(11-03-2017 04:20 PM)DavidSt Wrote:  

(11-03-2017 01:22 PM)TechRocks Wrote:  

(11-03-2017 12:14 AM)stinkfist Wrote:  

(11-03-2017 12:08 AM)Dasville Wrote:  

(11-02-2017 11:48 PM)oliveandblue Wrote:  This is actually quite incredible. The GOP put forward a circus clown... ...and that circus clown has absolutely dismantled the DNC. It's actually almost impressive.

...I voted third-party in 2016, but I'm sure as hell glad that Clinton did NOT win. Anything - and I mean fricking anything - was a safer bet... ...even Trump.

Couple corrections.........

President Trump is no clown

The GOP didn’t put President Trump forward

He dismantled not only the DNC but in addition the fake MSM and lazy do little establishment.

It was/is totally impressive and he called his shot

And the best part......he isn’t done yet!

remember when foiks labeled him as a "dippo dem"???

That reminds me stink, didn't a lot of our leftist buddies here warn us that Trump was a liberal and that we'd all be sorry when he screwed us over? I'm loving what he's doing to the judiciary. Those conservative judges he's appointing will serve for decades.

I warned you all with both Clinton and Trump. I was encouraging everybody to vote for a third party candidate. This was the best year the third party candidates got in votes. The third party candidates are on the rise since we know for sure that both Democrats and Republicans rigged their elections for who they wanted in the White House. Republicans did not want neither Trump or Cruz in the White House.

Nice speech, but still doesn't address what I posted.

Third party candidates? If I saw one that I thought could do the job perhaps but not those two loonies that were running. No thanks.

Not surprisingly, ABC, CBS and NBC ignored the story. They didn't want the DNC, the group that gives them their instructions, to look bad.

http://www.foxnews.com/entertainment/201...inton.html

(11-03-2017 04:34 PM)DavidSt Wrote:  The DNC is purging the Progressive members out of the party. Hillary Clinton and her likes are the John Mccains of the Republicans. We have Progressive Presidents in office like FDR and JFK. Jimmy Carter was a semi-Progressive. The Clintons were the first non-Progressive who actually past stuff that is like the Republican establishments would past. If the Progressive are drummed out of the Democratic party? The Democrats are dead.

no the opposite

(11-03-2017 09:15 PM)bullet Wrote:  Not surprisingly, ABC, CBS and NBC ignored the story. They didn't want the DNC, the group that gives them their instructions, to look bad.

http://www.foxnews.com/entertainment/201...inton.html

The projection in this post is unreal. There is one major news organization which you could argue acts as a mouthpiece for a political party, and it's the one whose owner meets with the president and has encouraged candidates to run by having his employees tell said candidates he'd fund them. Any sort of email of debate questions or elbow rubbing doesn't compare, even if we all agree it shouldn't happen.

(11-04-2017 03:39 PM)UCF08 Wrote:  

(11-03-2017 09:15 PM)bullet Wrote:  Not surprisingly, ABC, CBS and NBC ignored the story. They didn't want the DNC, the group that gives them their instructions, to look bad.

http://www.foxnews.com/entertainment/201...inton.html

The projection in this post is unreal. There is one major news organization which you could argue acts as a mouthpiece for a political party, and it's the one whose owner meets with the president and has encouraged candidates to run by having his employees tell said candidates he'd fund them. Any sort of email of debate questions or elbow rubbing doesn't compare, even if we all agree it shouldn't happen.

Holy hell man, Jake tapper of CNN went to the DNC and asked their permission to run stories. Those Wikileaks emails were actually real.

(11-04-2017 03:39 PM)UCF08 Wrote:  

(11-03-2017 09:15 PM)bullet Wrote:  Not surprisingly, ABC, CBS and NBC ignored the story. They didn't want the DNC, the group that gives them their instructions, to look bad.

http://www.foxnews.com/entertainment/201...inton.html

The projection in this post is unreal. There is one major news organization which you could argue acts as a mouthpiece for a political party, and it's the one whose owner meets with the president and has encouraged candidates to run by having his employees tell said candidates he'd fund them. Any sort of email of debate questions or elbow rubbing doesn't compare, even if we all agree it shouldn't happen.

