ballots from the wrong data set or all of that?

I’m comfortably not embarrassed. You want to try again?

1. It was a legislative hearing held at the senate. You can scream all you want to, but it was a hearing.

2. Point to any official from PA who has denied those numbers.

3. You should be embarrassed. I cant tell if your face is red or not because its up Toms ass.

Aww, thats cute. You must be their target audience because you fell for the "legislative hearing" hook line and sinker.

Let's look at facts surrounding the hearing.

Who organized it - The press release is linked below, it was organized by the Senate Majority Policy Committee
https://www.pasenategop.com/blog/112520/

Where was it held - You think it was held "at the senate". Where was it actually held? At the Wyndham Gettysburg Hotel. Says so right there in the press release.

Who's on this committee - Let's look.
https://policy.pasenategop.com/
Oh my god they are all republicans. Does PA even have democrats in the state senate. Yes, yes they do.

Is this even an official committee of the PA State Senate - here is a list of their committees. Spoiler alert, this one ain't there.
https://www.legis.state.pa.us/cfdocs/Cte...CteeBody=S

What is a policy committee -
According to the US House -
Each party policy committee provides research and other services to senators and also serves as a forum for discussion of party legislative strategy.

So a bunch of republicans met at a hotel, at an event sponsored by the Republican Party, and gave Rudy an open mic. Just like one of his press conferences.

In case you were wondering what a real legislative hearing would look like there would be people from both parties on the panel, and the other side would get to present their case. It also wouldn't be at a mid tier business hotel, it would be in the state capitol.

In case you need to brush up on your civics :
https://www.khanacademy.org/humanities/u...ics-parent

(11-27-2020 10:40 PM)U_of_Elvis Wrote:  

(11-27-2020 09:16 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

(11-27-2020 09:10 PM)U_of_Elvis Wrote:  

(11-27-2020 08:56 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

(11-26-2020 01:48 PM)U_of_Elvis Wrote:  This is another error on the trump legal teams part that is just as bad as the Michigan vs. Minnesota one.

Rudy said : "In the commonwealth of Pennsylvania, 1,823,148 mail-in ballots were sent out. You received back approximately 1.4 million. But in the count for President, you counted 2.5 million."

That's a very specific number. It also happens to be the number of mail in ballots requested for the PRIMARY election. You can see that at the link below, the data set was updated in Sept. and the total requested ballots is 1,823,148. You can see the total at the bottom of the table preview area.

https://data.pa.gov/Government-Efficienc.../853w-ecfz

Rudy is comparing the number of ballots requested from the primary, with the 2.5M counted in the general election.

The PA SoS reported to the AP that 3M mail in ballots had been requested at the end of October.

https://apnews.com/article/election-2020...e4ce7e4161

Wrong.

Below is from Mastriano. Those numbers came straight from the PA dashboard. (PA has since removed this data from their dashboard.) Maybe if twitter hadnt suspended Mastriano, you could have saved yourself form the embarrassment of posting your conjecture versus the actual data.

Also, noone from the state denied in the hearing that the numbers that Rudy was referencing was wrong. And they still havent. You would think the SOS would wantt to get out in front of that considering the data came from their own dashboard.

Do you think the screenshot with the number of ballots cast was posted on the PA SOS site, or the text typed below? Without the added text that screenshot tells us nothing about how many ballots PA SOS mailed.

As to why officials from the PA SOS didn’t answer in the room, they weren’t there. That “hearing” wasn’t a hearing in front of the PA senate.

It was an event organized by the GOP at a hotel. It had as much official standing as one of Rudy’s press conferences or a Rotary club meeting.

So your stance here is that the state sent out the exact same very specific number of ballots in both the primary and the general election?

And before the election, and before the supposed algorithm know how many votes to add, they reported over three million ballots to the AP just in case.

What’s more likely, Rudy reading the exact number of ballots from the wrong data set or all of that?

I’m comfortably not embarrassed. You want to try again?

