(12-02-2017 01:15 AM)cb4029 Wrote:  

(12-02-2017 12:48 AM)EagleX Wrote:  

(12-02-2017 12:42 AM)cb4029 Wrote:  I wonder if Twitter works in jail?

probably not. anthony's weiner is no longer on the prowl for teenage girls.

so, that probably a big "no"

Have you been drinking? lol

ok, try to hang with me:

you mentioned twitter in jail.

I mentioned Anthony Weiner, who is actually in jail for obscene tweets.

I think the connection is automatic.

(12-02-2017 12:28 AM)cb4029 Wrote:  I'm glad you guys elected this fool. This is the most entertaining thing on TV.

Better than the horror show we watched for the last 8 years

(12-02-2017 01:34 AM)shere khan Wrote:  

(12-02-2017 12:28 AM)cb4029 Wrote:  I'm glad you guys elected this fool. This is the most entertaining thing on TV.

Better than the horror show we watched for the last 8 years

Weaponized IRS: check
Weaponized DoJ: check

. . . but the battle has just begun.

(12-02-2017 01:38 AM)EagleX Wrote:  

(12-02-2017 01:34 AM)shere khan Wrote:  

(12-02-2017 12:28 AM)cb4029 Wrote:  I'm glad you guys elected this fool. This is the most entertaining thing on TV.

Better than the horror show we watched for the last 8 years

Weaponized IRS: check
Weaponized DoJ: check

. . . but the battle has just begun.

Gonna get a lot dirtier before its over.

(12-02-2017 01:52 AM)shere khan Wrote:  

(12-02-2017 01:38 AM)EagleX Wrote:  

(12-02-2017 01:34 AM)shere khan Wrote:  

(12-02-2017 12:28 AM)cb4029 Wrote:  I'm glad you guys elected this fool. This is the most entertaining thing on TV.

Better than the horror show we watched for the last 8 years

Weaponized IRS: check
Weaponized DoJ: check

. . . but the battle has just begun.

Gonna get a lot dirtier before its over.

I'm in.

(12-01-2017 03:12 PM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(12-01-2017 02:04 PM)TigerBlue4Ever Wrote:  

(12-01-2017 01:57 PM)rath v2.0 Wrote:  This might break a lot of liberals if it does't stick. Its going to be fun to watch.

Just watching them in here has been hilarious.

Dude, he's already copped to lying to the FBI. And Manafort...and Papa George...and likely Kushy and others to come.

At this point, we don't care if it ever gets to trump because his credibility and administration is already in shambles because of it. And if he manages to also muck up getting a tax bill passed....watch out...lol.

It serves us much better as the resistance if he stays in power and keeps failing with his legislative agenda then it would to have President Pence and or President Ryan and a return to some assemblance of competence and normalcy.

Lol.

So Now you, or any of the fellow traveler Donks around here (“We”) are “part of the resistance”?!? Haha

What part?

The “I sit on my ass and moan about 3-1/2% growth, the destruction of the isis cockroaches, the final, after 30 failed years of “diplomacy”, confrontation with the jack wagons in NK?

What? Do you don your black yoga pants, grab the weekend closet dowel and head on out to bust up bike racks and Starbucks?

Part of the resistance... * giggles*

About anyone on this forum. I’d perhaps give a nut like Maxie power a shot at that, but unlike others around here he’s honored his bet. And his word.

Too freaking funny.

(12-01-2017 04:03 PM)Kaplony Wrote:  The way this investigation is rolling along I expect Muller to charge Kushner with tearing the tags off a mattress he didn't own and the leftist morons in here to claim it's another step towards impeachment.

Haha

Best summation yet.

False “statements” about nothing regarding the campaign, this ROOOSKIES!!! ruse and other non criminal garbage, but they got some dates wrong or stupidly thought they could wiggle/talk their way out of this foolish goose chase. Apparently Flynn did his FBI “interview” without a lawyer present. Dumb dumb dumb.

Anyone else remember the Cank was allowed to bring her coconspirators in as legal counsel and no one recorded or took any notes about real, credible criminal activity?!? but HEY! The President said “*****” on a hidden mic 15 years ago...

But, to the ^^^ post, yea, I’m stealing that!

(12-01-2017 04:17 PM)cb4029 Wrote:  

(12-01-2017 04:02 PM)shere khan Wrote:  

(12-01-2017 03:54 PM)cb4029 Wrote:  

(12-01-2017 03:48 PM)shere khan Wrote:  Muller financially and emotionally bullied a distinguished American general into pleading guilty to one bs charge to get them off his back.

Democrats celebrate, never seeing the big picture.

Khan, you're going to have some killer biceps from all that water you're carrying.

Hell its like shooting sucks in a barrel. I'll play the democrats game. Let's say Trump peed on hookers, had a three way with Putin and told him Russia was gonna get special treatment if elected.

Exactly what law did he break. Specifically what law? There is a reason for the separation of powers. If this plays out the way you hope you get Pence.

Hell Nixon resigned and after a stop at stupid land with Carter for 4 years, there were 8 years of Reagan and 4 of Bush.

So yeah. The dems best case scenario is pretty weak.

I could have overlooked all of this had he chosen American hooker's over the Russian hooker's.

Then you really ARE out of your mind. Dude, (I’ve got that right, right?) take a closer look.

Ya know, jus sayin.

Political fishing expedition.

http://www.nationalreview.com/article/45...icy-israel

Will someone please answer this simple question

Why did Team Trump have to contact the Russians after the election to calm them down if they had been in collusion the whole time?

