Susan Rice ordered to answer questions by judge

A federal judge ruled Tuesday that former national security adviser Susan Rice and former deputy national security adviser Ben Rhodes must answer written questions about the State Department's response to the deadly 2012 terror attack in Benghazi, Libya, as part of an ongoing legal battle over whether Hillary Clinton sought to deliberately evade public record laws by using a private email server while secretary of state.

Good!

Yeah...good. Maybe you guys will finally realize that the only bad actors here were the killers. Maybe?

(01-16-2019 02:33 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  Yeah...good. Maybe you guys will finally realize that the only bad actors here were the killers. Maybe?

But you're surely not opposed to running down rabbit holes, right?

(01-16-2019 02:34 PM)umbluegray Wrote:  

(01-16-2019 02:33 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  Yeah...good. Maybe you guys will finally realize that the only bad actors here were the killers. Maybe?

But you're surely not opposed to running down rabbit holes, right?

Huh?

Investigate til your hearts content...but just to waste money, not a big fan of that.

It will be nice to get Susan Rice to admit where the talking points came from...

(01-16-2019 02:36 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(01-16-2019 02:34 PM)umbluegray Wrote:  

(01-16-2019 02:33 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  Yeah...good. Maybe you guys will finally realize that the only bad actors here were the killers. Maybe?

But you're surely not opposed to running down rabbit holes, right?

Huh?

Investigate til your hearts content...but just to waste money, not a big fan of that.

Anyone else sense the irony?

Sadly this is just a civil suit so we will not get to spike the football and claim victory over process crimes like the leftists and Mueller Investigation.

(01-16-2019 02:36 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(01-16-2019 02:34 PM)umbluegray Wrote:  

(01-16-2019 02:33 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  Yeah...good. Maybe you guys will finally realize that the only bad actors here were the killers. Maybe?

But you're surely not opposed to running down rabbit holes, right?

Huh?

Investigate til your hearts content...but just to waste money, not a big fan of that.

Me, either. But I know the left can't get enough of the anti-climactic, no surprise Mueller investigation, so I just assumed...

(01-16-2019 02:51 PM)VA49er Wrote:  

(01-16-2019 02:36 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(01-16-2019 02:34 PM)umbluegray Wrote:  

(01-16-2019 02:33 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  Yeah...good. Maybe you guys will finally realize that the only bad actors here were the killers. Maybe?

But you're surely not opposed to running down rabbit holes, right?

Huh?

Investigate til your hearts content...but just to waste money, not a big fan of that.

Anyone else sense the irony?

I'm pretty sure it just b!tch-slapped me.

My jaw dropped, then woke the dog with the hearty chuckle.

(01-16-2019 03:14 PM)umbluegray Wrote:  

(01-16-2019 02:36 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(01-16-2019 02:34 PM)umbluegray Wrote:  

(01-16-2019 02:33 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  Yeah...good. Maybe you guys will finally realize that the only bad actors here were the killers. Maybe?

But you're surely not opposed to running down rabbit holes, right?

Huh?

Investigate til your hearts content...but just to waste money, not a big fan of that.

Me, either. But I know the left can't get enough of the anti-climactic, no surprise Mueller investigation, so I just assumed...

Mueller has produced. To continually say otherwise is just ignorant. Indictments, guilty pleas, jail sentences, and haven't they seized enough in assets to nearly pay for itself already? Just because they haven't publicized that they found any collusion, yet, means nothing. After all, the SC was formed to investigate Russian interference in the election and other matters not specifically named collusion.

(01-16-2019 02:51 PM)VA49er Wrote:  

(01-16-2019 02:36 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(01-16-2019 02:34 PM)umbluegray Wrote:  

(01-16-2019 02:33 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  Yeah...good. Maybe you guys will finally realize that the only bad actors here were the killers. Maybe?

But you're surely not opposed to running down rabbit holes, right?

Huh?

Investigate til your hearts content...but just to waste money, not a big fan of that.

Anyone else sense the irony?

Only if you're just fooling yourself.

(01-16-2019 02:48 PM)No Bull Wrote:  It will be nice to get Susan Rice to admit where the talking points came from...