1. It was a legislative hearing held at the senate. You can scream all you want to, but it was a hearing.

2. Point to any official from PA who has denied those numbers.

3. You should be embarrassed. I cant tell if your face is red or not because its up Toms ass.

Aww, thats cute. You must be their target audience because you fell for the "legislative hearing" hook line and sinker.

Let's look at facts surrounding the hearing.

Who organized it - The press release is linked below, it was organized by the Senate Majority Policy Committee
https://www.pasenategop.com/blog/112520/

Where was it held - You think it was held "at the senate". Where was it actually held? At the Wyndham Gettysburg Hotel. Says so right there in the press release.

Who's on this committee - Let's look.
https://policy.pasenategop.com/
Oh my god they are all republicans. Does PA even have democrats in the state senate. Yes, yes they do.

Is this even an official committee of the PA State Senate - here is a list of their committees. Spoiler alert, this one ain't there.
https://www.legis.state.pa.us/cfdocs/Cte...CteeBody=S

What is a policy committee -
According to the US House -
Each party policy committee provides research and other services to senators and also serves as a forum for discussion of party legislative strategy.

So a bunch of republicans met at a hotel, at an event sponsored by the Republican Party, and gave Rudy an open mic. Just like one of his press conferences.

In case you were wondering what a real legislative hearing would look like there would be people from both parties on the panel, and the other side would get to present their case. It also wouldn't be at a mid tier business hotel, it would be in the state capitol.

In case you need to brush up on your civics :
https://www.khanacademy.org/humanities/u...ics-parent

So your saying that the Democrats now DONT want to see the evidence. If they do, then why were republicans forced to air the evidence elsewhere? So what’s the story—do Democrats really want to see evidence—or is that just the talking point with no real meaning behind it. Sounds like the latter.

TO prepare Elvis for more butthurt, Arizona has also scheduled a hearing on the election for Monday. I'm sure its fake too.

As to the OP. It’s all okay now, Twitter has once again used the “Oh sorry, it was a mistake” defense.

(11-27-2020 10:49 PM)Attackcoog Wrote:  

(11-27-2020 10:40 PM)U_of_Elvis Wrote:  

(11-27-2020 09:16 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

(11-27-2020 09:10 PM)U_of_Elvis Wrote:  

(11-27-2020 08:56 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  Wrong.

Below is from Mastriano. Those numbers came straight from the PA dashboard. (PA has since removed this data from their dashboard.) Maybe if twitter hadnt suspended Mastriano, you could have saved yourself form the embarrassment of posting your conjecture versus the actual data.

Also, noone from the state denied in the hearing that the numbers that Rudy was referencing was wrong. And they still havent. You would think the SOS would wantt to get out in front of that considering the data came from their own dashboard.

Do you think the screenshot with the number of ballots cast was posted on the PA SOS site, or the text typed below? Without the added text that screenshot tells us nothing about how many ballots PA SOS mailed.

As to why officials from the PA SOS didn’t answer in the room, they weren’t there. That “hearing” wasn’t a hearing in front of the PA senate.

It was an event organized by the GOP at a hotel. It had as much official standing as one of Rudy’s press conferences or a Rotary club meeting.

So your stance here is that the state sent out the exact same very specific number of ballots in both the primary and the general election?

And before the election, and before the supposed algorithm know how many votes to add, they reported over three million ballots to the AP just in case.

What’s more likely, Rudy reading the exact number of ballots from the wrong data set or all of that?

I’m comfortably not embarrassed. You want to try again?

1. It was a legislative hearing held at the senate. You can scream all you want to, but it was a hearing.

2. Point to any official from PA who has denied those numbers.

3. You should be embarrassed. I cant tell if your face is red or not because its up Toms ass.

Aww, thats cute. You must be their target audience because you fell for the "legislative hearing" hook line and sinker.

Let's look at facts surrounding the hearing.

Who organized it - The press release is linked below, it was organized by the Senate Majority Policy Committee
https://www.pasenategop.com/blog/112520/

Where was it held - You think it was held "at the senate". Where was it actually held? At the Wyndham Gettysburg Hotel. Says so right there in the press release.

