Poll: Should a Special Prosecutor be Named to Investigate H. Clinton
(11-14-2017 01:48 PM)Tom in Lazybrook Wrote: For what?
A big ole' nothing sandwich is what you've got
The BS Uranium sale story? LOL There's nothing there.
How about having a GOP controlled DOJ investigate internal Democratic party squabbles? Okay..don't complain with the Dems do that when they get in control
Benghazi? Already investigated.
Pizzagate? I want public hearings on that. With Infowars and Cernovich under oath.
Then nothing to worry your pretty little head about, right?
RE: Poll: Should a Special Prosecutor be Named to Investigate H. Clinton
(11-15-2017 07:38 AM)Old Blue Wrote: Would love to see it happen. What are the rules on this? She is no longer a part of the government. Can it even be done?
Flynn isn't part of the government. Manafort was never part of the government.
RE: Poll: Should a Special Prosecutor be Named to Investigate H. Clinton
(11-15-2017 07:42 AM)bullet Wrote:
(11-15-2017 07:38 AM)Old Blue Wrote: Would love to see it happen. What are the rules on this? She is no longer a part of the government. Can it even be done?
Flynn isn't part of the government. Manafort was never part of the government.
Yes but they were drawn into the investigation and not the subject of the investigation.
Poll: Should a Special Prosecutor be Named to Investigate H. Clinton
(11-15-2017 07:42 AM)bullet Wrote:
(11-15-2017 07:38 AM)Old Blue Wrote: Would love to see it happen. What are the rules on this? She is no longer a part of the government. Can it even be done?
Flynn isn't part of the government. Manafort was never part of the government.
Nor DjJr, or many others. But, you unleash a swarm with no restrictions and unlimited budget and there’s no telling what they dig up to justify their existence.
Also heard there are as many as 27... ( TWENTY-SEVEN) separate probes going in different directions with different targets.
Crafty ol Jeffro looking like a paddling duck on the water. Cool and calm on the surface, nary a feather askew, paddling like the dickens underneath getting on to getting on.
The leaky Swamp critters better get their antennae, defense loyyas and resumes up!
RE: Poll: Should a Special Prosecutor be Named to Investigate H. Clinton
(11-15-2017 08:01 AM)JMUDunk Wrote:
(11-15-2017 07:42 AM)bullet Wrote:
(11-15-2017 07:38 AM)Old Blue Wrote: Would love to see it happen. What are the rules on this? She is no longer a part of the government. Can it even be done?
Flynn isn't part of the government. Manafort was never part of the government.
Nor DjJr, or many others. But, you unleash a swarm with no restrictions and unlimited budget and there’s no telling what they dig up to justify their existence.
Also heard there are as many as 27... ( TWENTY-SEVEN) separate probes going in different directions with different targets.
Crafty ol Jeffro looking like a paddling duck on the water. Cool and calm on the surface, nary a feather askew, paddling like the dickens underneath getting on to getting on.
The leaky Swamp critters better get their antennae, defense loyyas and resumes up!
Poll: Should a Special Prosecutor be Named to Investigate H. Clinton
(11-15-2017 08:17 AM)cb4029 Wrote: Another Trump failure. He can't even get them to investigate Hilary. Sad.
???
Uhhhh, try something other than yahoo “news” and/or the shittty late night “comedians” for your infotainment.
Bubba, the Cank, the entire clintoons family front group will be under investigation/scrutiny here very shortly.
OR, as some around here tried to convince us a little over a year ago, the Federal Bureau of “Matters” lulz... will be taking a nice long looksie at the RICO that is the Global Initiative Slush Fund.
RE: Poll: Should a Special Prosecutor be Named to Investigate H. Clinton
(11-15-2017 08:46 AM)JMUDunk Wrote:
(11-15-2017 08:17 AM)cb4029 Wrote: Another Trump failure. He can't even get them to investigate Hilary. Sad.
???
Uhhhh, try something other than yahoo “news” and/or the shittty late night “comedians” for your infotainment.
Bubba, the Cank, the entire clintoons family front group will be under investigation/scrutiny here very shortly.
