OptimisticOwl
Legend
Posts: 58,766
Joined: Apr 2005
Reputation: 857
I Root For: Rice
Location: DFW Metroplex
|
RE: Trump Administration
(02-16-2018 11:18 AM)RiceLad15 Wrote: (02-16-2018 11:04 AM)OptimisticOwl Wrote: (02-16-2018 10:50 AM)RiceLad15 Wrote: (02-16-2018 10:30 AM)OptimisticOwl Wrote: (02-16-2018 10:06 AM)JustAnotherAustinOwlStill Wrote: ...because nothing is more important than hating gay people. That actually reinforces my point, at least from my perspective.
How do you know Obama and Hillary aren't strong Christians? I mean, maybe they aren't, but they belonged to and went to church didn't they? It seems like many on the Christian right think Strong Christian=Conservative Evangelical Christian. Yet many of the most active liberals and Dems I know are also devout Christians. They just don't go to the same churches people like Mike Pence (or my MIL) do.
EDIT: To be clear, I'm not equating you with the "Christian Right"...
The very first thing you do is to equate opposing gay marriage with "hating gay people". Can you not even comprehend that some people can have a viewpoint counter to yours without attributing it to hate?
Personally, I support gay marriage. I see no reason gay couples should not enjoy the same rights and responsibilities in their relationships as hetero couples. I go a step further than even you, probably, and support plural marriage. Is the number two sacred to you? Why not three or five?
But I can understand that some people think marriage is between a man and a woman, and not attribute this attitude to hatred of gays. I really get tired of the ultra liberals attributing any different viewpoint to hate. Hate is one of the least common political motivators. I oppose illegal immigration, too, but I don't hate illegal immigrants.
Obama did belong to a church, but claimed not to be there for many of Wright's more incendiary sermons. After election, I know of no instances of him attending a BLT church in DC, nor of any other instances of him attending any other church except possibly for political purposes, such as Easter and Christmas. I think his BLT membership in Chicago was more for political purposes.
Pretty much the same for Clinton, just a different church listed on his CV.
I understand there are many liberal Christians. I've known a few. My experience is that they are liberals first, Christians second, and any conflict between religion and politics is decided in favor of the political. The opposite is largely true of the Religious Right, I think.
I am not a religious person. My personal journey has taken me from fundamentalist to atheist to deacon to agnostic. The church in which I was a deacon was a very liberal church, not in its politics but in its welcoming of people of a wide variety of viewpoints. To be clear, my agnosticism is not the same as Joy Behar's. I don't hate religious people. I may not agree with them, but I respect their right to their opinion without me attributing either hate or insanity to them.
To the bold - you probably weren't aware because it always appeared as if wearing his religion on his sleeve was not something he wanted to do, and, especially in comparison to his predecessor, it was less integral to his life. A quick Google search found that he attended church 18 times in his first 5 years in the WH, which is more than just Easter and Christmas (heck, he even skipped a Christmas service in 2013).
http://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/...attendance
But even if his religion was not as pronounced as W's, I don't think Obama's Christian faith was just a CV booster - watching the way he spoke at numerous services, especially when he sang Amazing Grace, it seemed pretty clear that faith was not just some CV booster, but something he did care about and think about. Read a bit about it here: https://www.thedailybeast.com/keeping-ta...-his-faith
Quote:And Obama even brought church into the White House. Three years ago the president began a tradition that few know about, and one that had never occurred before: he started hosting an Easter Prayer Breakfast, a moment of worship each year specifically with Christian leaders. There had been Passover Seders before and White House Iftars, events for Diwali, and services for other religious and non-religious traditions as well. But no president had gathered the Christian community specifically to mark its holiest day, and President Obama decided that an Easter event was past due. So he organized this breakfast, invited diverse Christian leaders from around the country, and offered brief remarks about what the death and resurrection of Jesus meant to him.
In 2010 Obama explained “what draws me to this holy day and what lesson I take from Christ’s sacrifice.” In 2011 he reflected on “The triumph of Palm Sunday. The humility of Jesus washing the disciples’ feet. His slow march up that hill, and the pain and the scorn and the shame of the cross …”
Again, compared to W he was a near atheist, but as someone who isn't religious in any sense of the word, I appreciated Obama's generally understated approach to faith.
18 times in 260 Sundays. < 7%. Clearly devout. Does it say what the denomination(s) were? Were they all BLT?
Still smacks more of politics than faith to me.
Maybe Obama is one of these guys that place a higher value on "spirituality" than a traditional faith. I always thought that was a cop out.
Even in the depths of my atheism, i wanted my children to see, hear, and experience what it is to be in a church and see people who believe in something, in order that they could make an informed decision for themselves later in life, and so we joined that "liberal" church. I, still an atheist, attended church more times in the first 19 Sundays after joining than Obama did in five years. Maybe I just cared more for my kids.
I gradually learned to have tolerance for other viewpoints, as there was a wide variety of them there. I was in that church 12 years. Still not a fan of Bible based faith.
The number of times Obama attended church is in line with past presidents, except W, and W was a big outlier because of his evangelical take on the faith. Bush attended church 120 times in 8 years, which is less than your 19 times (avg of 15 times per year for W).
Reagan rarely attended church while in office, and no one seems to chide him. One thing about attending church as POTUS is that there are significant security issues that you must burden the church with - that was one reason Reagan didn't attend church while in office. Regardless, the amount of time someone spends publicly in a place of worship should not count for/against their faith or spirituality. I think there was likely some Bible verse about how people who just make a show of their faith in public aren't really all that great...
If Obama's faith was just for show, why did both of their children get baptized? Why were the Obama's members of a church in Chicago (United Church of Christ) for 20 years, well before he ran for POTUS.
Just read a bit a bout Obama's faith and spirituality - it runs counter to your belief, built upon nothing really, that it is all for show. http://www.nytimes.com/2013/12/29/us/as-...lines.html
Agree with the fact that church attendance for a POTUS has security challenges. But when Candidate Obama was faced with some of Jeremiah Wright's statements, his defense was that he had not heard them since he was not there. I think membership in a BLT church, a prominent black church, was needed for his political aspirations. Didn't mean he had to attend every week or believe.
As for the girls, maybe they wanted to be baptized. I certainly hoped my kids would make that choice on their own. maybe they did. None of them were ever baptized in that church, although one was baptized in a different church.
And we have not determined Michelle's part in all this. Maybe she took the girls to church every week. or sent them.
I wonder how many times the Obamas have been to church in the 13 months since he left office? Do you have a number on that?
I don't think your impassioned defense of Obama's religiosity is going to change me much. But we have traveled far afield, and I would like to get back to JAAOs and his assumption of "hate" on the part of the Religious Right. Most Christians I know say "Hate the sin, not the sinner", and certainly many of them will consider gay sex a sin. But JAAOs makes the assumption that they "hate gay people". I get really tired of leftists telling me I hate this or that. I think they hate me. Let's talk about hate for a while.
(This post was last modified: 02-16-2018 11:45 AM by OptimisticOwl.)
|
|