(11-09-2020 08:37 AM)rath v2.0 Wrote:  It was a referendum on stealing elections. It passed swimmingly. Now let’s see if enough people say they are not going to stand for it.

Anyone who voted just had their fundamental right to vote ******* nullified no matter who they voted for.

Just keep flailing dude, as you continually fail to present ANY evidence.

Correct me if I'm wrong, but aren't you a lawyer? If so, how many cases do you win or even present for that matter, with no evidence?

(11-09-2020 09:06 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(11-09-2020 08:37 AM)rath v2.0 Wrote:  It was a referendum on stealing elections. It passed swimmingly. Now let’s see if enough people say they are not going to stand for it.

Anyone who voted just had their fundamental right to vote ******* nullified no matter who they voted for.

Just keep flailing dude, as you continually fail to present ANY evidence.

Correct me if I'm wrong, but aren't you a lawyer? If so, how many cases do you win or even present for that matter, with no evidence?

We don't know what evidence, if any they have. That's what it all comes down to. Everybody on Earth knows this election was stolen, but that knowledge is worthless unless there is evidence to back it up.

If they do have evidence, then they are smart not to release it before going to court. And, if they don't then they're just wasting their time.

(11-09-2020 09:14 AM)appst89 Wrote:  

(11-09-2020 09:06 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(11-09-2020 08:37 AM)rath v2.0 Wrote:  It was a referendum on stealing elections. It passed swimmingly. Now let’s see if enough people say they are not going to stand for it.

Anyone who voted just had their fundamental right to vote ******* nullified no matter who they voted for.

Just keep flailing dude, as you continually fail to present ANY evidence.

Correct me if I'm wrong, but aren't you a lawyer? If so, how many cases do you win or even present for that matter, with no evidence?

We don't know what evidence, if any they have. That's what it all comes down to. Everybody on Earth knows this election was stolen, but that knowledge is worthless unless there is evidence to back it up.

If they do have evidence, then they are smart not to release it before going to court. And, if they don't then they're just wasting their time.

Sure, just keep thinking that.

But I hear Matt Schlapp has the "evidence!" Go look up that **** show...it's a great laugh.

(11-09-2020 09:20 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(11-09-2020 09:14 AM)appst89 Wrote:  

(11-09-2020 09:06 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(11-09-2020 08:37 AM)rath v2.0 Wrote:  It was a referendum on stealing elections. It passed swimmingly. Now let’s see if enough people say they are not going to stand for it.

Anyone who voted just had their fundamental right to vote ******* nullified no matter who they voted for.

Just keep flailing dude, as you continually fail to present ANY evidence.

Correct me if I'm wrong, but aren't you a lawyer? If so, how many cases do you win or even present for that matter, with no evidence?

We don't know what evidence, if any they have. That's what it all comes down to. Everybody on Earth knows this election was stolen, but that knowledge is worthless unless there is evidence to back it up.

If they do have evidence, then they are smart not to release it before going to court. And, if they don't then they're just wasting their time.

Sure, just keep thinking that.

But I hear Matt Schlapp has the "evidence!" Go look up that **** show...it's a great laugh.

I think he probably meant anyone with any common sense knows that meaning it would disqualify the libs. Anyone who bought the collusion nonsense, probably isnt the best judge of things.

(11-09-2020 09:20 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(11-09-2020 09:14 AM)appst89 Wrote:  

(11-09-2020 09:06 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(11-09-2020 08:37 AM)rath v2.0 Wrote:  It was a referendum on stealing elections. It passed swimmingly. Now let’s see if enough people say they are not going to stand for it.

Anyone who voted just had their fundamental right to vote ******* nullified no matter who they voted for.

Just keep flailing dude, as you continually fail to present ANY evidence.

Correct me if I'm wrong, but aren't you a lawyer? If so, how many cases do you win or even present for that matter, with no evidence?

We don't know what evidence, if any they have. That's what it all comes down to. Everybody on Earth knows this election was stolen, but that knowledge is worthless unless there is evidence to back it up.

If they do have evidence, then they are smart not to release it before going to court. And, if they don't then they're just wasting their time.

Sure, just keep thinking that.

But I hear Matt Schlapp has the "evidence!" Go look up that **** show...it's a great laugh.

I will, thank you, and I don't need your ******* blessing to believe the truth.

Regardless, none of it matters if they can't prove it.

(11-09-2020 08:40 AM)banker Wrote:  

(11-09-2020 08:27 AM)UofMemphis Wrote:  the 2020 election was a referendum on Donald Trump...it turned out badly for him

Let’s play “The election was completely on the up and up” for fun then.

This was in no way a referendum on Trump, it was a vote on the false narrative that the MSM and big tech built around Trump. In other words, it is continuing proof of the gullibility and ignorance of the majority of voters.