OR, as some around here tried to convince us a little over a year ago, the Federal Bureau of “Matters” lulz... will be taking a nice long looksie at the RICO that is the Global Initiative Slush Fund.
Buckle up!!!
I hope you're right.....I have little faith in pursuing unless they're waiting for ~mar '18 to release the guillotine....
Poll: Should a Special Prosecutor be Named to Investigate H. Clinton
(11-15-2017 08:50 AM)stinkfist Wrote:
(11-15-2017 08:46 AM)JMUDunk Wrote:
(11-15-2017 08:17 AM)cb4029 Wrote: Another Trump failure. He can't even get them to investigate Hilary. Sad.
???
Uhhhh, try something other than yahoo “news” and/or the shittty late night “comedians” for your infotainment.
Bubba, the Cank, the entire clintoons family front group will be under investigation/scrutiny here very shortly.
OR, as some around here tried to convince us a little over a year ago, the Federal Bureau of “Matters” lulz... will be taking a nice long looksie at the RICO that is the Global Initiative Slush Fund.
Buckle up!!!
I hope you're right.....I have little faith in pursuing unless they're waiting for ~mar '18 to release the guillotine....
RE: Poll: Should a Special Prosecutor be Named to Investigate H. Clinton
This whole thing reeks of nothing more than the usual partisan politics from the right toward Clinton. You really make yourself look weak and helpless by continually propping up this nonsense to try and make a story where none exists.
RE: Poll: Should a Special Prosecutor be Named to Investigate H. Clinton
(11-14-2017 01:05 PM)Redwingtom Wrote: No.
1. Because they won't find anything and it will just be a waste of money, and 2, it likely sets a dangerous precedent of investigating political opponents.
Ok, agreed on the Trump/Russia collusion BS... but what about Hillary?
RE: Poll: Should a Special Prosecutor be Named to Investigate H. Clinton
(11-15-2017 09:55 AM)ECUGrad07 Wrote:
(11-14-2017 01:05 PM)Redwingtom Wrote: No.
1. Because they won't find anything and it will just be a waste of money, and 2, it likely sets a dangerous precedent of investigating political opponents.
Ok, agreed on the Trump/Russia collusion BS... but what about Hillary?
Trumps own Attorney General just testified that there is no factual basis for any special prosecutor to investigate Hillary. You don't get to keep playing this card.
Poll: Should a Special Prosecutor be Named to Investigate H. Clinton
(11-15-2017 09:53 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:
This whole thing reeks of nothing more than the usual partisan politics from the right toward Clinton. You really make yourself look weak and helpless by continually propping up this nonsense to try and make a story where none exists.
You are referring to the year and a half old ROOOSKIES!!! Ruse, correct?!?
How’s that coming along, btdubs?
Shiffty and his complicit compatriots in the xtremestream media have been surprisingly silent on that matter of late.
Why is that? The “new face of the dim party” couldn’t sprint fast enough toward any open camera with a red light on 6 months ago, did he pull a hammy or something?!? Lol.
Frauds and useful idiots. And it wasn’t even all that clevah...
Too funny.
(This post was last modified: 11-16-2017 08:44 AM by JMUDunk.)
Poll: Should a Special Prosecutor be Named to Investigate H. Clinton
(11-16-2017 01:49 AM)UCF08 Wrote:
(11-15-2017 09:55 AM)ECUGrad07 Wrote:
(11-14-2017 01:05 PM)Redwingtom Wrote: No.
1. Because they won't find anything and it will just be a waste of money, and 2, it likely sets a dangerous precedent of investigating political opponents.
Ok, agreed on the Trump/Russia collusion BS... but what about Hillary?
Trumps own Attorney General just testified that there is no factual basis for any special prosecutor to investigate Hillary. You don't get to keep playing this card.
Source?
This oughta be good, but won’t be. Parsing words rarely is.
No need for a special prosecutor”... why?
Cause they got this. In house. No need indeed. Lock, stock and barrel, why muddy it with another endless SP?