Much like the DNC, CNN did an internal investigation and found themselves innocent and “nothing to see here”!

(11-04-2017 03:56 PM)Old Blue Wrote:  

(11-04-2017 03:39 PM)UCF08 Wrote:  

(11-03-2017 09:15 PM)bullet Wrote:  Not surprisingly, ABC, CBS and NBC ignored the story. They didn't want the DNC, the group that gives them their instructions, to look bad.

http://www.foxnews.com/entertainment/201...inton.html

The projection in this post is unreal. There is one major news organization which you could argue acts as a mouthpiece for a political party, and it's the one whose owner meets with the president and has encouraged candidates to run by having his employees tell said candidates he'd fund them. Any sort of email of debate questions or elbow rubbing doesn't compare, even if we all agree it shouldn't happen.

Holy hell man, Jake tapper of CNN went to the DNC and asked their permission to run stories. Those Wikileaks emails were actually real.

And she still lost, lol

Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk

(11-04-2017 04:00 PM)EverRespect Wrote:  

(11-04-2017 03:56 PM)Old Blue Wrote:  

(11-04-2017 03:39 PM)UCF08 Wrote:  

(11-03-2017 09:15 PM)bullet Wrote:  Not surprisingly, ABC, CBS and NBC ignored the story. They didn't want the DNC, the group that gives them their instructions, to look bad.

http://www.foxnews.com/entertainment/201...inton.html

The projection in this post is unreal. There is one major news organization which you could argue acts as a mouthpiece for a political party, and it's the one whose owner meets with the president and has encouraged candidates to run by having his employees tell said candidates he'd fund them. Any sort of email of debate questions or elbow rubbing doesn't compare, even if we all agree it shouldn't happen.

Holy hell man, Jake tapper of CNN went to the DNC and asked their permission to run stories. Those Wikileaks emails were actually real.

And she still lost, lol

Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk

Don Lemon have reported a bunch of negative news stories about Hillary, while Rachel Maddow tossed heaps of roses at Hillary's feet.

(11-04-2017 05:04 PM)DavidSt Wrote:  

(11-04-2017 04:00 PM)EverRespect Wrote:  

(11-04-2017 03:56 PM)Old Blue Wrote:  

(11-04-2017 03:39 PM)UCF08 Wrote:  

(11-03-2017 09:15 PM)bullet Wrote:  Not surprisingly, ABC, CBS and NBC ignored the story. They didn't want the DNC, the group that gives them their instructions, to look bad.

http://www.foxnews.com/entertainment/201...inton.html

The projection in this post is unreal. There is one major news organization which you could argue acts as a mouthpiece for a political party, and it's the one whose owner meets with the president and has encouraged candidates to run by having his employees tell said candidates he'd fund them. Any sort of email of debate questions or elbow rubbing doesn't compare, even if we all agree it shouldn't happen.

Holy hell man, Jake tapper of CNN went to the DNC and asked their permission to run stories. Those Wikileaks emails were actually real.

And she still lost, lol

Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk

Don Lemon have reported a bunch of negative news stories about Hillary, while Rachel Maddow tossed heaps of roses at Hillary's feet.

Yeah, after they got caught taking stories to the DNC. Have to save face somehow. What am I talking about? Gruber's could not care less.

(11-04-2017 05:17 PM)Old Blue Wrote:  

(11-04-2017 05:04 PM)DavidSt Wrote:  

(11-04-2017 04:00 PM)EverRespect Wrote:  

(11-04-2017 03:56 PM)Old Blue Wrote:  

(11-04-2017 03:39 PM)UCF08 Wrote:  The projection in this post is unreal. There is one major news organization which you could argue acts as a mouthpiece for a political party, and it's the one whose owner meets with the president and has encouraged candidates to run by having his employees tell said candidates he'd fund them. Any sort of email of debate questions or elbow rubbing doesn't compare, even if we all agree it shouldn't happen.

