(12-28-2017 11:23 AM)DogPoundNorth Wrote:  

(12-28-2017 11:20 AM)PrideinthePack2 Wrote:  

(12-28-2017 11:16 AM)DogPoundNorth Wrote:  

(12-28-2017 11:13 AM)PrideinthePack2 Wrote:  

(12-28-2017 11:07 AM)DogPoundNorth Wrote:  Ummmm b/c he still has one more year on his deal then. What is so hard to grasp?

You said to reasses after the 2019 season. He’s not signed through the 2019 season. Based on that comment you obviously thought he was under contract for at least 2 more football seasons.

I pointed out that he’s under contract for only one more football season and then you said it would be “even more stupid” to fire him once you gained the correct information, even though with less time on the contract it would cost less money to eat for a buyout.

So you’ve yet to explain why it is dumber to fire someone with less time on a contract in comparison to someone with more time especially since you’ve been harping on money since the beginning. You contradicted yourself.

Hahahaha you still think paying money to fire a coach that wins more than he loses at a G5 school is smart. You need to deal with your own issues then. Unless you have the money to pay him to be fired for literally no reason other than you don’t like his scheming and big game coaching. I’m here to tell you, there are no big games in the G5. None. So yes, firing him with just one year left would be even more stupid, much more stupid.

You’re arguing that firing someone with 1 year left on a contact is “even more stupid” than firing someone with 2 years left on a contract yet everything you have been saying is in favor saving money, the fiscally responsible answer would be to fire someone with 1 year left instead of 2.

You’re playing both sides of the fence. You can’t have it both ways.

You really really missed the point didn’t you? Lol. Best of luck to you.

The point is that you can’t keep one, it’s a scatterbrain mindset that doesn’t allow you to have just one point. The “point” you’re trying to make is all over the place.

(12-28-2017 11:24 AM)NIU007 Wrote:  

(12-28-2017 11:16 AM)DogPoundNorth Wrote:  

(12-28-2017 11:13 AM)PrideinthePack2 Wrote:  

(12-28-2017 11:07 AM)DogPoundNorth Wrote:  

(12-28-2017 11:04 AM)PrideinthePack2 Wrote:  In regards to my post on Carey having less time on his contract than you originally thought, you still haven’t given an answer to that question. You’re just saying the same thing over and over again.

So I’ll ask again...

What makes it “even more stupid” to fire him now than after the 2019 season after you found out he had less time on his contract than you originally thought?

Ummmm b/c he still has one more year on his deal then. What is so hard to grasp?

You said to reasses after the 2019 season. He’s not signed through the 2019 season. Based on that comment you obviously thought he was under contract for at least 2 more football seasons.

I pointed out that he’s under contract for only one more football season and then you said it would be “even more stupid” to fire him once you gained the correct information, even though with less time on the contract it would cost less money to eat for a buyout.

So you’ve yet to explain why it is dumber to fire someone with less time on a contract in comparison to someone with more time especially since you’ve been harping on money since the beginning. You contradicted yourself.

Hahahaha you still think paying money to fire a coach that wins more than he loses at a G5 school is smart. You need to deal with your own issues then. Unless you have the money to pay him to be fired for literally no reason other than you don’t like his scheming and big game coaching. I’m here to tell you, there are no big games in the G5. None. So yes, firing him with just one year left would be even more stupid, much more stupid.

There ARE big games in the G5. The P5 pundits would like you to believe otherwise though, and spend most of their time on TV trying to force that propaganda down everyone's throat.

They say those things because they are true. The biggest P5 game of the year was UCF vs USF, and it was a great game! Sadly, after UCF’s win the committee moved them up exactly one spot in their rankings. It did nothing for them. In the eyes of the P5 and the pundits, G5 Football is just entertainment, it has no real bearing on the national landscape. Even if a G5 beats a P5 during the season, which happens all the time, they are given no further opportunities. It’s a system that strictly benefits those who are already “rich.”

(12-28-2017 11:24 AM)NIU007 Wrote:  

(12-28-2017 11:16 AM)DogPoundNorth Wrote:  

(12-28-2017 11:13 AM)PrideinthePack2 Wrote:  

(12-28-2017 11:07 AM)DogPoundNorth Wrote:  

(12-28-2017 11:04 AM)PrideinthePack2 Wrote:  In regards to my post on Carey having less time on his contract than you originally thought, you still haven’t given an answer to that question. You’re just saying the same thing over and over again.