RE: Poll: Should a Special Prosecutor be Named to Investigate H. Clinton
(11-15-2017 08:53 AM)JMUDunk Wrote:
(11-15-2017 08:50 AM)stinkfist Wrote:
(11-15-2017 08:46 AM)JMUDunk Wrote:
(11-15-2017 08:17 AM)cb4029 Wrote: Another Trump failure. He can't even get them to investigate Hilary. Sad.
???
Uhhhh, try something other than yahoo “news” and/or the shittty late night “comedians” for your infotainment.
Bubba, the Cank, the entire clintoons family front group will be under investigation/scrutiny here very shortly.
OR, as some around here tried to convince us a little over a year ago, the Federal Bureau of “Matters” lulz... will be taking a nice long looksie at the RICO that is the Global Initiative Slush Fund.
Buckle up!!!
I hope you're right.....I have little faith in pursuing unless they're waiting for ~mar '18 to release the guillotine....
You buckled?
Haha
80% says I’m right... /snicker...
oh no no no no ..... me no own ze buster browns anymore
I simply have no faith in the establishment intentionally burning itself to the ground.....b/c if this one gets fully investigated???????......there's gonna be many more than just one hill-lair-liar that goes down with the titanic....
RE: Poll: Should a Special Prosecutor be Named to Investigate H. Clinton
(11-16-2017 06:42 AM)stinkfist Wrote:
(11-15-2017 08:53 AM)JMUDunk Wrote:
(11-15-2017 08:50 AM)stinkfist Wrote:
(11-15-2017 08:46 AM)JMUDunk Wrote:
(11-15-2017 08:17 AM)cb4029 Wrote: Another Trump failure. He can't even get them to investigate Hilary. Sad.
???
Uhhhh, try something other than yahoo “news” and/or the shittty late night “comedians” for your infotainment.
Bubba, the Cank, the entire clintoons family front group will be under investigation/scrutiny here very shortly.
OR, as some around here tried to convince us a little over a year ago, the Federal Bureau of “Matters” lulz... will be taking a nice long looksie at the RICO that is the Global Initiative Slush Fund.
Buckle up!!!
I hope you're right.....I have little faith in pursuing unless they're waiting for ~mar '18 to release the guillotine....
You buckled?
Haha
80% says I’m right... /snicker...
oh no no no no ..... me no own ze buster browns anymore
I simply have no faith in the establishment intentionally burning itself to the ground.....b/c if this one gets fully investigated???????......there's gonna be many more than just one hill-lair-liar that goes down with the titanic....
Poll: Should a Special Prosecutor be Named to Investigate H. Clinton
(11-16-2017 06:42 AM)stinkfist Wrote:
(11-15-2017 08:53 AM)JMUDunk Wrote:
(11-15-2017 08:50 AM)stinkfist Wrote:
(11-15-2017 08:46 AM)JMUDunk Wrote:
(11-15-2017 08:17 AM)cb4029 Wrote: Another Trump failure. He can't even get them to investigate Hilary. Sad.
???
Uhhhh, try something other than yahoo “news” and/or the shittty late night “comedians” for your infotainment.
Bubba, the Cank, the entire clintoons family front group will be under investigation/scrutiny here very shortly.
OR, as some around here tried to convince us a little over a year ago, the Federal Bureau of “Matters” lulz... will be taking a nice long looksie at the RICO that is the Global Initiative Slush Fund.
Buckle up!!!
I hope you're right.....I have little faith in pursuing unless they're waiting for ~mar '18 to release the guillotine....
You buckled?
Haha
80% says I’m right... /snicker...
oh no no no no ..... me no own ze buster browns anymore
I simply have no faith in the establishment intentionally burning itself to the ground.....b/c if this one gets fully investigated???????......there's gonna be many more than just one hill-lair-liar that goes down with the titanic....
Oh, yea. This one goes about as far as far goes. Interestingly right on up to Mueller himself, and perhaps even beyond.
No idea where this ends up, and I would still bet the “circle the wagons” routine wins this one too, about 75%.
But you never know. There were a LOT of really pissed off fbi after this last go around with the Comey confab, we’ll see what comes up next...
Buckling!
(This post was last modified: 11-16-2017 08:53 AM by JMUDunk.)