https://www.yahoo.com/gma/ukraine-whistl...52944.html

Quote:The first Ukraine whistleblower has offered through their legal team to answer congressional Republicans' written questions directly to them and under penalty of perjury,

Flip flop SAD

Why not do it in person? What does this person fear?

(11-04-2019 11:28 AM)cb4029 Wrote:  https://www.yahoo.com/gma/ukraine-whistl...52944.html

Quote:The first Ukraine whistleblower has offered through their legal team to answer congressional Republicans' written questions directly to them and under penalty of perjury,

Flip flop SAD

Trump is the target. The whistleblower is the accuser. Trump doesn’t have to say a word. The accuser doesn’t have that option.

Exactly, when you are throwing out accusations be prepared to have to back them up

How do you ask a follow-up or ask for clarity to a written answer?


More from Hee-Haw "news".

Sad.

(11-04-2019 04:22 PM)JMUDunk Wrote:  How do you ask a follow-up or ask for clarity to a written answer?


More from Hee-Haw "news".

Sad.

Ask trump. Ya know...the point of this thread.

(11-04-2019 04:25 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(11-04-2019 04:22 PM)JMUDunk Wrote:  How do you ask a follow-up or ask for clarity to a written answer?


More from Hee-Haw "news".

Sad.

Ask trump. Ya know...the point of this thread.

Again---he's the target. He doesnt have to say a word. Not one. The burden of proof lies with the accuser. Pretty basic stuff---but by all means carry on with yet another fake news narrative that conflates the two as being "the same". Meanwhile, the parade of witness's trying to spin a phone call we can all read continues. I love how the press pretends the phone call transcript doesn't exist or that the identity of the so called "whistle blower" is still secret.

(11-04-2019 04:34 PM)Attackcoog Wrote:  

(11-04-2019 04:25 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(11-04-2019 04:22 PM)JMUDunk Wrote:  How do you ask a follow-up or ask for clarity to a written answer?


More from Hee-Haw "news".

Sad.

Ask trump. Ya know...the point of this thread.

Again---he's the target. He doesnt have to say a word. Not one. The burden of proof lies with the accuser. Pretty basic stuff---but by all means carry on with yet another fake news narrative that conflates the two as being "the same". Meanwhile, the parade of witness's trying to spin a phone call we can all read continues. I love how the press pretends the phone call transcript doesn't exist or that the identity of the so called "whistle blower" is still secret.

Neither of these understand the concept....falls on deaf ears....

.
There's no Flip Flop at all.

How 2nd hand information can be used is beyond the pale.

Are they going to allow 2nd hand information to be able to rebut that?

The person in question is so politically biased it's almost as if he was planted by the Obama Administration to disrupt any future common everyday actions that any President might take.

It's so Kafkaesque

The Beltway's 'Whistleblower' Furor Obsesses Over One Name

Quote:.
On the Internet, meanwhile, Ciaramella's name for weeks has been bandied about on Twitter feeds and intelligence blogs as the suspected person who blew the whistle on the president. The mainstream media are also aware of his name.

“Everyone knows who he is. CNN knows. The Washington Post knows. The New York Times knows. Congress knows. The White House knows. Even the president knows who he is,” said Fred Fleitz, a former CIA analyst and national security adviser to Trump, who has fielded dozens of calls from the media.

Yet a rare hush has swept across the Potomac. The usually gossipy nation’s capital remains uncharacteristically — and curiously — mum, especially considering the magnitude of this story, only the fourth presidential impeachment inquiry in U.S. history.

Trump supporters blame the conspiracy of silence on a “corrupt” and "biased” media trying to protect the whistleblower from justified scrutiny of his political motives. They also complain Democrats have falsely claimed that exposing his identity would violate whistleblower protections, even though the relevant statute provides limited, not blanket, anonymity – and doesn’t cover press disclosures. His Democrat attorneys, meanwhile, have warned that outing him would put him and his family “at risk of harm," although government security personnel have been assigned to protect him.

