Hello There, Guest! (LoginRegister)

Thread Closed 
Trump Administration
Author Message
RiceLad15 Online
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 16,700
Joined: Nov 2009
Reputation: 111
I Root For: Rice Owls
Location: H-town
Post: #9641
RE: Trump Administration
(11-26-2019 05:48 PM)OptimisticOwl Wrote:  More bad news for Democrats:

New highs in all major indices today.

Should I post that comic again?
11-26-2019 05:50 PM
Find all posts by this user
OptimisticOwl Offline
Legend
*

Posts: 58,786
Joined: Apr 2005
Reputation: 857
I Root For: Rice
Location: DFW Metroplex

The Parliament AwardsNew Orleans BowlFootball GeniusCrappiesDonatorsDonators
Post: #9642
RE: Trump Administration
(11-26-2019 05:50 PM)RiceLad15 Wrote:  
(11-26-2019 05:48 PM)OptimisticOwl Wrote:  More bad news for Democrats:

New highs in all major indices today.

Should I post that comic again?

I wondered if you would. No problem, we know the mean temperature in 2188 is more important to you than jobs for Americans currently alive.

Stock indices are not, as CNN would have you believe, just a measure of how much richer the 1% is getting. It is an indicator of confidence and opportunity. It is a gauge of the economy.

So, yeah, go ahead. Never get tired of liberals doing meaningless things.
11-26-2019 05:56 PM
Find all posts by this user
tanqtonic Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 19,160
Joined: Nov 2016
Reputation: 775
I Root For: rice
Location:
Post: #9643
RE: Trump Administration
(11-26-2019 05:50 PM)RiceLad15 Wrote:  
(11-26-2019 05:48 PM)OptimisticOwl Wrote:  More bad news for Democrats:

New highs in all major indices today.

Should I post that comic again?

Which portion of the statement gives you the trigger to feel the urge to post a cartoon in return? Not snarky, just curious.
11-27-2019 03:13 AM
Find all posts by this user
Owl 69/70/75 Offline
Just an old rugby coach
*

Posts: 80,854
Joined: Sep 2005
Reputation: 3214
I Root For: RiceBathChelsea
Location: Montgomery, TX

DonatorsNew Orleans Bowl
Post: #9644
RE: Trump Administration
(11-26-2019 11:45 AM)RiceLad15 Wrote:  You have a grand misunderstanding of what environmentalists on the left advocate for if you think their entire focus is on reversing changes...

Quite frankly, I think the left's entire focus is on gaining ever more control, and climate change is just a means to that end.

Quote:And regarding the world ending, what a weird and transactional way to approach what could be a rather dire issue. So just because we can't pinpoint exactly when catastrophes will hit, we should not act? I see no other way to interpret that comment. Can you explain further?

I have a different construct. If we really think the world is going to end, then we should be doing big things that will have a material impact. If we merely want to use climate change as a lever to gain ever more control over the populace, then we should be doing the kinds of things that we are doing.
11-27-2019 07:20 AM
Find all posts by this user
RiceLad15 Online
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 16,700
Joined: Nov 2009
Reputation: 111
I Root For: Rice Owls
Location: H-town
Post: #9645
RE: Trump Administration
(11-27-2019 03:13 AM)tanqtonic Wrote:  
(11-26-2019 05:50 PM)RiceLad15 Wrote:  
(11-26-2019 05:48 PM)OptimisticOwl Wrote:  More bad news for Democrats:

New highs in all major indices today.

Should I post that comic again?

Which portion of the statement gives you the trigger to feel the urge to post a cartoon in return? Not snarky, just curious.

It’s like the third time in 3 days that OO has posted about the stock market, which isn’t an almighty indicator of economic health. It’s an indicator of shareholder value, which makes that comic spot on.
11-27-2019 07:34 AM
Find all posts by this user
RiceLad15 Online
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 16,700
Joined: Nov 2009
Reputation: 111
I Root For: Rice Owls
Location: H-town
Post: #9646
RE: Trump Administration
(11-27-2019 07:20 AM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  
(11-26-2019 11:45 AM)RiceLad15 Wrote:  You have a grand misunderstanding of what environmentalists on the left advocate for if you think their entire focus is on reversing changes...

Quite frankly, I think the left's entire focus is on gaining ever more control, and climate change is just a means to that end.

Quote:And regarding the world ending, what a weird and transactional way to approach what could be a rather dire issue. So just because we can't pinpoint exactly when catastrophes will hit, we should not act? I see no other way to interpret that comment. Can you explain further?

I have a different construct. If we really think the world is going to end, then we should be doing big things that will have a material impact. If we merely want to use climate change as a lever to gain ever more control over the populace, then we should be doing the kinds of things that we are doing.