So I’ll ask again...

What makes it “even more stupid” to fire him now than after the 2019 season after you found out he had less time on his contract than you originally thought?

Ummmm b/c he still has one more year on his deal then. What is so hard to grasp?

You said to reasses after the 2019 season. He’s not signed through the 2019 season. Based on that comment you obviously thought he was under contract for at least 2 more football seasons.

I pointed out that he’s under contract for only one more football season and then you said it would be “even more stupid” to fire him once you gained the correct information, even though with less time on the contract it would cost less money to eat for a buyout.

So you’ve yet to explain why it is dumber to fire someone with less time on a contract in comparison to someone with more time especially since you’ve been harping on money since the beginning. You contradicted yourself.

Hahahaha you still think paying money to fire a coach that wins more than he loses at a G5 school is smart. You need to deal with your own issues then. Unless you have the money to pay him to be fired for literally no reason other than you don’t like his scheming and big game coaching. I’m here to tell you, there are no big games in the G5. None. So yes, firing him with just one year left would be even more stupid, much more stupid.

There ARE big games in the G5. The P5 pundits would like you to believe otherwise though, and spend most of their time on TV trying to force that propaganda down everyone's throat.

Important to whom? The majority of this board told me they'd rather get a victory over a P5 than win a MACC. If you need a P5 team to make your G5 game important, there are no important G5 games.

(12-28-2017 11:26 AM)PrideinthePack2 Wrote:  

(12-28-2017 11:23 AM)DogPoundNorth Wrote:  

(12-28-2017 11:20 AM)PrideinthePack2 Wrote:  

(12-28-2017 11:16 AM)DogPoundNorth Wrote:  

(12-28-2017 11:13 AM)PrideinthePack2 Wrote:  You said to reasses after the 2019 season. He’s not signed through the 2019 season. Based on that comment you obviously thought he was under contract for at least 2 more football seasons.

I pointed out that he’s under contract for only one more football season and then you said it would be “even more stupid” to fire him once you gained the correct information, even though with less time on the contract it would cost less money to eat for a buyout.

So you’ve yet to explain why it is dumber to fire someone with less time on a contract in comparison to someone with more time especially since you’ve been harping on money since the beginning. You contradicted yourself.

Hahahaha you still think paying money to fire a coach that wins more than he loses at a G5 school is smart. You need to deal with your own issues then. Unless you have the money to pay him to be fired for literally no reason other than you don’t like his scheming and big game coaching. I’m here to tell you, there are no big games in the G5. None. So yes, firing him with just one year left would be even more stupid, much more stupid.

You’re arguing that firing someone with 1 year left on a contact is “even more stupid” than firing someone with 2 years left on a contract yet everything you have been saying is in favor saving money, the fiscally responsible answer would be to fire someone with 1 year left instead of 2.

You’re playing both sides of the fence. You can’t have it both ways.

You really really missed the point didn’t you? Lol. Best of luck to you.

The point is that you can’t keep one, it’s a scatterbrain mindset that doesn’t allow you to have just one point. The “point” you’re trying to make is all over the place.

I honestly don’t know why it’s so hard for you to grasp that spending any money to fire Care is stupid. Whether it’s one year or two years worth of money, it’s stupid. Why can’t you grasp that? Lol

(12-28-2017 11:28 AM)Rabid Squirrel Wrote:  

(12-28-2017 11:24 AM)NIU007 Wrote:  

(12-28-2017 11:16 AM)DogPoundNorth Wrote:  

(12-28-2017 11:13 AM)PrideinthePack2 Wrote:  

(12-28-2017 11:07 AM)DogPoundNorth Wrote:  Ummmm b/c he still has one more year on his deal then. What is so hard to grasp?

You said to reasses after the 2019 season. He’s not signed through the 2019 season. Based on that comment you obviously thought he was under contract for at least 2 more football seasons.

I pointed out that he’s under contract for only one more football season and then you said it would be “even more stupid” to fire him once you gained the correct information, even though with less time on the contract it would cost less money to eat for a buyout.

So you’ve yet to explain why it is dumber to fire someone with less time on a contract in comparison to someone with more time especially since you’ve been harping on money since the beginning. You contradicted yourself.

