Jim Jordan Just Annihilates Mueller On Bias And Raises Another Problem With The Investigation

So not only didn’t Mueller charge Joseph Mifsud, but there’s evidence Mifsud worked for western intelligence despite them trying to suggest he was a Russian connected contact.

(07-24-2019 10:19 PM)Kronke Wrote:  

(07-24-2019 10:27 PM)usmbacker Wrote:  Jim Jordan Just Annihilates Mueller On Bias And Raises Another Problem With The Investigation

So not only didn’t Mueller charge Joseph Mifsud, but there’s evidence Mifsud worked for western intelligence despite them trying to suggest he was a Russian connected contact.

But but but Mueller is a war hero.

So was Benedict Arnold.....until he wasnt

(07-24-2019 08:43 PM)CG_Hawk06 Wrote:  

(07-24-2019 06:38 PM)CrimsonPhantom Wrote:  

Because he didn’t write the report.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

That became painfully obvious pretty quickly.

So, even the hired henchmen couldn’t find anything worth a damn. Hunh

(07-24-2019 10:27 PM)usmbacker Wrote:  Jim Jordan Just Annihilates Mueller On Bias And Raises Another Problem With The Investigation

So not only didn’t Mueller charge Joseph Mifsud, but there’s evidence Mifsud worked for western intelligence despite them trying to suggest he was a Russian connected contact.

Mueller said it was classified. I wondered why no one I listened to brought that up. It may have been the biggest blunder of his testimony.

(07-25-2019 08:16 AM)SoMs Eagle Wrote:  

(07-24-2019 10:27 PM)usmbacker Wrote:  Jim Jordan Just Annihilates Mueller On Bias And Raises Another Problem With The Investigation

So not only didn’t Mueller charge Joseph Mifsud, but there’s evidence Mifsud worked for western intelligence despite them trying to suggest he was a Russian connected contact.

Mueller said it was classified. I wondered why no one I listened to brought that up. It may have been the biggest blunder of his testimony.

Most people in DC aren't very smart. And the ones who are live in a bubble and are clueless to reality.

I'll bet Michael Moore sat on his couch watching the Mueller debacle yesterday while stuffing about 18 Big Macs into his fat gut

(07-24-2019 10:27 PM)usmbacker Wrote:  Jim Jordan Just Annihilates Mueller On Bias And Raises Another Problem With The Investigation

So not only didn’t Mueller charge Joseph Mifsud, but there’s evidence Mifsud worked for western intelligence despite them trying to suggest he was a Russian connected contact.

That's the strong possibility. It was an inside job from day one.

(07-25-2019 09:02 AM)SuperFlyBCat Wrote:  

What the eff is it with discredited Hollyweird types anyway?

(07-25-2019 08:16 AM)SoMs Eagle Wrote:  

(07-24-2019 10:27 PM)usmbacker Wrote:  Jim Jordan Just Annihilates Mueller On Bias And Raises Another Problem With The Investigation

So not only didn’t Mueller charge Joseph Mifsud, but there’s evidence Mifsud worked for western intelligence despite them trying to suggest he was a Russian connected contact.

Mueller said it was classified. I wondered why no one I listened to brought that up. It may have been the biggest blunder of his testimony.

Jordan has taken over the role of Trey Gowdy, love it.

(07-25-2019 09:22 AM)TigerBlue4Ever Wrote:  

(07-25-2019 08:16 AM)SoMs Eagle Wrote:  

(07-24-2019 10:27 PM)usmbacker Wrote:  Jim Jordan Just Annihilates Mueller On Bias And Raises Another Problem With The Investigation

So not only didn’t Mueller charge Joseph Mifsud, but there’s evidence Mifsud worked for western intelligence despite them trying to suggest he was a Russian connected contact.

Mueller said it was classified. I wondered why no one I listened to brought that up. It may have been the biggest blunder of his testimony.

Jordan has taken over the role of Trey Gowdy, love it.

I look for Gowdy to be involved with this Administration some time in the future.

Guilty conscience? https://pjmedia.com/rogerlsimon/does-a-g...testimony/
"...He has a guilty conscience.

He should. And not just because Peter Strzok texted to his paramour what feels like decades ago that there was "no there there." Anyone with an IQ in the proverbial triple digits has known that for a long time. (How distant it seems, months, years, that Dianne Feinstein was asked about the collusion/conspiracy— pick one — and admitted there was none.)


Mueller, unless he was living on Pluto, knew this. And somewhere, deep down, a part of him, an increasingly significant part, I suspect, must have realized what he was doing was wrong. (Besides his demeanor, this may also explain why he gave up on interviewing Trump.)

This guilty conscience was made manifest in the many questions he claimed he could not or would not answer on the subject of the predicate for his investigation. As the world knows, more and more it is becoming clear that the entire Russia probe was a put-up job. Mueller's awkward answers and body-language responding to the questions about why Joseph Mifsud, the mysterious Maltese "professor" of dubious alliances, was not prosecuted for his multiple lies when so many others were was particularly telling....