A lot of people would agree with your second comment about doing big things - unfortunately, one political party won’t even agree that this issue exists, so doing big things isn’t possible at the federal level.
11-27-2019 07:37 AM
Find all posts by this user
Owl 69/70/75 Offline
Just an old rugby coach
*

Posts: 80,854
Joined: Sep 2005
Reputation: 3214
I Root For: RiceBathChelsea
Location: Montgomery, TX

DonatorsNew Orleans Bowl
Post: #9647
RE: Trump Administration
(11-27-2019 07:37 AM)RiceLad15 Wrote:  
(11-27-2019 07:20 AM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  
(11-26-2019 11:45 AM)RiceLad15 Wrote:  You have a grand misunderstanding of what environmentalists on the left advocate for if you think their entire focus is on reversing changes...
Quite frankly, I think the left's entire focus is on gaining ever more control, and climate change is just a means to that end.
Quote:And regarding the world ending, what a weird and transactional way to approach what could be a rather dire issue. So just because we can't pinpoint exactly when catastrophes will hit, we should not act? I see no other way to interpret that comment. Can you explain further?
I have a different construct. If we really think the world is going to end, then we should be doing big things that will have a material impact. If we merely want to use climate change as a lever to gain ever more control over the populace, then we should be doing the kinds of things that we are doing.
A lot of people would agree with your second comment about doing big things - unfortunately, one political party won’t even agree that this issue exists, so doing big things isn’t possible at the federal level.

But one thing that feeds that doubt is that for all the screaming about climate change, the screamers fall far short with any recommendations of what to do about it. Mandating moving off oil before any viable alternative exists strikes many of us as being far more about increasing control than about climate change.
11-27-2019 07:43 AM
Find all posts by this user
RiceLad15 Online
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 16,700
Joined: Nov 2009
Reputation: 111
I Root For: Rice Owls
Location: H-town
Post: #9648
RE: Trump Administration
(11-27-2019 07:43 AM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  
(11-27-2019 07:37 AM)RiceLad15 Wrote:  
(11-27-2019 07:20 AM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  
(11-26-2019 11:45 AM)RiceLad15 Wrote:  You have a grand misunderstanding of what environmentalists on the left advocate for if you think their entire focus is on reversing changes...
Quite frankly, I think the left's entire focus is on gaining ever more control, and climate change is just a means to that end.
Quote:And regarding the world ending, what a weird and transactional way to approach what could be a rather dire issue. So just because we can't pinpoint exactly when catastrophes will hit, we should not act? I see no other way to interpret that comment. Can you explain further?
I have a different construct. If we really think the world is going to end, then we should be doing big things that will have a material impact. If we merely want to use climate change as a lever to gain ever more control over the populace, then we should be doing the kinds of things that we are doing.
A lot of people would agree with your second comment about doing big things - unfortunately, one political party won’t even agree that this issue exists, so doing big things isn’t possible at the federal level.

But one thing that feeds that doubt is that for all the screaming about climate change, the screamers fall far short with any recommendations of what to do about it. Mandating moving off oil before any viable alternative exists strikes many of us as being far more about increasing control than about climate change.

But isn’t that a rather big move? Seems kinda cyclical to say no big things are suggested, and then follow up by chastising some for suggesting we move away from an oil and gas-based energy economy.
11-27-2019 08:14 AM
Find all posts by this user
tanqtonic Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 19,160
Joined: Nov 2016
Reputation: 775
I Root For: rice
Location:
Post: #9649
RE: Trump Administration
(11-27-2019 07:34 AM)RiceLad15 Wrote:  
(11-27-2019 03:13 AM)tanqtonic Wrote:  
(11-26-2019 05:50 PM)RiceLad15 Wrote:  
(11-26-2019 05:48 PM)OptimisticOwl Wrote:  More bad news for Democrats:

New highs in all major indices today.

Should I post that comic again?

Which portion of the statement gives you the trigger to feel the urge to post a cartoon in return? Not snarky, just curious.

It’s like the third time in 3 days that OO has posted about the stock market, which isn’t an almighty indicator of economic health. It’s an indicator of shareholder value, which makes that comic spot on.

It is actually an indicator of economic health, albeit indirect and not almighty. and one thar engenders widespread and common attention. Even your St Barry used it as such.