Who's on this committee - Let's look.
https://policy.pasenategop.com/
Oh my god they are all republicans. Does PA even have democrats in the state senate. Yes, yes they do.

Is this even an official committee of the PA State Senate - here is a list of their committees. Spoiler alert, this one ain't there.
https://www.legis.state.pa.us/cfdocs/Cte...CteeBody=S

What is a policy committee -
According to the US House -
Each party policy committee provides research and other services to senators and also serves as a forum for discussion of party legislative strategy.

So a bunch of republicans met at a hotel, at an event sponsored by the Republican Party, and gave Rudy an open mic. Just like one of his press conferences.

In case you were wondering what a real legislative hearing would look like there would be people from both parties on the panel, and the other side would get to present their case. It also wouldn't be at a mid tier business hotel, it would be in the state capitol.

In case you need to brush up on your civics :
https://www.khanacademy.org/humanities/u...ics-parent

So your saying that the Democrat now DONT want to see the evidence. If they do, then why were republicans forced to air the evidence elsewhere? So what’s the story—do Democrats really want to see evidence—or is that just the talking point with no real meaning behind it. Sounds like latter.

Or, they know the evidence is BS so they didn't invite the democratic senators to their hearing and didn't invite the PA SOS to speak. Could be that too.

(11-27-2020 10:55 PM)U_of_Elvis Wrote:  

(11-27-2020 10:49 PM)Attackcoog Wrote:  

(11-27-2020 10:40 PM)U_of_Elvis Wrote:  

(11-27-2020 09:16 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

(11-27-2020 09:10 PM)U_of_Elvis Wrote:  Do you think the screenshot with the number of ballots cast was posted on the PA SOS site, or the text typed below? Without the added text that screenshot tells us nothing about how many ballots PA SOS mailed.

As to why officials from the PA SOS didn’t answer in the room, they weren’t there. That “hearing” wasn’t a hearing in front of the PA senate.

It was an event organized by the GOP at a hotel. It had as much official standing as one of Rudy’s press conferences or a Rotary club meeting.

So your stance here is that the state sent out the exact same very specific number of ballots in both the primary and the general election?

And before the election, and before the supposed algorithm know how many votes to add, they reported over three million ballots to the AP just in case.

What’s more likely, Rudy reading the exact number of ballots from the wrong data set or all of that?

I’m comfortably not embarrassed. You want to try again?

1. It was a legislative hearing held at the senate. You can scream all you want to, but it was a hearing.

2. Point to any official from PA who has denied those numbers.

3. You should be embarrassed. I cant tell if your face is red or not because its up Toms ass.

Aww, thats cute. You must be their target audience because you fell for the "legislative hearing" hook line and sinker.

Let's look at facts surrounding the hearing.

Who organized it - The press release is linked below, it was organized by the Senate Majority Policy Committee
https://www.pasenategop.com/blog/112520/

Where was it held - You think it was held "at the senate". Where was it actually held? At the Wyndham Gettysburg Hotel. Says so right there in the press release.

Who's on this committee - Let's look.
https://policy.pasenategop.com/
Oh my god they are all republicans. Does PA even have democrats in the state senate. Yes, yes they do.

Is this even an official committee of the PA State Senate - here is a list of their committees. Spoiler alert, this one ain't there.
https://www.legis.state.pa.us/cfdocs/Cte...CteeBody=S

What is a policy committee -
According to the US House -
Each party policy committee provides research and other services to senators and also serves as a forum for discussion of party legislative strategy.

So a bunch of republicans met at a hotel, at an event sponsored by the Republican Party, and gave Rudy an open mic. Just like one of his press conferences.

In case you were wondering what a real legislative hearing would look like there would be people from both parties on the panel, and the other side would get to present their case. It also wouldn't be at a mid tier business hotel, it would be in the state capitol.

In case you need to brush up on your civics :
https://www.khanacademy.org/humanities/u...ics-parent

So your saying that the Democrat now DONT want to see the evidence. If they do, then why were republicans forced to air the evidence elsewhere? So what’s the story—do Democrats really want to see evidence—or is that just the talking point with no real meaning behind it. Sounds like latter.

