Quote:Prob. of going 0 - 7 is almost very small, probably around 1%.
Given our latest years, and considering the matchups, I would Not aim for around 1%! I think there's a realistic shot for it. This is Not a good year for the MAC. Just sayin'. Ohio is not in the same position as the last two years to be the solo-winner.
2019: ?-? (tough matchups; Down Year for the MAC and Ohio isn't as good as yester-years' to feel safe to heroically prevent us from being winless like they did in the last two)
2018: 1-5 (+much more winnable matchups than this year; Ohio solo win)
2017: 1-4 (all losses a blowout; Ohio's win a blow-out though)
2016: 0-6 (WMU vs Wisconsin, respectable close game; Miami-OH surprisingly played Miss-St down to wire; all close except for CMU game)
2015: 3-4
2014: 2-3
2013: 0-5
2012: 2-5
2011: 4-1 (HELL YEAH! WMU only loser in a barn-burner vs Purdue)
2010: 2-2 (.500 -- Awesome for us)
2009: 1-4
2008: 0-5
2007: 0-3
So no, I wouldn't put 0-7 @ 1-2%. Trust me. I WISH it were those odds.
Quote:Thanks for posting the Las Vegas odds. I am not familiar with how all the odds making works, so I am just grabbing the odds off the scoreboard at Yahoo sports that seem to be updated rather frequently. Just updated them again now.
Here's the link. Updated thru the day:
https://www.vegasinsider.com/college-foo...las-vegas/
It shows opening odds, then the culmination of other main places for "the" odds for one to go by, while showing the other ones individually.
I would assume Ohio's didn't change for the same reason someone like myself raised an eyebrow to see they were a TD favorite. It's because Nevada's in a state of flux. They probably predicted right after the UNLV game, bad stuff would happen. Otherwise, I'd figure Nevada would be the favorite. So you shouldn't be too surprised it didn't shift, because, well, it was no surprise there'd be repercussions! :)