“They’re hiding him,” Fleitz asserted. “They’re hiding him because of his political bias."

A CIA officer specializing in Russia and Ukraine, Ciaramella was detailed over to the National Security Council from the agency in the summer of 2015, working under Susan Rice, President Obama’s national security adviser. He also worked closely with the former vice president.

.

The hiding of this guy should tell even Commi Tom what the deal is here. Even the media doesn’t want him having to answer questions. But you know what, he’s going to have to. Schiffty will also have some questions to answer since the democrats have made congressmen subject to depositions now. Oh how the idiots changing of precedent comes back as bad karma once again....

(11-04-2019 11:46 PM)SoMs Eagle Wrote:  The hiding of this guy should tell even Commi Tom what the deal is here. Even the media doesn’t want him having to answer questions. But you know what, he’s going to have to. Schiffty will also have some questions to answer since the democrats have made congressmen subject to depositions now. Oh how the idiots changing of precedent comes back as bad karma once again....

Im still trying to figure out why a guy with second hand information on a phone call he didnt actually hear---but we can all read---is even relevant anymore. Other than proving he is a complete and total partisan who also has direct connections to the Russia Russia Russia hoax players---I see little value in his testimony. I guess the fact he would be so easy to embarrass during a public hearing makes him a really juicy target for the Republicans (especially since this who clown show is based on this political hack).

(11-05-2019 12:24 AM)Attackcoog Wrote:  

(11-04-2019 11:46 PM)SoMs Eagle Wrote:  The hiding of this guy should tell even Commi Tom what the deal is here. Even the media doesn’t want him having to answer questions. But you know what, he’s going to have to. Schiffty will also have some questions to answer since the democrats have made congressmen subject to depositions now. Oh how the idiots changing of precedent comes back as bad karma once again....

Im still trying to figure out why a guy with second hand information on a phone call he didnt actually hear---but we can all read---is even relevant anymore. Other than proving he is a complete and total partisan who also has direct connections to the Russia Russia Russia hoax players---I see little value in his testimony. I guess the fact he would be so easy to embarrass during a public hearing makes him a really juicy target for the Republicans (especially since this who clown show is based on this political hack).

At some point there has to be accountability. The average American understands accountability. Without an observable, shown on tv, reckoning this guy will have skated. All cards on the table is the gamblers creed....

(11-04-2019 06:27 PM)SoMs Eagle Wrote:  

(11-04-2019 04:34 PM)Attackcoog Wrote:  

(11-04-2019 04:25 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(11-04-2019 04:22 PM)JMUDunk Wrote:  How do you ask a follow-up or ask for clarity to a written answer?


More from Hee-Haw "news".

Sad.

Ask trump. Ya know...the point of this thread.

Again---he's the target. He doesnt have to say a word. Not one. The burden of proof lies with the accuser. Pretty basic stuff---but by all means carry on with yet another fake news narrative that conflates the two as being "the same". Meanwhile, the parade of witness's trying to spin a phone call we can all read continues. I love how the press pretends the phone call transcript doesn't exist or that the identity of the so called "whistle blower" is still secret.

Neither of these understand the concept....falls on deaf ears....

at least Mach had his moments in the sun (both good and bad)...

ask commie tommie how his redwings are doing this year.... hint: about as good as the donks will fare in today's elections in the 'sip (even with Hood getting a huge last minute influx of late money)...

(11-05-2019 12:24 AM)Attackcoog Wrote:  

(11-04-2019 11:46 PM)SoMs Eagle Wrote:  The hiding of this guy should tell even Commi Tom what the deal is here. Even the media doesn’t want him having to answer questions. But you know what, he’s going to have to. Schiffty will also have some questions to answer since the democrats have made congressmen subject to depositions now. Oh how the idiots changing of precedent comes back as bad karma once again....