Or, they know the evidence is BS so they didn't invite the democratic senators to their hearing and didn't invite the PA SOS to speak. Could be that too.

If they arent denying the evidence now, you better believe they werent gong to show up and deny it under oath.

(11-27-2020 10:54 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  TO prepare Elvis for more butthurt, Arizona has also scheduled a hearing on the election for Monday. I'm sure its fake too.

You are on a roll. It isn't a good roll. Like a bad streak in vegas. Quit while you are behind. You were already wrong on PA, know when to give up.

Nothing on the AZ legislature calendar for Monday:
https://www.azleg.gov/Alis-Today/?sdate=...-30&view=2

But there is an article in the local paper about a hearing. Where is it? The Hyatt hotel. Sounds like the same thing as PA. Another Rudy press conference.

https://www.azcentral.com/story/news/pol...443063002/

"Not a legislative hearing
The meeting at the Hyatt Regency in downtown Phoenix is not a hearing of the Legislature as Finchem and Trump campaign's legal team has cast it. "

(11-27-2020 11:03 PM)U_of_Elvis Wrote:  

(11-27-2020 10:54 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  TO prepare Elvis for more butthurt, Arizona has also scheduled a hearing on the election for Monday. I'm sure its fake too.

You are on a roll. It isn't a good roll. Like a bad streak in vegas. Quit while you are behind. You were already wrong on PA, know when to give up.

Nothing on the AZ legislature calendar for Monday:
https://www.azleg.gov/Alis-Today/?sdate=...-30&view=2

But there is an article in the local paper about a hearing. Where is it? The Hyatt hotel. Sounds like the same thing as PA. Another Rudy press conference.

https://www.azcentral.com/story/news/pol...443063002/

"Not a legislative hearing
The meeting at the Hyatt Regency in downtown Phoenix is not a hearing of the Legislature as Finchem and Trump campaign's legal team has cast it. "

If all of this is nonsense, then why care? Are you afraid the right will steal the election from Biden? Seems you are the one wasting your breath. Sit back and enjoy your very improbable victory and the country’s decent into mediocrity. And don’t forget, you wanted and voted for the senile old racist so accept his influence and don’t blame Trump for anything.

(11-28-2020 09:27 AM)Was SoMs Eagle Wrote:  

(11-27-2020 11:03 PM)U_of_Elvis Wrote:  

(11-27-2020 10:54 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  TO prepare Elvis for more butthurt, Arizona has also scheduled a hearing on the election for Monday. I'm sure its fake too.

You are on a roll. It isn't a good roll. Like a bad streak in vegas. Quit while you are behind. You were already wrong on PA, know when to give up.

Nothing on the AZ legislature calendar for Monday:
https://www.azleg.gov/Alis-Today/?sdate=...-30&view=2

But there is an article in the local paper about a hearing. Where is it? The Hyatt hotel. Sounds like the same thing as PA. Another Rudy press conference.

https://www.azcentral.com/story/news/pol...443063002/

"Not a legislative hearing
The meeting at the Hyatt Regency in downtown Phoenix is not a hearing of the Legislature as Finchem and Trump campaign's legal team has cast it. "

If all of this is nonsense, then why care? Are you afraid the right will steal the election from Biden? Seems you are the one wasting your breath. Sit back and enjoy your very improbable victory and the country’s decent into mediocrity. And don’t forget, you wanted and voted for the senile old racist so accept his influence and don’t blame Trump for anything.

I think at this point UofMstateU and Elvis just like arguing with each other. Nobody on this board or twitter or facebook is going to change the outcome of this election. People just like to argue with strangers on the internet

(11-28-2020 09:27 AM)Was SoMs Eagle Wrote:  

(11-27-2020 11:03 PM)U_of_Elvis Wrote:  

(11-27-2020 10:54 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  TO prepare Elvis for more butthurt, Arizona has also scheduled a hearing on the election for Monday. I'm sure its fake too.

You are on a roll. It isn't a good roll. Like a bad streak in vegas. Quit while you are behind. You were already wrong on PA, know when to give up.

