Thought it'd be interesting in a slow time to look at aggregate records since joining the AAC:

Cincinnati: 15-3, 13-5, 12-6, 16-2, 16-2, 14-4, 13-5: 99-27 (79%) 3 conf titles, 2 tourney titles
Memphis: 12-6, 10-8, 8-10, 9-9, 10-8, 11-7, 10-8: 70-56 (55%)
UConn: 12-6, 10-8, 11-7, 9-9, 7-11, 6-12, 10-8: 65-61 (52%) 1 tourney title
Temple: 4-14, 13-5, 14-4, 7-11, 8-10, 13-5, 6-12: 65-61 (52%) 1 conf title
Houston: 8-10, 4-14, 12-6, 12-6, 14-4, 16-2, 13-5: 79-47 (63%) 2 conf titles
Tulane: -, 6-12, 3-15, 3-15, 5-13, 0-18, 4-14: 21-87 (19%)
ECU: -, 6-12, 4-14, 6-12, 4-14, 3-15, 5-13: 28-80 (26%)
UCF: 4-14, 5-13, 6-12, 11-7, 9-9, 13-5, 7-11: 55-71 (44%)
USF: 3-15, 3-15, 4-14, 1-17, 3-15, 8-10, 7-11: 29-97 (23%)
SMU: 12-6, 15-3, 13-5, 17-1, 6-12, 6-12, 9-9: 78-48 (62%) 2 conf titles, 2 tourney titles
Tulsa: -, 14-4, 12-6, 8-10, 12-6, 8-10, 13-5: 67-41 (62%) 1 conf title
Wichita St, -, -, -, -, 14-4, 10-8, 11-7: 35-19 (65%)

It's the Bearcats' World and you're all living in it.

Is it sesame street that has the little game "one of these things is not like the others" ???

I never would have guessed that that the two teams tied for 2nd best winning percentage were SMU... and Tulsa.

I also forgot that Tulane and Tulsa were late adds. No offense, but once I refreshed my memory it hit me that those two were what finally drove away the C7... not that they weren't going to eventually leave anyway.

(03-17-2020 04:22 PM)Bear Catlett Wrote:  Is it sesame street that has the little game "one of these things is not like the others" ???

I never would have guessed that that the two teams tied for 2nd best winning percentage were SMU... and Tulsa.

I also forgot that Tulane and Tulsa were late adds. No offense, but once I refreshed my memory it hit me that those two were what finally drove away the C7... not that they weren't going to eventually leave anyway.

And instead they added.... Creighton. So they could visit scenic Omaha.

(03-17-2020 05:45 PM)invisiblehand Wrote:  

(03-17-2020 04:22 PM)Bear Catlett Wrote:  Is it sesame street that has the little game "one of these things is not like the others" ???

I never would have guessed that that the two teams tied for 2nd best winning percentage were SMU... and Tulsa.

I also forgot that Tulane and Tulsa were late adds. No offense, but once I refreshed my memory it hit me that those two were what finally drove away the C7... not that they weren't going to eventually leave anyway.

And instead they added.... Creighton. So they could visit scenic Omaha.

Creighton has more NCAA tourney appearances than ECU, Tulane, Tulsa, USF, UCF, SMU, and Wichita.

You only have 6 seasons for UH. We went 12-6 in back to back seasons following that misearble 4-14 campaign.

edit: also we had 47 losses in 7 seasons, not 59 in 6. Sloppy work.

UH and Cincy have almost had an identical five year stretch in conference.

UH: 12-6, 12-6, 14-4, 16-2, 13-5: 67-23 (74%), 2 regular season conference championships
UC: 12-6, 16-2, 16-2, 14-4, 13-5: 71-19 (79%), 2 regular season conference championships

Even the normally super lopsided H2H between UH and Cincy has been relatively close at 7-5 in favor of the Bearcats in that span. Very proud of how far our program has come since joining this conference.

