(11-26-2020 02:18 PM)MileHighBronco Wrote:  Things that make you go hmmmmmm?

Unsupervised Election Workers Allegedly Caught On Video As They Messed With Voting Machines In Georgia After The Alleged Pipe Bursts In The Room With Ballots

Quote:Fulton Commission Chairman Robb Pitts said that the pipe burst at 6:07 a.m. and was repaired within two hours. The burst pipe wasn’t mentioned by county officials during a 10 a.m. press conference.

One Georgia resident, attorney Paul J. Dzikowski, attempted to obtain more information on the reported water main break in Atlanta. He sent a letter to and requested any information related to the water main break under the Georgia Open Records Act. This is what he wrote in his request:

Please accept this correspondence (and the attached letter) as a request for production and inspection of records under the Georgia Open Records Act, O.C.G.A. § 50-18-70, et seq. (the “Act”). Please produce, for inspection and copying, the following records:

• ALL “Public records” related to the burst pipe at State Farm Arena that occurred on or about November 3, 2020, which impacted the counting of ballots by Fulton County authorities, including and not limited to internal and external communications with any person(s), communications with Fulton Co. Board of Registrations and Elections, memoranda, notes, work orders, requisitions, invoices, repair records, and all other public records.

This request is intended to be as comprehensive as possible and should be interpreted as broadly as the law allows, in accordance with the Act, and shall encompass records in paper form and any electronic and digital format. I look forward to your prompt response as soon as the records are available for inspection and copying but in no event more than three (3) business days following your receipt of this request, as required by the Act.

In response the only public records generated as a result of the alleged “burst pipe” that halted the counting of ballots in Atlanta (Fulton Co.) were a few text messages. These messages were with the Sr. Vice President of the Atlanta Hawks, Geoffrey Stiles, who called it a “slow leak” that was “contained quickly,” and he said the entire thing was “highly exaggerated.”

Quote:What really happened on election night in Atlanta and what was the real reason they stopped counting tens of thousands of absentee votes until the next day?

Sidney Powell seems to have video evidence of the whole situation.
She has released what she called ‘the Kraken’ – two lawsuits alleging ‘massive voter fraud’ in the presidential election.

She published a 104-page document detailing allegations about Georgia and a 75-page document looking at Michigan on Wednesday night, calling for the election results to be decertified, Trump to be declared the winner and voting machines to be impounded.

On page 8 of the Georgia filing, she dropped a huge bombshell.

Powell states that there is a video of unsupervised election workers unchallenged working on the computers!

Specifically, video from the State Farm Arena in Fulton County shows that on November 3rd after the polls closed, election workers falsely claimed a water leak required the facility to close. All poll workers and challengers were evacuated for several hours at about 10:00 P.M.
However, several election workers remained unsupervised and unchallenged working at the computers for the voting tabulation machines until after 1:00 A.M.

https://www.rightjournalism.com/unsuperv...h-ballots/

This sure seems like a Kraken to me...

If she has the video (assuming this is surveillance video from the facility?) and it's time-stamped to correlate with when that the elections workers were messing with the computers during the "water leak shutdown" that would be the equivalent of a smoking gun.
Does she really have it?

(11-26-2020 01:17 PM)U_of_Elvis Wrote:  

(11-26-2020 12:36 PM)MileHighBronco Wrote:  

(11-26-2020 11:07 AM)U_of_Elvis Wrote:  In two court filings headers she misspelled district three times, each in a different way. That takes talent.

Tell me, Skippy, do you believe that Sidney typed that up herself? Really?

So you're saying she actually paid someone to do that? That may be worse.

Have you read practically any news article from the past 10 years? What qualifies as edited is pretty pathetic.

(11-26-2020 02:54 PM)umbluegray Wrote:  

(11-26-2020 01:17 PM)U_of_Elvis Wrote:  

(11-26-2020 12:36 PM)MileHighBronco Wrote:  

(11-26-2020 11:07 AM)U_of_Elvis Wrote:  In two court filings headers she misspelled district three times, each in a different way. That takes talent.

Tell me, Skippy, do you believe that Sidney typed that up herself? Really?

So you're saying she actually paid someone to do that? That may be worse.

Have you read practically any news article from the past 10 years? What qualifies as edited is pretty pathetic.

