Quote:For criminals who are convicted of sex crimes with minors under the age of 13, Alabama will now require chemical castration as a condition of parole.

The measure was signed into law by Alabama's Gov. Kay Ivey on Aug. 10, and had been introduced by Republican state representative Steve Hurst of Calhoun County. Hurst would prefer that those offenders who have been convicted of these crimes were permanently castrated through surgical means, according to NBC News.

Hurst said "My preference would be if someone does a small infant child like that, they need to die. God's going to deal with them one day."

Under the new law, the prospective parolee would be required to begin the drug treatment at least one month prior to the date of their release. The drugs would be administered for as long as a judge deems necessary before the parolee would be permitted to live a regular life.

This makes Alabama one of at least seven states that either require or allow chemical castration on a voluntary basis for sex offenders before they are released. Those others include Wisconsin, Florida, Texas, Montana, Louisiana, and California. Guam also has this measure as a voluntary procedure from sex offenders of this type who are after parole.

The ACLU has taken issue with the law, and the Alabama chapter has called it "unconstitutional." Randall Marshall, the executive director for Alabama's ACLU, has said that chemical castration for sex offenders who harm minors under 13 shows that legislators "really misunderstand what sexual assault is about. Sexual assault isn't about sexual gratification. It's about power. It's about control."

Representative Hurst disagrees. "If they're going to mark these children for life, they need to be marked for life," he said.

Link

Hope more state adopt this.

Add a "C" to the end of LBGTQ

(08-19-2020 12:49 PM)Garrettabc Wrote:  Add a "C" to the end of LBGTQ

Well done......

Well we have many volunteers to do it and more than few rusty hunting knives so it seemed logical!

Sweet home

I can't go along with this one....sorry, guys...

the imitation game comes to mind....

there's not any of that in my being. . ... as an example, my first roomie was gay....he, nor his 'pals' were never a threat...

it's too inhumane based on
'jurisprudence'....

(08-19-2020 01:05 PM)stinkfist Wrote:  I can't go along with this one....sorry, guys...

the imitation game comes to mind....

there's not any of that in my being. . ... as an example, my first roomie was gay....he, nor his 'pals' were never a threat...

it's too inhumane based on
'jurisprudence'....

Come on whats wrong with a bunch of U Nicks. For what they’ve done it’s a just punishment.

(08-19-2020 01:12 PM)CardinalJim Wrote:  

(08-19-2020 01:05 PM)stinkfist Wrote:  I can't go along with this one....sorry, guys...

the imitation game comes to mind....

there's not any of that in my being. . ... as an example, my first roomie was gay....he, nor his 'pals' were never a threat...

it's too inhumane based on
'jurisprudence'....

Come wants wrong with a bunch of U Nicks. For what they’ve done it’s a just punishment.

your'e missing the point.....

e.g.......a 17 yr. old bangs a hot 15 yr. old....how would you know other than reading documents that the msm never reports unless...

@marginOfError

(08-19-2020 01:18 PM)stinkfist Wrote:  

(08-19-2020 01:12 PM)CardinalJim Wrote:  

(08-19-2020 01:05 PM)stinkfist Wrote:  I can't go along with this one....sorry, guys...

the imitation game comes to mind....

there's not any of that in my being. . ... as an example, my first roomie was gay....he, nor his 'pals' were never a threat...

it's too inhumane based on
'jurisprudence'....

Come wants wrong with a bunch of U Nicks. For what they’ve done it’s a just punishment.

your'e missing the point.....

e.g.......a 17 yr. old bangs a hot 15 yr. old....how would you know other than reading documents that the msm never reports unless...

@marginOfError

So...bunch of these guys running around?

(08-19-2020 01:22 PM)GoodOwl Wrote:  

(08-19-2020 01:18 PM)stinkfist Wrote:  

(08-19-2020 01:12 PM)CardinalJim Wrote:  

(08-19-2020 01:05 PM)stinkfist Wrote:  I can't go along with this one....sorry, guys...

the imitation game comes to mind....

there's not any of that in my being. . ... as an example, my first roomie was gay....he, nor his 'pals' were never a threat...

it's too inhumane based on
'jurisprudence'....

Come wants wrong with a bunch of U Nicks. For what they’ve done it’s a just punishment.

your'e missing the point.....

e.g.......a 17 yr. old bangs a hot 15 yr. old....how would you know other than reading documents that the msm never reports unless...