Im still trying to figure out why a guy with second hand information on a phone call he didnt actually hear---but we can all read---is even relevant anymore. Other than proving he is a complete and total partisan who also has direct connections to the Russia Russia Russia hoax players---I see little value in his testimony. I guess the fact he would be so easy to embarrass during a public hearing makes him a really juicy target for the Republicans (especially since this who clown show is based on this political hack).

XACLY!

#irreverentPlusIrrelevant

Democrats decide they no longer like reality...

(11-05-2019 08:08 AM)49RFootballNow Wrote:  Democrats decide they no longer like reality...

Democrats decided long ago to impeach Trump. Now they are just fabricating the "crime " to fit the narrative. They know their followers will believe even if they read the transcript.

(11-05-2019 08:32 AM)VA49er Wrote:  

(11-05-2019 08:08 AM)49RFootballNow Wrote:  Democrats decide they no longer like reality...

Democrats decided long ago to impeach Trump. Now they are just fabricating the "crime " to fit the narrative. They know their followers will believe even if they read the transcript.

#ourTurnPal

just got finished voting before I hit the field....it's a nice feeling on the skin both in temperament and the flesh...

(11-05-2019 08:50 AM)stinkfist Wrote:  

(11-05-2019 08:32 AM)VA49er Wrote:  

(11-05-2019 08:08 AM)49RFootballNow Wrote:  Democrats decide they no longer like reality...

Democrats decided long ago to impeach Trump. Now they are just fabricating the "crime " to fit the narrative. They know their followers will believe even if they read the transcript.

#ourTurnPal

just got finished voting before I hit the field....it's a nice feeling on the skin both in temperament and the flesh...

Voted this morning myself. It was early so lines weren't long. Hopefully it picks up as the day goes by........

Democrats start stupid nonsensical threads, get abused, and slink back to off to yahoo news to figure out where they went wrong. Idiots gonna idiot....

(11-04-2019 10:11 PM)Cletus Wrote:  .
There's no Flip Flop at all.

How 2nd hand information can be used is beyond the pale.

Are they going to allow 2nd hand information to be able to rebut that?

The person in question is so politically biased it's almost as if he was planted by the Obama Administration to disrupt any future common everyday actions that any President might take.

It's so Kafkaesque

The Beltway's 'Whistleblower' Furor Obsesses Over One Name

Quote:.
On the Internet, meanwhile, Ciaramella's name for weeks has been bandied about on Twitter feeds and intelligence blogs as the suspected person who blew the whistle on the president. The mainstream media are also aware of his name.

“Everyone knows who he is. CNN knows. The Washington Post knows. The New York Times knows. Congress knows. The White House knows. Even the president knows who he is,” said Fred Fleitz, a former CIA analyst and national security adviser to Trump, who has fielded dozens of calls from the media.

Yet a rare hush has swept across the Potomac. The usually gossipy nation’s capital remains uncharacteristically — and curiously — mum, especially considering the magnitude of this story, only the fourth presidential impeachment inquiry in U.S. history.

Trump supporters blame the conspiracy of silence on a “corrupt” and "biased” media trying to protect the whistleblower from justified scrutiny of his political motives. They also complain Democrats have falsely claimed that exposing his identity would violate whistleblower protections, even though the relevant statute provides limited, not blanket, anonymity – and doesn’t cover press disclosures. His Democrat attorneys, meanwhile, have warned that outing him would put him and his family “at risk of harm," although government security personnel have been assigned to protect him.

“They’re hiding him,” Fleitz asserted. “They’re hiding him because of his political bias."

A CIA officer specializing in Russia and Ukraine, Ciaramella was detailed over to the National Security Council from the agency in the summer of 2015, working under Susan Rice, President Obama’s national security adviser. He also worked closely with the former vice president.

.

Second hand information is totally allowed in the WB process. It's right there on the ******* form!

And if you overhear someone in a bar hiring someone for a murder and report it to the police, they take that information and investigate it. You don't need to show any further information.

Not to mention the WB report matches up quite nicely with the released portions of the actual phone "transcript" from the White House.