(03-17-2020 02:55 PM)kskenyon4 Wrote:  Thought it'd be interesting in a slow time to look at aggregate records since joining the AAC:

Cincinnati: 15-3, 13-5, 12-6, 16-2, 16-2, 14-4, 13-5: 99-27 (79%) 3 conf titles, 2 tourney titles
Memphis: 12-6, 10-8, 8-10, 9-9, 10-8, 11-7, 10-8: 70-56 (55%)
UConn: 12-6, 10-8, 11-7, 9-9, 7-11, 6-12, 10-8: 65-61 (52%) 1 tourney title
Temple: 4-14, 13-5, 14-4, 7-11, 8-10, 13-5, 6-12: 65-61 (52%) 1 conf title
Houston: 8-10, 4-14, 12-6, 14-4, 16-2, 13-5: 67-59 (53%) 2 conf titles
Tulane: -, 6-12, 3-15, 3-15, 5-13, 0-18, 4-14: 21-87 (19%)
ECU: -, 6-12, 4-14, 6-12, 4-14, 3-15, 5-13: 28-80 (26%)
UCF: 4-14, 5-13, 6-12, 11-7, 9-9, 13-5, 7-11: 55-71 (44%)
USF: 3-15, 3-15, 4-14, 1-17, 3-15, 8-10, 7-11: 29-97 (23%)
SMU: 12-6, 15-3, 13-5, 17-1, 6-12, 6-12, 9-9: 78-48 (62%) 2 conf titles, 2 tourney titles
Tulsa: -, 14-4, 12-6, 8-10, 12-6, 8-10, 13-5: 67-41 (62%) 1 conf title
Wichita St, -, -, -, -, 14-4, 10-8, 11-7: 35-19 (65%)

Math not your strong suit, my guy? UH has nowhere near 59 losses in this conference.

(03-17-2020 06:16 PM)HuskyU Wrote:  

(03-17-2020 05:45 PM)invisiblehand Wrote:  

(03-17-2020 04:22 PM)Bear Catlett Wrote:  Is it sesame street that has the little game "one of these things is not like the others" ???

I never would have guessed that that the two teams tied for 2nd best winning percentage were SMU... and Tulsa.

I also forgot that Tulane and Tulsa were late adds. No offense, but once I refreshed my memory it hit me that those two were what finally drove away the C7... not that they weren't going to eventually leave anyway.

And instead they added.... Creighton. So they could visit scenic Omaha.

Creighton has more NCAA tourney appearances than ECU, Tulane, Tulsa, USF, UCF, SMU, and Wichita.

And an 18,000 seat arena that they fill regularly. Not that we’ll ever get to go to arenas again but just saying.

(03-17-2020 06:16 PM)HuskyU Wrote:  

(03-17-2020 05:45 PM)invisiblehand Wrote:  

(03-17-2020 04:22 PM)Bear Catlett Wrote:  Is it sesame street that has the little game "one of these things is not like the others" ???

I never would have guessed that that the two teams tied for 2nd best winning percentage were SMU... and Tulsa.

I also forgot that Tulane and Tulsa were late adds. No offense, but once I refreshed my memory it hit me that those two were what finally drove away the C7... not that they weren't going to eventually leave anyway.

And instead they added.... Creighton. So they could visit scenic Omaha.

Creighton has more NCAA tourney appearances than ECU, Tulane, Tulsa, USF, UCF, SMU, and Wichita.

How many NCAA wins does Creighton have?

(03-17-2020 07:59 PM)pvtlamb Wrote:  

(03-17-2020 06:16 PM)HuskyU Wrote:  

(03-17-2020 05:45 PM)invisiblehand Wrote:  

(03-17-2020 04:22 PM)Bear Catlett Wrote:  Is it sesame street that has the little game "one of these things is not like the others" ???

I never would have guessed that that the two teams tied for 2nd best winning percentage were SMU... and Tulsa.

I also forgot that Tulane and Tulsa were late adds. No offense, but once I refreshed my memory it hit me that those two were what finally drove away the C7... not that they weren't going to eventually leave anyway.