Hahahaha you still think paying money to fire a coach that wins more than he loses at a G5 school is smart. You need to deal with your own issues then. Unless you have the money to pay him to be fired for literally no reason other than you don’t like his scheming and big game coaching. I’m here to tell you, there are no big games in the G5. None. So yes, firing him with just one year left would be even more stupid, much more stupid.

There ARE big games in the G5. The P5 pundits would like you to believe otherwise though, and spend most of their time on TV trying to force that propaganda down everyone's throat.

Important to whom? The majority of this board told me they'd rather get a victory over a P5 than win a MACC. If you need a P5 team to make your G5 game important, there are no important G5 games.

Yes, exactly. The occasional P5 win does the exact same thing for a G5 as the occasional conference title.....

(12-28-2017 11:28 AM)Rabid Squirrel Wrote:  

(12-28-2017 11:24 AM)NIU007 Wrote:  

(12-28-2017 11:16 AM)DogPoundNorth Wrote:  

(12-28-2017 11:13 AM)PrideinthePack2 Wrote:  

(12-28-2017 11:07 AM)DogPoundNorth Wrote:  Ummmm b/c he still has one more year on his deal then. What is so hard to grasp?

You said to reasses after the 2019 season. He’s not signed through the 2019 season. Based on that comment you obviously thought he was under contract for at least 2 more football seasons.

I pointed out that he’s under contract for only one more football season and then you said it would be “even more stupid” to fire him once you gained the correct information, even though with less time on the contract it would cost less money to eat for a buyout.

So you’ve yet to explain why it is dumber to fire someone with less time on a contract in comparison to someone with more time especially since you’ve been harping on money since the beginning. You contradicted yourself.

Hahahaha you still think paying money to fire a coach that wins more than he loses at a G5 school is smart. You need to deal with your own issues then. Unless you have the money to pay him to be fired for literally no reason other than you don’t like his scheming and big game coaching. I’m here to tell you, there are no big games in the G5. None. So yes, firing him with just one year left would be even more stupid, much more stupid.

There ARE big games in the G5. The P5 pundits would like you to believe otherwise though, and spend most of their time on TV trying to force that propaganda down everyone's throat.

Important to whom? The majority of this board told me they'd rather get a victory over a P5 than win a MACC. If you need a P5 team to make your G5 game important, there are no important G5 games.

It depends on the P5 team. If we beat a bad Purdue team again, yea, so what? I'd rather beat a good Boise team. BUT, the P5 pundits will act like the Purdue win is better, even if Boise has a much better team.

(12-28-2017 11:29 AM)DogPoundNorth Wrote:  

(12-28-2017 11:26 AM)PrideinthePack2 Wrote:  

(12-28-2017 11:23 AM)DogPoundNorth Wrote:  

(12-28-2017 11:20 AM)PrideinthePack2 Wrote:  

(12-28-2017 11:16 AM)DogPoundNorth Wrote:  Hahahaha you still think paying money to fire a coach that wins more than he loses at a G5 school is smart. You need to deal with your own issues then. Unless you have the money to pay him to be fired for literally no reason other than you don’t like his scheming and big game coaching. I’m here to tell you, there are no big games in the G5. None. So yes, firing him with just one year left would be even more stupid, much more stupid.

You’re arguing that firing someone with 1 year left on a contact is “even more stupid” than firing someone with 2 years left on a contract yet everything you have been saying is in favor saving money, the fiscally responsible answer would be to fire someone with 1 year left instead of 2.

You’re playing both sides of the fence. You can’t have it both ways.

You really really missed the point didn’t you? Lol. Best of luck to you.

The point is that you can’t keep one, it’s a scatterbrain mindset that doesn’t allow you to have just one point. The “point” you’re trying to make is all over the place.

I honestly don’t know why it’s so hard for you to grasp that spending any money to fire Care is stupid. Whether it’s one year or two years worth of money, it’s stupid. Why can’t you grasp that? Lol

Buying out one years worth of money is obviously better than buying out two years worth.

Yet you called buying out one years worth “even more stupid” than buying out two years. You in essence are saying spending less money is “even more stupid”.