The easiest current example is the news the last few days on Operation Warp Speed and the Vaccine story. Throughout the final weeks of the campaign the dems hammered on the fact that no vaccine would be available until next year, that Trump was lying, that Trump had no plan. The MSM assisted by running constantly negative Covid stories, not discussing any positive developments, etc. the day after they declare Joe won the positive news starts coming out.

So what happens is you lose a President who oversaw the potentially fastest defeat of a deadly plague in world history and replace him with a demented puppet.

A referendum of stupid, not worth feeling good about.

Good news. The President is still the president until 1/20. He's got plenty of time to oversee the development and production of a vaccine.

He can either do his job, or ***** and moan about conspiracy theories for the lame duck period. What kind of legacy does he want for himself? That of a sore loser, or that of someone who maybe actually gave a damn about the American people.

(11-09-2020 09:06 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(11-09-2020 08:37 AM)rath v2.0 Wrote:  It was a referendum on stealing elections. It passed swimmingly. Now let’s see if enough people say they are not going to stand for it.

Anyone who voted just had their fundamental right to vote ******* nullified no matter who they voted for.

Just keep flailing dude, as you continually fail to present ANY evidence.

Correct me if I'm wrong, but aren't you a lawyer? If so, how many cases do you win or even present for that matter, with no evidence?

You are a ******* hypocrite, how can you lecture someone on their profession while sitting there on your employer’s time and money and being here in this website instead of doing your job? I bet you are the Employee of the Month right?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

(11-09-2020 09:34 AM)BobcatEngineer Wrote:  

(11-09-2020 08:40 AM)banker Wrote:  

(11-09-2020 08:27 AM)UofMemphis Wrote:  the 2020 election was a referendum on Donald Trump...it turned out badly for him

Let’s play “The election was completely on the up and up” for fun then.

This was in no way a referendum on Trump, it was a vote on the false narrative that the MSM and big tech built around Trump. In other words, it is continuing proof of the gullibility and ignorance of the majority of voters.

The easiest current example is the news the last few days on Operation Warp Speed and the Vaccine story. Throughout the final weeks of the campaign the dems hammered on the fact that no vaccine would be available until next year, that Trump was lying, that Trump had no plan. The MSM assisted by running constantly negative Covid stories, not discussing any positive developments, etc. the day after they declare Joe won the positive news starts coming out.

So what happens is you lose a President who oversaw the potentially fastest defeat of a deadly plague in world history and replace him with a demented puppet.

A referendum of stupid, not worth feeling good about.

Good news. The President is still the president until 1/20. He's got plenty of time to oversee the development and production of a vaccine.

Which is good news for everyone, considering Joe Biden oversaw the development of the vaccine for H1N1. We're still waiting on that one.

(11-09-2020 09:50 AM)UTSAMarineVet09 Wrote:  

(11-09-2020 09:06 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(11-09-2020 08:37 AM)rath v2.0 Wrote:  It was a referendum on stealing elections. It passed swimmingly. Now let’s see if enough people say they are not going to stand for it.

Anyone who voted just had their fundamental right to vote ******* nullified no matter who they voted for.

Just keep flailing dude, as you continually fail to present ANY evidence.

Correct me if I'm wrong, but aren't you a lawyer? If so, how many cases do you win or even present for that matter, with no evidence?

You are a ******* hypocrite, how can you lecture someone on their profession while sitting there on your employer’s time and money and being here in this website instead of doing your job? I bet you are the Employee of the Month right?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

You seem upset. BTW - You off from work today...and every day you post here? Or are you retired? I thought you moved to Michigan for work.

Regardless, nowhere did I lecture him. I only asked how many cases he presents with no evidence. I also asked for evidence as nothing credible has been presented so far.

(11-09-2020 09:34 AM)BobcatEngineer Wrote:  

(11-09-2020 08:40 AM)banker Wrote:  

(11-09-2020 08:27 AM)UofMemphis Wrote:  the 2020 election was a referendum on Donald Trump...it turned out badly for him

Let’s play “The election was completely on the up and up” for fun then.

This was in no way a referendum on Trump, it was a vote on the false narrative that the MSM and big tech built around Trump. In other words, it is continuing proof of the gullibility and ignorance of the majority of voters.

The easiest current example is the news the last few days on Operation Warp Speed and the Vaccine story. Throughout the final weeks of the campaign the dems hammered on the fact that no vaccine would be available until next year, that Trump was lying, that Trump had no plan. The MSM assisted by running constantly negative Covid stories, not discussing any positive developments, etc. the day after they declare Joe won the positive news starts coming out.

So what happens is you lose a President who oversaw the potentially fastest defeat of a deadly plague in world history and replace him with a demented puppet.