And instead they added.... Creighton. So they could visit scenic Omaha.

Creighton has more NCAA tourney appearances than ECU, Tulane, Tulsa, USF, UCF, SMU, and Wichita.

How many NCAA wins does Creighton have?

More than ECU, Tulane, USF, UCF, and SMU.

Any other questions?

(03-17-2020 08:10 PM)HuskyU Wrote:  

(03-17-2020 07:59 PM)pvtlamb Wrote:  

(03-17-2020 06:16 PM)HuskyU Wrote:  

(03-17-2020 05:45 PM)invisiblehand Wrote:  

(03-17-2020 04:22 PM)Bear Catlett Wrote:  Is it sesame street that has the little game "one of these things is not like the others" ???

I never would have guessed that that the two teams tied for 2nd best winning percentage were SMU... and Tulsa.

I also forgot that Tulane and Tulsa were late adds. No offense, but once I refreshed my memory it hit me that those two were what finally drove away the C7... not that they weren't going to eventually leave anyway.

And instead they added.... Creighton. So they could visit scenic Omaha.

Creighton has more NCAA tourney appearances than ECU, Tulane, Tulsa, USF, UCF, SMU, and Wichita.

How many NCAA wins does Creighton have?

More than ECU, Tulane, USF, UCF, and SMU.

Any other questions?

How have times have they made it out of the first weekend?

Sent from my SM-N975U1 using Tapatalk

(03-17-2020 09:00 PM)Stickboy46 Wrote:  

(03-17-2020 08:10 PM)HuskyU Wrote:  

(03-17-2020 07:59 PM)pvtlamb Wrote:  

(03-17-2020 06:16 PM)HuskyU Wrote:  

(03-17-2020 05:45 PM)invisiblehand Wrote:  And instead they added.... Creighton. So they could visit scenic Omaha.

Creighton has more NCAA tourney appearances than ECU, Tulane, Tulsa, USF, UCF, SMU, and Wichita.

How many NCAA wins does Creighton have?

More than ECU, Tulane, USF, UCF, and SMU.

Any other questions?

How have times have they made it out of the first weekend?

Sent from my SM-N975U1 using Tapatalk

More often than 1/3 of AAC teams. Anything else?

(03-17-2020 09:20 PM)HuskyU Wrote:  

(03-17-2020 09:00 PM)Stickboy46 Wrote:  

(03-17-2020 08:10 PM)HuskyU Wrote:  

(03-17-2020 07:59 PM)pvtlamb Wrote:  

(03-17-2020 06:16 PM)HuskyU Wrote:  Creighton has more NCAA tourney appearances than ECU, Tulane, Tulsa, USF, UCF, SMU, and Wichita.

How many NCAA wins does Creighton have?

More than ECU, Tulane, USF, UCF, and SMU.

Any other questions?

How have times have they made it out of the first weekend?

Sent from my SM-N975U1 using Tapatalk

More often than 1/3 of AAC teams. Anything else?

Kind of crazy that ECU has never won a tourney game. Also crazy that ECU, Tulane, UCF, and USF combined tourney appearances are close to 10. Ouch.

(03-17-2020 09:33 PM)Joprior23 Wrote:  

(03-17-2020 09:20 PM)HuskyU Wrote:  

(03-17-2020 09:00 PM)Stickboy46 Wrote:  

(03-17-2020 08:10 PM)HuskyU Wrote:  

(03-17-2020 07:59 PM)pvtlamb Wrote:  How many NCAA wins does Creighton have?

More than ECU, Tulane, USF, UCF, and SMU.

Any other questions?

How have times have they made it out of the first weekend?

Sent from my SM-N975U1 using Tapatalk

More often than 1/3 of AAC teams. Anything else?

Kind of crazy that ECU has never won a tourney game. Also crazy that ECU, Tulane, UCF, and USF combined tourney appearances are close to 10. Ouch.

Ya, it's very strange how much Wichita fans and others like to crap all over the new Big East. The 3 nubs have more than held their own over the past decade and the other 7 have performed at a level that makes the AAC directionals look like UCONN Football.