(12-28-2017 11:35 AM)PrideinthePack2 Wrote:  

(12-28-2017 11:29 AM)DogPoundNorth Wrote:  

(12-28-2017 11:26 AM)PrideinthePack2 Wrote:  

(12-28-2017 11:23 AM)DogPoundNorth Wrote:  

(12-28-2017 11:20 AM)PrideinthePack2 Wrote:  You’re arguing that firing someone with 1 year left on a contact is “even more stupid” than firing someone with 2 years left on a contract yet everything you have been saying is in favor saving money, the fiscally responsible answer would be to fire someone with 1 year left instead of 2.

You’re playing both sides of the fence. You can’t have it both ways.

You really really missed the point didn’t you? Lol. Best of luck to you.

The point is that you can’t keep one, it’s a scatterbrain mindset that doesn’t allow you to have just one point. The “point” you’re trying to make is all over the place.

I honestly don’t know why it’s so hard for you to grasp that spending any money to fire Care is stupid. Whether it’s one year or two years worth of money, it’s stupid. Why can’t you grasp that? Lol

Buying out one years worth of money is obviously better than buying out two years worth.

Yet you called buying out one years worth “even more stupid” than buying out two years. You in essence are saying spending less money is “even more stupid”.

Because if spending money to fire a coach is stupid, then certainly doing it with only more year on his deal would be even more stupid. Jesus. We are done man, if you can’t get that I’m not sure what to tell you. Maybe start a lemonade stand so you can buy out his year...best of luck. Or, don’t be dumb and just let him coach and save a ton of money. My god.

(12-28-2017 11:39 AM)DogPoundNorth Wrote:  

(12-28-2017 11:35 AM)PrideinthePack2 Wrote:  

(12-28-2017 11:29 AM)DogPoundNorth Wrote:  

(12-28-2017 11:26 AM)PrideinthePack2 Wrote:  

(12-28-2017 11:23 AM)DogPoundNorth Wrote:  You really really missed the point didn’t you? Lol. Best of luck to you.

The point is that you can’t keep one, it’s a scatterbrain mindset that doesn’t allow you to have just one point. The “point” you’re trying to make is all over the place.

I honestly don’t know why it’s so hard for you to grasp that spending any money to fire Care is stupid. Whether it’s one year or two years worth of money, it’s stupid. Why can’t you grasp that? Lol

Buying out one years worth of money is obviously better than buying out two years worth.

Yet you called buying out one years worth “even more stupid” than buying out two years. You in essence are saying spending less money is “even more stupid”.

Because if spending money to fire a coach is stupid, then certainly doing it with only more year on his deal would be even more stupid. Jesus. We are done man, if you can’t get that I’m not sure what to tell you. Maybe start a lemonade stand so you can buy out his year...best of luck. Or, don’t be dumb and just let him coach and save a ton of money. My god.

It’s going to cost less money to fire him with one year left than two years left.

I really hope you don’t work in finance.

(12-28-2017 11:42 AM)PrideinthePack2 Wrote:  

(12-28-2017 11:39 AM)DogPoundNorth Wrote:  

(12-28-2017 11:35 AM)PrideinthePack2 Wrote:  

(12-28-2017 11:29 AM)DogPoundNorth Wrote:  

(12-28-2017 11:26 AM)PrideinthePack2 Wrote:  The point is that you can’t keep one, it’s a scatterbrain mindset that doesn’t allow you to have just one point. The “point” you’re trying to make is all over the place.

I honestly don’t know why it’s so hard for you to grasp that spending any money to fire Care is stupid. Whether it’s one year or two years worth of money, it’s stupid. Why can’t you grasp that? Lol

Buying out one years worth of money is obviously better than buying out two years worth.

Yet you called buying out one years worth “even more stupid” than buying out two years. You in essence are saying spending less money is “even more stupid”.

Because if spending money to fire a coach is stupid, then certainly doing it with only more year on his deal would be even more stupid. Jesus. We are done man, if you can’t get that I’m not sure what to tell you. Maybe start a lemonade stand so you can buy out his year...best of luck. Or, don’t be dumb and just let him coach and save a ton of money. My god.

It’s going to cost less money to fire him with one year left than two years left.

I really hope you don’t work in finance.

I know that lol, I think you’re arguing with yourself at this point.

