https://twitter.com/ChuckRossDC/status/1...7786840064

SHUT'ER DOWN

I think we've reached the point where it will be news-worthy when it's discovered that an FBI agent involved in these inestigations was NON-BIASED.

(06-25-2018 03:19 PM)TechRocks Wrote:  I think we've reached the point where it will be news-worthy when it's discovered that an FBI agent involved in these inestigations was NON-BIASED.

I think the news is how often these deeply anti-Trump "resistance" lawyers just happen to be handling the most sensitive portions of the case where all the key escalating "events" take place.

(06-25-2018 03:32 PM)Attackcoog Wrote:  

(06-25-2018 03:19 PM)TechRocks Wrote:  I think we've reached the point where it will be news-worthy when it's discovered that an FBI agent involved in these inestigations was NON-BIASED.

I think the news is how often these deeply anti-Trump "resistance" lawyers just happen to be handling the most sensitive portions of the case where all the key escalating "events" take place.

Yes, but isn't that the same as reporting that water is wet? Nothing surprises me anymore. The fix was in.

I'm shocked.

Flynn case is going to get thrown out. Papagiorgio case is going to get thrown out. The Russians called mueller's bluff, showed up for their speedy trial, and have been met with nothing but unreasonable delays, because mueller only wanted the headline and had no intention of actually going to trial. Concord Catering was fake, and didn't exist.

Will anything that mueller has done, actually stick?

Glad we all get to pick the lawyer that interviews us. We get to pick the judge as well, right?

Just wait until it's proven that mccabe changed the 302s. comey already admitted that FBI agents didn't think Flynn lied. Something doesn't add up there.

(06-25-2018 03:19 PM)TechRocks Wrote:  I think we've reached the point where it will be news-worthy when it's discovered that an FBI agent involved in these inestigations was NON-BIASED.

shows you what you know ...
the case hinges on papadopoulos ...
recall it's his offhand remark that formally launched russia probe ...
or so the story goes ...
impeach principal witness testimony ...
and like a house of cards ...
it abjectly falls apart ...

AU CONTRAIRE MON FRERE (ON THE CONTRARY MY BROTHER)

(06-25-2018 05:08 PM)cb4029 Wrote:  Glad we all get to pick the lawyer that interviews us. We get to pick the judge as well, right?

No, but plenty of cases have been tossed because either the investigation or the judge was tainted in some fashion. You should know that, but then, I now recall you're a lib so, nevermind.

(06-25-2018 07:17 PM)green Wrote:  

(06-25-2018 03:19 PM)TechRocks Wrote:  I think we've reached the point where it will be news-worthy when it's discovered that an FBI agent involved in these inestigations was NON-BIASED.

shows you what you know ...
the case hinges on papadopoulos ...
recall it's his offhand remark that formally launched russia probe ...
or so the story goes ...
impeach principal witness testimony ...
and like a house of cards ...
it abjectly falls apart ...

AU CONTRAIRE MON FRERE (ON THE CONTRARY MY BROTHER)

Are you guys misconfusing what I'm trying to say?