RE: Iranian military commander General Soleimani killed in Baghdad strike
Wasn't this board literally just celebrating the abandonment of our Kurdish allies to slaughter because it meant the US was withdrawing from the region?
Now your orange boy is embedding the US in another war in the Middle East, and you're celebrating that too?
Can someone please explain this reasoning? Because the only common link I can find is that Republicans don't actually care for strategy or consistency, they just fall in line and support whatever the person in power decides in the moment.
You people are practically frothing at the mouth for a chance to send someone else's children to fight in a war no one wants, to kill brown people that didn't want us there anyway. For what?
RE: Iranian military commander General Soleimani killed in Baghdad strike
(01-03-2020 04:23 PM)Kruciff Wrote: Wasn't this board literally just celebrating the abandonment of our Kurdish allies to slaughter because it meant the US was withdrawing from the region?
Now your orange boy is embedding the US in another war in the Middle East, and you're celebrating that too?
Can someone please explain this reasoning? Because the only common link I can find is that Republicans don't actually care for strategy or consistency, they just fall in line and support whatever the person in power decides in the moment.
You people are practically frothing at the mouth for a chance to send someone else's children to fight in a war no one wants, to kill brown people that didn't want us there anyway. For what?
RE: Iranian military commander General Soleimani killed in Baghdad strike
(01-03-2020 04:23 PM)Kruciff Wrote: Wasn't this board literally just celebrating the abandonment of our Kurdish allies to slaughter because it meant the US was withdrawing from the region?
Now your orange boy is embedding the US in another war in the Middle East, and you're celebrating that too?
Can someone please explain this reasoning? Because the only common link I can find is that Republicans don't actually care for strategy or consistency, they just fall in line and support whatever the person in power decides in the moment.
You people are practically frothing at the mouth for a chance to send someone else's children to fight in a war no one wants, to kill brown people that didn't want us there anyway. For what?
Ja, you've got it all figured out...
I challenge you to find a person on board that was looking for war...............................oh Ja, what war is he conceiving at this point.....
are you pining for cuck-dumb or ze pacifist in general....
do you really believe your end strategy as valid.....
ewe don't understand how DJT plays this one, does ya?
bull and horns......bull and horns....
he's going to splatter the masses w/o global concern if muh sandbags challenge.....
killing is a biatch.....the repercussions are much more on the other side....
stick with your stick-horsey-puckey.....and thank those with balls...
RE: Iranian military commander General Soleimani killed in Baghdad strike
(01-03-2020 04:23 PM)Kruciff Wrote: Wasn't this board literally just celebrating the abandonment of our Kurdish allies to slaughter because it meant the US was withdrawing from the region?
Now your orange boy is embedding the US in another war in the Middle East, and you're celebrating that too?
Can someone please explain this reasoning? Because the only common link I can find is that Republicans don't actually care for strategy or consistency, they just fall in line and support whatever the person in power decides in the moment.
You people are practically frothing at the mouth for a chance to send someone else's children to fight in a war no one wants, to kill brown people that didn't want us there anyway. For what?
What war?
It's pretty simple. We don't want to be in the ME at all; however, we are there and if attacked we respond, as it should be. It really is that simple.
RE: Iranian military commander General Soleimani killed in Baghdad strike
(01-03-2020 04:38 PM)VA49er Wrote:
(01-03-2020 04:23 PM)Kruciff Wrote: Wasn't this board literally just celebrating the abandonment of our Kurdish allies to slaughter because it meant the US was withdrawing from the region?
Now your orange boy is embedding the US in another war in the Middle East, and you're celebrating that too?
Can someone please explain this reasoning? Because the only common link I can find is that Republicans don't actually care for strategy or consistency, they just fall in line and support whatever the person in power decides in the moment.
You people are practically frothing at the mouth for a chance to send someone else's children to fight in a war no one wants, to kill brown people that didn't want us there anyway. For what?
What war?
It's pretty simple. We don't want to be in the ME at all; however, we are there and if attacked we respond, as it should be. It really is that simple.
What War? You don't think assassinating a world leader isn't an act of war? Sending 3500 troops isn't mobilizing for war? Russia and China aligned with Iran and sharing interests eager to take advantage of an increasingly weak and ally-less US isn't mobilizing for war?
But that ignores my original point. I'm asking how do Republicans swallow the hypocrisy of abandoning the region in the name of "withdrawal" only to further entrench the US in that very region (regardless of what you want to call it) a month later? It makes absolutely zero sense.
RE: Iranian military commander General Soleimani killed in Baghdad strike
(01-03-2020 04:36 PM)stinkfist Wrote:
(01-03-2020 04:23 PM)Kruciff Wrote: Wasn't this board literally just celebrating the abandonment of our Kurdish allies to slaughter because it meant the US was withdrawing from the region?
Now your orange boy is embedding the US in another war in the Middle East, and you're celebrating that too?
Can someone please explain this reasoning? Because the only common link I can find is that Republicans don't actually care for strategy or consistency, they just fall in line and support whatever the person in power decides in the moment.
You people are practically frothing at the mouth for a chance to send someone else's children to fight in a war no one wants, to kill brown people that didn't want us there anyway. For what?
Ja, you've got it all figured out...
I challenge you to find a person on board that was looking for war...............................oh Ja, what war is he conceiving at this point.....
are you pining for cuck-dumb or ze pacifist in general....
do you really believe your end strategy as valid.....
ewe don't understand how DJT plays this one, does ya?
bull and horns......bull and horns....
he's going to splatter the masses w/o global concern if muh sandbags challenge.....
killing is a biatch.....the repercussions are much more on the other side....
stick with your stick-horsey-puckey.....and thank those with balls...
He's making the price of a war very high for Iran. They have been ratcheting up activity and crossed a line. Very different reaction than Red line Neville Obama.