(12-28-2017 11:43 AM)DogPoundNorth Wrote:  

(12-28-2017 11:42 AM)PrideinthePack2 Wrote:  

(12-28-2017 11:39 AM)DogPoundNorth Wrote:  

(12-28-2017 11:35 AM)PrideinthePack2 Wrote:  

(12-28-2017 11:29 AM)DogPoundNorth Wrote:  I honestly don’t know why it’s so hard for you to grasp that spending any money to fire Care is stupid. Whether it’s one year or two years worth of money, it’s stupid. Why can’t you grasp that? Lol

Buying out one years worth of money is obviously better than buying out two years worth.

Yet you called buying out one years worth “even more stupid” than buying out two years. You in essence are saying spending less money is “even more stupid”.

Because if spending money to fire a coach is stupid, then certainly doing it with only more year on his deal would be even more stupid. Jesus. We are done man, if you can’t get that I’m not sure what to tell you. Maybe start a lemonade stand so you can buy out his year...best of luck. Or, don’t be dumb and just let him coach and save a ton of money. My god.

It’s going to cost less money to fire him with one year left than two years left.

I really hope you don’t work in finance.

I know that lol, I think you’re arguing with yourself at this point.

So you admitted that “you know that”, yet you’re still quoted as saying that it would be even more stupid to fire him with one year as opposed to two. It’s a contradiction.

I’ve been correcting you. This isn’t even arguing.

(12-28-2017 11:45 AM)PrideinthePack2 Wrote:  

(12-28-2017 11:43 AM)DogPoundNorth Wrote:  

(12-28-2017 11:42 AM)PrideinthePack2 Wrote:  

(12-28-2017 11:39 AM)DogPoundNorth Wrote:  

(12-28-2017 11:35 AM)PrideinthePack2 Wrote:  Buying out one years worth of money is obviously better than buying out two years worth.

Yet you called buying out one years worth “even more stupid” than buying out two years. You in essence are saying spending less money is “even more stupid”.

Because if spending money to fire a coach is stupid, then certainly doing it with only more year on his deal would be even more stupid. Jesus. We are done man, if you can’t get that I’m not sure what to tell you. Maybe start a lemonade stand so you can buy out his year...best of luck. Or, don’t be dumb and just let him coach and save a ton of money. My god.

It’s going to cost less money to fire him with one year left than two years left.

I really hope you don’t work in finance.

I know that lol, I think you’re arguing with yourself at this point.

So you admitted that “you know that”, yet you’re still quoted as saying that it would be even more stupid to fire him with one year as opposed to two. It’s a contradiction.

I’ve been correcting you. This isn’t even arguing.

Alright, I'm going to make this as simple as possible for you so you can stop replying to comments thinking you "got me."

I said it would be stupid to fire Carey because it would cost money. I thought he had two years left since, you told me didn't (thanks!). So I said given that he only has one year left on his deal it would be "even more stupid" to fire him then. You took this as "no it wouldn't it would cost less money to fire him with only one year left (again, correct! nice job). I have been arguing since the beginning that paying ANY amount of money to fire carey would be stupid. So if you can end up paying ZERO dollars and get a new coach you desperately want that that would be the best way to go about things since our budget is already very small (finance!). Therefore, paying Carey any dollar amount when he only has a single year is stupid. More stupid than playing for two years given that it's only one more year left and we have no money in the budget (unless you start that lemonade stand). So I say again, please stop arguing with yourself, because that's what you are doing. You seem to think I care about the finances of two years vs one year. I do not seeing as how I believe, given our current financial situation (Finance again!), that paying ANY money would be stupid. In conclusion, I hope I cleared up any confusion you may (still) have. Not sure why it's hard for you to understand what I'm saying. Have a blessed day.

(12-28-2017 11:52 AM)DogPoundNorth Wrote:  

(12-28-2017 11:45 AM)PrideinthePack2 Wrote:  

(12-28-2017 11:43 AM)DogPoundNorth Wrote:  

(12-28-2017 11:42 AM)PrideinthePack2 Wrote:  

(12-28-2017 11:39 AM)DogPoundNorth Wrote:  Because if spending money to fire a coach is stupid, then certainly doing it with only more year on his deal would be even more stupid. Jesus. We are done man, if you can’t get that I’m not sure what to tell you. Maybe start a lemonade stand so you can buy out his year...best of luck. Or, don’t be dumb and just let him coach and save a ton of money. My god.

It’s going to cost less money to fire him with one year left than two years left.

I really hope you don’t work in finance.

I know that lol, I think you’re arguing with yourself at this point.