#ReleaseTheSpellCheck

(11-26-2020 02:59 PM)U_of_Elvis Wrote:  

(11-26-2020 02:54 PM)umbluegray Wrote:  

(11-26-2020 01:17 PM)U_of_Elvis Wrote:  

(11-26-2020 12:36 PM)MileHighBronco Wrote:  

(11-26-2020 11:07 AM)U_of_Elvis Wrote:  In two court filings headers she misspelled district three times, each in a different way. That takes talent.

Tell me, Skippy, do you believe that Sidney typed that up herself? Really?

So you're saying she actually paid someone to do that? That may be worse.

Have you read practically any news article from the past 10 years? What qualifies as edited is pretty pathetic.

#ReleaseTheSpellCheck

#ButtHurtReleased

(11-26-2020 02:49 PM)mptnstr@44 Wrote:  If she has the video (assuming this is surveillance video from the facility?) and it's time-stamped to correlate with when that the elections workers were messing with the computers during the "water leak shutdown" that would be the equivalent of a smoking gun.
Does she really have it?

The italicized paragraph at the end of my post came directly from the complaint filed in Michigan. I was just unable to get it to post, so I copied it word for word. I doubt that they include that in the filing if she doesn't have it.

Beware of a change of talking points from the left:

I've got to admire tennis2k4 and Elvis's enthusiasm. He declares the Kraken a dud before the court has even had a chance to read it.

I doubt that there is a bonus from their paymaster for jumping the gun and slamming something that has barely been delivered. They should ask Tommie how that all works.

(11-26-2020 04:05 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  Beware of a change of talking points from the left:

I wouldn't like the evidence if it was damning.

Trumps going to GA on Saturday.

It is hard to type when your suckers keep getting stuck on the keyboards.

Sidknee aksed me to piss tihs along two Turmp Sipporders:

We need your help fiteing to safe are democracy. It doesn't matter what dickstrict we review, fruad is rampint! Plaese doenate twoday!

-The Crakin

(11-27-2020 10:50 AM)indianashocker Wrote:  Sidknee aksed me to piss tihs along two Turmp Sipporders:

We need your help fiteing to safe are democracy. It doesn't matter what dickstrict we review, fruad is rampint! Plaese doenate twoday!

-The Crakin

DavidSt agreas.....

"But in the Michigan case, she offered evidence from a large number of witnesses who alleged in Wayne County and the city of Detroit tens of thousands of voting irregularities were witnessed.

She charged that Detroit and Wayne County officials took actions “permitting illegal double voting by persons that had voted by absentee ballot and in person; counting ineligible ballots – and in many cases – multiple times; counting ballots without signatures, or without attempting to match signatures, and ballots without postmarks, pursuant to direct instructions from Defendants.”

Among other misconduct, she alleged Michigan election officials were:

• “Fraudulently adding ‘tens of thousands’ of new ballots and/or new voters to QVF in two separate batches on November 4, 2020, all or nearly all of which were votes for Joe Biden;
• “Forging voter information and fraudulently adding new voters to the QVF Voters, in particular, e.g., when a voter’s name could not be found, the election worker assigned the ballot to a random name already in the QVF to a person who had not voted;”
• “Changing dates on absentee ballots received after 8:00 PM Election Day deadline to indicate that such ballots were received before the deadline;
• “Changing Votes for Trump and other Republican candidates.

https://justthenews.com/politics-policy/...ge-numbers

(11-27-2020 11:54 AM)mptnstr@44 Wrote:  "But in the Michigan case, she offered evidence from a large number of witnesses who alleged in Wayne County and the city of Detroit tens of thousands of voting irregularities were witnessed.

She charged that Detroit and Wayne County officials took actions “permitting illegal double voting by persons that had voted by absentee ballot and in person; counting ineligible ballots – and in many cases – multiple times; counting ballots without signatures, or without attempting to match signatures, and ballots without postmarks, pursuant to direct instructions from Defendants.”

Among other misconduct, she alleged Michigan election officials were:

• “Fraudulently adding ‘tens of thousands’ of new ballots and/or new voters to QVF in two separate batches on November 4, 2020, all or nearly all of which were votes for Joe Biden;
• “Forging voter information and fraudulently adding new voters to the QVF Voters, in particular, e.g., when a voter’s name could not be found, the election worker assigned the ballot to a random name already in the QVF to a person who had not voted;”
• “Changing dates on absentee ballots received after 8:00 PM Election Day deadline to indicate that such ballots were received before the deadline;
• “Changing Votes for Trump and other Republican candidates.

https://justthenews.com/politics-policy/...ge-numbers

I voted in-person, in Wayne County at my assigned precinct outside of the city of Detroit. My ID was checked and verified real-time against a database of absentee applications. I saw first hand poll workers question an individual in line ahead of me when they cross referenced her to an absentee ballot in the system. She stated that she requested but did not return the ballot. They had her sign an affidavit stating as such and allowed her to vote in person.