Holy hell man, Jake tapper of CNN went to the DNC and asked their permission to run stories. Those Wikileaks emails were actually real.

And she still lost, lol

Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk

Don Lemon have reported a bunch of negative news stories about Hillary, while Rachel Maddow tossed heaps of roses at Hillary's feet.

Yeah, after they got caught taking stories to the DNC. Have to save face somehow. What am I talking about? Gruber's could not care less.

Actually, he was doing that before Tapper got caught. If you have noticed the crosshairs of a photo memes of CNN of all the reporters and pundits? Don Lemon was not even featured. I wondered why? Maybe they thought he was fair and balance than the others?

Why would Donna B be scared for her life after the [his name was] Seth Rich murder if it was just a botched robbery?

Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk

(11-02-2017 06:56 AM)UCF08 Wrote:  

(11-02-2017 06:48 AM)BuffaloTN Wrote:  Good read. Small correction in the first paragraph. The Russians didn't hack those emails. It was Seth Rich. And then they murdered him.

Holy hell, any conservative here willing to call this guy out on pushing literal fake news? Because that's what this is, fake news, based on absolutely no evidence. It is in fact is so blatantly without evidence, both Seth Richs family and the only source ever cited in the Fox News story are suing Fox News over it.

Also, for all these claims of "criminal incompetency", there sure are a lack of charges to back them up. There is only one 2016 presidential candidate whose campaign is literally under criminal investigation, and who has had criminal charges pressed on his staff, but yet the other candidates are the "criminals"?

Hahaha. Even Donna thinks the DNC killed him. You're corrupt ass party is imploding. F Yeah.

(11-02-2017 06:56 AM)UCF08 Wrote:  

(11-02-2017 06:48 AM)BuffaloTN Wrote:  Good read. Small correction in the first paragraph. The Russians didn't hack those emails. It was Seth Rich. And then they murdered him.

Holy hell, any conservative here willing to call this guy out on pushing literal fake news? Because that's what this is, fake news, based on absolutely no evidence. It is in fact is so blatantly without evidence, both Seth Richs family and the only source ever cited in the Fox News story are suing Fox News over it.

Also, for all these claims of "criminal incompetency", there sure are a lack of charges to back them up. There is only one 2016 presidential candidate whose campaign is literally under criminal investigation, and who has had criminal charges pressed on his staff, but yet the other candidates are the "criminals"?

Hahaha. Even Donna thinks the DNC killed him. You're corrupt ass party is imploding. F Yeah.

https://www.investors.com/politics/edito...n-the-law/

Maybe Hillary Clinton was the one doing money laundering:

"...The deal let Clinton raise money outside the limits of the campaign finance law, by in effect laundering campaign donations through the DNC. It may have been illegal...."

(11-05-2017 10:08 AM)bullet Wrote:  https://www.investors.com/politics/edito...n-the-law/

Maybe Hillary Clinton was the one doing money laundering:

"...The deal let Clinton raise money outside the limits of the campaign finance law, by in effect laundering campaign donations through the DNC. It may have been illegal...."

Tread lightly. You know, she kills people.

https://www.thedailybeast.com/donna-braz...ty-blew-it

Daily Beast claims it wasn't rigged after all. Its the kind of situational ethics the permeates the left. We can't criticize other Democrats. We have to justify everything they do because there is a great evil out there. And they wonder why they keep losing.

https://www.salon.com/2017/11/04/demo-ca...s-hillary/
Salon, on the other hand admits the problems, comparing the DNC to a Tony Soprano run organization.

I'm will go down as the largest coordinated voter disenfranchisement and vote nullification in American history.

This was arguably RICO worthy.

Guillotine time.

(11-04-2017 10:33 PM)EverRespect Wrote:  Why would Donna B be scared for her life after the [his name was] Seth Rich murder if it was just a botched robbery?

Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk

OH!