@marginOfError

So...bunch of these guys running around?

sleestacks in HS. . ..yeah, pretty much...

#hormones

edit: don't get started on banging teachers....oye vie..

(08-19-2020 01:18 PM)stinkfist Wrote:  

(08-19-2020 01:12 PM)CardinalJim Wrote:  

(08-19-2020 01:05 PM)stinkfist Wrote:  I can't go along with this one....sorry, guys...

the imitation game comes to mind....

there's not any of that in my being. . ... as an example, my first roomie was gay....he, nor his 'pals' were never a threat...

it's too inhumane based on
'jurisprudence'....

Come wants wrong with a bunch of U Nicks. For what they’ve done it’s a just punishment.

your'e missing the point.....

e.g.......a 17 yr. old bangs a hot 15 yr. old....how would you know other than reading documents that the msm never reports unless...

@marginOfError

I dont think the law applies that way. But yeah that's nuts

Snicker

(08-19-2020 01:33 PM)shere khan Wrote:  

(08-19-2020 01:18 PM)stinkfist Wrote:  

(08-19-2020 01:12 PM)CardinalJim Wrote:  

(08-19-2020 01:05 PM)stinkfist Wrote:  I can't go along with this one....sorry, guys...

the imitation game comes to mind....

there's not any of that in my being. . ... as an example, my first roomie was gay....he, nor his 'pals' were never a threat...

it's too inhumane based on
'jurisprudence'....

Come wants wrong with a bunch of U Nicks. For what they’ve done it’s a just punishment.

your'e missing the point.....

e.g.......a 17 yr. old bangs a hot 15 yr. old....how would you know other than reading documents that the msm never reports unless...

@marginOfError

I dont think the law applies that way. But yeah that's nuts

Snicker

For a pedophile charge, it typically has to be a prepubescent victim. So yea, cut it off.

(08-19-2020 12:58 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

Lol. Good ole Willie C.
Guess he better watch his satchel on his next trip to Birmingham.

Is this a satire website. Has to be right?

(08-19-2020 01:18 PM)stinkfist Wrote:  

(08-19-2020 01:12 PM)CardinalJim Wrote:  

(08-19-2020 01:05 PM)stinkfist Wrote:  I can't go along with this one....sorry, guys...

the imitation game comes to mind....

there's not any of that in my being. . ... as an example, my first roomie was gay....he, nor his 'pals' were never a threat...

it's too inhumane based on
'jurisprudence'....

Come wants wrong with a bunch of U Nicks. For what they’ve done it’s a just punishment.

your'e missing the point.....

e.g.......a 17 yr. old bangs a hot 15 yr. old....how would you know other than reading documents that the msm never reports unless...

@marginOfError

Its only for those who rape kids under the age of 13.

I'm almost certain that there are federal cases from decades ago declaring this type of thing unconstitutional.

(08-19-2020 05:00 PM)Jugnaut Wrote:  I'm almost certain that there are federal cases from decades ago declaring this type of thing unconstitutional.

I'm the fueld... that makes sense...

having said that, if it was my child, the courts would never be an option......

#medieval

(08-19-2020 02:13 PM)CrimsonPhantom Wrote:  

(08-19-2020 01:18 PM)stinkfist Wrote:  

(08-19-2020 01:12 PM)CardinalJim Wrote:  

(08-19-2020 01:05 PM)stinkfist Wrote:  I can't go along with this one....sorry, guys...

the imitation game comes to mind....

there's not any of that in my being. . ... as an example, my first roomie was gay....he, nor his 'pals' were never a threat...

it's too inhumane based on
'jurisprudence'....

Come wants wrong with a bunch of U Nicks. For what they’ve done it’s a just punishment.

your'e missing the point.....

e.g.......a 17 yr. old bangs a hot 15 yr. old....how would you know other than reading documents that the msm never reports unless...

@marginOfError

⁶
Its only for those who rape kids under the age of 13.

I'm simply arguing law from the field on the fly...see my response above to Jugnaut...

(08-19-2020 02:06 PM)450bench Wrote:  

(08-19-2020 12:58 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

Lol. Good ole Willie C.
Guess he better watch his satchel on his next trip to Birmingham.

He's trying to recall if the Lolita express made a pit stop in Mobile.