Again, this occurred in Wayne County but not in the city of Detroit. Was this same procedure followed in the city? Given the amount of evidence coming to light, I suspect not.

(11-27-2020 12:12 PM)DtownBronco Wrote:  

(11-27-2020 11:54 AM)mptnstr@44 Wrote:  "But in the Michigan case, she offered evidence from a large number of witnesses who alleged in Wayne County and the city of Detroit tens of thousands of voting irregularities were witnessed.

She charged that Detroit and Wayne County officials took actions “permitting illegal double voting by persons that had voted by absentee ballot and in person; counting ineligible ballots – and in many cases – multiple times; counting ballots without signatures, or without attempting to match signatures, and ballots without postmarks, pursuant to direct instructions from Defendants.”

Among other misconduct, she alleged Michigan election officials were:

• “Fraudulently adding ‘tens of thousands’ of new ballots and/or new voters to QVF in two separate batches on November 4, 2020, all or nearly all of which were votes for Joe Biden;
• “Forging voter information and fraudulently adding new voters to the QVF Voters, in particular, e.g., when a voter’s name could not be found, the election worker assigned the ballot to a random name already in the QVF to a person who had not voted;”
• “Changing dates on absentee ballots received after 8:00 PM Election Day deadline to indicate that such ballots were received before the deadline;
• “Changing Votes for Trump and other Republican candidates.

https://justthenews.com/politics-policy/...ge-numbers

I voted in-person, in Wayne County at my assigned precinct outside of the city of Detroit. My ID was checked and verified real-time against a database of absentee applications. I saw first hand poll workers question an individual in line ahead of me when they cross referenced her to an absentee ballot in the system. She stated that she requested but did not return the ballot. They had her sign an affidavit stating as such and allowed her to vote in person.

Again, this occurred in Wayne County but not in the city of Detroit. Was this same procedure followed in the city? Given the amount of evidence coming to light, I suspect not.

sounds like even you who live there don't trust the BOE to have acted totally above board.

Pretty simple. If more votes were cast than the number of registered voters fraud was committed. Hel. If it is over 80% fraud was committed because voter rolls are rarely updated.

If you want to read excerpts from the MI lawsuit...
https://twitter.com/PandaTribune/status/...9143704579

the affidavits from data experts (whose credentials are included) is pretty damning.

(11-27-2020 12:40 PM)mptnstr@44 Wrote:  If you want to read excerpts from the MI lawsuit...
https://twitter.com/PandaTribune/status/...9143704579

the affidavits from data experts (whose credentials are included) is pretty damning.

These are the statistical anomalies that have to called out and explained.



Sent from my SM-N975U using Tapatalk

(11-27-2020 12:40 PM)mptnstr@44 Wrote:  If you want to read excerpts from the MI lawsuit...
https://twitter.com/PandaTribune/status/...9143704579

the affidavits from data experts (whose credentials are included) is pretty damning.

One of the affidavits is from the same guy who confused MI and MN, so I wouldn't put your full faith in these affidavits.

His amended affidavit seems to be completely incorrect or misleading.

So according to the affidavit, the city in question with 781% turnout is North Muskegon.

N. Muskegon is divided into two precincts. According to the precinct-by-precinct results on the official page, there were 3,390 registered voters in N. Muskegon for this election: 1,602 in the 1st Precinct + 1,788 in the 2nd.
https://www.co.muskegon.mi.us/DocumentCe...-11-3-2020
(starts on page 459)

The results show 73.53% turnout for its 1st Precinct (1,178 voters), and 82.21% for the 2nd (1,470) — 2,648 votes, or 77.87% turnout for the city as a whole.

781.91% of 3,390 registered voters would be 26,506.749. No idea where that number comes from. But if there were a misplaced decimal somewhere, 78.191% of 3,390 is 2,650 — only two votes more than the reported 2,648. 78.1% of 3,390 is exactly the reported number if we round down the fraction in 2,648.

So this guy is still completely incorrect or wildly misleading.