(03-17-2020 09:43 PM)HuskyU Wrote:  

(03-17-2020 09:33 PM)Joprior23 Wrote:  

(03-17-2020 09:20 PM)HuskyU Wrote:  

(03-17-2020 09:00 PM)Stickboy46 Wrote:  

(03-17-2020 08:10 PM)HuskyU Wrote:  More than ECU, Tulane, USF, UCF, and SMU.

Any other questions?

How have times have they made it out of the first weekend?

Sent from my SM-N975U1 using Tapatalk

More often than 1/3 of AAC teams. Anything else?

Kind of crazy that ECU has never won a tourney game. Also crazy that ECU, Tulane, UCF, and USF combined tourney appearances are close to 10. Ouch.

Ya, it's very strange how much Wichita fans and others like to crap all over the new Big East. The 3 nubs have more than held their own over the past decade and the other 7 have performed at a level that makes the AAC directionals look like UCONN Football.

Central isn’t a direction.

(03-17-2020 09:43 PM)HuskyU Wrote:  

(03-17-2020 09:33 PM)Joprior23 Wrote:  

(03-17-2020 09:20 PM)HuskyU Wrote:  

(03-17-2020 09:00 PM)Stickboy46 Wrote:  

(03-17-2020 08:10 PM)HuskyU Wrote:  More than ECU, Tulane, USF, UCF, and SMU.

Any other questions?

How have times have they made it out of the first weekend?

Sent from my SM-N975U1 using Tapatalk

More often than 1/3 of AAC teams. Anything else?

Kind of crazy that ECU has never won a tourney game. Also crazy that ECU, Tulane, UCF, and USF combined tourney appearances are close to 10. Ouch.

Ya, it's very strange how much Wichita fans and others like to crap all over the new Big East. The 3 nubs have more than held their own over the past decade and the other 7 have performed at a level that makes the AAC directionals look like UCONN Football.

Not following you Jonesey

Tulsa carrying on the winning tradition as one of the best basketball programs in the league. It's a good league too.

(03-17-2020 06:16 PM)HuskyU Wrote:  

(03-17-2020 05:45 PM)invisiblehand Wrote:  

(03-17-2020 04:22 PM)Bear Catlett Wrote:  Is it sesame street that has the little game "one of these things is not like the others" ???

I never would have guessed that that the two teams tied for 2nd best winning percentage were SMU... and Tulsa.

I also forgot that Tulane and Tulsa were late adds. No offense, but once I refreshed my memory it hit me that those two were what finally drove away the C7... not that they weren't going to eventually leave anyway.

And instead they added.... Creighton. So they could visit scenic Omaha.

Creighton has more NCAA tourney appearances than ECU, Tulane, Tulsa, USF, UCF, SMU, and Wichita.

They haven’t been to a sweet 16 since 74 and their only elite eight happened when hitler was in power.

(03-17-2020 09:20 PM)HuskyU Wrote:  

(03-17-2020 09:00 PM)Stickboy46 Wrote:  

(03-17-2020 08:10 PM)HuskyU Wrote:  

(03-17-2020 07:59 PM)pvtlamb Wrote:  

(03-17-2020 06:16 PM)HuskyU Wrote:  Creighton has more NCAA tourney appearances than ECU, Tulane, Tulsa, USF, UCF, SMU, and Wichita.

How many NCAA wins does Creighton have?

More than ECU, Tulane, USF, UCF, and SMU.

Any other questions?

How have times have they made it out of the first weekend?

Sent from my SM-N975U1 using Tapatalk

More often than 1/3 of AAC teams. Anything else?

Oh wow, that midwestern program that's outdone 4 whole AAC schools is certainly why you're clamoring to join a "regional" league with historic rivals like Seton Hall and Providence that UConn fans spent a hundred years not giving a **** about until June.

It all comes together. It has nothing to do with a floundering football program and a hemorrhaging budget. Thanks for clearing it all up, I was so confused.