Now its bad to flaunt it for some, I guess.
11-27-2019 09:48 AM
Find all posts by this user
RiceLad15 Online
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 16,700
Joined: Nov 2009
Reputation: 111
I Root For: Rice Owls
Location: H-town
Post: #9650
RE: Trump Administration
(11-27-2019 09:48 AM)tanqtonic Wrote:  
(11-27-2019 07:34 AM)RiceLad15 Wrote:  
(11-27-2019 03:13 AM)tanqtonic Wrote:  
(11-26-2019 05:50 PM)RiceLad15 Wrote:  
(11-26-2019 05:48 PM)OptimisticOwl Wrote:  More bad news for Democrats:

New highs in all major indices today.

Should I post that comic again?

Which portion of the statement gives you the trigger to feel the urge to post a cartoon in return? Not snarky, just curious.

It’s like the third time in 3 days that OO has posted about the stock market, which isn’t an almighty indicator of economic health. It’s an indicator of shareholder value, which makes that comic spot on.

It is actually an indicator of economic health, albeit indirect and not almighty. and one thar engenders widespread and common attention. Even your St Barry used it as such.

Now its bad to flaunt it for some, I guess.

It isn’t bad, but even as you admit, it isn’t the be all end all. So continuing to see OO post his comments about the record highs, without other economic indicators or comments about other important issues makes me think of that comic. The comic comments about the single-mindedness that the post gets to - focusing on shareholder value/economic health to the exclusion of other issues.
11-27-2019 10:05 AM
Find all posts by this user
tanqtonic Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 19,160
Joined: Nov 2016
Reputation: 775
I Root For: rice
Location:
Post: #9651
RE: Trump Administration
(11-27-2019 10:05 AM)RiceLad15 Wrote:  
(11-27-2019 09:48 AM)tanqtonic Wrote:  
(11-27-2019 07:34 AM)RiceLad15 Wrote:  
(11-27-2019 03:13 AM)tanqtonic Wrote:  
(11-26-2019 05:50 PM)RiceLad15 Wrote:  Should I post that comic again?

Which portion of the statement gives you the trigger to feel the urge to post a cartoon in return? Not snarky, just curious.

It’s like the third time in 3 days that OO has posted about the stock market, which isn’t an almighty indicator of economic health. It’s an indicator of shareholder value, which makes that comic spot on.

It is actually an indicator of economic health, albeit indirect and not almighty. and one thar engenders widespread and common attention. Even your St Barry used it as such.

Now its bad to flaunt it for some, I guess.

It isn’t bad, but even as you admit, it isn’t the be all end all. So continuing to see OO post his comments about the record highs, without other economic indicators or comments about other important issues makes me think of that comic. The comic comments about the single-mindedness that the post gets to - focusing on shareholder value/economic health to the exclusion of other issues.

Please do tell what other requirements (should) exist in your world for a fiduciary duty of a company?

To be honest, I expect some litany of progressive current paeans, and 'outcome specific' items here.

But yes, entities at their core have a single specific fiduciary duty. When you stop and think about it, it makes a crapload of sense.

And your comic only seeminly highlights the lefts active hate on companies and commerce at this point, with the cute little tagline that it happens to be in an arena that is super-important to you and your side.

Yes, companies do not have duties to *your* pet issue. For good reason. One bright enough can see a way to fold in that very simple, very cogent reason for a fiduciary duty to enable your pet outcome; as opposed to tossing out a snarkfest on how fing *dare* a company doesnt share that duty. That is, exemplified by the cartoon and by your tossing it out there.

Not even to mention the core issue with that particular POV put forth both by George recently and by me ad infinitum -- that there is a metric ton of uncertainty in the conjectures put forth by a AGW community in the scope of effects of the AGW activity. But, why let that little issue ruin a cartoon, I guess.

Yes, OO doesnt see *your* important issues as his. Instead of accepting that subjectiveness in differences of importance, apparently it is fine to simply (in a little bit of a mealy mouth manner) talk about *your* 'other important issues.'

Not meaning to be combative, but simply noting that OO has you doing a kneejerk dance as only he can do, seemingly. (I initially typed 'though', but restrained myself in light of our earlier interactions).
11-27-2019 10:31 AM
Find all posts by this user
OptimisticOwl Offline
Legend
*

Posts: 58,786
Joined: Apr 2005
Reputation: 857
I Root For: Rice
Location: DFW Metroplex

The Parliament AwardsNew Orleans BowlFootball GeniusCrappiesDonatorsDonators
Post: #9652
RE: Trump Administration
(11-27-2019 10:05 AM)RiceLad15 Wrote:  
(11-27-2019 09:48 AM)tanqtonic Wrote:  
(11-27-2019 07:34 AM)RiceLad15 Wrote:  
(11-27-2019 03:13 AM)tanqtonic Wrote:  
(11-26-2019 05:50 PM)RiceLad15 Wrote:  Should I post that comic again?