So you admitted that “you know that”, yet you’re still quoted as saying that it would be even more stupid to fire him with one year as opposed to two. It’s a contradiction.

I’ve been correcting you. This isn’t even arguing.

Alright, I'm going to make this as simple as possible for you so you can stop replying to comments thinking you "got me."

I said it would be stupid to fire Carey because it would cost money. I thought he had two years left since, you told me didn't (thanks!). So I said given that he only has one year left on his deal it would be "even more stupid" to fire him then. You took this as "no it wouldn't it would cost less money to fire him with only one year left (again, correct! nice job). I have been arguing since the beginning that paying ANY amount of money to fire carey would be stupid. So if you can end up paying ZERO dollars and get a new coach you desperately want that that would be the best way to go about things since our budget is already very small (finance!). Therefore, paying Carey any dollar amount when he only has a single year is stupid. More stupid than playing for two years given that it's only one more year left and we have no money in the budget (unless you start that lemonade stand). So I say again, please stop arguing with yourself, because that's what you are doing. You seem to think I care about the finances of two years vs one year. I do not seeing as how I believe, given our current financial situation (Finance again!), that paying ANY money would be stupid. In conclusion, I hope I cleared up any confusion you may (still) have. Not sure why it's hard for you to understand what I'm saying. Have a blessed day.

I’m only talking about the difference of firing 1 vs. 2 years.

My post has nothing to do about saving money in regards of not firing vs firing any amount of time so your contradiction still stands. The “gotcha moment” still applies. That’s why you’re still trying to save face.

And how many times are you going to tell me a variation of goodbye?

Message boards.....where the most important thing in life is proving a total stranger wrong.

(12-28-2017 12:00 PM)Rabid Squirrel Wrote:  Message boards.....where the most important thing in life is proving a total stranger wrong.

It isn't the most important thing on the message board. So you're wrong.

(12-28-2017 12:03 PM)NIU007 Wrote:  

(12-28-2017 12:00 PM)Rabid Squirrel Wrote:  Message boards.....where the most important thing in life is proving a total stranger wrong.

It isn't the most important thing on the message board. So you're wrong.

(12-28-2017 12:00 PM)Rabid Squirrel Wrote:  Message boards.....where the most important thing in life is proving a total stranger wrong.

Mr finance took one thing I said and turned it into a million posts. Sorry. For some reason he was dead set on trying to tell me that two years of money is more than one. Lol.

Anywho, firing carey would be very stupid for many reasons. Including and now especially because there is only one year left on his deal lol. I made a bunch of other points but mr finance was having none of it.

(12-28-2017 12:08 PM)DogPoundNorth Wrote:  

(12-28-2017 12:00 PM)Rabid Squirrel Wrote:  Message boards.....where the most important thing in life is proving a total stranger wrong.

Mr finance took one thing I said and turned it into a million posts. Sorry. For some reason he was dead set on trying to tell me that two years of money is more than one. Lol.

Anywho, firing carey would be very stupid for many reasons. Including and now especially because there is only one year left on his deal lol. I made a bunch of other points but mr finance was having none of it.

Your other points were irrevelant in regards to the 1 vs 2 year firing discussion.

You were deflecting by bringing up points not relevant to the topic. The lemonade stand thing is really when you jumped the shark.

(12-28-2017 12:03 PM)NIU007 Wrote:  

(12-28-2017 12:00 PM)Rabid Squirrel Wrote:  Message boards.....where the most important thing in life is proving a total stranger wrong.

It isn't the most important thing on the message board. So you're wrong.

We should go back and forth about 20 times in a importance debate that is really opinion based and therefore cant be proven wrong or right. I will employ circular logic and eventually trap you so you actually make yourself wrong.

(12-28-2017 12:08 PM)DogPoundNorth Wrote:  

(12-28-2017 12:00 PM)Rabid Squirrel Wrote:  Message boards.....where the most important thing in life is proving a total stranger wrong.

Mr finance took one thing I said and turned it into a million posts. Sorry. For some reason he was dead set on trying to tell me that two years of money is more than one. Lol.

Anywho, firing carey would be very stupid for many reasons. Including and now especially because there is only one year left on his deal lol. I made a bunch of other points but mr finance was having none of it.

One thing about it though, and somebody mentioned it above, that you don't want a lame duck coach which is why they are generally extended ahead of time. I just hope we don't extend him to avoid that....