I notice that some commenters think I am excusing Mueller's execrable behavior in the past (anthrax case, etc.) by saying he has a guilty conscience. I didn't intend that in the slightest. I never bought the heroic image of Muelller. He is and was a pompous creep who ran over people. But the human mind is a complex animal. Many things happen at once. People like Mueller and Comey think they are good, which makes them all the more dangerous. In the case of Mueller, I suspect something was beginning to impinge on that--call it a guilty conscience or whatever, an uncomfortable truth-and he started to disintegrate in the tradition of the witch in the Wizard of Oz. That's what we saw today...."

For those who missed it yesterday, this short piece by the babylon bee pretty much sums up the day.

https://babylonbee.com/news/i-am-still-s...n-a-banana

(07-25-2019 10:42 AM)bullet Wrote:  Guilty conscience? https://pjmedia.com/rogerlsimon/does-a-g...testimony/
"...He has a guilty conscience.
He should. And not just because Peter Strzok texted to his paramour what feels like decades ago that there was "no there there." Anyone with an IQ in the proverbial triple digits has known that for a long time. (How distant it seems, months, years, that Dianne Feinstein was asked about the collusion/conspiracy— pick one — and admitted there was none.)
Mueller, unless he was living on Pluto, knew this. And somewhere, deep down, a part of him, an increasingly significant part, I suspect, must have realized what he was doing was wrong. (Besides his demeanor, this may also explain why he gave up on interviewing Trump.)
This guilty conscience was made manifest in the many questions he claimed he could not or would not answer on the subject of the predicate for his investigation. As the world knows, more and more it is becoming clear that the entire Russia probe was a put-up job. Mueller's awkward answers and body-language responding to the questions about why Joseph Mifsud, the mysterious Maltese "professor" of dubious alliances, was not prosecuted for his multiple lies when so many others were was particularly telling....
I notice that some commenters think I am excusing Mueller's execrable behavior in the past (anthrax case, etc.) by saying he has a guilty conscience. I didn't intend that in the slightest. I never bought the heroic image of Muelller. He is and was a pompous creep who ran over people. But the human mind is a complex animal. Many things happen at once. People like Mueller and Comey think they are good, which makes them all the more dangerous. In the case of Mueller, I suspect something was beginning to impinge on that--call it a guilty conscience or whatever, an uncomfortable truth-and he started to disintegrate in the tradition of the witch in the Wizard of Oz. That's what we saw today...."

He certainly did not come across as "Bobby Three Sticks" yesterday, He reminded me of ADM Stockdale at the 1992 VP debate.

Before the Mueller Investigation:

Libs: Trump is guilty.
Cons: Trump is innocent.

During the investigation:

Libs: Trump is guilty.
Cons: Trump is innocent.

After the Report is issued:

Libs: Trump is guilty?
Cons: Trump is innocent.

After Bob's first press conference:

Libs: Trump is guilty?
Cons: Trump is innocent.


After yesterday:

Libs: Trump is guilty?
Cons: Trump is innocent!

(07-25-2019 12:21 PM)gdunn Wrote:  Before the Mueller Investigation:

Libs: Trump is guilty.
Cons: Trump is innocent.

During the investigation:

Libs: Trump is guilty.
Cons: Trump is innocent.

After the Report is issued:

Libs: Trump is guilty?
Cons: Trump is innocent.

After Bob's first press conference:

Libs: Trump is guilty?
Cons: Trump is innocent.


After yesterday:

Libs: Trump is guilty?
Cons: Trump is innocent!

Today

Cons: I'm exhausted from winning!
Libs: We're f*cked in 2020
Mueller: Did I leave my banana phone on the desk?

Dems went "all in" on this. With this outcome, that could backfire big-time on them in 2020. Americans don't like unfairness. There could be a backlash.

I think that's why so many democrats are doubling down. They've gone this far, they may have to cling to hope that somehow, some way, there will be an 11th hour Hail Mary that comes through. I don't know which strategy makes more sense--ride this dead horse or change horses in mid-stream.

If the Barr probe of the origins of the "investigation" turns up anything substantive, it could be Trump in a rout in 2020.

(07-25-2019 12:24 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

(07-25-2019 12:21 PM)gdunn Wrote:  Before the Mueller Investigation:

Libs: Trump is guilty.
Cons: Trump is innocent.

During the investigation:

Libs: Trump is guilty.
Cons: Trump is innocent.

After the Report is issued:

Libs: Trump is guilty?
Cons: Trump is innocent.

After Bob's first press conference:

Libs: Trump is guilty?
Cons: Trump is innocent.


After yesterday:

Libs: Trump is guilty?
Cons: Trump is innocent!

Today

Cons: I'm exhausted from winning!
Libs: We're f*cked in 2020
Mueller: Did I leave my banana phone on the desk?