Nothing on the AZ legislature calendar for Monday:
https://www.azleg.gov/Alis-Today/?sdate=...-30&view=2

But there is an article in the local paper about a hearing. Where is it? The Hyatt hotel. Sounds like the same thing as PA. Another Rudy press conference.

https://www.azcentral.com/story/news/pol...443063002/

"Not a legislative hearing
The meeting at the Hyatt Regency in downtown Phoenix is not a hearing of the Legislature as Finchem and Trump campaign's legal team has cast it. "

If all of this is nonsense, then why care? Are you afraid the right will steal the election from Biden? Seems you are the one wasting your breath. Sit back and enjoy your very improbable victory and the country’s decent into mediocrity. And don’t forget, you wanted and voted for the senile old racist so accept his influence and don’t blame Trump for anything.

The effort through these hearings in MI, AZ, and PA is an attempt at an end run around democracy by a sitting president. All Americans should care, it’s an attempt to steal electoral votes from the will of the people.

The “hearings” are a direct attempt to deceive the populace by making them think that this is a real legislative hearing. They are dressing up their press conference in this manner to lend credibility to the unfounded claims they are making.

The end run around democracy has already occurred with the casting of ballots by non-existent people. Fake people does not equal democracy.

(11-28-2020 11:24 AM)banker Wrote:  The end run around democracy has already occurred with the casting of ballots by non-existent people. Fake people does not equal democracy.

There has been no credible evidence presented that that happened.

(11-28-2020 11:27 AM)U_of_Elvis Wrote:  

(11-28-2020 11:24 AM)banker Wrote:  The end run around democracy has already occurred with the casting of ballots by non-existent people. Fake people does not equal democracy.

There has been no credible evidence presented that that happened.

As I said before, investigating fraud, discovering the method, the people involved, building a case, and presenting a case ready for trial in 3 weeks is basically impossible. Typically, a law enforcement agency will take a months--and more likely--years to unravel such a case and have it ready for trial. And a law enforcement agency has spectacular tools that make it easier to do---the ability to detain, search, and compel private parties to provide records/evidence. The Trump lawyers have none of those powers.

It was always going to be easier to prove a violation of process rather than the fraud that likely resulted from those changes in process. Now that we know the absentee ballot process is expressly and specifically written into the state constitution---changing the absentee balloting process could only have been done with a constitutional amendment--which neither the Pennsylvania election officials or legislature did. This election, which was massively impacted by what are now clearly unconstitutional mail in ballots, will likely be overturned. I dont know how you get around that constitutional issue.

(11-28-2020 09:45 AM)U_of_Elvis Wrote:  

(11-28-2020 09:27 AM)Was SoMs Eagle Wrote:  

(11-27-2020 11:03 PM)U_of_Elvis Wrote:  

(11-27-2020 10:54 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  TO prepare Elvis for more butthurt, Arizona has also scheduled a hearing on the election for Monday. I'm sure its fake too.

You are on a roll. It isn't a good roll. Like a bad streak in vegas. Quit while you are behind. You were already wrong on PA, know when to give up.

Nothing on the AZ legislature calendar for Monday:
https://www.azleg.gov/Alis-Today/?sdate=...-30&view=2

But there is an article in the local paper about a hearing. Where is it? The Hyatt hotel. Sounds like the same thing as PA. Another Rudy press conference.

https://www.azcentral.com/story/news/pol...443063002/

"Not a legislative hearing
The meeting at the Hyatt Regency in downtown Phoenix is not a hearing of the Legislature as Finchem and Trump campaign's legal team has cast it. "

If all of this is nonsense, then why care? Are you afraid the right will steal the election from Biden? Seems you are the one wasting your breath. Sit back and enjoy your very improbable victory and the country’s decent into mediocrity. And don’t forget, you wanted and voted for the senile old racist so accept his influence and don’t blame Trump for anything.

The effort through these hearings in MI, AZ, and PA is an attempt at an end run around democracy by a sitting president. All Americans should care, it’s an attempt to steal electoral votes from the will of the people.