A referendum of stupid, not worth feeling good about.

Good news. The President is still the president until 1/20. He's got plenty of time to oversee the development and production of a vaccine.

He can either do his job, or ***** and moan about conspiracy theories for the lame duck period. What kind of legacy does he want for himself? That of a sore loser, or that of someone who maybe actually gave a damn about the American people.

Yeah, Donnie needs to be sitting in the lab stirring up batches of vaccine.

(11-09-2020 09:14 AM)appst89 Wrote:  

(11-09-2020 09:06 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(11-09-2020 08:37 AM)rath v2.0 Wrote:  It was a referendum on stealing elections. It passed swimmingly. Now let’s see if enough people say they are not going to stand for it.

Anyone who voted just had their fundamental right to vote ******* nullified no matter who they voted for.

Just keep flailing dude, as you continually fail to present ANY evidence.

Correct me if I'm wrong, but aren't you a lawyer? If so, how many cases do you win or even present for that matter, with no evidence?

We don't know what evidence, if any they have. That's what it all comes down to. Everybody on Earth knows this election was stolen, but that knowledge is worthless unless there is evidence to back it up.

If they do have evidence, then they are smart not to release it before going to court. And, if they don't then they're just wasting their time.

I would say everybody knows there was massive fraud.

Whether there was enough to steal it, nobody really knows at this point.

(11-09-2020 10:01 AM)bullet Wrote:  

(11-09-2020 09:34 AM)BobcatEngineer Wrote:  

(11-09-2020 08:40 AM)banker Wrote:  

(11-09-2020 08:27 AM)UofMemphis Wrote:  the 2020 election was a referendum on Donald Trump...it turned out badly for him

Let’s play “The election was completely on the up and up” for fun then.

This was in no way a referendum on Trump, it was a vote on the false narrative that the MSM and big tech built around Trump. In other words, it is continuing proof of the gullibility and ignorance of the majority of voters.

The easiest current example is the news the last few days on Operation Warp Speed and the Vaccine story. Throughout the final weeks of the campaign the dems hammered on the fact that no vaccine would be available until next year, that Trump was lying, that Trump had no plan. The MSM assisted by running constantly negative Covid stories, not discussing any positive developments, etc. the day after they declare Joe won the positive news starts coming out.

So what happens is you lose a President who oversaw the potentially fastest defeat of a deadly plague in world history and replace him with a demented puppet.

A referendum of stupid, not worth feeling good about.

Good news. The President is still the president until 1/20. He's got plenty of time to oversee the development and production of a vaccine.

He can either do his job, or ***** and moan about conspiracy theories for the lame duck period. What kind of legacy does he want for himself? That of a sore loser, or that of someone who maybe actually gave a damn about the American people.

Yeah, Donnie needs to be sitting in the lab stirring up batches of vaccine.

The south park covid special comes to mind

Saw a report where Trump is going to keep holding rallies!

This sh*t isn't over!

(11-09-2020 10:02 AM)bullet Wrote:  

(11-09-2020 09:14 AM)appst89 Wrote:  

(11-09-2020 09:06 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(11-09-2020 08:37 AM)rath v2.0 Wrote:  It was a referendum on stealing elections. It passed swimmingly. Now let’s see if enough people say they are not going to stand for it.

Anyone who voted just had their fundamental right to vote ******* nullified no matter who they voted for.

Just keep flailing dude, as you continually fail to present ANY evidence.

Correct me if I'm wrong, but aren't you a lawyer? If so, how many cases do you win or even present for that matter, with no evidence?

We don't know what evidence, if any they have. That's what it all comes down to. Everybody on Earth knows this election was stolen, but that knowledge is worthless unless there is evidence to back it up.

If they do have evidence, then they are smart not to release it before going to court. And, if they don't then they're just wasting their time.

I would say everybody knows there was massive fraud.

Whether there was enough to steal it, nobody really knows at this point.

No, no they don't. Nor does "everybody" even remotely allege it.

(11-09-2020 10:10 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(11-09-2020 10:02 AM)bullet Wrote:  

(11-09-2020 09:14 AM)appst89 Wrote:  

(11-09-2020 09:06 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(11-09-2020 08:37 AM)rath v2.0 Wrote:  It was a referendum on stealing elections. It passed swimmingly. Now let’s see if enough people say they are not going to stand for it.

Anyone who voted just had their fundamental right to vote ******* nullified no matter who they voted for.

Just keep flailing dude, as you continually fail to present ANY evidence.

Correct me if I'm wrong, but aren't you a lawyer? If so, how many cases do you win or even present for that matter, with no evidence?

We don't know what evidence, if any they have. That's what it all comes down to. Everybody on Earth knows this election was stolen, but that knowledge is worthless unless there is evidence to back it up.

