(08-28-2018 07:19 PM)Marc Mensa Wrote:  

(08-28-2018 07:17 PM)shere khan Wrote:  

(08-28-2018 07:13 PM)Marc Mensa Wrote:  

(08-28-2018 07:08 PM)shere khan Wrote:  Y'all remember when the Democrat party was a masculine party, not full of soy boy sky screamers worrying about payments to ho s.

I member

Y'all remember when you bit_h_s were whining about Gennifer Flowers, Paula Jones and Monica Lewinsky?

Only the ones Bill raped. Meh to the others.

Did he shove his tongue down their throats and grab them by the ....? Pass the tic tacs, please.

Brutal rape

Clinton arrived at the hotel he asked to meet in Broaddrick's room instead and, after he arrived, violently raped her. Broaddrick said he bloodied her lip by biting it.

https://www.businessinsider.com/these-ar...on-2017-11

(08-28-2018 07:19 PM)Marc Mensa Wrote:  

(08-28-2018 07:17 PM)shere khan Wrote:  

(08-28-2018 07:13 PM)Marc Mensa Wrote:  

(08-28-2018 07:08 PM)shere khan Wrote:  Y'all remember when the Democrat party was a masculine party, not full of soy boy sky screamers worrying about payments to ho s.

I member

Y'all remember when you bit_h_s were whining about Gennifer Flowers, Paula Jones and Monica Lewinsky?

Only the ones Bill raped. Meh to the others.

Did he shove his tongue down their throats and grab them by the ....? Pass the tic tacs, please.

You know; I don’t believe Trump said that. I believe he said “you could”.....

(08-28-2018 04:58 PM)Native Georgian Wrote:  

(08-28-2018 12:34 PM)Marc Mensa Wrote:  

(08-28-2018 11:04 AM)umbluegray Wrote:  A sitting president cannot be indicted.

Bill Clinton was.

When did that happen?

Bump

(08-28-2018 07:27 PM)Native Georgian Wrote:  

(08-28-2018 04:58 PM)Native Georgian Wrote:  

(08-28-2018 12:34 PM)Marc Mensa Wrote:  

(08-28-2018 11:04 AM)umbluegray Wrote:  A sitting president cannot be indicted.

Bill Clinton was.

When did that happen?

Bump

Lol call em out

(08-28-2018 07:27 PM)Native Georgian Wrote:  

(08-28-2018 04:58 PM)Native Georgian Wrote:  

(08-28-2018 12:34 PM)Marc Mensa Wrote:  

(08-28-2018 11:04 AM)umbluegray Wrote:  A sitting president cannot be indicted.

Bill Clinton was.

When did that happen?

Bump

He was subpoenaed to testify before the grand jury... which is what will happen to Trump in New York.

(08-28-2018 07:30 PM)Marc Mensa Wrote:  

(08-28-2018 07:27 PM)Native Georgian Wrote:  

(08-28-2018 04:58 PM)Native Georgian Wrote:  

(08-28-2018 12:34 PM)Marc Mensa Wrote:  

(08-28-2018 11:04 AM)umbluegray Wrote:  A sitting president cannot be indicted.

Bill Clinton was.

When did that happen?

Bump

He was subpoenaed to testify before the grand jury... which is what will happen to Trump in New York.

Do you even know what happened or are you just s Facebook propaganda parrot.

Do you constitution bro?

(08-28-2018 07:42 PM)shere khan Wrote:  

(08-28-2018 07:30 PM)Marc Mensa Wrote:  

(08-28-2018 07:27 PM)Native Georgian Wrote:  

(08-28-2018 04:58 PM)Native Georgian Wrote:  

(08-28-2018 12:34 PM)Marc Mensa Wrote:  Bill Clinton was.

When did that happen?

Bump

He was subpoenaed to testify before the grand jury... which is what will happen to Trump in New York.

Do you even know what happened or are you just s Facebook propaganda parrot.

Do you constitution bro?

Put together two coherent sentences and get back with me.

A subpoena is not an indictment. Some posters need a few history/vocabulary lessons.

(08-28-2018 07:55 PM)HuskyU Wrote:  A subpoena is not an indictment. Some posters need a few history/vocabulary lessons.

I was speaking of Trump being subpoenaed earlier in the thread and just read the post wrong. I know the difference between a subpoena and an indictment.

(08-28-2018 07:59 PM)Marc Mensa Wrote:  

(08-28-2018 07:55 PM)HuskyU Wrote:  A subpoena is not an indictment. Some posters need a few history/vocabulary lessons.

I was speaking of Trump being subpoenaed earlier in the thread and just read the post wrong. I know the difference between a subpoena and an indictment.

(08-28-2018 08:01 PM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

(08-28-2018 07:59 PM)Marc Mensa Wrote:  

(08-28-2018 07:55 PM)HuskyU Wrote:  A subpoena is not an indictment. Some posters need a few history/vocabulary lessons.

I was speaking of Trump being subpoenaed earlier in the thread and just read the post wrong. I know the difference between a subpoena and an indictment.

Lulz. When will he figure it out. I'm not gonna tell him.

(08-28-2018 07:59 PM)Marc Mensa Wrote:  

(08-28-2018 07:55 PM)HuskyU Wrote:  A subpoena is not an indictment. Some posters need a few history/vocabulary lessons.

I was speaking of Trump being subpoenaed earlier in the thread and just read the post wrong. I know the difference between a subpoena and an indictment.

Lanny Davis, is that you?

(08-28-2018 07:07 PM)Marc Mensa Wrote:  

(08-28-2018 07:04 PM)umbluegray Wrote:  

(08-28-2018 06:17 PM)Marc Mensa Wrote:  

(08-28-2018 05:08 PM)Brookes Owl Wrote:  

(08-28-2018 04:56 PM)Marc Mensa Wrote:  Hmmm. The Stormy Daniels/ Donald Trump affair took place in 2006. The payoff occurred in October of 2016. If Trump was worried about the affects on his home life, then he would have paid her off 10 years prior.

