A bit shrill. But certainly on point.

(10-19-2020 08:11 AM)AdoptedMonarch Wrote:  A bit shrill. But certainly on point.

Yeah but she's hot so there's that too.

That young lady just put it all together with a nice red bow on top in about 30 seconds. Nicely done.

Personality? Don’t give a chit. Done seen him for 20 yrs yucking it up with schmuksters like Imus, Stern etc. He was always a ratings bonanza. Funny thing was it was often the “ladies” that tuned in most often, gave them a little shimmie in the jimmies. Dirty talk and all.

Policy? That’s what I give a chit about. Taxpayer funding for health insurance for the fence jumpers when zerOs scheme ruined normal, hard working play by the rules families? F#%% that. Sloe plans to double down on stupid. Invite the entire world in. No thanks.

Policy? Check. Personality? He cracks me up periodically, otherwise don’t care.

Next

Another video from the same young lady.... Alexandra Lains

Another example of Conservative Women being better looking than Liberal Women.

no, you're voting for Trump because you don't have a better option in a 2 party system...

but don't let that get in the way of a youtube video :-)

(10-19-2020 08:52 AM)UofMemphis Wrote:  no, you're voting for Trump because you don't have a better option in a 2 party system...

but don't let that get in the way of a youtube video :-)

Trump is the better option in the 2 party system.

I've yet had any of you tell me why I should consider Joe Biden without mentioning Trump's name.

(10-19-2020 08:52 AM)UofMemphis Wrote:  no, you're voting for Trump because you don't have a better option in a 2 party system...

but don't let that get in the way of a youtube video :-)

Would you vote for Regan over Biden?
Would you vote for Either Bush over Biden?
All three are far and away a better choice than Joe.

I suspect your answer would be no - you have pretty much spilled your team over country leanings........

(10-19-2020 09:04 AM)gdunn Wrote:  

(10-19-2020 08:52 AM)UofMemphis Wrote:  no, you're voting for Trump because you don't have a better option in a 2 party system...

but don't let that get in the way of a youtube video :-)

Trump is the better option in the 2 party system.

I've yet had any of you tell me why I should consider Joe Biden without mentioning Trump's name.

if you're considering voting for Trump at this stage you probably shouldn't.

(10-19-2020 09:30 AM)UofMemphis Wrote:  

(10-19-2020 09:04 AM)gdunn Wrote:  

(10-19-2020 08:52 AM)UofMemphis Wrote:  no, you're voting for Trump because you don't have a better option in a 2 party system...

but don't let that get in the way of a youtube video :-)

Trump is the better option in the 2 party system.

I've yet had any of you tell me why I should consider Joe Biden without mentioning Trump's name.

if you're considering voting for Trump at this stage you probably shouldn't.

Holy ****! Congrats checkout boy, after all these years you actually added something useful to a discussion on this board with this reply. You proved the premise of the video in the OP to be factual.

YOU are the reason people are voting for Trump.

(10-19-2020 09:30 AM)UofMemphis Wrote:  

(10-19-2020 09:04 AM)gdunn Wrote:  

(10-19-2020 08:52 AM)UofMemphis Wrote:  no, you're voting for Trump because you don't have a better option in a 2 party system...

but don't let that get in the way of a youtube video :-)

Trump is the better option in the 2 party system.

I've yet had any of you tell me why I should consider Joe Biden without mentioning Trump's name.

if you're considering voting for Trump at this stage you probably shouldn't.

Looks at watch.. Still waiting.

That girl is awesome. Gonna have to subscribe to her channel now.

"Policy over personality" but also "We are voting for Trump, because of you".


lol

I guess we'll see how well that works for Republicans come November 3rd (or 4th or 5th or 6th and beyond as Trump zealots claim his loss was due to a rigged election)

(10-19-2020 10:55 AM)JDTulane Wrote:  "Policy over personality" but also "We are voting for Trump, because of you".


lol

I guess we'll see how well that works for Republicans come November 3rd (or 4th or 5th or 6th and beyond as Trump zealots claim his loss was due to a rigged election)

Are you assuming a Trump loss? If so, based on what?

JDT still protesting the election results of 2016 I see.

(10-19-2020 10:59 AM)VA49er Wrote:  

(10-19-2020 10:55 AM)JDTulane Wrote:  "Policy over personality" but also "We are voting for Trump, because of you".


lol

I guess we'll see how well that works for Republicans come November 3rd (or 4th or 5th or 6th and beyond as Trump zealots claim his loss was due to a rigged election)

Are you assuming a Trump loss? If so, based on what?

Thoughts and prayers.


*snark aside* I have no idea how this election will go.

(10-19-2020 11:03 AM)JDTulane Wrote:  

(10-19-2020 10:59 AM)VA49er Wrote:  

(10-19-2020 10:55 AM)JDTulane Wrote:  "Policy over personality" but also "We are voting for Trump, because of
you".


lol

I guess we'll see how well that works for Republicans come November 3rd (or 4th or 5th or 6th and beyond as Trump zealots claim his loss was due to a rigged election)

Are you assuming a Trump loss? If so, based on what?

Thoughts and prayers.

Thoughts and prayers are what put Trump in the White House. They are also what will likely keep him there another 4 years.

People who actually believe in God and pray to Him know how evil and godless the progressive left is.

(10-19-2020 08:11 AM)AdoptedMonarch Wrote:  A bit shrill. But certainly on point.

In my case that's true. I told myself there was nothing Trump could do to get me to vote for him in 2016. After his love notes to Pelosi, I had doubts about how conservative he and his Supreme Court picks would be. And when you diss Barbara Bush, your judgement is questionable. But the Democrats changed my mind.

Well, Barbara Bush was the power behind the family that existed only to feed the military industrial complex. She probably deserves some negative comments.

https://amgreatness.com/2020/10/18/the-u...ican-left/

"...Add the examples of the dishonest, discredited but very much alive “1619 Project,” or the unapologetic admission of discrimination against Asian-American university applicants, and we can sense not so much a brave new defiance, but a more calculated insolence that the Left is at last soon going to dominate and alter politics as they have the major American cultural and social institutions. They see their efforts bending in a preordained historical arc that ends with ultimate progressive justice—and retributions. And in that context there is no longer any need to play by the rules of fairness, or even to say that such rules need to exist or indeed ever existed.

On November 3, we will see whether they are justifiably arrogant or suicidal."

I hope the left's antics have proven suicidal. But our President gives them enough ammunition to make the result uncertain.