(12-02-2017 06:50 PM)solohawks Wrote:  Will someone please answer this simple question

Why did Team Trump have to contact the Russians after the election to calm them down if they had been in collusion the whole time?

so he could develop a food plot for the fawns that would throw off the scent and allow him to immediately begin doing the job he was elected to do.....

#allbydesign

#divertandslaughter

#puregenius

the fawns will still be there next year too.......book it danno

No laws broken. Dummies

(12-01-2017 08:41 PM)TechRocks Wrote:  

(12-01-2017 08:25 PM)UCF08 Wrote:  A hearing leaked the morning its scheduled isn't on Mueller, neither is a raid on a persons house. We're not getting leaks of the information they found, the people who have flipped, or their internal workings until the moment they're taking action. The leaks we do get occur when the information leaves Muellers team.

Trey Gowdy seems to disagree with you. Is he in error or lying?

Quote:Republican Rep. Trey Gowdy, the leader of the House’s top investigative committee, slammed special counsel Robert Mueller on Sunday for allowing the news media to learn that he and his legal team now have charges in their Russia investigation.

“In the only conversation I’ve had with Robert Mueller, I stressed to him the importance of cutting out the leaks,” Gowdy, chairman of the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, told “Fox News Sunday.” “It’s kind of ironic that the people charged with investigating the law and the violations of the law would violate the law.”

“Make no mistake, disclosing grand jury material is a violation of the law. Somebody violated their oath of secrecy,” Gowdy, a South Carolina lawmaker and former federal prosecutor, also told Fox News on Sunday.

The Wall Street Journal reported Saturday that anyone charged will be taken into custody Monday. However, the charges have been sealed by a federal judge. So whoever is charged and whether the charges are criminal remains unclear.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/10/...probe.html

UCF, you there?

(12-04-2017 09:08 AM)TechRocks Wrote:  

(12-01-2017 08:41 PM)TechRocks Wrote:  

(12-01-2017 08:25 PM)UCF08 Wrote:  A hearing leaked the morning its scheduled isn't on Mueller, neither is a raid on a persons house. We're not getting leaks of the information they found, the people who have flipped, or their internal workings until the moment they're taking action. The leaks we do get occur when the information leaves Muellers team.

Trey Gowdy seems to disagree with you. Is he in error or lying?

Quote:Republican Rep. Trey Gowdy, the leader of the House’s top investigative committee, slammed special counsel Robert Mueller on Sunday for allowing the news media to learn that he and his legal team now have charges in their Russia investigation.

“In the only conversation I’ve had with Robert Mueller, I stressed to him the importance of cutting out the leaks,” Gowdy, chairman of the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, told “Fox News Sunday.” “It’s kind of ironic that the people charged with investigating the law and the violations of the law would violate the law.”

“Make no mistake, disclosing grand jury material is a violation of the law. Somebody violated their oath of secrecy,” Gowdy, a South Carolina lawmaker and former federal prosecutor, also told Fox News on Sunday.

The Wall Street Journal reported Saturday that anyone charged will be taken into custody Monday. However, the charges have been sealed by a federal judge. So whoever is charged and whether the charges are criminal remains unclear.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/10/...probe.html

UCF, you there?

If it were me being charged, I'd launch a counter-suit of sorts considering the ramifications of such leaks causing public opinion to sway and preventing a fair ruling of the law.

Here's UCF's original assertion that I've challenged:

(12-01-2017 06:25 PM)UCF08 Wrote:  We don't know everything they know, because it's a properly run investigation full of professionals who don't leak.

(12-04-2017 09:59 AM)TechRocks Wrote:  Here's UCF's original assertion that I've challenged:

(12-01-2017 06:25 PM)UCF08 Wrote:  We don't know everything they know, because it's a properly run investigation full of professionals who don't leak.

Yeah... that's easily proven to be factually incorrect. They leaked it out last Friday.

This thread has suddenly become to UCF what garlic is to a vampire. What's up with that?

UCF nowhere to be found... bahahahaha

(12-04-2017 10:03 AM)CG_Hawk06 Wrote:  

(12-04-2017 09:59 AM)TechRocks Wrote:  Here's UCF's original assertion that I've challenged:

(12-01-2017 06:25 PM)UCF08 Wrote:  We don't know everything they know, because it's a properly run investigation full of professionals who don't leak.

Yeah... that's easily proven to be factually incorrect. They leaked it out last Friday.

UCF has a history of making up his own facts. Keep that in mind when reading his posts.

(12-04-2017 11:06 AM)Kaplony Wrote:  

(12-04-2017 10:03 AM)CG_Hawk06 Wrote:  

(12-04-2017 09:59 AM)TechRocks Wrote:  Here's UCF's original assertion that I've challenged:

(12-01-2017 06:25 PM)UCF08 Wrote:  We don't know everything they know, because it's a properly run investigation full of professionals who don't leak.

Yeah... that's easily proven to be factually incorrect. They leaked it out last Friday.

UCF has a history of making up his own facts. Keep that in mind when reading his posts.

Wow, you guys really get excited when you think I've made some incorrect statement, wish you held yourselves to that standard. I didn't mean to imply that there had never been any leaks on his investigation full stop, more that they've not had the history and preponderance of leaks we've seen elsewhere in this administration. Which it hasn't. Take that as a victory on your part I guess? The point made stands in its entirety, but I guess you could argue that I wasn't specific enough in my meaning to exclude that interpretation. Grats?