If they do have evidence, then they are smart not to release it before going to court. And, if they don't then they're just wasting their time.

I would say everybody knows there was massive fraud.

Whether there was enough to steal it, nobody really knows at this point.

No, no they don't. Nor does "everybody" even remotely allege it.

Tom - if evidence of mass fraud is presented, lawsuits go through, and the election is flipped back to Trump... will you accept the results?

If Trump and his team are unable to produce evidence enough to convince judges, I will accept the result.

(11-09-2020 10:09 AM)ECUGrad07 Wrote:  Saw a report where Trump is going to keep holding rallies!

This sh*t isn't over!

He should do that no matter what. Even if Biden* is POTUS, he should. Half the country isn’t gonna respect the Delaware Retard anyway.

(11-09-2020 10:10 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(11-09-2020 10:02 AM)bullet Wrote:  

(11-09-2020 09:14 AM)appst89 Wrote:  

(11-09-2020 09:06 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(11-09-2020 08:37 AM)rath v2.0 Wrote:  It was a referendum on stealing elections. It passed swimmingly. Now let’s see if enough people say they are not going to stand for it.

Anyone who voted just had their fundamental right to vote ******* nullified no matter who they voted for.

Just keep flailing dude, as you continually fail to present ANY evidence.

Correct me if I'm wrong, but aren't you a lawyer? If so, how many cases do you win or even present for that matter, with no evidence?

We don't know what evidence, if any they have. That's what it all comes down to. Everybody on Earth knows this election was stolen, but that knowledge is worthless unless there is evidence to back it up.

If they do have evidence, then they are smart not to release it before going to court. And, if they don't then they're just wasting their time.

I would say everybody knows there was massive fraud.

Whether there was enough to steal it, nobody really knows at this point.

No, no they don't. Nor does "everybody" even remotely allege it.

Well, "everybody" may be a stretch, but you know what they say, "if it looks and quacks like a duck, it's a duck".

https://nypost.com/2020/11/08/if-theres-...it-devine/

"There’s more evidence of voter fraud in the 2020 election than there ever was of Russia collusion, so America is owed a legal examination of the election irregularities alleged by the Trump campaign.

It’s not crazy to say this, despite the gaslighting from much of the media.

Basically, the election is down to roughly 120,000 votes of almost 150 million votes cast.

That’s 0.08 percent, a tiny margin by anyone’s reckoning.

Recounts have been ordered. President Trump’s campaign is challenging hundreds of thousands of votes in the courts.

Five swing states are within 1 percent, all with Joe Biden in the lead...."

"...Remarkably enough, there are now three justices of nine on the Supreme Court who were on the Bush legal team during the contested “hanging chads” election in 2000. They were the recently confirmed Amy Coney Barrett, the disgracefully maligned Brett Kavanaugh, and Chief Justice John Roberts. In addition, Justices Clarence Thomas and Stephen Breyer were part of the court that decided the case almost exactly 20 years ago, but on opposite sides. So there is plenty of corporate memory on the court to adjudicate on any case that might come before them."

(11-09-2020 10:11 AM)ECUGrad07 Wrote:  

(11-09-2020 10:10 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(11-09-2020 10:02 AM)bullet Wrote:  

(11-09-2020 09:14 AM)appst89 Wrote:  

(11-09-2020 09:06 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  Just keep flailing dude, as you continually fail to present ANY evidence.

Correct me if I'm wrong, but aren't you a lawyer? If so, how many cases do you win or even present for that matter, with no evidence?

We don't know what evidence, if any they have. That's what it all comes down to. Everybody on Earth knows this election was stolen, but that knowledge is worthless unless there is evidence to back it up.

If they do have evidence, then they are smart not to release it before going to court. And, if they don't then they're just wasting their time.

I would say everybody knows there was massive fraud.

Whether there was enough to steal it, nobody really knows at this point.

No, no they don't. Nor does "everybody" even remotely allege it.

Tom - if evidence of mass fraud is presented, lawsuits go through, and the election is flipped back to Trump... will you accept the results?

If Trump and his team are unable to produce evidence enough to convince judges, I will accept the result.

No question. And I'd call for all those involved to be locked up with no parole for life.

(11-09-2020 10:09 AM)ECUGrad07 Wrote:  Saw a report where Trump is going to keep holding rallies!

This sh*t isn't over!

And I just saw that someone pushed back against it. Said only things you might see would either be boat or car rallies like you saw during the campaign, which weren't directly affiliated with the campaign.

Best guess, they have no money for it...especially if they're going to fund any recounts.

Also, the fine print of the latest fundraising efforts from the campaign contain language saying 60% of your donation goes to paying down current campaign debt.