Which portion of the statement gives you the trigger to feel the urge to post a cartoon in return? Not snarky, just curious.

It’s like the third time in 3 days that OO has posted about the stock market, which isn’t an almighty indicator of economic health. It’s an indicator of shareholder value, which makes that comic spot on.

It is actually an indicator of economic health, albeit indirect and not almighty. and one thar engenders widespread and common attention. Even your St Barry used it as such.

Now its bad to flaunt it for some, I guess.

It isn’t bad, but even as you admit, it isn’t the be all end all. So continuing to see OO post his comments about the record highs, without other economic indicators or comments about other important issues makes me think of that comic. The comic comments about the single-mindedness that the post gets to - focusing on shareholder value/economic health to the exclusion of other issues.

I guess the idea that I am focusing on shareholder wealth comes from somewhere inside you, as it most certainly is NOT what I am doing.

I am calling attention to the continuing economic well being of our country. I
am calling attention to the good economy. I have told you this outright before, but you insist om trying to pin that false narrative on me.

It's like taking the patient's temperature. Temperature is an indication of health. Not the only one, not even, often, the best one. But a simple one that most people understand.

Same with the Dow. You yourself listed a long list of other economic indicators - unemployment, for example. But apparently you take umbrage at people who drive the economy doing well. And at people saying that things are going well.

It's not just the stockholders who do well. It is an indicator of people all through the economy doing well.

I point out the rise in the market as an indicator that Trump's policies are doing well for Americans.

I also point out that Democratic strategists are hoping for a fall in the market and in the economy before Election Day, 2020, as it will enhance their chances of unseating him.

Your stupid little cartoon presupposes that I and others like me care only about shareholder gains to the exclusion of all other problems we face.

Clearly not true, and it there is anything we have learned in the Trump era, it is that anything not true is a lie.

Yeah, we have climate change. Had it before, many times. The Sahara used to be be lush grasslands, and now it is a desert. Antarctica used to be jungle. The Viking used to grow grapes on Vinland, now known as Greenland. Glaciers used to cover half of North america, and there used to be a land bridge between Siberia and Alaska. Then came climate change.

Now come climate change again. The main difference now is that the people portion of said change is larger.

If instead of mentioning the Dow, if I said black unemployment was down, would you take the same offense at me pointing out ONE indicator of economic health, rather than the whole panoply? I think your problem is with THIS indicator. I think your problem is that it could be seen as putting Trump in a good light. I doubt you would have taken so much offence had I posted the Dow in 2015.

I think we have some difference in our basic outlooks. I think you care more about the people in 2188, and I care more about those in 2019. I think you believe in man caused climate change, and I think it is largely natural. I think you believe it can be cured by man's actions, and I think they are futile.

So, we have JMHO vs. JYHO.

Isn't that what this forum is for?

Not unusual for left wingers to think of the Dow as something of interest only to tux-wearing Richie Rich types. But I don't wear a tux. I look at the Dow as one measure of economic health among many. I don't care about shareholder wealth except for the shares I own, directly or indirectly.

Now that I have explained myself to you once again, I wonder how the Dow is doing today.
(This post was last modified: 11-27-2019 11:01 AM by OptimisticOwl.)
11-27-2019 10:58 AM
Find all posts by this user
OptimisticOwl Offline
Legend
*

Posts: 58,786
Joined: Apr 2005
Reputation: 857
I Root For: Rice
Location: DFW Metroplex

The Parliament AwardsNew Orleans BowlFootball GeniusCrappiesDonatorsDonators
Post: #9653
RE: Trump Administration
Dow is up just a small amount at this point, but of course, anything up from yesterday is a new record. Still indicating optimism about the future of the economy.

I hear unemployment is still down and business is till booming, too. The construction around here of new building and development of of land continues.
Lots of people working and making money. Good times.

I hope that covers enough not to upset Lad.
11-27-2019 01:37 PM
Find all posts by this user
OptimisticOwl Offline
Legend
*

Posts: 58,786
Joined: Apr 2005
Reputation: 857
I Root For: Rice
Location: DFW Metroplex

The Parliament AwardsNew Orleans BowlFootball GeniusCrappiesDonatorsDonators
Post: #9654
RE: Trump Administration
Dow DOWN today in early action.

I am for some reason reminded of Elizabeth Warren throwing her arms in the air. SCORE!!