The “hearings” are a direct attempt to deceive the populace by making them think that this is a real legislative hearing. They are dressing up their press conference in this manner to lend credibility to the unfounded claims they are making.

Hunh.

So kinda like the “official “ Office of the President elect”?

Fake office. Fake wanna be POTUS.

(11-28-2020 02:15 PM)JMUDunk Wrote:  

(11-28-2020 09:45 AM)U_of_Elvis Wrote:  

(11-28-2020 09:27 AM)Was SoMs Eagle Wrote:  

(11-27-2020 11:03 PM)U_of_Elvis Wrote:  

(11-27-2020 10:54 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  TO prepare Elvis for more butthurt, Arizona has also scheduled a hearing on the election for Monday. I'm sure its fake too.

You are on a roll. It isn't a good roll. Like a bad streak in vegas. Quit while you are behind. You were already wrong on PA, know when to give up.

Nothing on the AZ legislature calendar for Monday:
https://www.azleg.gov/Alis-Today/?sdate=...-30&view=2

But there is an article in the local paper about a hearing. Where is it? The Hyatt hotel. Sounds like the same thing as PA. Another Rudy press conference.

https://www.azcentral.com/story/news/pol...443063002/

"Not a legislative hearing
The meeting at the Hyatt Regency in downtown Phoenix is not a hearing of the Legislature as Finchem and Trump campaign's legal team has cast it. "

If all of this is nonsense, then why care? Are you afraid the right will steal the election from Biden? Seems you are the one wasting your breath. Sit back and enjoy your very improbable victory and the country’s decent into mediocrity. And don’t forget, you wanted and voted for the senile old racist so accept his influence and don’t blame Trump for anything.

The effort through these hearings in MI, AZ, and PA is an attempt at an end run around democracy by a sitting president. All Americans should care, it’s an attempt to steal electoral votes from the will of the people.

The “hearings” are a direct attempt to deceive the populace by making them think that this is a real legislative hearing. They are dressing up their press conference in this manner to lend credibility to the unfounded claims they are making.

Hunh.

So kinda like the “official “ Office of the President elect”?

Fake office. Fake wanna be POTUS.

(11-28-2020 02:15 PM)JMUDunk Wrote:  

(11-28-2020 09:45 AM)U_of_Elvis Wrote:  

(11-28-2020 09:27 AM)Was SoMs Eagle Wrote:  

(11-27-2020 11:03 PM)U_of_Elvis Wrote:  

(11-27-2020 10:54 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  TO prepare Elvis for more butthurt, Arizona has also scheduled a hearing on the election for Monday. I'm sure its fake too.

You are on a roll. It isn't a good roll. Like a bad streak in vegas. Quit while you are behind. You were already wrong on PA, know when to give up.

Nothing on the AZ legislature calendar for Monday:
https://www.azleg.gov/Alis-Today/?sdate=...-30&view=2

But there is an article in the local paper about a hearing. Where is it? The Hyatt hotel. Sounds like the same thing as PA. Another Rudy press conference.

https://www.azcentral.com/story/news/pol...443063002/

"Not a legislative hearing
The meeting at the Hyatt Regency in downtown Phoenix is not a hearing of the Legislature as Finchem and Trump campaign's legal team has cast it. "

If all of this is nonsense, then why care? Are you afraid the right will steal the election from Biden? Seems you are the one wasting your breath. Sit back and enjoy your very improbable victory and the country’s decent into mediocrity. And don’t forget, you wanted and voted for the senile old racist so accept his influence and don’t blame Trump for anything.

The effort through these hearings in MI, AZ, and PA is an attempt at an end run around democracy by a sitting president. All Americans should care, it’s an attempt to steal electoral votes from the will of the people.

The “hearings” are a direct attempt to deceive the populace by making them think that this is a real legislative hearing. They are dressing up their press conference in this manner to lend credibility to the unfounded claims they are making.

Hunh.

So kinda like the “official “ Office of the President elect”?

Fake office. Fake wanna be POTUS.

Feeble minded puppet