Ben Rhodes

(01-16-2019 04:35 PM)SuperFlyBCat Wrote:  

(01-16-2019 02:48 PM)No Bull Wrote:  It will be nice to get Susan Rice to admit where the talking points came from...

Ben Rhodes

and then to get this douchebag to state who had him put the memo together...

(01-16-2019 02:33 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  Yeah...good. Maybe you guys will finally realize that the only bad actors here were the killers. Maybe?

Lol. You’ve lost all credibility at this point.

(01-16-2019 04:29 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(01-16-2019 02:51 PM)VA49er Wrote:  

(01-16-2019 02:36 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(01-16-2019 02:34 PM)umbluegray Wrote:  

(01-16-2019 02:33 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  Yeah...good. Maybe you guys will finally realize that the only bad actors here were the killers. Maybe?

But you're surely not opposed to running down rabbit holes, right?

Huh?

Investigate til your hearts content...but just to waste money, not a big fan of that.

Anyone else sense the irony?

Only if you're just fooling yourself.

Nah, it's just you support one and not the other. It's purely partisan, but you know that. Everyone knows that but most don't care.

(01-17-2019 08:38 AM)VA49er Wrote:  

(01-16-2019 04:29 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(01-16-2019 02:51 PM)VA49er Wrote:  

(01-16-2019 02:36 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(01-16-2019 02:34 PM)umbluegray Wrote:  But you're surely not opposed to running down rabbit holes, right?

Huh?

Investigate til your hearts content...but just to waste money, not a big fan of that.

Anyone else sense the irony?

Only if you're just fooling yourself.

Nah, it's just you support one and not the other. It's purely partisan, but you know that. Everyone knows that but most don't care.

Completely asinine and totally oblivious to the comments I've made on both over the years. You're just blindly blabbering at this point.

Benghazi has been investigated by myriad panels, commissions and government bodies for years now and they've all basically reached the same conclusion. Time to let it go.

(01-16-2019 11:42 PM)Attackcoog Wrote:  

(01-16-2019 02:33 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  Yeah...good. Maybe you guys will finally realize that the only bad actors here were the killers. Maybe?

Lol. You’ve lost all credibility at this point.

Hasn't had any for quite a while.

(01-16-2019 02:33 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  Yeah...good. Maybe you guys will finally realize that the only bad actors here were the killers. Maybe?

No. Somebody screwed up big time on our side. Things like that don't happen unless somebody screwed up. My problem with all the so-called "investigations" was that democrats were in such a rush to whitewash it, and republicans were in such a rush to blame Hillary, that nobody asked the questions that needed to be asked.

Like WTF was our ambassador doing in that situation in the first place without adequate security? And don't give me that bit about republicans cutting the budget. If you get your budget cut, you cutback in low-risk areas, not Benghazi. And what was needed in that situation was not a security detail but an amphib full of Marines ready to come ashore in a heartbeat, and that's defense budget not embassy security budget, and it's democrats who cut that one.

Or how and why did this whole video deal come up anyway? There was one "investigation" that concluded that there were no intel failures. That's patently false. If there was any credible intel suggesting this was because of a video, then there was a massive intel failure. Intel is not supposed to make those kinds of mistakes, to get it that far wrong. And if there was not an intel failure, then there was massive lying on the part of the political leadership. There aren't other possibilities,

(01-16-2019 04:29 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(01-16-2019 03:14 PM)umbluegray Wrote:  

(01-16-2019 02:36 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(01-16-2019 02:34 PM)umbluegray Wrote:  

(01-16-2019 02:33 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  Yeah...good. Maybe you guys will finally realize that the only bad actors here were the killers. Maybe?

But you're surely not opposed to running down rabbit holes, right?

Huh?

Investigate til your hearts content...but just to waste money, not a big fan of that.

Me, either. But I know the left can't get enough of the anti-climactic, no surprise Mueller investigation, so I just assumed...

Mueller has produced. To continually say otherwise is just ignorant. Indictments, guilty pleas, jail sentences, and haven't they seized enough in assets to nearly pay for itself already? Just because they haven't publicized that they found any collusion, yet, means nothing. After all, the SC was formed to investigate Russian interference in the election and other matters not specifically named collusion.

Oh, we get that the Mueller probe has manipulated some high-fives, but many people are still aware of the treasonous coup by the left.