Heard this song yesterday: For some reason, I was reminded of Lad.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aMY-GZYAyIU

"In the year 9595
I'm kinda wonderin', if man is gonna be alive
He's taken everything this old Earth can give
And he ain't put back nothing"

Circa 1969. One of my mother's (and my) favorite songs.
(This post was last modified: 11-29-2019 10:52 AM by OptimisticOwl.)
11-29-2019 10:49 AM
Find all posts by this user
OptimisticOwl Offline
Legend
*

Posts: 58,786
Joined: Apr 2005
Reputation: 857
I Root For: Rice
Location: DFW Metroplex

The Parliament AwardsNew Orleans BowlFootball GeniusCrappiesDonatorsDonators
Post: #9655
RE: Trump Administration
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/...ar-BBXyLQc

“...fears that the information would be used “maliciously” by the media...”

Seems Hunter and Trump think alike.
(This post was last modified: 12-01-2019 11:40 AM by OptimisticOwl.)
12-01-2019 11:37 AM
Find all posts by this user
RiceLad15 Online
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 16,700
Joined: Nov 2009
Reputation: 111
I Root For: Rice Owls
Location: H-town
Post: #9656
RE: Trump Administration
(12-01-2019 11:37 AM)OptimisticOwl Wrote:  https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/...ar-BBXyLQc

“...fears that the information would be used “maliciously” by the media...”

Seems Hunter and Trump think alike.

Big difference is one decided to run for President and one happens to be the child of a politician. Are we now supposed to be scrutinizing the children of politicians who are not working for the admin?
12-01-2019 02:54 PM
Find all posts by this user
OptimisticOwl Offline
Legend
*

Posts: 58,786
Joined: Apr 2005
Reputation: 857
I Root For: Rice
Location: DFW Metroplex

The Parliament AwardsNew Orleans BowlFootball GeniusCrappiesDonatorsDonators
Post: #9657
RE: Trump Administration
(12-01-2019 02:54 PM)RiceLad15 Wrote:  
(12-01-2019 11:37 AM)OptimisticOwl Wrote:  https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/...ar-BBXyLQc

“...fears that the information would be used “maliciously” by the media...”

Seems Hunter and Trump think alike.

Big difference is one decided to run for President and one happens to be the child of a politician. Are we now supposed to be scrutinizing the children of politicians who are not working for the admin?

Defensive much?

Just pointing out that Hunter has fears that the media would revel in the innuendo and misinterpretation of his financial details, exactly what I said Trump was probably worried about four years ago when he declined to publish his tax returns. Always interesting to see the shoe on the other foot. Always interesting, also, to see how people can rationalize being for one and against the other.

Personally, I think both Hunter and Trump are right. Preserve your privacy.

Apparently Hunter doesn't want his Ukraine money to be used for child support. That is less laudable. But I don't know what is being asked.
(This post was last modified: 12-01-2019 07:00 PM by OptimisticOwl.)
12-01-2019 06:30 PM
Find all posts by this user
OptimisticOwl Offline
Legend
*

Posts: 58,786
Joined: Apr 2005
Reputation: 857
I Root For: Rice
Location: DFW Metroplex

The Parliament AwardsNew Orleans BowlFootball GeniusCrappiesDonatorsDonators
Post: #9658
RE: Trump Administration
12-03-2019 12:51 AM
Find all posts by this user
OptimisticOwl Offline
Legend
*

Posts: 58,786
Joined: Apr 2005
Reputation: 857
I Root For: Rice
Location: DFW Metroplex

The Parliament AwardsNew Orleans BowlFootball GeniusCrappiesDonatorsDonators
Post: #9659
RE: Trump Administration
12-03-2019 01:11 PM
Find all posts by this user
tanqtonic Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 19,160
Joined: Nov 2016
Reputation: 775
I Root For: rice
Location:
Post: #9660
RE: Trump Administration
Anybody else a little disturbed that the elected members of Congress are using secret subpoenas to obtain, and then release to the public at large, the call records of political opponents and reporters?
12-05-2019 10:56 AM
Find all posts by this user
Thread Closed 




User(s) browsing this thread: 3 Guest(s)


Copyright © 2002-2024 Collegiate Sports Nation Bulletin Board System (CSNbbs), All Rights Reserved.
CSNbbs is an independent fan site and is in no way affiliated to the NCAA or any of the schools and conferences it represents.
This site monetizes links. FTC Disclosure.
We allow third-party companies to serve ads and/or collect certain anonymous information when you visit our web site. These companies may use non-personally identifiable information (e.g., click stream information, browser type, time and date, subject of advertisements clicked or scrolled over) during your visits to this and other Web sites in order to provide advertisements about goods and services likely to be of greater interest to you. These companies typically use a cookie or third party web beacon to collect this information. To learn more about this behavioral advertising practice or to opt-out of this type of advertising, you can visit http://www.networkadvertising.org.
Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2024 MyBB Group.