(03-01-2018 01:46 PM)Stickboy46 Wrote: (03-01-2018 01:35 PM)TU4ever Wrote: (03-01-2018 12:30 PM)Stickboy46 Wrote: (03-01-2018 12:29 PM)TU4ever Wrote: (03-01-2018 12:23 PM)MemTigers1998 Wrote: Alabama & Oklahoma both still 10 seeds on Lunardi
What an absolute joke. Only reasons are the names Collin Sexton and Trae Young.
Tide lost about 5 in a row including 2 in a row at home (1 by about 25 to FLA) and I don't remember the last time Oklahoma didn't get blown out.
My understanding is Lunardi isn't as good as some. My guess is the ESPN bias is strong. Oklahoma is in the same position as Temple.
Oklahoma's wins are quite a bit better than Temples ...
37 RPI
Losing conference record
16 wins
8 wins vs quad 1+2
41 RPI
Losing conference record
16 wins
8 wins vs quad 1+2
Oklahoma - 6 Q1 wins (5 Kansas @ 12 WSU, @ 19 TCU, 19 TCU, 23 Texas Tech, N 31 USC)
BPI - 41
KP - 40
Sag - 32
KPI - 24
SOR - 29
Temple 3 Q1 wins (N 7 Auburn, N 10 Clemson, 12 WSU)
BPI - 77
KP - 82
Sag - 78
KPI - 50
SOR - 64
OU wins that one up and down. Lumping Tier 1 and 2 together hides the fact that OU has better wins. OU's computer numbers are drastically better.
Can't just pick and choose items off the team sheets. About the ONLY thing that Temple's resume looks better than OUs is Non-con SOS. Overall SOS is very similar (7 vs 15).
OU is on the right side of the bubble thanks to the good start. Temple is not.
https://extra.ncaa.org/solutions/rpi/Sta...Sheets.pdf
Use that and you will see the official team sheets as of earlier this week. ALL of that data is presented to the committee.
Okay I am putting this together with Steve's for a response because they are virtually the same.
First thanks for the site I like when it's all in one place and I hadn't seen that one yet.
Oklahoma has more wins in quadrant 1 but a similar winning percentage .400 (6-9) of which only two are outside their conference and only two are away from home to .300 (3-7) two on neutral and one in conference at home.
In quad 2s OU is .500 (3-3) and Temple is .875 (7-1)
OU played 2 games against quads 3 (2-0) and 6 games against quads 4 (6-0) none on the road and only Portland neutral. They went 8-0.
Temple played 8 teams in quad 3 including 2 away and one neutral as well as 1 away game vs quad 4. They went 4-4 (.500) vs quad 3 one loss away and one neutral. 4-0 vs quad 4s.
That's the whole picture.
Their isn't much difference in quad 1 when you take into account the extra attempts afforded OU.
Temple easily wins quad 2.
OU is better quad 3, mostly because of the difference in attempts.
Quad 4 is a wash.
Advanced metrics will not be used unless it is an either or situation head to head comparison.
The strongest indicator of them being in the same category is the RPI which as a measuring stick for NCAA capable teams shows them 4 apart #37 to #41