Similarly, the Karen McDougal affair occurred over a 10 month period from 2006-2007, but the payout to McDougal didn't occur until 2016.

Trump loves publicity... all publicity. He couldn't care less about the impact on his home life because it is the publicity that made him relevant and rebuilt his career after his real estate failings in the 90's.

I think you make a perfectly reasonable argument for a message board debate but I don't think it flies in a courtroom. The fact that he did this because of the campaign STILL doesn't (necessarily) make it a campaign expense if he makes the perfectly reasonable argument that he was worried campaign scrutiny would turn these women up and affect his marriage/home life.

For an average person, that may be true, but not for a media hound like Trump. His past does not indicate any concern about marital indiscretions and it would seem if he were truly concerned then he would have handled this 10 years prior soon after his wife had given birth to their son.

We are fortunate, in this case however, to have people in his inner circle who are willing to testify under oath to his 2016 motivations.

The former FEC chair disagrees with your assessment.

Former FEC Chairman To Mark Levin: Stormy Daniels Money Cannot Be In Kind Campaign Contribution

We'll see how it plays out in court.

Maybe

(08-28-2018 07:13 PM)Marc Mensa Wrote:  

(08-28-2018 07:08 PM)shere khan Wrote:  Y'all remember when the Democrat party was a masculine party, not full of soy boy sky screamers worrying about payments to ho s.

I member

Y'all remember when you bit_h_s were whining about Gennifer Flowers, Paula Jones and Monica Lewinsky?

Rape vs mutual consent.

Wow.

(08-29-2018 09:21 AM)umbluegray Wrote:  

(08-28-2018 07:13 PM)Marc Mensa Wrote:  

(08-28-2018 07:08 PM)shere khan Wrote:  Y'all remember when the Democrat party was a masculine party, not full of soy boy sky screamers worrying about payments to ho s.

I member

Y'all remember when you bit_h_s were whining about Gennifer Flowers, Paula Jones and Monica Lewinsky?

Rape vs mutual consent.

Wow.

there are a line of Trump accusers who have claimed there was no mutual consent, just as there were with Clinton accusers.

(08-29-2018 09:49 AM)Marc Mensa Wrote:  

(08-29-2018 09:21 AM)umbluegray Wrote:  

(08-28-2018 07:13 PM)Marc Mensa Wrote:  

(08-28-2018 07:08 PM)shere khan Wrote:  Y'all remember when the Democrat party was a masculine party, not full of soy boy sky screamers worrying about payments to ho s.

I member

Y'all remember when you bit_h_s were whining about Gennifer Flowers, Paula Jones and Monica Lewinsky?

Rape vs mutual consent.

Wow.

there are a line of Trump accusers who have claimed there was no mutual consent, just as there were with Clinton accusers.

If he raped somebody he should be punished.

I actually haven't heard about that line of accusers.

I have heard about the #metoo movement where many women who consented at the time of the act changed their minds years later and retroactively removed their consent.

Not saying the line of accusers you mention did this as well, but who knows.

(08-29-2018 09:55 AM)umbluegray Wrote:  

(08-29-2018 09:49 AM)Marc Mensa Wrote:  

(08-29-2018 09:21 AM)umbluegray Wrote:  

(08-28-2018 07:13 PM)Marc Mensa Wrote:  

(08-28-2018 07:08 PM)shere khan Wrote:  Y'all remember when the Democrat party was a masculine party, not full of soy boy sky screamers worrying about payments to ho s.

I member

Y'all remember when you bit_h_s were whining about Gennifer Flowers, Paula Jones and Monica Lewinsky?

Rape vs mutual consent.

Wow.

there are a line of Trump accusers who have claimed there was no mutual consent, just as there were with Clinton accusers.

If he raped somebody he should be punished.

I actually haven't heard about that line of accusers.

I have heard about the #metoo movement where many women who consented at the time of the act changed their minds years later and retroactively removed their consent.

Not saying the line of accusers you mention did this as well, but who knows.

Line of accusers? Thats laughable. ONE accuser came forward, and offered proof in a memo she supposedly penned over a decade prior when it happened. She was busted when it was proven the memo was written just days prior to her release of it.

#ForgedYearbookFail

(08-29-2018 10:16 AM)UofMstateU Wrote:  

(08-29-2018 09:55 AM)umbluegray Wrote:  

(08-29-2018 09:49 AM)Marc Mensa Wrote:  

(08-29-2018 09:21 AM)umbluegray Wrote:  

(08-28-2018 07:13 PM)Marc Mensa Wrote:  Y'all remember when you bit_h_s were whining about Gennifer Flowers, Paula Jones and Monica Lewinsky?

Rape vs mutual consent.

Wow.

there are a line of Trump accusers who have claimed there was no mutual consent, just as there were with Clinton accusers.

If he raped somebody he should be punished.

I actually haven't heard about that line of accusers.

I have heard about the #metoo movement where many women who consented at the time of the act changed their minds years later and retroactively removed their consent.

Not saying the line of accusers you mention did this as well, but who knows.

Line of accusers? Thats laughable. ONE accuser came forward, and offered proof in a memo she supposedly penned over a decade prior when it happened. She was busted when it was proven the memo was written just days prior to her release of it.

#ForgedYearbookFail

Well, I was giving MM the opportunity to back it up with evidence.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.cnn.com...index.html

(08-29-2018 11:22 AM)Marc Mensa Wrote:  https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.cnn.com...index.html

Fake News doesn't count.

Especially when they continue to stand by stories proven to be false.